OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING RECLAMATION AND ENFORCEMENT
Library of COALEX Research Reports
COALEX Research Reports are the products of research and analysis conducted on specific issues relating to the regulation of Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977. The research is conducted in response to requests for information from State Regulatory Authorities, under a cooperative agreement between the Office of Surface Mining (OSM) and the Interstate Mining Compact Commission (IMCC).
COALEX refers to the Library of Surface Mining Materials maintained by OSM in LEXIS-NEXIS and is a major source for the research.
Each Report includes a list of resources which were sent as attachments to the individual who requested the research. To obtain a copy of the attachments or to obtain any additional information, contact Joyce Zweben Scall by phone at 202-686-9138 or by email at JZScall@aol.com.
COALEX STATE COMPARISON REPORT - 278
March 1994
James Hamm
Oklahoma Department of Mines
4040 North Lincoln Blvd.
Suite 107
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73105
TOPIC: AVAILABILITY OF PERMIT, INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT RECORDS
INQUIRY: According to 30 CFR 840.14 and 842.16, copies of permit applications, inspection and enforcement records, etc. "shall be made immediately available to the public in the area of mining...." Compliance with the availability requirement can be accomplished by making copies "available for public inspection at a Federal, State, or local government office in the county where the mining is occurring..." or by having the regulatory authority mail copies of information promptly (provided a description of the information available and mailing procedures are posted in the county where the mining is occurring). Please locate any material that indicates what information is to be included as part of "a description of the information available". How do the other states implement this requirement?
SEARCH RESULTS: Research was conducted using the COALEX Library and other materials available in LEXIS. Retrieved were the regulatory history of the relevant federal rules and Federal Register preambles where OSM discussed amendments to state regulatory programs. Research was supplemented by a telephone survey to selected states across the country. Findings indicate that copies of permit application packages, renewals, significant revisions, etc. that require public comment are kept at the county/local level while copies of inspection and enforcement records are kept at regional or district offices; states will provide copies of requested information by mail; no state surveyed provides the public with a specific list of the types of documents available for review or that may be requested by mail [Illinois provided a Memorandum that lists the documents forwarded to counties for public review, see the attached packet of Illinois material].
The list of what is included as part of this Report is as follows:
REGULATORY HISTORY OF FEDERAL RULES:
COPIES OF MATERIALS INCLUDED WITH REPORT (some complete, some excerpted):
SURVEYED STATES WITH REGULATIONS ALLOWING MAILING OF RECORDS AS WELL AS THOSE WHOSE REGULATIONS DO NOT STATE THAT THEY MAIL RECORDS REGARDING:
REGULATORY HISTORY OF FEDERAL RULES
STATE PROGRAM REGULATIONS: FEDERAL REGISTER PREAMBLES
These are enclosed for background:
STATE CASE LAW
One state case, from West Virginia, was identified that addresses publication requirements for surface mining permit applicants:
ZIRKLE v FAERBER, CMMR, WV DOE AND ENOXY COAL, INC., 350 SE 2d 3 (W Va 1986).
"SYNOPSIS: Where an applicant for a surface-mining permit publishes the advertisement required by W.Va. Code 22A-3-20 [1985] before his permit application is complete, the advertisement must be republished upon the submission of the complete application, and concerned parties must be permitted to comment as envisaged by W.Va. Code 22A-3-20(b) [1985]."
COMPARISON OF REGULATIONS I
State program regulations comparable to these federal rules were retrieved from COALEX and are included as part of this Report. The final column indicates whether state sections corresponding to 840.14 and 842.16 provide the state with the option to mail information.
STATE |
DOES THE STATE HAVE REGULATIONS COMPARABLE TO 700.14 (Y/N) |
733.13/786.15 (Y/N) |
840.14 (Y/N) |
842.16 (Y/N) |
DOES THE STATE PROVIDE THE OPTION TO MAIL INFORMATION (Y/N)? |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALABAMA |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
ARKANSAS |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
No |
COLORADO |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
ILLINOIS |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
INDIANA |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
KENTUCKY |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
LOUISIANA |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
No |
MARYLAND |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
MISSISSIPPI |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
MISSOURI |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
MONTANTA |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
NEW MEXICO |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
OHIO |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
OKLAHOMA |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
PENNSYLVANIA |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
TEXAS |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
UTAH |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
VIRGINIA |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
WEST VIRGINIA |
No |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
No |
WYOMING |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
No |
SURVEY OF STATES
The six states, aside from Oklahoma, that have regulations allowing compliance of record availability requirements by providing copies of inspection and enforcement information by mail were surveyed by telephone [see the Table, above]. The states were asked how they implement the requirements of their program version of 840.14 and 842.16. As a "control group", five states whose regulations do not indicate that they provide copies of material by mail were also surveyed. All eleven states were surveyed on their implementation of the rules requiring public availability of permit applications (733.13). Results of the survey follow.
