Blog Posts tagged with "Camp Bastion"

Operation Moshtarak

And so began the Afghan-NATO offensive into Helmad province, known as Operation Moshtarak – which translates roughly as “Together.” We are focusing on the area around a town called Marjah, where there has historically been a great deal of insurgent activity and heroin production.

Soldiers from six nations gather to hear the three senior officers involved in commanding Operation Moshtarak, Brigadier James Cowan; Commander 11 Light Brigade (UK); Brigadier General Moyaiyodin Ghori, Commanding Officer 3rd Brigade Afghan National Army; and Colonel Shirin Shah Afghan National Civil Order Police. Images by: SSgt Mark Jones (British Army)

There are about 10,000 troops directly involved, including about 5,000 Afghan Army and Police, and about 5,000 NATO forces – U.S., British, Danish, and Estonians – under tactical command of 2-star British General, Nick Carter and Afghan 1-star Shir Mohammad.

We are working very hard (and thus far have been successful) in minimizing civilian casualties. This has been at the heart of our strategy since last summer, and is different than any of the large operations that were conducted over the previous years in Afghanistan.

To accomplish this, we have been in extensive consultation with the people of the area – notably through Shuras and other local processes – and have truly listened to them. We seek to prevent any civilian casualties and in return have received a great deal of support.

At Camp Bastion the six nations involved in Operation Moshtarak are conducting battle preparations.

Tragically, while troops were in contact with insurgents Sunday, two rockets from a High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS) launched at insurgents firing upon Afghan and ISAF forces impacted approximately 300 meters off their intended target, killing 12 civilians in Nad Ali district, Helmand province. We deeply regret this tragic loss of life and will ensure we do all we can to avoid future incidents. The use of the HIMARS has been suspended until a thorough review of this incident has been conducted.

It is important also to know that this is the first Afghan-led operation of this scale. It was fully briefed to President Karzai by his military and police leadership and approved by him. They have real ownership and are partnering with us in approximately a 1:1 ratio of forces.

It is crucial to know that the military phase of this is NOT the decisive part – it is the introduction of governance and the follow-on economic activity that will be key. Again, that will be Afghan led but supported by the rest of the coalition. In that sense, the military part is not the “main event,” but rather the enabling function.

As Stan told me, and I agree fully, “this is only a step on a long road - and there will be twists, turns, and plenty of improvised explosive devices along the way.” I couldn’t agree more. The key will be to be steady in the four things upon which we’ve focused for months now:

- Protecting and partnering with the Afghan people

- Effectively communicating, both in Afghanistan and our nations

- Balancing civilian and military efforts

- Training and empowering the Afghan security forces

It is clearly “early days” in this operation, but as a model for how we seek to conduct operations, it is off to a good start.

Adm. James Stavridis
Commander, U.S. European Command and
Supreme Allied Commander Europe

Find more blog posts tagged with:

Comments: 4

by Amir Guy on February 19, 2010 :

@C.P. Smith -- agreed. I find myself constantly battling family, friends & colleagues whose opinions are shaped and molded by what the 3-letter news agencies peddle. I'll be certain to post good primary source info like this on my FB page as well. The thought of Afghan military leadership giving orders to NATO forces does elicit a bit of a shiver. I'm certain that our leadership has put several checks & balances in place, and I trust the integrity of NATO officers and soldiers, to ensure that the kinds of corruption evidenced within the Afghan government in the past will not be perpetrated by coalition troops. Still, I wonder what effect a different worldview, intent & leadership concept from Afghan leadership will have upon Western troops.

by ADM Jim Stavridis on February 19, 2010 :

Thanks to all for their comments! Planning is fully integrated and in this case much of it was led by our Afghan partners, with President Karzai the final approval authority for the operation. In terms of the tactical command and control in the field, the NATO and Afghan forces operate under separate but well coordinated chains of command.

by C. P. Smith on February 16, 2010 :

Excellent. This is a perfect example of social media at its is most effective. ADM Stavridis has provided news-worthy information that in several respects is better than what is available through "traditional" news sources - all while providing EUCOM's take on events. I did not see the information about HIMARS - in particular, that the use of HIMARS has been suspended as a result of the tragic incident - or mention that the ratio of Afghan forces to NATO forces is 1:1 anywhere in the news or that this is an Afghan-led operation. This is going up on my FB wall. That said, based on "traditional" news sources I wonder about the extent and effectiveness of the Afghan military and police leading such a complex operation involving multiple nations. I find it difficult to imagine Afghans issuing orders to NATO forces. Did anyone else raise an eyebrow reading that paragraph?

by Wayne Shanks on February 18, 2010 :

ISAF forces are partnering with the Afghans - working, planning and fighting together. As with most coalition operations, each nation retains it's national chain of command but coordinates their activities to ensure unity of effort. Afghan forces led the planning effort with assistance from ISAF.

Your comment: