Official Site of the U.S. Air Force   Right Corner Banner
Join the Air Force

News > Lesser-known UCMJ offenses
Lesser-known UCMJ offenses

Posted 12/15/2010 Email story   Print story

    


by Lt. Col. Gregory Friedland
28th Bomb Wing staff judge advocate


12/15/2010 - ELLSWORTH AIR FORCE BASE, S.D. (AFNS) -- Some Airmen destroy promising careers, and it's not always because they are caught stealing, using drugs or misusing their government computer.

Having served as a prosecutor, defense attorney and military judge, I've seen people lose their careers for many reasons: from voyeurism to disloyal statements, to graft and sedition, and even wrongful cohabitation.

In one particular case, an Airman who was separated -- not divorced -- from his wife moved into base housing with another woman. Because he was still married, he had applied for and was offered base housing. He and his girlfriend lived together for four months, and even his neighbors thought they were husband and wife.

Later, he was convicted of wrongful cohabitation, among other things, and sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for one year, total forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and reduced to the grade of E-1.

Wrongful cohabitation occurs when an Airman and another person openly and publicly live together as husband and wife, but they're not. It can happen in base housing or in the civilian community.

In another case, an Airman was convicted of looting. While standing guard at a warehouse in Panama during Operation Just Cause, he stole a camera and four watches.

Looting differs from larceny in that the property generally belongs to the enemy; however, there are exceptions. He was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for six months, forfeiture of $400 pay per month for six months and reduction to the grade of E-1.

Following is a list of several Uniform Code of Military Justice offenses people may not have encountered:

-- Fleeing the scene of an accident: both the driver and the senior ranking passenger can be charged with this offense;

-- Drunk and disorderly: you can violate this provision by being drunk, disorderly or both;

-- Misprision of a serious offense: concealing a serious offense committed by another;

-- Obstructing justice: intimidating a witness or saying essentially, "Don't tell them it was me.";

-- Soliciting another to commit an offense;

-- Disloyal statements: watch what you post on social media websites;

-- Child endangerment or reckless endangerment: wrongfully subjecting someone to a reasonable probability of harm;

-- False or unauthorized pass offenses: this offense also applies to altering your identification card, loaning your ID to someone or having an unauthorized ID card;

-- Stalking: this applies to both the victim of the stalking and their immediate family;

-- Voyeurism: this is now found under Article 120 as "indecent conduct;"

-- Graft: compensation for services performed in an official manner when no compensation is due; and

-- Sedition: think "mutiny" but in the overthrow of civil authority sense versus military authority.

There are many more offenses that you probably haven't heard about. Although the UCMJ contains some laws you may not have heard of, ignorance of the law is no excuse.



tabComments
12/18/2010 9:38:29 AM ET
Nice to see that nothing much has changed in the Air Force in the past 40 years. In 1968 when I first entered the USAF we young ones had all the modern thinking and many of us voiced the same complaints regarding the UCMJ --except for that religion one...where'd that come from. I expect the UCMJ will out live all of us. It will give future generations of airman soldiers and sailors something to complain about along with the cruddy living condtions nasty food dumb looking uniforms and short hair. Good luck to you all and Keep 'em Flying.
Tom D in SC, South Carolina
 
12/17/2010 12:13:54 PM ET
Great comments and interesting article. It is unfortunate that many of these offenses are not as well known as they should be. Perhaps formal detailed training with examples could be included in CC calls and...not another one...CBTs. The paragraph or two included in base papers does not really describe the circumstances of each crime and gossip seems to be the way people learn from the mistakes of others. The UCMJ is important and we should take knowing more about it seriously. Ignorance IS a valid excuse if we are not trained properly. I appreciate the higher standard. Also I am pretty sure cohabitation is not legal in some states.
SM, NM
 
12/16/2010 7:35:35 PM ET
I agree with TSgt Rojek in that many times I believe these laws are kept so that they can throw the book at offenders who commit worse crimes. Article 125 regarding Sodomy would likely apply to greater than 90 percent of the military force. However the Air Force isn't going to have OSI standing outside everyone's window making sure that they only have perform natural carnal acts. The article remains in order to stack charges against someone accused of another crime.I haven't heard of anyone getting court-martialed just because they performed unnatural carnal acts. Please enlighten me if there has been such a case, because I would really like to know that the military takes great interest in how I make love to my wife.
SSgt, AK
 
