Guideline Title
Metatarsalgia/intractable plantar keratosis/Tailor's bunion.
Bibliographic Source(s)
Academy of Ambulatory Foot and Ankle Surgery. Metatarsalgia/intractable plantar keratosis/Tailor's bunion. Philadelphia (PA): Academy of Ambulatory Foot and Ankle Surgery; 2003. 6 p. [26 references] |
Guideline Status
This is the current release of the guideline.
This guideline updates a previous version: Academy of Ambulatory Foot and Ankle Surgery. Metatarsalgia/intractable plantar keratosis/Tailor's bunion. Philadelphia (PA): Academy of Ambulatory Foot and Ankle Surgery; 2000. 13 p.
The guideline is reviewed and updated twice a year as needed (in May and October). According to the guideline developer, this guideline has been reviewed and is still considered current as of September 2009. This review involved new literature searches of electronic databases followed by expert committee review of new evidence that has emerged since the original publication date.
UMLS Concepts ( what's this?)
Click to view all guideline(s) indexed with these concepts
Hide...
|
Disease/Condition(s)
- Metatarsalgia
- Intractable plantar keratosis
- Tailor's bunion
Guideline Category
Diagnosis
Treatment
Clinical Specialty
Podiatry
Intended Users
Podiatrists
Guideline Objective(s)
To provide recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of metatarsalgia, intractable plantar keratosis, and Tailor's bunion
Target Population
Patients with metatarsalgia, intractable plantar keratosis, and Tailor's bunion
Interventions and Practices Considered
Diagnosis
- History, including an evaluation of the chief complaint (nature, location, duration, onset, course, anything that improves or exacerbates, any previous treatment) and past medical history(medications/allergies, medical history, surgical history, family history, social history)
- Physical examination, including peripheral vascular, neurological, orthopedic(palpation, biomechanical/gait analysis, range of motion), and dermatological exams
- Diagnostic procedures, including radiographic examination, laboratory tests, additional tests (nerve conduction studies, electromyography [EMG], noninvasive vascular testing)
Treatment
- Nonsurgical treatments, including debridement, padding, shoe modifications, oral anti-inflammatory medications (NSAIDs), anti-inflammatory injectables, orthotics
- Surgical treatments, including metatarsal osteotomy (percutaneous, transverse, "V" shaped, or bi- or tri- plane, partial or "through and through"), excision of all or part of a metatarsal head and/or shaft, intramedullary decompression
- Postoperative management, including x-rays, foot gear, and orthotics
Major Outcomes Considered
|
Methods Used to Collect/Select the Evidence
Searches of Electronic Databases
Description of Methods Used to Collect/Select the Evidence
The guideline development process began with a thorough MEDLINE search as well as a "call for papers" from the membership of the Academy of Ambulatory Foot and Ankle Surgery at large.
Number of Source Documents
Methods Used to Assess the Quality and Strength of the Evidence
Not stated
Rating Scheme for the Strength of the Evidence
Methods Used to Analyze the Evidence
Review
Description of the Methods Used to Analyze the Evidence
Methods Used to Formulate the Recommendations
Not stated
Rating Scheme for the Strength of the Recommendations
Cost Analysis
A formal cost analysis was not performed and published cost analyses were not reviewed.
Method of Guideline Validation
Internal Peer Review
Description of Method of Guideline Validation
Drafts of the guidelines were reviewed in detail by each member of the Board of Trustees.
|
Major Recommendations
- Diagnosis
- History: This may include any of the following:
- An evaluation of the chief complaint (including the nature, location, duration, onset, course, anything that improves or exacerbates, and any previous treatment).
- The past medical history (including medications/allergies, medical history, surgical history, family history, and social history).
- Physical examination: The following may be important parts of the appropriate examination:
- Peripheral vascular
- Neurological
- Orthopedic (involvement may be ascertained by examining the foot in either the weight bearing or non-weight bearing positions)
- Palpation
- Range of motion
- Biomechanical/gait analysis
- Dermatological (presence of lesions or hyperkeratoses).
