Official Site of the U.S. Air Force   Right Corner Banner
Join the Air Force

News > Department prepares for 'Don't Ask' repeal
Department prepares for 'Don't Ask' repeal

Posted 12/17/2010 Email story   Print story

    


by Lisa Daniel
American Forces Press Service


12/17/2010 - WASHINGTON (AFNS) -- The Defense Department is preparing for passage of a law that overturns the ban on gays serving openly in the military, a Pentagon spokesman said Dec 17.

The U.S. Senate is expected to vote -- possibly as soon as Dec. 18 -- on a bill the House of Representatives passed Dec. 15 that would repeal the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" law.

"The department is preparing guidance to inform the entire department about that change" should it occur, Marine Corps Col. Dave Lapan told reporters.

The guidance would come in the form of a memo from Clifford L. Stanley, the undersecretary of defense for personnel and readiness, Colonel Lapan said. It would serve to notify personnel of the change and explain timelines involved in implementing a new law.

Under the House-passed legislation, the president, the secretary of defense and the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff all must certify that the military is prepared to make the change before it can be implemented. A 60-day waiting period would follow that certification before the new law would take effect.

A Pentagon working group led by Jeh C. Johnson, the department's general counsel, and Gen. Carter F. Ham, the commander of U.S. Army Europe, presented a support plan for implementation Nov. 30. The plan outlines key policies affected if the law is repealed and information for creating training and communications materials.

The support plan calls for a "pre-repeal" stage to begin at the direction of the secretary of defense prior to a congressional vote to overturn the law. During this time, department and service leaders would continue to review existing policies affected by repeal and prepare new or revised issuances. Leaders also should develop education and training materials and communications plans that would be used in the implementation stage, the plan says, but education and training should not begin before the law is changed.

The implementation stage would begin when Congress passes a new law and would continue after the effective date of repeal and once new policies have been drafted, the plan says. During this stage, the department and services would finalize policy revisions and conduct education and training to prepare for the change, it says.

If the Senate does not vote on the legislation in the coming days, the bill will not be decided by the current Congress, which adjourns next week. Meanwhile, a lawsuit against the 17-year-old law is pending in the federal court system and is expected to be heard in the early spring.

President Barack Obama, Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates, and Navy Adm. Mike Mullen, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, support congressional repeal of the law.



tabComments
12/21/2010 2:01:32 PM ET
So many are bothered about this, but you actually think that the 1300 service men and women who were discharged were the only gays in the military Newsflash. They were the only ones who were outed or chose to be open about their relationships. Besides most of you still worried about showertime likely won't have to worry about anyone gay or otherwise giving your junk a second look or thought.
EN, OH
 
12/21/2010 11:18:13 AM ET
I'm pretty disgusted at the bigotry in these comments. Just because DADT is repealed it doesn't mean that we're gonna be wearing Rainbow uniforms and Gay Airmen will be prancing around flamboyantly. I guarantee every one of these posters knows or knew a gay airman and they didn't even know it. Repealing DADT just makes it so they can be themselves the same professional standards will apply. Those of you saying you will get out or would have gotten out if it had been repealed when you were in SHAME ON YOU. You obviously don't care about this country and the freedom it represents, if you could throw away your service to the country just because it's not a little more free.
Straight Male, Kirtland AFB
 
12/21/2010 9:55:20 AM ET
So let me get this straight...some say they would quit at once. So you would break a contract on the basis of a lawful order Sounds like insubordination, not the flag-waving heroes that you make yourself out to be when you beg for your discount at the steakhouse on Friday evening. Does anyone with any sense really think that dudes are going to step in off the gay pride parade and come swishing through the barracks? No. If repealing DADT would have kept some of the people on this board from enlisting, I say we'd have a better AF right now.
Bilbo, FL
 
12/21/2010 9:17:29 AM ET
I am neutral on the subject just as long as we don't have the flaming ones...they are irritating. I agree this is going to be very expensive to implement and I just don't like how the minority group of people gets to say what the majority wants or does not want. Maybe I will start a beard or goatee campaign and if I can get a few people to support it then we can take it to congress and get that rule repealed as well.
G-Man, San Antonio
 
