Official Site of the U.S. Air Force   Right Corner Banner
Join the Air Force

News > Policy changes consider troops, families, official says
Policy changes consider troops, families, official says

Posted 6/10/2011 Email story   Print story

    


by Lisa Daniel
American Forces Press Service


6/10/2011 - WASHINGTON (AFNS) -- The Pentagon office for personnel and readiness and the programs it oversees will not be immune from Defense Department efficiency initiatives, but will keep troops and their families at the forefront in the consideration of changes, the office's top civilian leader said.

"I joined with an efficiency mindset," Clifford L. Stanley, the undersecretary of defense for personnel and readiness, said of his recent return to the Pentagon.

General Stanley is a retired Marine Corps major general who was appointed undersecretary in February 2010. Although he has worked in other senior civilian positions in the department, he said, his 33 years in uniform guide his decision-making today.

"Not a day goes by that we don't ask how we can help our troops," he said of his staff. "Accountability -- that's critical to what we're doing, and making sure we're relevant."

The personnel and readiness office, which oversees recruitment, career development, and pay and benefits for more than 2 million service members, is in the midst of a five-year strategic plan. General Stanley said his goals for the plan, in order, are:

-- To provide the right policies, practices, and tools to attract, train, educate, shape, sustain and retain diverse talent to anticipate and meet future requirements;

-- Strengthen individual and mission readiness and family support;

--- Deliver quality health care at an affordable cost while improving military readiness;

-- Strengthen the internal workings of the personnel and readiness office; and

-- Communicate with "one voice."

To stay connected, General Stanley and his staff travel to military installations around the country, as well as some overseas, including Iraq and Afghanistan. "He wants to know the honest truth," said Marine Corps Master Gunnery Sgt. William Mahoney Sr., Stanley's senior enlisted advisor. "At the end of the day, our work is about 'What have we done to support the total force?'

"He's not just reading it or publishing a plan," Master Gunnery Sgt. Mahoney added. "He's reinforcing it every day."

It's important to have a flexible, working document that doesn't just sit on a shelf, General Stanley said. "Our actions speak louder than our words," he said. "We're already executing our portfolio of initiatives."

One area Stanley and his staff are working on is reforming the department's "talent management," or personnel system. "It's about having the right people in the right places at the right time for the right kinds of missions," he said. "We don't have that right now."

The system needs some improvement, General Stanley acknowledged. "Our bureaucracy sometimes works against us in terms of getting the best here," he said.

General Stanley said he goes beyond common goals of hiring reform, focusing on "employment reform," including recruiting new hires, developing staff, and properly transitioning people out of the military into civilian employment.

"At the same time, we have to be able to move those folks who aren't performing out of the system," he said. "The government is loath to that -- in many cases, for the right reasons that are there to protect the system -- but I think we've gone too far in that. So, when a person is here, they're here for a long time."

The military system works better than on the civilian side because "if you don't make the next cut in promotion, you're out after a couple of looks," he said. "On the civilian side, we don't have the same. You can find yourself at a level and just be comfortable and retire there after 20 or 30 years. That's not right, so we have to fix that."

General Stanley's plan also includes an assessment of military and family support programs. He couldn't say yet what the outcome will be, except that some programs need more resources, while others will be cut altogether, either because of duplication of efforts or because they are ineffective.

The strategic initiatives also focus on military health care, which General Stanley is personally familiar with. "I am a TRICARE Prime user," he said. "I understand what the system is and isn't. I understood it when I was on active duty, so I'm not removed from that."

With booming health care costs and no fee increases since the mid-1990s, the department in its fiscal 2012 budget proposed raising TRICARE user fees on a gradual, sliding scale for working-age retirees. General Stanley said other concerns to be addressed include too few military hospitals, serving National Guardsmen and reservists who live far from military or Veterans Affairs hospitals and outpatient centers, and improving the disability evaluation system.

"When we look at the disability evaluation system, we're looking at how we take care of people who have been wounded, that they're not being held up in some morass of bureaucracy," General Stanley said. "How do we ensure they're taken care of immediately, and how do we do that with compassion?"

That also means extending compassion to those separating from the military. "We're not trying to kick anybody out the door," he said.

While no one knows yet what changes will transpire with health care, change itself is certain, Stanley said.

