Skip Navigation
PrintDownload PDFGet Adobe ReaderDownload to WordDownload as HTMLDownload as XMLCitation Manager
Save to Favorites
Guideline Summary
Guideline Title
ACR–AIUM–SRU practice guideline for the performance of scrotal ultrasound examinations.
Bibliographic Source(s)
American College of Radiology (ACR), American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine (AIUM), Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound (SRU). ACR-AIUM-SRU practice guideline for the performance of scrotal ultrasound examinations. [online publication]. Reston (VA): American College of Radiology (ACR); 2010. 4 p.
Guideline Status

This is the current release of the guideline.

Jump ToGuideline ClassificationRelated Content

Scope

Disease/Condition(s)

Abnormalities of the scrotum

Note: Refer to the "Indications" section of the "Major Recommendations" field for a detailed list of diseases and conditions.

Guideline Category
Diagnosis
Evaluation
Clinical Specialty
Family Practice
Internal Medicine
Radiology
Urology
Intended Users
Advanced Practice Nurses
Allied Health Personnel
Nurses
Physician Assistants
Physicians
Guideline Objective(s)
  • To assist practitioners in providing appropriate radiologic care for patients
  • To describe principles of practice for performance and interpretation of scrotal ultrasound examinations
Target Population

Patients undergoing ultrasound examination of the scrotum

Interventions and Practices Considered
  1. Ultrasound evaluation of the scrotum (Doppler sonography [spectral and color/power Doppler imaging])
    • Use of qualified personnel
    • Written request for the examination
    • Use of appropriate examination technique
      • Use of longitudinal and transverse views
      • Evaluation of extratesticular structures
      • Additional techniques such as Valsalva maneuver or upright positioning
  2. Equipment specifications
  3. Appropriate documentation
Major Outcomes Considered

Not stated

Methodology

Methods Used to Collect/Select the Evidence
Searches of Electronic Databases
Description of Methods Used to Collect/Select the Evidence

The Medline literature search is based on keywords provided by the topic author. The two general classes of keywords are those related to the condition (e.g., ankle pain, fever) and those that describe the diagnostic or therapeutic intervention of interest (e.g., mammography, MRI).

The search terms and parameters are manipulated to produce the most relevant, current evidence to address the Practice Guideline or Technical Standard topic being reviewed or developed. Combining the clinical conditions and diagnostic modalities or therapeutic procedures narrows the search to be relevant to the topic. Exploding the term "diagnostic imaging" captures relevant results for diagnostic topics.

The following criteria/limits are used in the searches.

  1. Articles that have abstracts available and are concerned with humans.
  2. Restrict the search to the year prior to the last topic update or in some cases the author of the topic may specify which year range to use in the search. For new topics, the year range is restricted to the last 5 years unless the topic author provides other instructions.
  3. May restrict the search to Adults only or Pediatrics only.
  4. Articles consisting of only summaries or case reports are often excluded from final results.

The search strategy may be revised to improve the output as needed.

Number of Source Documents

The total number of source documents identified as the result of the literature search is not known.

Methods Used to Assess the Quality and Strength of the Evidence
Expert Consensus
Rating Scheme for the Strength of the Evidence

Not applicable

Methods Used to Analyze the Evidence
Review
Description of the Methods Used to Analyze the Evidence

Not stated

Methods Used to Formulate the Recommendations
Expert Consensus
Description of Methods Used to Formulate the Recommendations

Recommendations are formulated through iterative review by committee, collaborating societies, and membership. Suggested recommendations are reviewed by the committee and agreement is reached by consensus.

Rating Scheme for the Strength of the Recommendations

Not applicable

Cost Analysis

A formal cost analysis was not performed and published cost analyses were not reviewed.

Method of Guideline Validation
Internal Peer Review
Description of Method of Guideline Validation

Each practice guideline and technical standard, representing a policy statement by the American College of Radiology (ACR), has undergone a thorough consensus process in which it has been subjected to extensive review, requiring the approval of the Commission on Quality and Safety as well as the ACR Board of Chancellors, the ACR Council Steering Committee, and the ACR Council.

Recommendations

Major Recommendations

These guidelines are intended to assist practitioners performing ultrasound studies of the scrotum. In some cases, additional and/or specialized examinations may be necessary. While it is not possible to detect every abnormality, adherence to the following guidelines will maximize the probability of detecting most of the abnormalities that occur in the scrotum.

Qualifications and Responsibilities of the Physician

Each organization addresses this requirement individually. American College of Radiology (ACR) language is as follows:

See the "ACR–SPR–SRU Practice Guideline for Performing and Interpreting Diagnostic Ultrasound Examinations" (see the ACR Web site External Web Site Policy for this practice guideline and additional ones mentioned below).