12/21/2010 8:27:00 AM ET
Chris the surveys never had anything to do with soliciting your opinion in order to help CSAF and SECAF with the decision. They just needed to gauge how much pushback there would be when it happened. And it has been obvious this would be another simple case of our liberal government following their hearts and not their heads and giving in to the vocal minority. I hope it works out for everyone because, yes, it is going to be a zoo. Watch all the general officers retire. It's going to get interesting.
Jerry, Seattle
 
12/21/2010 4:33:36 AM ET
Good point Jim. The problem that I could see is that we could see a spike in sexual harrassment cases in the near future because some people will not be able to keep their hands off others. But who knows. Hopefully we can all get along in a professional manner but we can only hope.
SSgt, Somewhere
 
12/20/2010 10:05:06 PM ET
Jay Kansas - way to go with that team spirit. Remember some of those desk jockeys are busting their behinds to keep your records updated while you're out playing in the sand. If it weren't for them you'd have more additional duties than you could fathom. Some of them are the ones that control your personnel medical and financial records so if I were you I wouldn't be so quick to judge. Contrary to your statement yes, EVERYONE is part of this new implementation not just YOU.
JS, Florida
 
12/20/2010 7:33:39 PM ET
You signed up to serve our country they signed up with the same purpose. To be a part of something bigger they took a chance knowing they can get kicked out in any given time if someone finds out their sexuality. They've willingly sacrificed their happiness and personality just to be able to serve. Give them a little bit of respect and credibility.
JustSaying, Land of Oppurtunity
 
12/20/2010 6:25:16 PM ET
At least I'll have separated before this happens.
RG, Nellis
 
12/20/2010 6:21:06 PM ET
Interesting when a group of politicians most of whom never had the desire or guts to serve make a decision that affects military personnel personally. Put these guys in uniform for 4 years. The military is a war machine not a societal proving ground. So that homosexual deviants can have special rights the rights of the majority are abridged. The major effect is on combatants who live together in close proximity not admin personnel or cooks. They should have the overriding vote and it was NO. If I were still on active duty I would resign my commission. If I were considering joining, I would say NO. I'm extremely disappointed in this nation and feel my service was for naught and in vain. Military leaders especially should be ashamed of themselves for not taking the correct action but they are only concerned about being good ol' boys in retirement..
Dave, Cali
 
12/20/2010 3:40:47 PM ET
I saw a stat that read 13500 servicemen and women were relieved of duty because of their choice of sexual orientation. I wonder how many skilled and talented people will choose NOT to join the military because DADT is in the works of being overturned With health and other issues being a automatic disqualifier for some potential recruitees I don't think we should limit ourselves even more just for a few more votes or a campaign promise. Wouldn't want to be a recruiter these days.
JM, DC
 
12/20/2010 3:35:48 PM ET
To all of those who have desk jobs this won't affect you. But those of who deploy and are in close quarters we better watch out. So for all you desk jockeys keep on talking this kudos cause you aren't really part of the affected ones.
Jay, Kansas
 
12/20/2010 3:33:10 PM ET
I hope they do let all the people against it get out. I'd rather work with people who are only concerned about the mission and core values rather than their personal learned beliefs. I'm glad it's repealed and I seriously doubt it's going to be as big of an issue as some people are making it out to be. Its as simple as this be professional when at work and dont hang out with someone who is gay when not at work if you're against it. I know in the bases Ive been to with privatized housing they allow people of the same sex to rent a house together. They call them roommates, but I wouldn't be surprised if some were more than roommates. Anyway I'm sure the some of the same arguments were used with desegregation but that seemed to work out pretty well. Regardless its now the law and once its rolled out you either follow the law or pay the consequences.
MM, FL
 
