Official Site of the U.S. Air Force   Right Corner Banner
Join the Air Force

News > High-altitude fitness test rules reinstated
High-altitude fitness test rules reinstated

Posted 1/21/2012 Email story   Print story

    


by Gino Mattorano
U.S. Air Force Academy Public Affairs


1/21/2012 - U.S. AIR FORCE ACADEMY, Colo. (AFNS) -- Airmen undergoing their fitness tests at high-altitude bases can breathe easier during fitness testing thanks to the efforts of Air Force Academy leaders and the Human Performance Laboratory.

Changes to the Air Force Fitness testing program in 2010 didn't include an altitude adjustment, as the previous testing system did, but that change didn't sit well with the Academy's leaders, so they set their sights on reinstating the altitude adjustment, according to Academy officials.

"Many people who come from lower elevations are seeing up to a minute increase in their run times," said Chief Master Sgt. Todd Salzman, the Academy command chief. "I noticed a marked difference in my own run times when I first arrived here, so I knew that we owed it to our folks to do what we could to bring back the altitude allowance."

The Academy's Human Performance Laboratory initiated a study to see if there was any difference in cardiorespiratory performance between 7,200 feet, the altitude here, and sea level. The laboratory enlisted 55 non-smoking, male and female subjects who had lived in Colorado Springs for at least six weeks for their test. Testers each ran 1.5 miles in the lab's Colorado Altitude Tent, which can simulate both sea level and high-altitude oxygen content.

"Due to atmospheric pressure, there is a significant difference in oxygen content at sea level (26.5 percent) than there is at 7,200 feet (20.9 percent)," said A.L. Wile, the director of the Human Performance Laboratory. "The CAT gives us the capability to simulate 26.5-percent oxygen content at sea level and test our subjects in both environments."

Distance was the only known factor for the subjects as the two atmospheric pressure conditions were randomized, Wile said. The overall average difference in run times for all subjects was 30 seconds.

Armed with that information, Academy leaders addressed the issue with Defense Department officials, who agreed to reinstate an altitude adjustment for physical fitness tests. The change benefits Academy personnel as well as Airmen at Schriever Air Force Base, Colo., Peterson AFB, Colo., F.E. Warren AFB, Wyo., Kirtland AFB, N.M., and Buckley AFB, Colo.

"It was important for Air Force leadership to understand that there truly is a difference running at this altitude, and the work the Human Performance Laboratory did to prove that was conclusive," Salzman said. "If we expect our Airmen to perform at high levels, we need to ensure they're equipped with the tools to succeed. We make sure that our Airmen have the appropriate gear to do their mission in cold weather, so it just makes sense that we help them to be successful in a high-altitude environment."

Skeptics might argue that once someone becomes acclimatized to the higher altitude, there is no need for an altitude adjustment, but studies show that isn't the case.

"Training at altitude and getting acclimatized over four to six months can help," Wile said. "However, studies have shown that aerobic endurance is still impaired with total acclimatization, thus warranting the recent adjustment."

The altitude correction is a straight-time bonus starting at 18 seconds and increasing minimally depending on the window in which a person finishes, said Craig Seay, from the Health and Wellness Center's fitness testing office. It is also installation-specific. For example, an Airman who completes his 1.5-mile run at the Academy in 12 minutes would receive a 25-second altitude correction to his run time.

The altitude adjustment is not retroactive and will only be applied to those testing after Jan. 1. For more information, contact your unit fitness program representative or the HAWC.



tabComments
2/3/2012 2:47:45 PM ET
I don't understand why anyone would get a variable from 18-25 it don't make sense. Why don't they just give a flat 25 seconds off for high altitude period
GR, F.E. Warren
 
1/24/2012 6:35:14 PM ET
The PT website still says in FAQthat AF researsch indicates that a score adjustment for people taking the AFPFT at higher altitudes is not needed Guess they may not have done the right research What about this program can we believe
RC, Texas
 
1/24/2012 5:00:21 PM ET
Greg I don't think that the increased emphasis on PT is idiotic at all. I certainly think that the fickle nature with which the PT system has evolved over the last 10 years is a bit silly and representative of poor leadership. However you can't tell me that the 1-mile death run or the bike test made a lick of sense. All branches of the military should put emphasis on PT and healthy living. Taxpayers pay us to fight wars. That can't be effectively accomplished with everyone being on the honor system to maintain necessary fitness levels. There must be in place some mechanism to set a standard measure against the standard and facilitate improvement.
Chris Kimball, Indiana
 
1/24/2012 9:32:51 AM ET
CL....I agree, as during inclement weather here at Scott we have to run 27 laps on the smallest possible track one could build. My time increased by a minute since you are turning or preparing to turn with almost every stride.
PT Guy, Scott IL
 
1/24/2012 9:14:37 AM ET
Ah yes, the continuing saga of Big Blue flailing around in the dark like a drunk looking for a lamp switch when it comes to its new idiotic obsession with PT. At least this time it's a change for the better...for once.
Greg Arious, SWA
 
1/22/2012 9:48:42 PM ET
Great to see common sense rule for once....
Dane, Colorado
 
1/22/2012 5:54:04 AM ET
They should do a study on running in a circle for 20-something laps inside a cramped gym vs outside on a track. A lot of people complain about increased times when forced to run in the gym.
CL, Ramstein
 
Add a comment

 Inside AF.mil

ima cornerSearch

tabSubscribe AF.MIL
tabMore HeadlinesRSS feed 
Solve problems like an Air Force pilot

Active-duty Airmen can pass education benefits to dependents  1

Air Force launches new GPS satellite

Sister-service PME provides valuable joint tool  1

Davis-Monthan, Spangdahlem earn top lodging honors

Through Airmen's Eyes: Building partnerships by building a school

Discovery Channel series highlights C-17

Elmendorf P38 Lightning  5

Welsh honors two Airmen from AFMAO  1

Airmen showcase C-17 to New Zealanders  1

Retroactive Stop Loss application deadline nears

'REEP'ing the rewards of energy conservation

13th Air Force inactivates, merges with PACAF  |  VIDEO

Electronic payments required for TRICARE Reserve Select and Retired Reserve monthly premiums  2

tabCommentaryRSS feed 
Standards? What standards?

First things first: Get your degrees in order  6


Site Map      Contact Us     Questions     Security and Privacy notice     E-publishing