OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING RECLAMATION AND ENFORCEMENT
Library of COALEX Research Reports
COALEX Research Reports are the products of research and analysis conducted on specific issues relating to the regulation of Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977. The research is conducted in response to requests for information from State Regulatory Authorities, under a cooperative agreement between the Office of Surface Mining (OSM) and the Interstate Mining Compact Commission (IMCC).
COALEX refers to the Library of Surface Mining Materials maintained by OSM in LEXIS-NEXIS and is a major source for the research.
Each Report includes a list of resources which were sent as attachments to the individual who requested the research. To obtain a copy of the attachments or to obtain any additional information, contact Joyce Zweben Scall by phone at 202-686-9138 or by email at JZScall@aol.com.
COALEX STATE COMPARISON REPORT - 185
May 1991
Interstate Mining Compact
459 B Carlisle Drive
Herndon, Virginia 22090
TOPIC: SELF-BONDING
INQUIRY:Please conduct a survey of the states to determine which state programs use self-bonding as an alternative bonding system. Include copies of the state statutes and regulations. List the state contacts.
SEARCH RESULTS: A survey of 15 states was conducted, using a questionnaire and supplemented by COALEX Library research. The survey asked the following questions:
The results of the survey follow. A Table summarizing the findings, a list of the state contacts, and copies of the statutes, regulations, policies or procedures are attached.
TABLE OF RESPONSES
ALABAMA
QUESTIONS |
RESPONSES |
---|---|
Has self-bonding? |
Yes |
Currently using self-bonding? |
No |
No. of companies: |
None |
Statute/Regulation cite: |
Regulation Chap. 880-X-9. Bond and Insurance Requirements for Surface Coal Mining and Reclamation Operations; Form, Conditions and Terms of Performance Bonds and Liability Insurance. |
Comments: |
Only two applications for self-bonding were ever submitted to the Commission. Both were later withdrawn at the company's request. |
ARKANSAS
QUESTIONS |
RESPONSES |
---|---|
Has self-bonding? |
Yes |
Currently using self-bonding? |
Yes |
No. of companies: |
One |
Statute/Regulation cite: |
Regulation Sec. 806.11 Form of the Performance Bond (1987). |
Comments: |
Self-bonding is seldom requested. |
ILLINOIS
QUESTIONS |
RESPONSES |
---|---|
Has self-bonding? |
No |
Currently using self-bonding? |
No |
No. of companies: |
N/A |
Statute/Regulation cite: |
N/A |
Comments: |
The self-bonding provision was removed because it was incompatible with the state act. The bonding requirements of the current state act are based on the requirements of previous Illinois reclamation regulatory programs which have been highly successful. |
INDIANA [from COALEX]
QUESTIONS |
RESPONSES |
---|---|
Has self-bonding? |
Yes |
Currently using self-bonding? |
Unknown |
No. of companies: |
Unknown |
Statute/Regulation cite: |
Statute Sec. 13-4.1-6.3 Self-Bonding (1988). |
Comments: |
N/A |
KENTUCKY [from COALEX]
QUESTIONS |
RESPONSES |
---|---|
Has self-bonding? |
No |
Currently using self-bonding? |
N/A |
No. of companies: |
N/A |
Statute/Regulation cite: |
N/A |
Comments: |
Kentucky deleted self-bonding as an option in 1982, in response to OSM findings that the state's definition was inconsistent with the federal definition. |
LOUISIANA [from COALEX]
QUESTIONS |
RESPONSES |
---|---|
Has self-bonding? |
No |
Currently using self-bonding? |
N/A |
No. of companies: |
N/A |
Statute/Regulation cite: |
N/A |
Comments: |
OSM disapproved the state self-bonding regulations in 1980. A revised definition of "self-bonding" was proposed in 1990 and is awaiting OSM approval. |
NEW MEXICO
QUESTIONS |
RESPONSES |
---|---|
Has self-bonding? |
Yes |
Currently using self-bonding? |
Yes |
No. of companies: |
Three companies (eight permits) |
Statute/Regulation cite: |
Regulation Sec. 14-23; CSMC Rule 80-1; Amendment No. 3 (1984). |
Comments: |
