Official Site of the U.S. Air Force   Right Corner Banner
Join the Air Force

News > F-22 scientific board findings announced pilot safety is priority
 
Photos 
F-22 scientific board findings
(U.S. Air force graphic/Sylvia Saab) (U.S. Air Force photo/Senior Airman Laura Turner)
Download HiRes
F-22 scientific board findings announced pilot safety is priority

Posted 3/30/2012 Email story   Print story

    


by Mitch Gettle
Air Force Public Affairs Agency


3/30/2012 - WASHINGTON (AFNS) -- Air Force leaders provided an update on the Air Force Scientific Advisory Board study into the F-22 Raptor life support systems and flight operations during a briefing in the Pentagon March 29.

Retired Gen. Gregory Martin, an aviator and a former commander of two major commands, chaired the nine member SAB team which studied the aircrafts' on-board oxygen generation systems and briefed its findings and recommendations in trying to determine a root cause for pilots experiencing unexplained physiological events with the F-22 Raptor.

"From April 2008 until May 2011, the Air Force experienced 14 physiological incidents with the fleet of F-22s," Martin said. "Each incident was investigated, and of those incidents, 10 did not reveal a root cause."

It was the unexplained nature of those incidents that gave the Air Force concern and led the Secretary of the Air Force to ask for a broad area review which the SAB conducted, he added.

"We were unable to determine a root cause, but we were able to put in place the proper safety measures and risk mitigation techniques that would allow the F-22 fleet to return to fly...to ensure the integrity of the life support system," Martin said. "We went from ground test to flight test to a return to fly phase, and moving into a transition phase."

The advisory board made nine findings and 14 recommendations based on a seven-month study of the F-22's evolution - from conception and acquisition through current flight operations - which the Air Force can use to move forward.

Martin said the findings and recommendations fall into three main areas; the acquisition processes and policies, the organizational structure recommendations and equipment recommendations to not only protect the pilots and crew members today but also for the future.

"Some of the things we recommended give us a much better understating of the pilots' performance in those environments that we have not operated in before," Martin said. "It will further our understanding of the aviation physiology of operating in that environment."

Air Force leaders remain steadfast that the F-22 is a fully combat capable aircraft and they have every confidence in its current and future performance.

"Since September of last year we've flown over 10,000 sorties," said Maj. Gen. Charles Lyon, Air Combat Command Director of Operations. "We've had a 99.9 percent effective flying rate relative to physiological incidents, but that is not good enough. We will not rest; we will not stop; we will not end this journey we are on until we carry that 99 percent decimal point to the farthest right that we can."

The Air Force is well into the implementation phase of the recommendations from the SAB team and continues to aggressively pursue the root cause of these unexplained incidents, he said.

"Let there be no doubt that safety is paramount to the men and women who operate (the F-22) and the commander's who command them," Lyon said. "When we wear this uniform there is risk, there is risk inherent in aviation and risk inherently in conducting military operations.

Pilot safety has and always will remain a priority for ACC, Lyon added.

"We have taken a 9-1-1 call approach" Lyon said. "We have instructed and talked to our members in the field; whenever you get any indication that something may not be right, knock it off, the flying equivalent of calling 9-1-1 and terminate the flight. All eyes are focused on you and the safe recovery of your aircraft."

When a physiological event occurs, the pilot is met by a medical team to care for the pilot and take additional tests and send the tests to the lab, and so far nothing remarkable has come back from the lab tests we've analyzed, he said.

"When it comes to safety, no one second guesses the pilot," Lyon said.

The F-22 is a fifth generation fighter and one that is needed for the United States to establish air superiority in today's and tomorrow's conflict's, said Maj. Gen. Noel "Tom" Jones, Air Force Deputy Chief of Staff for Operations, Plans and Requirements.

