Official Site of the U.S. Air Force   Right Corner Banner
Join the Air Force

News > Edwards officials developing new parachute system
 
Photos
Previous ImageNext Image
New parachute system
Members of the 418th Flight Test Squadron perform functional testing on the ground for the experimental parachute system called the Guardian Angel Advance Parachute System. GAAPS is a threefold parachute system, which includes a freefall parachute system, a static-line parachute and a tandem parachute system. The parachute's canopy is made with a special type of fabric designed to allow the user to land at high altitudes. (U.S. Air Force photo/Rob Densmore)
Download HiRes
Edwards officials developing new parachute system

Posted 1/20/2011 Email story   Print story

    


by Senior Airman William A. O'Brien
95th Air Base Wing Public Affairs


1/20/2011 - EDWARDS AIR FORCE BASE, Calif. (AFNS) -- 
Officials here are creating a guardian angel system to help Air Force members who parachute to land safely and softly.

Officials are replacing the Air Force's nearly five-decades-old parachute system with a new one, called the Guardian Angel Advance Parachute System, which is designed for safer landings at higher altitudes.

Officials from the Air Force's official parachute test organization, which falls under the 418th Flight Test Squadron, are creating this new system.

GAAPS is a threefold system, which includes a freefall parachute system, a static-line parachute and a tandem parachute system. The parachute's canopy is made with a special type of fabric designed to allow the user to land at high altitudes.

"With the current systems, the descent rate is too fast at high altitudes," said 2nd Lt. Jonathan Sepp, a 418th airdrop engineer. "That's because our current systems were designed in the 1960s for landing at sea level, and that worked (well) for them then, but now we're in Afghanistan, so we have to develop something for the modern warfighter who has to land in austere mountain conditions."

GAAPS is designed to fit a variety of missions for rescue professionals. To accommodate a variety of mission needs, each of the parachute systems fits different situations.

A single pararescueman jumping into adverse terrain with a load of gear would typically use the single free fall system. In other cases, a pararescueman with a load of gear may need to be inserted low and fast, and will not need to steer the parachute. In that case he would use the static-line system. If a pararescueman needed to bring a medic with him, he could put the medic on a second harness connected to him, jumping with the tandem system.

With the team going into its third year of testing, safety is paramount and ensuring that a parachute system is safe requires a lot of scrupulous testing, Lieutenant Sepp said.

"We started testing in 2009. There have been a few road blocks that we ran into because experimental parachutes have a lot of things that have to be worked out before you give it the 100-percent thumbs up," Lieutenant Sepp said.

"We make sure the testing is really thorough and that we've worked out every kink before we even think about approving a system," he said.

The tests begin with functional testing on the ground to ensure that when the user tries to operate it, it will work the way it was intended.

"We started with different ground tests, like seeing how hard it is to pull certain handles and tensile tests on the ground to make sure certain things aren't going to break in the air when you strap a lot of weight to it," the lieutenant said.

"Currently, we're performing dummy tests where we strap the parachute to a dummy that simulates a human being, and push it out of an airplane to see how the system actually works in air," he said. "Then you have a lot of review boards, and that leads to live-jump testing where you actually put it on the test parachutists. After the test parachutists jump with it they review it and tell us how things worked."

While GAAPS is being created primarily for use by Air Force pararescuemen, Lieutenant Sepp said he believes that once this system is implemented it will be the primary system used by every military branch.

"The parachutes are designed for pararescuemen who are going to be landing in austere mountain conditions to rescue personnel," Lieutenant Sepp said. "But GAAPS is also going to take over for a lot of the current parachute systems and potentially be applied across the Air Force and the rest of the military once it's approved.

"The systems the Air Force has now are getting older, out of date and worn out so we need to replace them with new parachute systems and GAAPS is going to do that for us," he said. "It's going to allow people to land in a safer manner, carry more gear and accomplish the mission more effectively than they could've with the parachute systems we currently have."

The GAAPS testing is scheduled to wrap up around the end of February 2011.



tabComments
1/26/2011 7:34:37 PM ET
There isn't a parachute system in the world that would allow a PJ to jump in everything he would need to SURVIVE AN EXERCISE let alone an actual PR mission.
Mac, Moody AFB Ga
 
1/22/2011 2:59:02 PM ET
As a former NSW Operator my guess is that the tandem system is intended to be a force multiplier. There may be missions such as domestic rescue operations where PJs are on limited supply, but a non-operator could be latched on to the PJ to augment him on the ground. A medic might not be the best example, but let's not split hairs with the LT. The tandem system would allow the insertion of any personnel into a critical situation regardless of whether or not they were jump qualified. That aspect makes it a valuable tool.
Chris, Louisiana
 
1/22/2011 12:20:44 PM ET
Hopefully they replace the harness as well. After all it is just as old and just as out of date. Perhaps they will replace the rip cord with a throw away. It's much safer and easier to pack. But this is the military. Good ideas don't go to far. Kind of like the ABU. Or kind of like a PJ jumping in a medic That didn't make much sense. Maybe a CCT will jump in a TACP someday. Who knows...
Mo-Mo , USA
 
1/21/2011 10:51:53 PM ET
Is there a missing d in the name of the new system? Guardian Angel AdvanceD Parachute System?
Gregg Taylor, Clearwater FL
 
1/21/2011 5:13:30 PM ET
Why would a pararescueman need to tandem jump with a medic when he's a trained EMT and combat medic himself? No disrespect meant, legitimate question.
SmoothCyberOperator, Colorado
 
1/21/2011 4:37:22 PM ET
The parachute is not designed to land at high altitudes.It is designed to land at high elevations.Dan Poynter author.The Parachute Manual.
Dan Poynter, Santa Barbara
 
1/21/2011 3:46:32 PM ET
If a pararescueman needed to bring a medic with him... REALLY I hope that's a typo cause I think a PJ would know what he's doing without having to bring a medic.
MSgt, JBER AK
 
1/21/2011 2:39:26 PM ET
Rather short on detail. Are they discussing a system of new generation Ram Airs that will also replace the S 17-18?
Mike Marthaller, USA
 
Add a comment

 Inside AF.mil

ima cornerSearch

tabSubscribe AF.MIL
tabMore HeadlinesRSS feed 
Airmen rally to help save lives

Lost Johnny Carson film found at March

Brig. Gen. Witham nominated as ANG deputy director

AFPC Airman: Don't forget, they're not all home

Muncy Honored With Second Highest Private Citizen Award

AF nominates AFMC, AFSPC civilians for DOD award

Air Force medical treatment facilities not involved in multi-state meningitis outbreak

Hundreds on October supplemental promotion list

Construction of second runway continues at Osan, South Korea  |  VIDEO

Air Force Week in Photos

'Vortex surfing' could be revolutionary  1

Tail swap enables Afghan mission support and humanitarian effort

Fort Smith ANG Airmen Head Home   |  VIDEO

1952 C-124 crash descendant finds closure in Alaska  1

tabCommentaryRSS feed 
Standards? What standards?   3

First things first: Get your degrees in order  34


Site Map      Contact Us     Questions     Security and Privacy notice     E-publishing