Official Site of the U.S. Air Force   Right Corner Banner
Join the Air Force

News > Commentary - Trust: The leadership difference
Trust: The leadership difference

Posted 12/8/2010 Email story   Print story

    


Commentary by Lt. Col. Jefferson O'Donnell
333rd Fighter Squadron


12/8/2010 - SEYMOUR JOHNSON AIR FORCE BASE, N.C. (AFNS) -- "Trust is the essence of leadership," retired Army Gen. Colin Powell once said.

When listing the characteristics of a leader, "vulnerable" is an unlikely term to arise, but anyone who places his or her trust in others is inherently "vulnerable." How a leader approaches vulnerability falls on a spectrum ranging from absolute paranoia to euphoric blind faith.

Most feelings of worry, especially paranoia, often generate an unhealthy desire to manage situations and people, irrational thoughts of being able to personally prevent every error and an absence of trust. On the other extreme, blind faith is equally unrealistic, considering the inevitability of human error.

Both limit followers' potential. Somewhere in the middle is the approach that effectively manifests in words and actions as "I trust you," and unleashes the most capable performers.

Imagine an organization where every Airman knows and complies with applicable technical orders, regulations and directives; where every Airman reports to work and completes tasks on time; where every Airman selflessly prioritizes personal interests to optimize mission performance; where every Airman is present because he or she has voluntarily chosen to be a member of the unit; and where every Airman recognizes he or she is a valued and important part of the team.

In the United States Air Force, creating that organization requires leadership trust. The Airmen are already here. As a leader, achieving the ability to say "I trust you," and truly mean it, is as easy as believing in the Air Force core values: integrity first, service before self and excellence in all we do.

People will make mistakes. Mistakes may be simple human error, or they may reflect deficiencies in training or resourcing. Mistakes are not violations of the core values and are not violations of trust.

From time to time, someone will commit a crime -- an act that is willful and malicious or grossly negligent. A crime is a violation of the core values and a violation of trust between the leader and those responsible, not the organization; and trust is sustained through the acceptance of responsibility and the application of corrective or administrative action. Unfortunately, both instances -- mistakes and crimes -- will challenge a leader's ability to trust.

Henry Stimson, the secretary of war during World War II, said, "The only way you can make a man trustworthy is by trusting him, and the surest way to make him untrustworthy is to distrust him and show your distrust."

To retain that trust approach is the difference of leadership.

Whether as a supervisor, commander, parent, deacon, teacher, team lead or team member, we all will experience opportunities to be a leader. An environment built upon the most effective leadership trust will, in and of itself, reward integrity, grow selfless servant-leaders and inspire excellence. You cannot achieve the mission alone. Give your trust to Airmen, and they will do incredible things!



tabComments
12/14/2010 4:09:28 PM ET
Communication is essential but my failings as a leader should not be the barrier for trusting in Airmen to serve. If I keep failing it's a great reason for them to stop trusting me
Author, SJAFB
 
12/13/2010 4:03:33 PM ET
MSgt F V Ret, MSgt MN You both made valid points. Trust is a two-way street and you cannot go one way without another. It all depends on the individual and how you perceive them. Bottom line to both your comments is COMMUNICATION. You can debate over trust distrust philosophies but a leader must communicate well what they want expect and demand UPFRONT. This is the foundation for trust to establish itself. I think many supervisors fail in this aspect causing ambiguity and differing interpretations. Communicate first then trust can be relinquished to subordinates to prove or disprove themselves.
Steve, Tampa
 
12/13/2010 9:31:38 AM ET
MSgt F V, I always found it more effective to trust unless given reason not to. So I trusted first then monitored performance. People perform better and more willingly if trusted from the beginning than if made to feel untrustworthy until they prove themselves.
RetMSgt, Minnesota
 
12/12/2010 2:20:41 PM ET
Great article. This is definitely useful to me as I'm a new NCO and I have yet to have my own troops to trust. I have leaders who are constantly over my shoulder looking at what I do and even at times interfering with what I do That's not good leadership in my opinion. It's not like I haven't been doing the job for quite sometime. On top of that, I'm an NCO. Trust me to get the job done. No one is trusted when you micromanage. Again really good article.
F-Dizzle, Bagram AF
 
12/9/2010 3:45:02 PM ET
Trust in many cases needs to be earned, not blindly given. Consider the biblical parable of the talents. You have been faithful over a little, now I will give you more. Trust also means that people should be expected to ask for help if they are in over their heads. That does not show weakness. It shows intelligence and judgement. Trust is then earned. In my 20 years I had the pleasure of supervising many fine people. Many earned my trust and then some. A few also earned my distrust through their actions. It is a two-way street.
MSgt F V - retired, Ireland
 
Add a comment

 Inside AF.mil

ima cornerSearch

tabSubscribe AF.MIL
tabMore HeadlinesRSS feed 
OWLS inspires women to ignite power within

Lancers, Falcons share South Dakota skies

U.S. participates in South African Exposition  1

'Multidimensional' approach to energy initiative

US, Nepal build relationships, improve lives   2

Commander addresses military training investigation report

World War II veterans share memories during conference   1

Retired, separated wounded warriors can still pursue CCAF degrees

Never forget: World War II Airman, POW shares story of resiliency.   7

Slideshow: Phantom in the water

Comptroller: Sequestration Would Devastate Defense Spending

AF officials encourage Airmen to submit retraining packages before MilPDS upgrade

More than 900 rally to support wingman's cause

KC-46 enters critical design review phase

tabCommentaryRSS feed 
Cultural battlegrounds: Why culture matters in Global War on Terror

Toeing the line on standards  6


Site Map      Contact Us     Questions     Security and Privacy notice     E-publishing