Official Site of the U.S. Air Force   Right Corner Banner
Join the Air Force

News > Air Force completes Kabul shooting investigation
 
Photos 
Investigation results released
(U.S. Air Force graphics/Robin Meredith)
Download HiRes
 
Related Links
 Group members dedicate camp to fallen hero
 Silver Star posthumously awarded to Airman
Air Force completes Kabul shooting investigation

Posted 1/17/2012 Email story   Print story

    

1/17/2012 - WASHINGTON (AFNS) -- The Air Force completed its investigation into the April 27, 2011 shooting incident at the Afghanistan air force Headquarters located in Kabul, Afghanistan, in which eight U.S. Air Force Airmen and one civilian contractor were killed in the line of duty while serving in a combat zone.

The incident occurred when an Afghanistan air force officer, Col. Ahmed Gul, entered the Afghan Command and Control Center in the Afghanistan air force headquarters, North Kabul International Airport, and shot and killed the eight Airmen and one civilian contractor. In addition to the U.S. personnel killed, two Afghans were shot and three other Afghans were injured in the attack. The attacker died of wounds received during the incident.

The investigation report concludes Gul acted alone and discusses factors that may have played a role in the incident. While the investigation did not determine a conclusive motive for the killing, the attack appeared to be pre-meditated and there were multiple witness statements in the Air Force Office of Special Investigations report that indicated Gul may have had personal issues that were possibly compounded by alleged financial problems.

The OSI findings do not support initial media coverage of the event that reported an argument may have occurred earlier that day between the shooter and the American service members, nor reports that the gunman disarmed and methodically killed the Airmen.

"These Airmen paid the ultimate sacrifice while serving our nation in a combat zone," Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Norton Schwartz said. "Each of these Airmen bravely and purposely performed their duties, and their selfless sacrifices leave behind an honorable legacy that we continue to see in the commitment of Airmen who serve as air advisers today."

The Air Force, sister services and coalition partners continue training Afghan soldiers and airmen in an effort to build a stable Afghanistan government.

"These Airmen were committed to noble service, helping the Afghanistan government in its quest to establish a stable environment," said Maj. Gen. Charles Lyon, the commander of 9th Air and Space Expeditionary Task Force-Afghanistan at the time of the incident. "We keep their families in our thoughts and prayers as we remember their sacrifices and honor their courageous legacy. These Airmen and their families will always be part of the Air Force family."

Killed in the April 27, 2011, incident were:
- Maj. Philip D. Ambard, 44, of Edmonds, Wash. He was assigned to the 460th Space Communications Squadron, Buckley Air Force Base, Colo.
- Maj. Jeffrey O. Ausborn, 41, of Gadsden, Ala. He was assigned to the 99th Flying Training Squadron, Randolph AFB, Texas.
- Maj. David L. Brodeur, 34, of Auburn, Mass. He was assigned to the 11th Air Force, Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaska.
- Master Sgt. Tara R. Brown, 33, of Deltona, Fla. She was assigned to the Air Force Office of Special Investigations, JB Andrews, Md.
- Lt. Col. Frank D. Bryant Jr., 37, of Knoxville, Tenn. He was assigned to the 56th Operations Group, Luke AFB, Ariz.
- Maj. Raymond G. Estelle II, 40, of New Haven, Conn. He was assigned to Headquarters Air Combat Command, JB Langley-Eustis, Va.
- Capt. Nathan J. Nylander, 35, of Hockley, Texas. He was assigned to the 25th Operational Weather Squadron, Davis-Monthan AFB, Ariz.
- Maj. Charles A. Ransom, 31, of Midlothian, Va. He was assigned to the 83rd Network Operations Squadron, JB Langley-Eustis, Va.
- Ret. U.S. Army Lt. Col. James McLaughlin Jr., 55, of Santa Rosa, Calif. He was working as a civilian contractor for Military Personnel Resources, Inc. a division of L3.

Since the shooting incident, several security initiatives have been implemented to improve the force protection posture for the coalition advisers.

Extra personnel have been assigned to the force protection mission and air advisors have received additional "active shooter" training. In addition to armed overwatch and improvements to intelligence surveillance and reconnaissance capabilities, several emergency response vehicles have been purchased, and command and control upgrades have been initiated, according to officials from the International Security Assistance Force headquarters in Kabul. Armed overwatch provides security forces an opportunity to engage an active shooter with reduced risk, increasing the likelihood the shooter can be neutralized safely before attacking additional victims.

Click here for a copy of the redacted AFOSI Report of Investigation. 

(Courtesy of Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs)



tabComments
1/24/2012 12:43:11 PM ET
This is a tragedy that didn't have to happen. Leadership should be held accountable. I bet if general officers were in that room they would have had loaded weapons or escorts with loaded weapons to protect them. The current policy still won't protect our troops. My prayers go out to the survivors. Our leadership get into those rarified positions so that they no longer relate to the troops on the ground. Shame on them.
Troop, MacDill AFB
 
1/23/2012 4:30:32 PM ET
HEROES
Todd, HAFB
 
1/21/2012 3:45:21 AM ET
We were not allowed to have a clip in. No leadership was held accountable for their lack of judgement. This day was the worst day and this report of only one shooter is false. Please keep the thoughts of our fallen and their families in your prayers.
C, United States
 
1/20/2012 4:06:58 PM ET
Unarmed was incorrect as explained by other posters the weapons were most likely cleared and if they had a live magazine did not have a round int he chamber. There is no other explanation for 8 armed Airmen to die from one attacker in a small room. I pray we pull our troops as soon as possible and let Afghanistan implode.
Scott, Waco
 