- Diagnostic Procedures
- Radiographic examination: X-rays should be taken. They may be used to evaluate the type of deformity as well as other factors. X-rays may be weight bearing, partial weight bearing, or non-weight bearing.
- Laboratory tests: Not required in the nonsurgical patient, unless underlying factors exist (i.e., infection or inflammatory disease). Blood and urine tests may be indicated for the surgical patient at the discretion of the surgeon based on the patient's medical history.
- Additional tests (nerve conduction studies, electromyography (EMG), noninvasive vascular testing). These studies may be utilized in isolated situations when deemed necessary.
- Nonsurgical Treatment
- The primary reasons for nonsurgical treatment are:
- Due to the patient's health status, surgery is contraindicated
- The patient does not want surgery
- Types of nonsurgical treatment:
- Debridement
- Padding
- Shoe modifications
- Oral anti-inflammatory medications (NSAIDs)
- Anti-inflammatory injectables
- Orthotics
- Surgical Treatment
- The primary reasons for surgical treatment are:
- Failure of nonsurgical treatment
- Impracticality of nonsurgical treatment
- The patient desires correction of a presenting deformity that is painful and/or causes a degree of loss of function.
- The patient is informed of the procedure(s) to be performed, the treatment alternatives, and the reasonable risks involved and elects to have surgical intervention.
- Site of surgery: The surgical treatment of metatarsalgia, intractable plantar keratosis (IPK), and Tailor's bunion is usually performed in the doctor's office, however, the hospital or an ambulatory center may also be appropriate.
- Anesthesia: Local anesthesia is sufficient, unless there are extenuating circumstances.
- Hemostasis: Absence of bleeding is not required.
- Surgical preparation: aseptic preparation ("usual" aseptic scrub, prep, draping, and sterility).
- Preoperative lab: May or may not be necessary based on the patient's past medical history and current medical status.
- Prophylactic antibiotics: At the discretion of the surgeon (or based upon requirement: i.e., mitral valve prolapse).
- Pathological analysis of surgically removed tissue: Recommended.
- Bilateral or multiple surgery: May be performed at the same surgical session, or in different surgical sessions.
- Surgical Procedures for the Correction of Metatarsalgia/IPK/Tailor's Bunion
Procedures may be performed as isolated situations or in conjunction with other procedures.
- Metatarsal osteotomy may be:
- Percutaneous
- Transverse, "V" shaped, or bi- or tri-plane
- Partial or "through and through"
- Excision of all or part of a metatarsal head and/or shaft may be performed at appropriate times to treat these conditions.
- Intramedullary decompression (IMDC)
- Fixation
Fixation may be via internal, percutaneous, or external means such as casts, splints, surgical shoes, or adhesive forms of dressings. Internal fixation is generally not required and is at the discretion of the surgeon.
- Postoperative Management
The patient may ambulate during the recovery period. X-rays should be taken postoperatively and may be taken thereafter to access the healing. Postoperative foot gear may include a surgical shoe or other form of restrictive footwear. Generally, a surgical dressing is applied in the immediate postoperative period. This is modified with time and the postoperative course. The return to a normal shoe is based upon the procedure(s) performed and the postoperative course of the individual patient. Orthotics may be useful postoperatively.
|
Evidence Supporting the Recommendations
Type of Evidence Supporting the Recommendations
The type of supporting evidence is not specifically stated for each recommendation.
|
Benefits/Harms of Implementing the Guideline Recommendations
Potential Benefits
Treatment may relieve or reduce pain, reduce the deformity, eliminate lesions (or reduce severity), and arrest progression of deformity.