We have had self-bonding since 1987. Total amount of self-bonds is currently $64,402,200. We have not had any bad experiences. Self-bonds save the companies a considerable amountof money. |
OHIO
QUESTIONS |
RESPONSES |
---|---|
Has self-bonding? |
Yes |
Currently using self-bonding? |
No |
No. of companies: |
None |
Statute/Regulation cite: |
Regulation Sec. 1501:13-7-04 Self-Bonding (1988). |
Comments: |
No self-bonding application has been approved yet. |
OKLAHOMA {from COALEX]
QUESTIONS |
RESPONSES |
---|---|
Has self-bonding? |
Yes |
Currently using self-bonding? |
Unknown |
No. of companies: |
Unknown |
Statute/Regulation cite: |
Regulation Sec. 800.23 Self-bonding (1988). |
Comments: |
N/A |
PENNSYLVANIA
QUESTIONS |
RESPONSES |
---|---|
Has self-bonding? |
Yes |
Currently using self-bonding? |
No |
No. of companies: |
None |
Statute/Regulation cite: |
25 Pa Code Ch. 86, Secs. 86.142 Definitions and 86.159 Self-bonding (1990). |
Comments: |
Very few companies can qualify. Those who can are financially secure enough to obtain surety bonds. |
TENNESSEE
QUESTIONS |
RESPONSES |
---|---|
Has self-bonding? |
No |
Currently using self-bonding? |
N/A |
No. of companies: |
N/A |
Statute/Regulation cite: |
N/A |
Comments: |
N/A |
TEXAS
QUESTIONS |
RESPONSES |
---|---|
Has self-bonding? |
Yes |
Currently using self-bonding? |
Yes |
No. of companies: |
Three companies |
Statute/Regulation cite: |
Regulation Sec. 806.309 Terms and Conditions of the Bond (recently promulgated). |
Comments: |
Texas is participating in a joint OSM and Industry Task Force to evaluate self-bonding rules applicable to public electric utilities. |
VIRGINIA
QUESTIONS |
RESPONSES |
---|---|
Has self-bonding? |
No |
Currently using self-bonding? |
N/A |
No. of companies: |
N/A |
Statute/Regulation cite: |
N/A |
Comments: |
N/A |
WEST VIRGINIA
QUESTIONS |
RESPONSES |
---|---|
Has self-bonding? |
Yes |
Currently using self-bonding? |
Yes |
No. of companies: |
Four companies |
Statute/Regulation cite: |
Regulation Sec. 38-2-11. Insurance and Bonding. |
Comments: |
The program seems to be working satisfactorily. There has been no occasion to forfeit or collect the bond on a self-bonded permittee. |
WYOMING [from COALEX]
QUESTIONS |
RESPONSES |
---|---|
Has self-bonding? |
Yes |
Currently using self-bonding? |
Unknown |
No. of companies: |
Unknown |
Statute/Regulation cite: |
Regulation Chap. XII Self-Bonding Program. Secs. 1-7. |
Comments: |
N/A |
LIST OF CONTACTS
STATE |
CONTACT INFO |
---|---|
ALABAMA |
Carla D. Lightsey |
ARKANSAS |
Art Ritchie, Engineering Supervisor |
ILLINOIS |
Don Pflederer |
INDIANA |
Michael Sponsler, Director |
KENTUCKY |
Carl Campbell |
LOUISIANA |
Anthony J. Duplechin, Geologist Supervisor |
MARYLAND |
Anthony F. Abar, Director |
NEW MEXICO |
Barry Bailey, Operations Manager |
OHIO |
Jean Backs |
OKLAHOMA |
James Hamm |
PENNSYLVANIA |
Ernest Giovanetti, Director |
TENNESSEE |
Carl Tenut, Director |
TEXAS |
Melvin B. Hodgkiss, Director |
VIRGINIA |
Benny Wampler, Ass't Director |
WEST VIRGINIA |
Stephen C. Keen, Director |
WYOMING |
Rick Chancellor |
ATTACHMENTS
ALABAMA:
Regulation Chap. 880-X-9. Bond and Insurance Requirements for Surface Coal Mining and Reclamation Operations; Form, Conditions and Terms of Performance Bonds and Liability Insurance.
ARKANSAS:
Regulation Sec. 806.11 Form of the Performance Bond (1987).
INDIANA:
Statute Sec. 13-4.1-6.3 Self-Bonding (1988).
KENTUCKY:
LOUISIANA:
NEW MEXICO:
Regulation Sec. 14-23; CSMC Rule 80-1; Amendment No. 3; Dated 3/5/84.
OHIO:
Regulation Sec. 1501:13-7-04 Self-Bonding (1988) and accompanying procedures.
OKLAHOMA:
Regulation Sec. 800.23 Self-bonding (1988).
PENNSYLVANIA:
25 Pa Code Ch. 86, Secs. 86.142 Definitions and 86.159 Self-bonding (1990).
TEXAS:
Regulation Sec. 806.309 Terms and Conditions of the Bond (recently promulgated).
WEST VIRGINIA:
Regulation Sec. 38-2-11. Insurance and Bonding.
WYOMING:
Regulation Chap. XII Self-Bonding Program. Secs. 1-7.
Research conducted by: Gregory Conrad (IMCC)
Additional research conducted by: Joyce Zweben Scall