November 29, 2011 (The Editor’s Desk is updated each business day.)
State employment and unemployment, October 2011
From October 2010 to October 2011, 23 states experienced statistically significant changes in employment, 22 of which were increases. The largest increase occurred in California (+239,100), followed by Texas (+231,600), and Florida (+93,900). The only state with an over-the-year statistically significant decrease in employment was Georgia (−33,100).
[Chart data]
Among those states with statistically significant employment changes from October 2010 to October 2011, the largest over-the-year percentage increases in employment occurred in North Dakota (+4.9 percent), followed by Oklahoma (+3.1 percent), and Utah (+2.6 percent). Georgia experienced the only decrease (−0.9 percent).
[Chart data]
Nevada continued to report the highest unemployment rate among the states, 13.4 percent in October. California posted the next highest rate, 11.7 percent. North Dakota registered the lowest jobless rate, 3.5 percent, followed by Nebraska, 4.2 percent.
In total, 26 states reported jobless rates significantly lower than the U.S. figure of 9.0 percent, 10 states and the District of Columbia had measurably higher rates, and 14 states had rates that were not appreciably different from that of the nation.
These data are from the Current Employment Statistics (State and Metro Area) and Local Area Unemployment Statistics programs. Data for the most recent month are preliminary and subject to revision. To learn more, see "Regional and State Employment and Unemployment — October 2011" (HTML) (PDF), news release USDL-11-1672.
Related TED articles
Employment |
Regions and States |
Unemployment
Of interest
Spotlight on Statistics: National Hispanic Heritage Month
In this Spotlight, we take a look at the Hispanic labor force—including labor force participation, employment and unemployment, educational attainment, geographic location, country of birth, earnings, consumer expenditures, time use, workplace injuries, and employment projections.
.
Read more »