1/19/2012 2:28:56 PM ET
RIP Tara. We miss you every day.
EJ, CONUS
 
1/19/2012 10:44:26 AM ET
If these service members were serving in a combat zone, why weren't they carrying sidearms? If they had sidearms, could they have responded to the shooter faster? It would have saved lives.
Chris Pugh, Robins AFB
 
1/19/2012 10:26:48 AM ET
Each base in Afghanistan had different weapon status based on the threat. Some bases are you carry a weapon, but without a clip in. Other locations you have a clip in, but not one chambered. And still others call for a round chambered. KAIA at the time was the lowest of these. It does seem silly to give a person a weapon but not at least have a magazine in the weapon. This was a sad day at KAIA and one I will never forget. God bless our heroes.
Jason, Offutt AFB
 
1/19/2012 9:49:51 AM ET
We had weapons, but were not allowed to keep clips in them or bullets in the chambers like trained to do by the Air Force. The Afghans were AND STILL ARE allowed to carry loaded concealed weapons.
Jay, MacDill AFB
 
1/19/2012 9:43:41 AM ET
Make sure you read the report. This press release is not indicitive of the findings of the report. It is a shame that leadership is not being held accountable for the lack of security that led up to this attack. Remember Khobar leadership here was more accountable, but all O-5s and above got Bronse Stars.
Jay, MacDill AFB
 
1/19/2012 12:43:02 AM ET
@Mo, where I am we still carry them unloaded. nothing has changed.
MM, SWA
 
1/18/2012 10:56:26 PM ET
Hindsight is always 20/20. What have or could have the importance of weapons utilization ultimately resides on the person carrying. For years I've carried a rifle for many years and I understand it's up to me to load a magazine, chamber a round and engage a target. Navy seals, CBTs and all sorts of stuff has nothing to do with any of this. At the end of the day your at WAR. A real one at that. Just like in Vietnam, one day they are your friend. You upset them, the next day they are your enemy. That's why they call it winning hearts and minds. People shoud always be aware of they're surroundings. It's a tragedy, and with most cases could have been avoided if there was more situational awareness by all parties. Afghanistan is not Iraq. Not even close.
Chris, Japan
 
1/18/2012 3:46:04 PM ET
I read the report. There was a whole lot of descriptions of victims and responders loading their unloaded weapons in response to hearing gunfire.I suppose if you think carrying an unloaded gun is armed, then police should probably carry their pistols without one in the chamber. Right. Logical.
GA, UT
 
1/18/2012 3:16:12 PM ET
Conducting active shooter CBT training and adding a few more personnel for force protection isn't going to change a thing. Most personnel AF personnel on established bases in Afghanistan do not carry a loaded weapon. Maybe now they due now after this incident but it doesn't change anything. You can do all the CBT's active shooter or watch Navy SEAL's 100 times. In the end if you don't train to effectively fire your weapon it won't matter. The AF fails to train their personnel to a standard that is in line with the environment in which they work in. May the fallen RIP and thank you for your service and sacrifice.
Mo, MidSouth
 
1/18/2012 12:41:06 PM ET
OMG your kidding, they were forced to unload their firarms in a combat area. That is rally a bad judgement policy call. If only one was able to not follow the rules they all might have survived. I hope this is a sore lesson learned so it may never happen again. May they all rest in Peace and Blessings to their Families so they can carry on beyond the pain.
SNCO Ret 89, Ohio
 
1/18/2012 11:33:09 AM ET
Scott Airmen trusted with security clearances, aircraft operations, 2,000lb bombs and so on can't necessarily be trusted with a loaded sidearm. The report seems to indicate some airmen but not all were armed. None were apparently carrying loaded weapons. A weapon you can't bring quickly enough to the fight is no weapon at all.
GA, UT
 
1/17/2012 11:27:13 PM ET
The report doesn't indicate the Airmen were unarmed. It states at least two individuals - one identified Airman - fired at the assailant.
Todd, Wash DC
 
1/17/2012 7:50:25 PM ET
Scott you obviously didn't click on the link and read the report did you With the acception of Mr. McLaughlin and Maj Estelle all the Airmen had weapons and they were all loaded. Please do your research before commenting.
Chris, Kabul Afghanistan
 
1/17/2012 1:29:17 PM ET
This is a real shame, my heart goes out to the families.Gods speed.
Michael Routson, LimaOhio
 
1/17/2012 11:17:25 AM ET
The unarmed per CSTCA Airmen and contractor were sitting ducks for the Afghan shooter in an Afghan facility. Do you think this Afghan would have killed all of them if just one had a loaded weapon on their body? When you make armed soldiers unload a weapon for political correctness, death results. I hope the new security initiatives save lives. God Bless Jim and the Airmen that died.
Scott, Waco TX
 
Add a comment

 Inside AF.mil

ima cornerSearch

tabSubscribe AF.MIL
tabMore HeadlinesRSS feed 
AF officials encourage Airmen to submit retraining packages before MilPDS upgrade

More than 900 rally to support wingman's cause

KC-46 enters critical design review phase

Slideshow: Fifth-generation formation  1

Air Force Week in Photos

Chaplains provide support and comfort for families

IDS agencies team up to teach life skills to new Airmen

ANG director discusses way forward

Carter: Sequestration would have effect of 'hidden tax'

CMSAF: 'Be the best, know your Airmen, tell your story'  1

Carter urges stepped up progress on cyber defense

Partnerships develop Air Force youth  1

Air Force leaders offer perspectives at four-star forum

Dempsey: Insider attacks won't affect NATO's Afghan strategy  1

tabCommentaryRSS feed 
Sept. 17: A day for Constitutional conversation  2

Losing Your Future to Sexual Assault   24


Site Map      Contact Us     Questions     Security and Privacy notice     E-publishing