Indications

Indications for scrotal ultrasound include, but are not limited to:

  1. Evaluation of scrotal pain, including but not limited to testicular trauma, ischemia/torsion, and infectious or inflammatory scrotal disease
  2. Evaluation of a palpable inguinal, scrotal, or scrotal mass
  3. Evaluation of scrotal asymmetry, swelling, or enlargement
  4. Evaluation of potential scrotal hernia
  5. Detection/evaluation of varicoceles
  6. Evaluation of male infertility
  7. Follow-up of prior indeterminate scrotal ultrasound findings
  8. Localization of undescended testes
  9. Detection of an occult primary tumor in patients with metastatic germ cell tumor
  10. Follow-up of patients with prior primary testicular neoplasms, leukemia, or lymphoma
  11. Evaluation of abnormality noted on other imaging studies (including but not limited to computed tomography [CT], magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] and positron emission tomography [PET])
  12. Evaluation of intersex conditions

Written Request for the Examination

Each organization addresses this requirement individually. ACR language is as follows:

The written or electronic request for a scrotal ultrasound examination should provide sufficient information to demonstrate the medical necessity of the examination and allow for its proper performance and interpretation.

Documentation that satisfies medical necessity includes 1) signs and symptoms and/or 2) relevant history (including known diagnoses). Additional information regarding the specific reason for the examination or a provisional diagnosis would be helpful and may at times be needed to allow for the proper performance and interpretation of the examination.

The request for the examination must be originated by a physician or other appropriately licensed health care provider. The accompanying clinical information should be provided by a physician or other appropriately licensed health care provider familiar with the patient's clinical problem or question and consistent with the state's scope of practice requirements. (ACR Resolution 35, adopted in 2006)

Specifications of the Examination

The testes should be evaluated in at least two planes, longitudinal and transverse. Transverse images should be obtained in the superior, mid, and inferior portions of the testes. Longitudinal views should be obtained centrally as well as medially and laterally. Each testis should be evaluated in its entirety, as should the epididymis (head, body and tail) when technically feasible. The size and echogenicity of each testis and epididymis should be compared to the contralateral side. Comparison of the testes, including grayscale and color Doppler imaging, is best accomplished with a side-by-side transverse image. Scrotal skin thickness should be evaluated. If a palpable abnormality is the indication for the sonogram, this area should be directly imaged.

Relevant extratesticular structures should be evaluated. Additional techniques such as Valsalva maneuver or upright positioning can be used as needed. Any abnormality should be documented.

Doppler sonography (spectral and color/power Doppler imaging) should be used as necessary in all examinations of the scrotum, particularly in the setting of acute scrotal pain. If used, color and/or power Doppler sonography should include at least one side-by-side image comparing both testes and two images with identical Doppler settings to evaluate symmetry of flow. Low-flow detection settings should be used to document testicular blood flow, and the transducer frequency should be optimized for maximum Doppler sensitivity while maintaining adequate penetration. If flow cannot be demonstrated on color Doppler, power Doppler, if available, should be used to increase flow sensitivity.

Documentation

Each organization addresses this requirement individually. ACR language is as follows:

Adequate documentation is essential for high-quality patient care. There should be a permanent record of the ultrasound examination and its interpretation. Comparison with prior relevant imaging studies may prove helpful. Images of all appropriate areas, both normal and abnormal, should be recorded. Variations from normal size should generally be accompanied by measurements. Images should be labeled with the patient identification, facility identification, examination date, and image orientation. An official interpretation (final report) of the ultrasound examination should be included in the patient's medical record. Retention of the ultrasound examination images should be consistent both with clinical need and with relevant legal and local health care facility requirements.

Reporting should be in accordance with the "ACR Practice Guideline for Communication of Diagnostic Imaging Findings."

Equipment Specifications

See the original guideline document for information about equipment specifications.

Clinical Algorithm(s)

None provided

Evidence Supporting the Recommendations

Type of Evidence Supporting the Recommendations

The type of supporting evidence is not specifically stated for each recommendation.

Benefits/Harms of Implementing the Guideline Recommendations

Potential Benefits

While it is not possible to detect every abnormality, adherence to the guidelines will maximize the probability of detecting most of the abnormalities that occur in the scrotum.

Potential Harms

Not stated

Qualifying Statements

Qualifying Statements
  • These guidelines are an educational tool designed to assist practitioners in providing appropriate radiologic care for patients. They are not inflexible rules or requirements of practice and are not intended, nor should they be used, to establish a legal standard of care. For these reasons and those set forth below, the American College of Radiology cautions against the use of these guidelines in litigation in which the clinical decisions of a practitioner are called into question.
  • The ultimate judgment regarding the propriety of any specific procedure or course of action must be made by the physician or medical physicist in light of all the circumstances presented. Thus, an approach that differs from the guidelines, standing alone, does not necessarily imply that the approach was below the standard of care. To the contrary, a conscientious practitioner may responsibly adopt a course of action different from that set forth in the guidelines when, in the reasonable judgment of the practitioner, such course of action is indicated by the condition of the patient, limitations of available resources, or advances in knowledge or technology subsequent to publication of the guidelines. However, a practitioner who employs an approach substantially different from these guidelines is advised to document in the patient record information sufficient to explain the approach taken.
  • The practice of medicine involves not only the science, but also the art of dealing with the prevention, diagnosis, alleviation, and treatment of disease. The variety and complexity of human conditions make it impossible to always reach the most appropriate diagnosis or to predict with certainty a particular response to treatment. Therefore, it should be recognized that adherence to these guidelines will not assure an accurate diagnosis or a successful outcome. All that should be expected is that the practitioner will follow a reasonable course of action based on current knowledge, available resources, and the needs of the patient to deliver effective and safe medical care. The sole purpose of these guidelines is to assist practitioners in achieving this objective.
  • The clinical aspects contained in specific sections of this guideline (Introduction, Indications, Specifications of the Examination, and Equipment Specifications) were developed collaboratively by the American College of Radiology (ACR), the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine (AIUM), and the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound (SRU). Recommendations for physician qualifications, written request for the examination, procedure documentation, and quality control vary among the three organizations and are addressed by each separately.