12/16/2010 5:22:52 PM ET
No Mike this country was NOT founded on religious principles. Speed limits DO change and have seen a rise over the past century partly due to the increased power of cars. I don't even know where you pulled that abolish religion nonsense from although you're right about it being outdated.
Aaron Steigerwalt, Altus AFB OK
 
12/16/2010 4:41:47 PM ET
Dueling consists of more than what we normally think of -- two cowboys meeting up at high noon on main street at ten paces with really bad music playing in the background. Now it more often refers to when two airmen become upset with each other for whatever reason and agree to take it outside and prove the other is good at blocking punches with his face. When one knows within reason there is a fight waiting for him and he still agrees to meet up he is agreeing to a duel and can no longer use an excuse of self-defense. In most cases it would amount to a charge of simple assault and is more common than most people think.
Cayton, Texas
 
12/16/2010 3:37:27 PM ET
Scott Southern US. You cannot be serious about your comments. The military has to hold its members to the highest standards. What we do as Airmen Soldiers Sailors and Marines reflects on how the people of this country and the world view our armed forces. Conduct unbecoming is as true today as it was when it was written. Adultery is reprehensible, our society looks too easily on the act. Fraternization which includes officer enlisted relationships is illegal in the civilian world not by any federal law, but any company worth its name has anti fraternization rules and in most it is a terminating offense it is also very dangerous to morale.
Mark, West Coast
 
12/16/2010 3:11:48 PM ET
At Paul W. Your point is weak and overused. People are not whining out of control like you are eluding to. A couple are expressing their opinion which this forum allows for. Yours is an opinion, but certainly is not original.
SNCO, Scott AFB IL
 
12/16/2010 2:35:59 PM ET
Mike our country was never founded on religious principles. Just saying.
Andrew, littlerock
 
12/16/2010 2:30:14 PM ET
Get real, even though I commend the UCMJ for keeping the laws active but they should in no way be as strict. As long as our Senior Officers and Elected Officials keep getting away with much bigger offenses to include keeping their retirement in most cases the double standard can not exist.
Mike, Utah
 
12/16/2010 2:14:45 PM ET
If the military persued every offender of the Cohabitation article they would lose a lot of the force and some very good Airmen. That is definitely an out-dated article. They probably only use that one when another offense occurs and they want to throw the book at the defendent.
TSgt Ben Rojek, Soto Cano AB Honduras
 
12/16/2010 1:45:15 PM ET
Mike, it is not necessarily a bad thing to reconsider old laws. Culture changes and some laws that are on our books in this country just don't make sense. No this country wasn't founded on religious principals. Principals from enlightenment political thinkers such as John Locke and Montesquieu were used to help found this nation.
Analyst, Barksdale
 
12/16/2010 1:33:42 PM ET
Look, I'm the first to roll my eyes when I hear 'the military is the noblest profession'. But think about it--we have to be held to the highest standards and that means our laws under the UCMJ must be stricter than civilian laws. We are entrusted with conventional and nuclear weapons. The civilian population must trust us to have the highest moral and ethical standards. Let's be proud of our UCMJ and military culture.
Capt S, NH
 
12/16/2010 1:29:52 PM ET
As practised from the 11th to 20th centuries in Western societies, a duel is an engagement in combat between two individuals with matched weapons in accordance with their combat doctrines. In the modern application the term is applied to aerial warfare between fighter pilots. A battle between two warships is also referred to as a duel or a naval duel especially in the Age of Sail when such encounters were more common. A duel is different than murder with a handgun and you don't need a dueling provision in the UCMJ to make shooting another soldier illegal.
Analyst, Barksdale
 
12/16/2010 12:50:05 PM ET
My advice for everyone who's not happy with the UCMJ is to get out. If you want to act like a civilian and be treated like a civilian then get out and BE a civilian. Oh wait a minute...the civilian economy kind of sucks now so it's safer to be on active duty... Quit complaining about the high standards that have ALWAYS been in place. I hope you folks who are whining about the UCMJ aren't supervisors yet. You have a lot to learn.
Paul Walmsley, Wichita Falls TX
 
12/16/2010 12:24:14 PM ET
So the UCMJ should be rewritten I suppose all the laws should be also. Speed limits should be raised since cars are now more powerful and roads are better Religion should be abolished since it too is outdated. Wake up people. Is this really the country that was founded on religious principles?
mike, U.S.
 
