Official Site of the U.S. Air Force   Right Corner Banner
Join the Air Force

News > Air Force to lift hiring freeze Dec. 15
 
Photos 
Winter Thaw
(U.S. Air Force Graphic/Corey Parrish)
Download HiRes
Air Force to lift hiring freeze Dec. 15

Posted 12/14/2011 Email story   Print story

    


by Debbie Gildea
Air Force Personnel, Services and Manpower Public Affairs


12/14/2011 - RANDOLPH AIR FORCE BASE, Texas (AFNS) -- The hiring freeze implemented in August will be fully lifted Dec. 15, Air Force Personnel Center officials announced.

The freeze, preceded by hiring controls, was one of several measures implemented in 2011 to bring manning down to mandated 2010 levels. In addition, voluntary separation incentives were recently offered, with employees expected to separate by Dec. 31.

"We have made significant progress in reducing manning levels through various programs," said Michelle LoweSolis, the AFPC civilian force integration director. "But in some areas we are still short of the goal, so the freeze was extended in those targeted areas to help us work toward that end.

"Even with the hiring freeze being lifted Dec. 15, budget and funding issues are still fluid, so major command and wing leaders must be alert to changing conditions as they'll have the responsibility to control hiring to stay below targeted levels," LoweSolis explained.

Since the spring, nearly 9,000 positions have been trimmed from Air Force manning levels, but an additional 4,500 are necessary to reach required levels. Many of the positions identified for elimination are already vacant, and the hiring freeze resulted in more vacant positions, which will help the Air Force reach its goals, the director said.

"Nevertheless, our nation faces significant challenges and we all must remain firmly focused on force management," LoweSolis said. "Toward that end, a second round of voluntary separation measures is anticipated in January (2012)."

Voluntary separation incentives are "effective tools to help reduce our footprint without resorting to involuntary measures," LoweSolis said.

Once current voluntary early retirement authority and voluntary separation incentive pay actions are complete, Air Force leaders will be able to fully assess the manning situation and determine if additional measures will be implemented, she said.

Who will be able to apply for VERA and/or VSIP during the next round has not yet been determined.

"We at AFPC are committed to assisting the personnel strategic advisors in the field, and our benefits and entitlements team has been working round-the-clock to ensure Air Force employees get the best care possible," LoweSolis explained.

"There are many moving parts involved in this effort, and we are all working to ensure employees whose positions have been targeted for elimination are quickly placed in positions vacated by those who accepted VERA and/or VSIP, while keeping in mind the fact that we have a variety of mandatory placements to handle as well," she said.

Mandatory placements include people returning from overseas and outplacing centrally funded interns and employees in professional military education, LoweSolis said.

"In this difficult and challenging time, we are committed to making placement decisions that will benefit both our invaluable civilian employees and our critical Air Force mission," she said. "Nothing less will do."



tabComments
12/17/2011 1:26:51 AM ET
@Willie. You're confusing faces and spaces. Yes, they did cut positions, a lot of them were vacant to begin with to get below a certain number. That number included other vacant positions that they decided not to cut and now are trying to fill them with qualified people. So while the number of faces will go up, it will not exceed the number of spaces already on the books and counted towards the number used for the ceiling.
MM, SWA
 
12/16/2011 6:15:06 PM ET
SSgt USAF. Have you looked at a GS or WG pay scale? Does a SSgt-equivalent really make double what you get with pay, bah, bas and associated tax advantages? I don't think so.
Maj, staff
 
12/16/2011 5:48:45 PM ET
Civil servants may not cost more on an annual basis than a contractor, but when one takes into account the pension and lifetime benefits of a civil servant, then contractors are a bargain. Its easy to look at a fiscal snapshot, but it makes far more sense to look at the civil service vs. contractor costs from a long term perspective. The uniformed members will also be looked at closely in the future. Existing GI's will be grandfathered, but make no mistake, an overhaul of the military and DOD civil service retirement systems will happen in the future.
JRM, Somewhere VA
 
12/16/2011 1:55:29 PM ET
To SSgt USAF: As a civilian and retired SNCO, I still make less than I did while on active duty.
Arctic Warrior, Colorado Springs
 
12/16/2011 1:18:39 PM ET
So we kick out active duty and hire civilians? Don't civilians make double what and active member does? This makes no sense. Iraq is closed, so where is the trillions of dollars that was being spent go now? Hurry up, Iran, so we can recruit everyone back to the service. geez
SSgt , USAF
 
12/16/2011 9:03:28 AM ET
Fire Fire Fire...Now Hire Hire Hire.We voluntarily seperate people to get below a certain line, which it didn't work now we're hiring more with more seperations coming January...That's confusing.
Willie, New Mexico
 
12/16/2011 7:38:32 AM ET
Pay freeze lifted furlough begin...
JJ, TX
 
12/15/2011 5:03:45 AM ET
Even though they are cutting positions, vacancies in other positions cannot always be filled by personnel in eliminated positions due to qualifications. Some of these positions have been vacant since before the hiring freeze started. @Andouille, that's an easy answer: they can say they cut xx number of civil service positions. Contractor numbers don't really count towards the bottom line number of employees. I'm sure they'll be looking at all the contracts in the near future, though, so while they may be there now, they may not be there in the future.
MM, FL
 
12/14/2011 10:50:57 AM ET
don't look for it to make sense. on the active duty side, folks are being involuntarily separated at the same time others are being denied voluntary separation...in the same career field even.
Tony, Washington DC
 
12/14/2011 8:24:37 AM ET
Could someone explain then why positions such as mine were cut, a GS6 with 26 years in, and why contractor positions doing the same function were allowed to stay? The contractor position costs more, does not have seniority, and yet the contract and person remains in place.
Andouille, Langley AFB
 
12/13/2011 7:01:50 PM ET
Why would the hiring freeze be lifted before personnel in eliminated positions have the opportunity to fill these vacant positions? You indicate 4,500 additional positions need to be eliminated in FY12. I don't understand why you would begin hiring new personnel before this goal is met.
John, Randolph
 
Add a comment

 Inside AF.mil

ima cornerSearch

tabSubscribe AF.MIL
tabMore HeadlinesRSS feed 
Air Force officials outline cyber capabilities in today's fight

AF is transforming how it provides services

Secretary of Defense visits Yokota

Air Force recognizes 2012 Outstanding Airmen of the Year  |  VIDEO

CSAF talks Air Force innovation, evolution at AFA Conference  2  |  VIDEO

AF Reserve commander praises total force

AFLINK mobile app keeps people connected to everything Air Force  1

First week of RARO 12 wraps up

Air Force athletes discuss world class program during roundtable

Multinational communication exercise evolves through years  1

Welsh: 'The only way to move forward is together'  1

ISR chief stresses importance of turning data into information

New DOD Safe Helpline Mobile App now available

Annual space, missile pioneers inducted

tabCommentaryRSS feed 
Sept. 17: A day for Constitutional conversation  1

Losing Your Future to Sexual Assault   24


Site Map      Contact Us     Questions     Security and Privacy notice     E-publishing