"This aircraft is the world's most advanced aircraft and does air superiority mission unlike any other aircraft in the world," Jones said. "This is the leading edge of technology, and if our nation needs a capability to enter contested airspace to deal with air forces that are trying to deny our forces the ability to maneuver without prejudice on the ground; it will be the F-22 that takes on that mission."



tabComments
4/6/2012 3:55:50 AM ET
Non-Article related...Please review your articles before publishing them on the website Saftey...Spell Check
Mykal Donathan, RAF Lakenheath UK
 
4/5/2012 5:37:11 PM ET
Another interesting physiological mystery developed recently in our U-2 pilots. It had to do with seemingly random cases of decompression sickness aka the bends. Turns out changes in the U-2 mission ops tempo overtaxed a life support system that had for decades proven to be sufficient. Our Raptor pilots are also operating in a new environment with a life support system that has proven to be sufficient in other applications. Sometimes the effects of life support systems issues are delayed distorting the timeline of events we typically rely on to solve problems. Thinking out of the box is crucial to discovering root causes of problems like this one.
DG, Holloman AFB
 
4/5/2012 5:25:58 PM ET
Another interesting physiological mystery developed recently in our U-2 pilots. It had to do with seemingly random cases of decompression sickness aka the bends. Turns out changes in the U-2 mission ops tempo overtaxed a life support system that had for decades proven to be sufficient. Our Raptor pilots are also operating in a new environment with a life support system that has proven to be sufficient in other applications. Sometimes the effects of life support systems issues are delayed distorting the timeline of events we typically rely on to solve problems. Thinking out of the box is crucial to discovering root causes of problems like this one.
DG, Holloman AFB NM
 
4/3/2012 8:25:04 PM ET
We don't second guess pilots Yet the Alaska crash was blamed on pilot error. I guess when a pilot loses their lives for their country they are not longer pilots and can take the fall.
really, reality
 
4/3/2012 10:38:44 AM ET
Somewhat of a ridiculous headline. Was pilot safety not a priority before this announcement
Caveman, Bedrock
 
4/3/2012 8:06:52 AM ET
Not sure if they had to totally redesign the OBOGS for the F-22 but the F-16 OBOGS works just fine. Not sure why a totally redesigned package had to be made for the F-22 but it seems like a waste when there are already verified working systems out there.
RL, Shaw AFB
 
4/2/2012 1:30:31 PM ET
Why not ask our newly confirmed first female 4-star general Wolfenbarger what she thinks the root cause of F-22 problem is After all she was the F-22 Lead Program Element Monitor and F-22 Subsystems Team Chief.
JT, Tampa
 
4/2/2012 1:06:26 PM ET
Is there any proof that there is a fundamental flaw in the design of the F-22 OBOGS DC Have you uncovered some fact that the other nine on the SAB did not Pilots are trained to recgnize their hypoxia and take steps to rectify the situation. Yes flying is risky but so is getting out of bed. I would venture most flyers not just pilots object to the nickel-seat emotional sensationalism.
Capt MRC Pilot, Louisville KY
 
4/2/2012 11:52:28 AM ET
So why do they not load these aircraft with the remote control capability and place test instrumentaion on board The capability is there we fly F4 Phantoms remotely and Drones so why risk pilots without putting this aircraft through every test available. We are far beyond the Writh Brothers and Col John Glenn s time so there could be no good reason to risk another life at the 99 percent rate spend the extra and put remote control on board if for no other reason then to bring a Airmen in trouble home by remote control surely we can at least do that.
SNCO Retired, Ohio
 
3/30/2012 8:12:12 PM ET
I guess it will take another smoking hole in the ground before they realize there is a fundamental flaw in design and not subject more pilots to this risk until it has been corrected... not mitigated and accepted as part of flying a high tech plane. Flying is risky enough without having to worry about hypoxia taking your life.
DC, MD
 
Add a comment

 Inside AF.mil

ima cornerSearch

tabSubscribe AF.MIL
tabMore HeadlinesRSS feed 
Partnerships develop Air Force youth

Air Force leaders offer perspectives at four-star forum

Dempsey: Insider attacks won't affect NATO's Afghan strategy  1

'Teammates wanted' to deliver future

Personnel chief: Road ahead for Airmen tough, but bright

U.S. citizens overseas urged to vote

36th Wing provides consistent evac support in Asia-Pacific

Air Force officials describe ICBM way-ahead

Air Force officials outline cyber capabilities in today's fight

AF is transforming how it provides services  1

Secretary of Defense visits Yokota

Air Force recognizes 2012 Outstanding Airmen of the Year  6  |  VIDEO

CSAF talks Air Force innovation, evolution at AFA Conference  2  |  VIDEO

AF Reserve commander praises total force

tabCommentaryRSS feed 
Sept. 17: A day for Constitutional conversation  1

Losing Your Future to Sexual Assault   24


Site Map      Contact Us     Questions     Security and Privacy notice     E-publishing