Official Site of the U.S. Air Force   Right Corner Banner
Join the Air Force

News > Space Command retires workhorse satellite
 
Photos 
3 SOPS retires workhorse satellite
Lt. Col. Kevin (center) and Lt. Col. Benjamin Jones (second from right) lead 3rd Space Operations Squadron members in deactivating the Defense Satellite Communications System B9 satellite Aug. 12, 2011 at Schriever Air Force Base Colo. Colonel Mortensen is the 3rd SOPS commander. Colonel Jones is the 53rd Signal Battalion commander. (U.S. Air Force photo\Scott Prater)
Download HiRes
Space Command retires workhorse satellite

Posted 8/17/2011 Email story   Print story

    


by Scott Prater
50th Space Wing


8/17/2011 - SCHRIEVER AIR FORCE BASE, Colo. (AFNS) -- Members of the 3rd Space Operations Squadron, along with their counterparts from the 53rd Signal Battalion, waved a fond farewell to a trusted old friend Aug. 12.

Lt. Col. Kevin Mortensen, 3rd SOPS commander and Lt. Col. Benjamin Jones, 53rd SB commander, took the honors, shutting down the final components of the satellite simply known as "B9," with a couple of mouse clicks.

And with that, a Defense Satellite Communications System vehicle that served both the U.S. Air Force and U.S. Army for 18 years sent its last bit of vital information.

"A lot of world events happened under the footprint of this satellite," said Lt. Col. Greg Karahalis, 3rd SOPS operations officer. "It's 18 years old and been in service on active duty longer than many of us. It's a Soldier and an Airman and that's how we like to talk about it. The events it has been through bare some recognition in terms of how it has performed and the contribution it's made to extending the life of the DSCS constellation."

Launched from Cape Canaveral Air Force Station aboard an Atlas II rocket July 19, 1993, DSCS B9 reached geosynchronous orbit on schedule and entered service following a two-month checkout.

While Air Force operations squadrons have controlled the space vehicle, its communications payload has been managed and operated by Army units. B9 served users as the West
Pacific wideband satellite for most of its operational life.

According to Maj. Mike Reeder, 53 SB executive officer, B9 supported multiple missions, including the Diplomatic Telecommunications Service, the U.S. Navy's Surveillance
Towed Array Sensor System and the White House Communications Agency [presidential support]. It also supported U.S. military operations including Global Thunder and Terminal Fury and assisted in humanitarian efforts such as the Tsunami relief of 2004.

Spacecraft control authority for the entire DSCS constellation was transferred from the 5th Space Operations Squadron to 3 SOPS during 1996. Launched with a design life of 10 years, B9 easily blew through that envelope, serving for 13 years on orbit before telemetry data indicated that it was running low on fuel. Rather than give up and dispose of a fully functional satellite, the DSCS team refined and improved its fuel estimation capabilities and managed to squeeze an additional two and half year of life out of the spacecraft.

The DSCS team earned the 2006 Air Force Chief of Staff Team Excellence award for that specific effort on B9, but the old bird showed that it wasn't done just yet. During April 2008, B9 was placed in super synchronous orbit as a test asset.

"The best simulator on the ground is nowhere near as good as an actual satellite on orbit for realistic testing," Karahalis said. "The DCSC team has used B9 as a test asset for more than three years and we've made every effort to take full advantage of the unique opportunity."

As the spacecraft crept up in age, B9 was used in more than 15 end-of-life tests, which provided valuable information applicable to the entire DSCS constellation.

The spacecraft aided 3rd SOPS during anomaly investigations by allowing engineers to recreate abnormal conditions and helped extend the life of the constellation by enabling engineers to validate contingency procedures and mitigation strategies prior to implementation on operational vehicles.

"It has also provided a platform for running experimental procedures," Karahalis said. "This helps us push the operational envelope of the constellation and maximize spacecraft utility."

Capt. Kyle Volpe, 3rd SOPS' DSCS III engineering section chief, explained that B9's deactivation process was spread out over a two day period as crews first purged the vehicle of any remaining fuel and then began shutting off the payload and subsystem components on the subsequent day.