Potential Harms
Postoperative Complications
- Edema
- Recurrence/regrowth
- Pain
- Numbness
- Stiffness
- Shortening of digits/metatarsals
- Malposition
- Nonunion
- Delayed union
- Transfer lesions
- Vascular complications
- Reflex sympathetic dystrophy
|
Implementation of the Guideline
Description of Implementation Strategy
An implementation strategy was not provided.
|
Institute of Medicine (IOM) National Healthcare Quality Report Categories
IOM Care Need
Getting Better
Living with Illness
IOM Domain
Effectiveness
Patient-centeredness
|
Identifying Information and Availability
Bibliographic Source(s)
Academy of Ambulatory Foot and Ankle Surgery. Metatarsalgia/intractable plantar keratosis/Tailor's bunion. Philadelphia (PA): Academy of Ambulatory Foot and Ankle Surgery; 2003. 6 p. [26 references] |
Adaptation
Not applicable: The guideline was not adapted from another source.
Date Released
2000 (revised 2003 Sep; reviewed 2009 Sep)
Guideline Developer(s)
Academy of Ambulatory Foot and Ankle Surgery - Medical Specialty Society
Source(s) of Funding
Academy of Ambulatory Foot and Ankle Surgery (AAFAS)
Guideline Committee
Preferred Practice Guidelines Committee
Composition of Group That Authored the Guideline
The committee consisted of five (5) members who were board certified, had a minimum of ten (10) years of clinical practice experience, and a minimum of five (5) years of teaching experience.
Financial Disclosures/Conflicts of Interest
Guideline Status
This is the current release of the guideline.
This guideline updates a previous version: Academy of Ambulatory Foot and Ankle Surgery. Metatarsalgia/intractable plantar keratosis/Tailor's bunion. Philadelphia (PA): Academy of Ambulatory Foot and Ankle Surgery; 2000. 13 p.
The guideline is reviewed and updated twice a year as needed (in May and October). According to the guideline developer, this guideline has been reviewed and is still considered current as of September 2009. This review involved new literature searches of electronic databases followed by expert committee review of new evidence that has emerged since the original publication date.
Guideline Availability
Electronic copies: Not available at this time.
Print copies: Available from the Academy of Ambulatory Foot and Ankle Surgery (AAFAS) (formerly the Academy of Ambulatory Foot Surgery), 1601 Walnut Street, Suite 1005, Philadelphia, PA 19102; Web site, www.academy-afs.org .
Availability of Companion Documents
NGC Status
This summary was completed by ECRI on October 12, 2000. The information was verified by the guideline developer as of December 8, 2000. This summary was updated by ECRI on December 19, 2003. The information was verified by the guideline developer on December 29, 2003. This summary was updated on May 3, 2005 following the withdrawal of Bextra (valdecoxib) from the market and the release of heightened warnings for Celebrex (celecoxib) and other nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). This summary was updated by ECRI on June 16, 2005, following the U.S. Food and Drug Administration advisory on COX-2 selective and non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)./p>
Copyright Statement
This NGC summary is based on the original guideline, which is copyrighted by the guideline developer.
|
NGC Disclaimer
The National Guideline Clearinghouseâ„¢ (NGC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the guidelines represented on this site. Read full disclaimer...The National Guideline Clearinghouseâ„¢ (NGC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the guidelines represented on this site.
All guidelines summarized by NGC and hosted on our site are produced under the auspices of medical specialty societies, relevant professional associations, public or private organizations, other government agencies, health care organizations or plans, and similar entities.
Guidelines represented on the NGC Web site are submitted by guideline developers, and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NGC Inclusion Criteria which may be found at http://www.guideline.gov/about/inclusion-criteria.aspx.
NGC, AHRQ, and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or clinical efficacy or effectiveness of the clinical practice guidelines and related materials represented on this site. Moreover, the views and opinions of developers or authors of guidelines represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NGC, AHRQ, or its contractor ECRI Institute, and inclusion or hosting of guidelines in NGC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes.
Readers with questions regarding guideline content are directed to contact the guideline developer. Hide...
|