GENERAL FINDINGS FOR ALL STATES SURVEYED:
SPECIFIC STATE RESPONSES FOLLOW:
STATES WITH MAILING REGULATIONS
ILLINOIS
Permit applications are filed with the county clerk's office in the county where the mining will occur. A second copy is filed with the county board. The main files, containing permit renewals and revisions, inspection reports and enforcement actions, are kept in Springfield and duplicates are in the southern district office. Copies of documents such as permit renewals, revisions, inspection reports and enforcement actions are sent to the county clerk's office; however, the state regulatory authority has no control over the county offices and does not monitor how the records are kept and the files maintained. [See the attached Illinois Memorandum for a list of the documents forwarded to counties.]
KENTUCKY
Preliminary permit applications are filed either at the seven regional offices or at the central office. The main files are kept in Frankfort and copies of all permit-related documents (applications, correspondence, inspection reports, etc.) are kept at the seven regional offices through bond release or forfeiture, at which time the files from the regional office are merged with the inspectors files and maintained at the central office.
At the beginning of SMCRA in Kentucky, the regulatory authority sent copies of permit materials to the counties. The counties complained that they had no room to store all of the required material; therefore, the practice was stopped.
MONTANA
Permit and major revision applications are filed at county courthouses or local libraries. Inspection and enforcement records and originals of all records are maintained at the state capitol with duplicates available at the Billings office.
TEXAS
Permit applications "in process" are filed at local courthouses. Copies of documents requiring public comment, such as significant permit revisions and bond release applications, are sent to the county courthouses. Complete copies of permit applications, correspondence, inspection reports and enforcement actions are maintained at the two regional offices which are located in the general mining areas of the state and in Austin.
UTAH
Copies of permit applications, renewals and revisions are kept on file at county office, as well as at the main office in Salt Lake City. Inspection and enforcement documents are kept at the main office. The field office may have copies of the documents comprising permit files but they are not "official files" and, therefore, do not purport to be complete. The public may, however, review whatever materials the field office has available.
VIRGINIA
Materials related to permit applications and any other documents that require public comment are kept at county offices until the permit, or revision, etc. is issued, as required. Complete records of inspection and enforcement materials are kept at Big Stone Gap. The records can be made available to the public for review and copying at the northern field office.
CONTROL GROUP
INDIANA
Copies of permit applications and related documents are kept on file at the field offices and at the local representative library. At a fixed time after the permit has been approved, the permit packages may be removed from the library. However, copies of subsequent permit correspondence, plan changes, inspection reports and enforcement actions will continue to be kept on file at the local representative library even if the application part of the file is removed.
OHIO
Permit applications are filed with Columbus. The applicant is responsible for sending copies of the documentation to the local county, this may be the local SCS office or one of the seven district offices if an office is located in that county. Copies of inspection and enforcement records are kept at Columbus and at the district offices.
PENNSYLVANIA
Copies of permit records, from initial application through permit issuance, are kept at the county offices (county conservation districts). Copies of inspection and enforcement records are kept in the six district offices. Copies of all records are available in Harrisburg.
WEST VIRGINIA
Copies of permit applications, major revisions and any other pending documents required to go through the comment process are kept at local courthouses. Copies of inspection and enforcement documents are kept at the field office. The master set of permit documents is on file at the headquarters.
WYOMING
Copies of the permit application packages are kept on file at the county level until permit approval. Copies of inspection and enforcement records are kept in Cheyenne and three district locations. Copies of all permit records are available in Cheyenne.
COMPARISON OF REGULATIONS II
Local Repository = Courthouse, Library, SCS office, etc.
Main Office = Main/central/headquarters office
Regional Office = Regional/district/field office
STATE |
Location where copies of documents requiring public comment are filed or available for review. |
Are these documents required to be maintained at the local repository? [Y/N] |
Are copies of all permit-related records available at local repository? [Y/N] |
Location where copies of inspection and enforcement records are retained. |
Are lists of permit-related documents available for review posted at local repository? [Y/N] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
STATES WITH RULES ALLOWING THE OPTION TO MAIL INFORMATION
|
|||||
ILLINOIS |
Local Repository |
No |
Yes |
Local Repository; Main Office; Regional Office |
No |
KENTUCKY |
Regional Office |
No |
No |
Main Office; Regional Office |
No |
MONTANA |
Local Repository |
No |
No |
Main Office; Regional Office |
No |
TEXAS |
Local Repository |
No |
No |
Main Office; Regional Office |
No |
UTAH |
Local Repository |
No |
No |
Main Office* |
No |
VIRGINIA |
Local Repository |
No |
No |
Main Office* |
No |
STATES WITHOUT SUCH SPECIFIC REGULATIONS |
|||||
INDIANA |
Local Repository |
No |
Yes |
Local Repository; Main Office; Regional Office |
No |
OHIO |
Local Repository |
No |
No |
Local Repository; Main Office; Regional Office |
No |
PENNSYLVANIA |
Local Repository |
No |
No |
Main Office; Regional Office |
No |
WEST VIRGINIA |
Local Repository |
No |
No |
Main Office; Regional Office |
No |
WYOMING |
Local Repository |
No |
No |
Main Office; Regional Office | No |
ATTACHMENTS
Survey and research conducted by: Joyce Zweben Scall