Even then, B9 refused to go quietly. Following a command to shutdown its reaction wheels, the satellite responded by deactivating only two of the four on board. It succumbed after the command was sent a second time, however, and few minutes later 3 SOPS and 53 SB members said their final farewells.

"DSCS B9's amazing mission accomplishment can be traced to the tremendous community that has supported it over the past 18 years," Mortensen said. "From Air Force and Army operators flying the satellite and payload, respectively, to our joint, acquisition, and industry partners working in close collaborations to ensure we provide National Command Authorities, Combatant Commanders, joint and allied forces, and other users around the world with reliable wideband satellite communications."



tabComments
8/30/2011 7:03:55 PM ET
If you take a closer look at the photo it seems to me the USAF is teaching the Army on what's going on. If only the Army would have been wearing flight suits they wouldn't need the help.
Retired, Arizona
 
8/27/2011 9:29:23 PM ET
@Buzz Lightyear - So what is your argument in favor of satellite flyers wearing flightsuits? Many on here are not criticizing the importance of the space career field, just questioning the necessity of a career field wearing a flight suit when there is no operational need for it.
Caveman, Bedrock
 
8/24/2011 12:57:04 PM ET
I am an HVACR troop and work around boilers, furnaces, high pressure steam lines, and other highly dangerous equipment. If the argument is about catching on fire, shouldn't I, more than anyone in the AF, get a flight suit?
TSI, SP
 
8/23/2011 3:41:39 PM ET
The common characteristic of those whining about who is wearing a flightsuit or not and their worth to the USAF and DoD overall is typically JUNIOR enlisted and officers who have no clue about space operations and have zero or very little joint military experience. When or if you grow up someday and get around other DoD services you will soon find out how important air, space, and cyber are to the fight. But until then, you whine about the other guy who gets a flightsuit. You whine about some space operator wearing a flightsuit and demean their importance to the USAF but you don't mind the effects you get from his/her work.The problem is with you in your head.
Buzz Lightyear, Outer Space
 
8/23/2011 11:21:17 AM ET
All of you should stop hating and complaining about flight suits. You know by now that the military always does things that don't make sense so in a way that has become the standard so why complain about it Besides this article is in no way about uniforms and that just goes to show that you only post comments to complain and not to discuss the actual subject of this article. What does it matter what they wear anyway As long as they wear it correctly I couldn't care who wears what.
Chris, JBSA
 
8/22/2011 12:54:12 PM ET
Though I retired in 2007, can I wear a flight suit as well? It's hot out here in Arizona and I might catch fire out on the golf course. I spent two years at Schriever and never understood why they wore flight suits. The only thing they're flying is a chair. You can wear ABU's to do this job. I wonder if Tops in Blue wears flightsuits.
Retired, Arizona
 
8/19/2011 9:57:43 PM ET
Can someone provide a valid reason why they are wearing flight suits? Intel analysts work 12 shifts too on watch floors but wear ABU's. I'd love for a 1C6 to justify the need to wear the flight suit.
SSgt L, Buckley AFB CO
 
8/19/2011 12:24:12 PM ET
I especially love those Spwings. The symbol on the Space Command patch looks like the gadget Captain Kirk and his Star Trek personnel would touch and say "Beam me up Scotty."
Arctic Warrior, Colorado Springs CO
 
8/19/2011 12:04:25 PM ET
Why? Why do people feel the need to comment about uniforms EVERY time a picture is posted? News flash! This is the official AF website and I'm pretty sure they wouldn't print a picture of someone out of uniform. Apparently some people don't have enough to do at work.
Sgt.Ihavebetterthingstodo, Left Coast
 
8/19/2011 10:58:47 AM ET
Wow, buzz, that's pretty awesome to just insult the other side. I agree that space operators should not be in flight suits. It's not only a waste of money but the fact you get a clothing allowance to maintain uniforms you never wear is nuts. Although, maybe we can get computer operators and AGE operators and bus operators to all wear flight suits as well. BTW, I did test high enough to wear the bag when I was in so I by no means am jealous.
Dave C, OH
 
8/19/2011 10:45:59 AM ET
Then if they are wearing them because of a fire then why don't AF fire fighters wear bags? Don't they have a fire retardant ABU? Just saying...
Just , Saying 2
 
8/19/2011 12:06:13 AM ET
TSgt Picka. I think Buzz's comments speaks highly of the space career field and the caliber of character they possess. If we treated all operaters as equals we would have had a CSAF who was a space cadet by now, but we haven't. It looks as that room in the picture could combust at any given minute. Let them wear their suits if it makes them feel important. Heck, let's just issue them to everyone. Our culture does and will continue to reward all, even in last place, with a special trophy.
AMC PILOT, The real world.
 