12/20/2010 3:32:39 PM ET
I don't understand how they worked the big survey we all took just a few months ago. The results showed that most military members did not care. Then the majority of the peole who were against it are all of the combat troops. It's almost as if the survey was just a big joke and a spit in the face to deployed troops. As for the CBT's that they plan to release I find it as a waste of time and resources to even put them together. I'm not changing my lifestyle to make someone else's more comfortable.
Chris, Awards
 
12/20/2010 3:19:38 PM ET
I am so excited you guys. This has been a dream of mine and I am so looking forward to it coming into full effect.
Chris, Undisclothed
 
12/20/2010 3:11:57 PM ET
1st question they need to answer...Basic training.... 60 men 1 large Dorm 8 shower heads 1 homosexual serious problem... Whats the plan there? 2nd question...Deployed location in Man Tents. What's the plan for that? I could go on but I think this is going to cost a lot more money then we have. We can't even get boots/cold weather gear for flightline guys. Now this.
G, RAF lakenheath
 
12/20/2010 2:06:34 PM ET
Kudos to congress for getting this passed. To those of you who have reservations, it is now time to salute smartly and make it happen. All of us are responsible for making this work.
Analyst, Barksdale
 
12/20/2010 8:44:24 AM ET
This is great. I've been a pretty big supporter of this repeal but now I won't have to say why it's a positive thing. Some of the biggots against repeal will now get to see for themselves that their fears were completely unwarranted.
Aaron Steigerwalt, Altus AFB OK
 
12/18/2010 7:07:23 PM ET
As a recently retired MSgt I just want to ask the following: how do you handle it when there isn't enough space to give every airman their own room? Also if two individuals are homosexual rooming together and like each other, how is that fair to the heterosexual airmen? They would get in trouble for co-habitation. What about when two homosexual airmen go and get married in one of the states that allows that then come back to base and apply for housing? Will the USAF give it to them? What if they go to a Military Equal Opportunity office about it? Many years ago, during the inception of DADT, I told a Below-the-Zone board that there was a logistics problem at minimum. I got the stripe. And indeed the problems still exist. Good luck to the NCOs and junior officers who have to lead through and administrate this boondoggle. You're going to need it.
Heartland Patriot, Heartland USA
 
12/18/2010 12:20:26 PM ET
The repeal of DADT is going to cost BILLIONS of dollars in litigation. The repeal of DADT is going to result in a fiasco. Not all States recognize homosexual unions. Transsexuals openly serve in NATO member countries. And will those previously separated under DADT sue for constructive service credit, back pay, and allowances?
TJN, Retired
 
12/18/2010 9:12:58 AM ET
THIS WILL BE A SAD DAY INDEED AND IN DEED.
ALVIN ZIEGELBAUER, BEDFORD TEXAS
 
12/18/2010 9:11:25 AM ET
If they repeal this law they should allow any military person to leave the service immediately if he or she desired to. I served 21 years in the Air Force but would have quit at once if they had repealed the law while I was still active.
william brooks, florida
 
Add a comment

 Inside AF.mil

ima cornerSearch

tabSubscribe AF.MIL
tabMore HeadlinesRSS feed 
AF officials encourage Airmen to submit retraining packages before MilPDS upgrade

More than 900 rally to support wingman's cause

KC-46 enters critical design review phase

Slideshow: Fifth-generation formation  1

Air Force Week in Photos

Chaplains provide support and comfort for families

IDS agencies team up to teach life skills to new Airmen

ANG director discusses way forward

Carter: Sequestration would have effect of 'hidden tax'

CMSAF: 'Be the best, know your Airmen, tell your story'  1

Carter urges stepped up progress on cyber defense

Partnerships develop Air Force youth  1

Air Force leaders offer perspectives at four-star forum

Dempsey: Insider attacks won't affect NATO's Afghan strategy  1

tabCommentaryRSS feed 
Sept. 17: A day for Constitutional conversation  2

Losing Your Future to Sexual Assault   24


Site Map      Contact Us     Questions     Security and Privacy notice     E-publishing