Skip to content
Social Security Online
Program Development & Research

Disability Research Home

Research & Data


What's New
 
Major Activities
Demonstrations
Projects & Studies
Completed Projects
Research & Data
Work Incentive Policy
Public Use Files
 
 
More Information
About Us
Occupational Information Development Advisory Panel
Red Book
BPQY Handbook
Organization Chart
Related Links
Site Map
Site Content
Questions & Comments
 


Disability Determination Process Small Grant Program (DDP)
Consultative Exam (CE) Baseline Study
The National Survey of SSI Children and Families (NSCF)
Ticket to Work Evaluation

The National Beneficiary Survey (NBS)
HIV Report
Cardiovascular Report


Disability Determination Process Small Grant Program (DDP)

Grant # IDD11000001

We awarded a 5-year grant (renewable annually) September 1, 2011 to Policy Research Inc. (PRI) in Delmar, New York. The goal of this new program is to improve the disability determination process by making make small stipends ($10,000) available to graduate students for innovative research relevant to the disability program.  This will allow graduate-level students to conduct supervised independent research on improving disability determination processes.  PRI directs this project as program manager.

On October 13, 2011, we issued a press release mentioning this grant, http://www.ssa.gov/pressoffice/pr/ss-expands-compassionate-allowances.html.

In March 2012, we issued a press release announcing the first round of stipend awards to eight graduate student researchers from across the country.  These projects are in three categories: compassionate allowances and wounded warriors, homelessness and SSI, and disability enrollment.  The Commissioner of Social Security sent each researcher a letter recognizing his or her achievement.  At the same time, PRI released a request for applications for the second round of research proposals.  You can find more information about currently funded projects and application information at PRI’s website:  http://ddp.policyresearchinc.org .


Consultative Exam (CE) Baseline Study

A CE is a physical or mental examination performed by a treating source or other medical source when additional information (e.g., clinical findings, laboratory tests, diagnosis, and prognosis) is needed to make a disability determination. The CE Baseline Study analyzed and documented the quality of CEs used in the initial level of disability determination; assessed if CEs were requested in compliance with SSA regulations; and established a baseline for CE quality.   

There were important limitations to this study. The study used the electronic folder for review.  At the time of the study, an electronic folder for the initial claim record was not available in sufficient numbers in all States.  Comparisons could only be made between States with electronic folders, and the cases were selected in a non-scientific manner, thus limiting the ability to generalize the study findings.  The study also did not include CEs obtained at the hearings level.  At the time of the study electronic folders were not available at that level.

Back to Top

 


The National Survey of SSI Children and Families (NSCF)

The NSCF collected data on the health status, functional limitations, health care utilization, health insurance coverage, receipt of services, SSI experience, and socioeconomic status of the households of over 8,000 children who were receiving, had received, or were applying for SSI.  The study was limited to the non-institutionalized population in the contiguous United States.  Data collection began July 2001 and concluded July 2002.  

We are exploring our options for a second National Survey of SSI Children and Families in the coming years and have posted a link to a survey options report.  This report provides options related to the structure and technical aspects of a potential new survey.

For more information, continue to the NSCF page.

Back to Top

 


Ticket to Work Evaluation

The Ticket to Work and Work Incentives Act of 1999 (P.L. 106-170) requires the Commissioner of Social Security to provide for independent evaluations to assess the effectiveness of the Ticket to Work program and submit reports to Congress with findings and recommendations to improve the program.

The law required that we provide reports on the evaluation to Congress through 2007. In May 2003, we awarded two five-year contracts to Mathematica Policy Research, Inc. to conduct the evaluation of the Ticket to Work program. The first contract focuses on data development, qualitative data collection, and implementation of the comprehensive evaluation analyses. The second contract implements a survey of beneficiaries. The agency significantly modified the Ticket to Work program in 2008. We extended the evaluation of the Ticket to Work program to address these changes. We transmitted the project's first, second, and third evaluation reports to Congress. The Fourth TTW Evaluation Report and the ten papers that comprise the Fifth TTW Evaluation Report are complete. Papers from the Sixth TTW Evaluation Report are available, and we will post additional papers of the Sixth and Seventh TTW Evaluation Report as they are completed. The annual National Beneficiary Surveys (NBS) for 2004 through 2007 are complete and we fielded an additional round after the new regulations went into effect in 2008. The seventh evaluation report will be the final evaluation report.

The First WIPA Evaluation Report, the Second WIPA Evaluation Report, and the Third WIPA Evaluation Report Part 1 and Third WIPA Evaluation Report Part 2  are included in the Ticket to Work Evaluation reports.

For more information, continue to Ticket to Work Evaluation Reports.


Back to Top


The National Beneficiary Survey (NBS)

The National Beneficiary Survey is part of the Social Security Administration’s (SSA) evaluation of the Ticket to Work and Self-Sufficiency program (TTW). The NBS collects data on knowledge of TTW, participation in TTW, program experiences of beneficiaries who use their Tickets, and perceptions about TTW and other SSA programs designed to help beneficiaries with disabilities find and keep jobs.  Though some sections of the NBS ask about beneficiary activity directly related to TTW, most of the survey captures more general information on SSA beneficiaries, including their disabilities, interest in work, employment, barriers to work, and use of services. In an effort to ensure that the survey represents the full range of beneficiary perspectives, the survey is fielded using procedures that accommodate the needs of respondents with all kinds of disabilities. The first three rounds of the NBS were conducted in 2004, 2005, and 2006. The fourth round of the NBS is being conducted in 2010.

For more information, continue to the NBS page.

Back to Top


HIV Report

In 2009, SSA commissioned a report from the Institute of Medicine (IOM) of The National Academies on the criteria that SSA uses to evaluate disability in persons with HIV infection.  The IOM published the report, HIV and Disability: Updating the Social Security Listings, in 2010. The report recommended ways to improve the utility of the HIV infection listings by improving the sensitivity and specificity of listing criteria for evaluating HIV infection. 

To view the full report, continue to the HIV Report.

Back to Top


Cardiovascular Report

In 2009, SSA commissioned a report from the Institute of Medicine (IOM) of The National Academies on the criteria that SSA uses to evaluate disability in persons with cardiovascular disorders.  The IOM published the report, Cardiovascular Disability: Updating the Social Security Listings, in 2010. The report recommended ways to improve the utility of the cardiovascular listings by improving the sensitivity and specificity of listing criteria for evaluating cardiovascular disorders.

To view the full report, continue to the Cardiovascular Report.

Back to Top

 

 

 

  USA.gov: Portal to U.S. government agencies Privacy Policy | Website Policies & Other Important Information | Site Map
Last reviewed or modified Friday Aug 24, 2012
Need Larger Text?