8/18/2011 11:19:13 PM ET
Sorry to disappoint Buzz Lightyear but my wings are earned Enlisted Aircrew ones. That means I actually use a flight suit for its intended purpose of all things being FLYING in an USAF aircraft. You can keep your Direct TV while Im sipping beer and clicking over my 6000th flight hour while you reassure yourself of the PPE properties of that bag you guys deserve to wear while sitting at a desk much like finance does. I suppose Finance and Comm is as much as an operator as yourself. Maybe the whole AF should be issued Flight Suits so nobody will catch fire around coffee pots and LCD screens. You are a true warrior huzzah
TSgt Picka, MDL
 
8/18/2011 6:01:26 PM ET
Your jealous comments about flight suits only serve to divide the force. Of course, so do these units that wear the flight suit with unauthorized morale patches -- left sleeve of the Lt. Col., 4th person from the left. And flight suit nametag colors must be derived from the colors of the unit patch, i.e. not a red nametag, which looks stupid by the way, with a blue, yellow, and black unit patch.
Maj, SWA
 
8/18/2011 3:44:27 PM ET
@TSgt Picka, agree 100 percent. It's a flame-resistant coverall meant for flight or hazardous duty.
Flint, not a hater
 
8/18/2011 1:52:21 PM ET
I am also a jealous non-flight suit wearer. But comments like that are going to have us all wearing nothing but blues. The more we whine about uniforms the more those complaints bite us on the backside.
TSgt W, Colorado
 
8/18/2011 1:12:10 PM ET
Amen, TSgt Picka. Let the great flight suit debate begin anew. But ya never know. Those Dells might catch fire and the Nomex in the uniforms might save the space operators. But seeing how worn and threadbare those flight suits look, really, there's no fire retardant property left in those bags. Just retardant properties.
ROF, COS CO
 
8/18/2011 12:45:34 PM ET
Actually TSgt, the Army doesn't fly the satellite. They just operate the payload on DSCS satellites. The bag came over to space when missile crews were integrated under the 13SX career field. Missile crews wore the bags, blue bags at first, because of possible fire hazards in the missile launch control center. The Air Force treats all operators as equals in the fight so space and missile operators wear the bag like air and ground tactics operators do too. It seems you are just mad you couldn't test high enough to be a space operator. Don't worry you'll still get your DirecTV signal.
Buzz Lightyear, Outer Space
 
8/17/2011 11:30:10 PM ET
I want everyone to take note that the Army does not wear flight suits when controlling satellites. FWA folks. Do you need a 135-issued flight suit to work in a cubicle farm? Ditto for the UAV warriors as well.
TSgt S Picka, MDL
 
Add a comment

 Inside AF.mil

ima cornerSearch

tabSubscribe AF.MIL
tabMore HeadlinesRSS feed 
Life Extension Programs modernize ICBMs

SecAF visits basic military training

Through Airmen's Eyes: Airman battles breast cancer

Remains of two Airmen lost in 1969 identified, honored

Top female AF general tells personal examples of women's progress in military

Wizards salute Andrews Airmen, service members

Online access simplifies dependent updates

Aviano unveils first locally painted F-16

'Green Flag' keeps Airmen, Soldiers mission ready

Contingency Response Airmen battle elements at JRTC  1

AF awards $25K to essay winners

Through Airmen's Eyes: Ultimate wingman helps save friend's life  12

Declassified document shows 'real' flying saucer

Hurlburt Airman found dead after boating mishap identified

tabCommentaryRSS feed 
Teal ropes to spotlight sexual assault response  37

Air Force Academy energy research will yield global benefits


Site Map      Contact Us     Questions     Security and Privacy notice     E-publishing