Official Site of the U.S. Air Force   Right Corner Banner
Join the Air Force

News > 2012 Caring for People Forum addresses issues affecting Airmen, families
 
Photos
Previous ImageNext Image
Caring for people
Chief Master Sergeant of the Air Force James Roy speaks at the Caring for People forum at Joint Base Andrews, Md., on Sept. 26, 2012. This is the fourth annual forum which provides strategies for commanders, leaders and care professionals to help Airmen and their families. (U.S. Air Force photo/Scott M. Ash)
Download HiRes
2012 Caring for People Forum addresses issues affecting Airmen, families

Posted 9/28/2012 Email story   Print story

    


by Senior Airman Lindsey A. Porter
11th Wing Public Affairs


9/28/2012 - JOINT BASE ANDREWS, Md. (AFNS) -- The 2012 Caring for People Forum concluded here Sept. 27 with a presentation of initiatives to members of the Air Force's Community Action Information Board and Integrated Delivery System.

Since its establishment in 2009, the Caring for People Forum has evolved into a two-day seminar during which forum attendees divide into working groups at the beginning and develop initiatives to fix Air Force issues that affect Airmen and their families.

More than 140 active-duty, Guard, Reserve and civilian Air Force members participated in the forum, each contributing their unique total force perspective on the issues discussed during the working group meetings.

"These issues all relate to how the Air Force takes care of its Airmen and their families," said Carl Buchanan, the Caring for People Forum manager. "Without the participants' input, we can't achieve the forum's ultimate goal -- making the Air Force better."

During their presentations, group leaders spoke on why initiatives were chosen and how CAIB and IDS members could potentially resolve each concern. Twelve issues were briefed, with top initiatives revolving around similar subject matters.

Some of the discussed initiatives include the Air Force's Exceptional Family Member Program, housing options for single Airmen, and immigration and naturalization assistance programs.

Secretary of the Air Force Michael Donley, who spoke at the conclusion of the forum, told the participants there's nothing more important to the Air Force than its Airmen and their families.

"By attending this forum, you have provided leadership with a glimpse into how we can enhance the lives of our most important asset," Donley said. "By attending, you not only help them but have taken steps to actively improve the whole force."

Air Force CAIB and IDS members will meet in October to discuss the initiatives and decide upon courses of action to address the concerns.



tabComments
10/4/2012 10:49:28 AM ET
C. Michaud. I agree. I have been a part of this forum and the one thing I learned was any issue that might make the unit or base look bad did not get elevated.
CPF participant, Base X
 
10/3/2012 1:03:39 PM ET
Michaud, I too used to be at Dover. When I was there I saw leadership do some strange things. Colonels drinking in their offices. The MSG enlarged a picture of a subordinate's face and hung it from their door hitting it and laughing each time they walked by. The subordinate they made fun of had alreay PCSed. One officer cheated with another officer's wife and leadership knew this. Just stuff like that. If leadership allows that type of behavior, than I think it's safe to say that caring for people isn't a top priority. You brought up a lot of good points. Take care
Jenny, USA
 
10/2/2012 8:47:25 AM ET
One guy in my group raised an issue about leave but was also dismissed. He is in a career field where the manning is low and time off is hard to get. It was taking a toll on his relationship with his wife. With the focus on resiliency and the high rate of suicide, I'm surprised this was so easily dismissed. Perhaps the single people in our family issues group couldn't relate. Perhaps they could ask the Reserve unit also on the base to help augment the staff so they can take leave. But instead, this guy's issue never left the room. For those who really wanted to help facilitate change in areas impacting them specifically, I feel the forum was a disappointment. I felt like the facilitator for our group was dismissive and didn't even really understand the intent because the way I understood the program was to identify things locally as well as two issues we could send up to big Air Force. It was disheartening to see the way it turned out because the day felt like a waste. From the prese
C Michaud, Part 3
 
10/2/2012 8:46:38 AM ET
Part 2 I have a friend whose husband has children from a previous marriage. He and his ex were stationed in Alaska when they divorced. Therefore he is being subjected to Alaska Child Support Guidelines. Alaska is one of like 10 states that don't factor in the custodial parent's income. His ex is stationed overseas and probably makes even more money than he does, but only his income is calculated for child support because she filed in Alaska. In the military, we can still claim our legal state of residence. We file our taxes there and can vote in our HOR. Why are military members serving their country subjected to the child support guidelines of the place the military sent them or even in some cases wherever the ex may choose to file even if the military member never even lived in that state? Even the new Military Spouse Residency Relief Act recognizes that spouse shouldn't be subjected to state taxes where they are stationed because they are supporting their spouse. Considering the div
C Michaud , Part two
 
10/1/2012 4:13:30 PM ET
I participated in the Caring for People Forum at Dover AFB as part of the Family and School Age Children group. Ironically I was the only parent of a school-age child who actually resided with them in my group and there were many people who were single or didn't have children at all. I tried to bring up issues like family child care and the Give Parents a Break Program. I asked the major leading the forum for our base how the people were chosen for the groups and she said she put people in whatever group they requested. We had single CGOs single Airmen and some people were had children who lived with exes in other states weighing in on issues that impact families in the Air Force. In fact the issue our team sent up was better communication about events on base. I brought up another issue I feel impacts a great deal of military members and it was shot down because it wasn't easily fixable. I have a friend whose husband has children from a previous marriage. He and his ex were stati
C Michaud, Dover AFB
 
9/28/2012 5:17:57 PM ET
Taking care of people will always take a back seat to sortie production. Leaders can attempt to find a balance by eliminating many of the confusing and conflicting procedures which keep Airmen from efficiently performing their duties. Sortie production keeps Airmen at work long hours every day and many many weekends. For any program to be effective the family should have the benefit of the members being at home as much as possible.
Chuck, Tennessee
 
Add a comment

 Inside AF.mil

ima cornerSearch

tabSubscribe AF.MIL
tabMore HeadlinesRSS feed 
13th Air Force inactivates, merges with PACAF  |  VIDEO

Electronic payments required for TRICARE Reserve Select and Retired Reserve monthly premiums  2

Operation Deep Freeze main season begins

One family, one mission, a lifetime of readiness

Academy identifies cadet who died Sept. 28

Air Force stands up single unit to execute global CE operations  1

NORTHCOM marks 10 years protecting U.S. homeland

OSI introduces new smartphone anonymous tip line  3

National Disability Employment Month kicks off at Pentagon

AF leaders encourage energy savings in latest 'Letter to Airmen'  1

'Today's Air Force' showcases AFA conference, multinational C-17 operations

Special Tactics Airmen earn Silver Star, Bronze Star, Purple Heart  3

Roth contributions open to all active-duty service members  5

Yokota Airman dies

tabCommentaryRSS feed 
First things first: Get your degrees in order  1

Special needs families find support from DoD panel


Site Map      Contact Us     Questions     Security and Privacy notice     E-publishing