Implementation of the Guideline

Description of Implementation Strategy

Quality Control and Improvement, Safety, Infection Control, and Patient Education

Each organization addresses this requirement individually. American College of Radiologists (ACR) language is as follows:

Policies and procedures related to quality, patient education, infection control, and safety should be developed and implemented in accordance with the ACR Policy on Quality Control and Improvement, Safety, Infection Control, and Patient Education appearing under the heading Position Statement on QC & Improvement, Safety, Infection Control, and Patient Education on the ACR Web site External Web Site Policy.

Equipment performance monitoring should be in accordance with the "ACR Technical Standard for Diagnostic Medical Physics Performance Monitoring of Real Time Ultrasound Equipment" (see the ACR Web site External Web Site Policy).

Institute of Medicine (IOM) National Healthcare Quality Report Categories

IOM Care Need
Getting Better
Living with Illness
IOM Domain
Effectiveness
Patient-centeredness

Identifying Information and Availability

Bibliographic Source(s)
American College of Radiology (ACR), American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine (AIUM), Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound (SRU). ACR-AIUM-SRU practice guideline for the performance of scrotal ultrasound examinations. [online publication]. Reston (VA): American College of Radiology (ACR); 2010. 4 p.
Adaptation

Not applicable: The guideline was not adapted from another source.

Date Released
1993 (revised 2010)
Guideline Developer(s)
American College of Radiology - Medical Specialty Society
American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine - Nonprofit Organization
Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound - Professional Association
Source(s) of Funding

American College of Radiology

Guideline Committee

Guidelines and Standards Committee of the American College of Radiology (ACR) Commission on Ultrasound in collaboration with the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine (AIUM) and the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound (SRU)

Composition of Group That Authored the Guideline

Collaborative Committee

American College of Radiology (ACR): Ruth B. Goldstein, MD (Chair); Nirvikar Dahiya, MD; Rick I. Feld, MD, FACR

American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine (AIUM): Michael C. Hill, MB, FACR; William D. Middleton, MD, FACR; Thomas C. Winter, III, MD

Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound (SRU): Brian D. Coley, MD; Vikram S. Dogra, MD; Sharlene A. Teefey, MD

ACR Guidelines and Standards Committee – Ultrasound: Mary C. Frates, MD, FACR (Chair); Debra L. Acord, MD; Marcela Bohm-Velez, MD, FACR; Helena Gabriel, MD; Ruth B. Goldstein, MD; Robert D. Harris, MD, MPH, FACR; Beverly E. Hashimoto, MD, FACR; Leann E. Linam, MD; Laurence Needleman, MD, FACR; Maitray D. Patel, MD; Philip W. Ralls, MD, FACR; Michelle L. Robbin, MD, FACR; Robert M. Sinow, MD; Deborah Levine, MD, FACR (Chair, Commission)

Financial Disclosures/Conflicts of Interest

Not stated

Guideline Status

This is the current release of the guideline.

Guideline Availability

Electronic copies: Available in Portable Document Format (PDF) from the American College of Radiology (ACR) Web site.

Print copies: Available from the American College of Radiology, 1891 Preston White Drive, Reston, VA 20191. Telephone: (703) 648-8900.

Availability of Companion Documents

The following are available:

  • The process of developing ACR practice guidelines and technical standards. Reston (VA): American College of Radiology. Electronic copies: Available from the American College of Radiology (ACR) Web site External Web Site Policy.
  • Purpose and intended use. Reston (VA): American College of Radiology. Electronic copies: Available from the ACR Web site External Web Site Policy.
Patient Resources

None available

NGC Status

This NGC summary was completed by ECRI Institute on December 8, 2011.

Copyright Statement

Copyright © by the American College of Radiology, 1891 Preston White Dr., Reston, VA 20191-4397, 703-648-8900. All rights reserved. No reproduction of this material in any format, electronic or otherwise, is permitted except with prior written consent from the American College of Radiology.

Disclaimer

NGC Disclaimer

The National Guideline Clearinghouseâ„¢ (NGC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the guidelines represented on this site.

Read full disclaimer...