"This is going to affect families," he said. "We're looking at asking some hard questions, and I will promise you, we will change. We'll do it with the help of Congress and the people in this building, and the help of our service members and retirees, but we will change and we will improve."



tabComments
6/17/2011 1:15:08 AM ET
I am certain there have been numerous comments submitted on this article and I resubmit mine every day or so. Still you have posted no comments. Are you afraid to let our voices be heard? Got my Family Life survey in the mail yesterday signed by General Stanley. I had to laugh. In the last survey it notes that most of us felt secure financially despite the economy. Well, now that there is a civilian hiring freeze and, as a permanent federal employee and military spouse, I may not have a job when we PCS along with General Stanley's statements that if I worked a GS-06 or 07 job 20 years faithfully my getting retirement wouldn't be right I am not feeling secure about our financial situation at all. The policy change he is talking about sure isn't helping or protecting this military family. I have a lot to say on this year's new survey when it comes out.
KSG, Japan
 
6/15/2011 9:03:38 PM ET
I find the portion regarding Civil Service very interesting and contradictory of current actions. We just had a great system in place called NSPS that rewarded performers and allowed those of us with prior military experience and varied skills more job movement instead of being stuck in a job series. For instance, a spouse former AD like me started as an EPRDEC Manager, went to a Technician job with Support Division, and then went to Contracting working with GSA account auditing. I too had the ability to fill any of these positions. This was truly utilizing the skills of current employees. But the decision was made to go back to the rigid GS system. Traveling from assignment to assignment as a spouse, I've rarely had the opportunity to serve in a GS position with any upward movement at all. We have to wait until the same job series at the Group or FW level opens and hope to get it. Now there is a hiring freeze so when I return to CONUS it is highly unlikely I will be able to ...
Gaijin, Japan
 
6/15/2011 12:13:08 PM ET
I think the general is a little out of touch with GS life. There should be nothing wrong with someone being comfortable doing their job well for 20 or 30 years. I rely on my civilian counterparts for continuity while I'm deployed or PCSing. How about using performance reports to ensure people are doing a good job year to year? Not everyone can be the CEO, and why would we want that?
Almost Retired, San Antonio
 
6/14/2011 2:04:28 AM ET
When General Stanley makes the statement comparing the military system of promotion with the the GS system and promotion opportunities within the GS system, it makes us wonder if he was taken out of context or doesn't understand the reality of the DoD Civilian work force. In the GS system, we don't have the same opportunities for promotion as the military. And to state that people who do the same job for 20 or 30 years effectively and dont promote up shouldn't get retirement is insulting to dedicated employees. Most job series don't have upper level jobs for all the people working in the middle to promote into. For military spouses moving every 3 to 4 years, it makes it difficult to get a job in their field or the upper end of their resume. They are lucky to get a GS 4-6 job in anything. With the hiring freeze those of us who are permanent GS and PCSing might not even get a job. We have 1 year LWOP, so hopefully the freeze will lift and something will be open.
SuzieQ, Japan
 
6/13/2011 8:54:56 PM ET
I find the portion regarding Civil Service very interesting and contradictory of current actions. We just had a great system in place called NSPS that rewarded performers and allowed those of us with prior military experience and varied skills more job movement instead of being stuck in a job series. For instance, a spouse, former AD, like me, started as an EPR DEC Manager, went to a Technician job with Support Division, and then went to Contracting working with GSA account auditing. I too had the ability to fill any of these positions. This was truly utilizing the skills of current employees. But the decision was made to go back to the rigid GS system. Traveling from assignment to assignment as a spouse I've rarely had the opportunity to serve in a GS position with any upward movement at all. We have to wait until the same job series at the Group or FW level opens and hope to get it. Now there is a hiring freeze.
Gaijin, Japan
 
Add a comment

 Inside AF.mil

ima cornerSearch

tabSubscribe AF.MIL
tabMore HeadlinesRSS feed 
Never forget: World War II Airman, POW shares story of resiliency.   4

Slideshow: Phantom in the water

Comptroller: Sequestration Would Devastate Defense Spending

AF officials encourage Airmen to submit retraining packages before MilPDS upgrade

More than 900 rally to support wingman's cause

KC-46 enters critical design review phase

Slideshow: Fifth-generation formation  1

Air Force Week in Photos

Chaplains provide support and comfort for families

IDS agencies team up to teach life skills to new Airmen

ANG director discusses way forward

Carter: Sequestration would have effect of 'hidden tax'

CMSAF: 'Be the best, know your Airmen, tell your story'  1

Carter urges stepped up progress on cyber defense

tabCommentaryRSS feed 
Sept. 17: A day for Constitutional conversation  3

Losing Your Future to Sexual Assault   24


Site Map      Contact Us     Questions     Security and Privacy notice     E-publishing