12/16/2010 11:41:43 AM ET
Yes Scott, Jason definitely said that fraternization lying and dishonorable behavior is perfectly acceptable. Please don't be melodramatic about this. The UCMJ was written in a very different era and it may indeed be time to consider removing some of the outdated articles such as ones concerning an individual's private life or dueling. We don't ride horses into combat anymore, this is a different military and it might need different rules.
Analyst, Barksdale
 
12/16/2010 9:11:08 AM ET
It is definitely time for a rewrite of the UCMJ. It is outdated. If you think about what we are fighting for- freedom and defending our country, then look at the limited freedoms we as enlisted or officer have. We are extremely limited and some things that are normal for civilians where they wouldn't be punished at all for it we could lose our careers be confined and/or lose pay for something which isn't an offense as a civilian- like living with someone else while not married. I completely understand that we as military are held to a higher standard, but to be punished to that extreme is unreasonable when it is not a crime under the United States law but it is under the UCMJ. The UCMJ needs to be updated.
KC, Wright-Patt
 
12/16/2010 2:47:39 AM ET
Jason Kirtland AFB NM is right. In this day and age honor is more of a marketing slogan than a code to live by. The Air Force should just focus on budgets and PT scores. If it isn't illegal in the civilian sector, it shouldn't be illegal or even frowned upon in the military. Homosexuals, let'em in. Adultery, no problem. Officer-enlisted relationships, pu-lease. Disloyal statements...come on, if you're not degrading the Chain-of-command up to the President and hating on America you're not being very fashionable or 'truly' American.
Scott, Southern US
 
12/16/2010 2:23:04 AM ET
Jason obviously you don't know the fact that there have been several deaths in the past year in the military from soldiers shooting soldiers.... The rule regarding dueling is still needed and used.
Alan, Ok
 
12/15/2010 8:51:31 PM ET
Reference Stalking. As I read this summary it implies that the one being stalked and their family can be prosecuted but the stalker is immune. Is this correct?
James C. Devine, El Paso TX
 
12/15/2010 5:21:09 PM ET
So if Don't Ask Don't Tell is repealed will Article 125 Sodomy be removed also?
Todd, Fort Rucker
 
12/15/2010 4:47:08 PM ET
My personal favorite, Article 114 - Dueling. Any person subject to this chapter who fights or promotes or is concerned in or connives at fighting a duel or who having knowledge of a challenge sent or about to be sent fails to report the fact promptly to the proper authority shall be punished as a court-martial may direct. Cohabitation is just as ridiculous as dueling is in this day and age. Maybe it's time for a rewrite.
Jason, Kirtland AFB NM
 
Add a comment

 Inside AF.mil

ima cornerSearch

tabSubscribe AF.MIL
tabMore HeadlinesRSS feed 
AF officials encourage Airmen to submit retraining packages before MilPDS upgrade

More than 900 rally to support wingman's cause

KC-46 enters critical design review phase

Slideshow: Fifth-generation formation  1

Air Force Week in Photos

Chaplains provide support and comfort for families

IDS agencies team up to teach life skills to new Airmen

ANG director discusses way forward

Carter: Sequestration would have effect of 'hidden tax'

CMSAF: 'Be the best, know your Airmen, tell your story'  1

Carter urges stepped up progress on cyber defense

Partnerships develop Air Force youth  1

Air Force leaders offer perspectives at four-star forum

Dempsey: Insider attacks won't affect NATO's Afghan strategy  1

tabCommentaryRSS feed 
Sept. 17: A day for Constitutional conversation  2

Losing Your Future to Sexual Assault   24


Site Map      Contact Us     Questions     Security and Privacy notice     E-publishing