Guideline Title
Best practice guide for the treatment of REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD).
Bibliographic Source(s)
Aurora RN, Zak RS, Maganti RK, Auerbach SH, Casey KR, Chowdhuri S, Karippot A, Ramar K, Kristo DA, Morgenthaler TI, Standards of Practice Committee, American Academy of Sleep Medicine. Best practice guide for the treatment of REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD). J Clin Sleep Med 2010 Feb 15;6(1):85-95. [99 references] PubMed |
Guideline Status
This is the current release of the guideline.
UMLS Concepts ( what's this?)
Click to view all guideline(s) indexed with these concepts
Hide...
|
Disease/Condition(s)
Rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder (RBD)
Guideline Category
Management
Treatment
Clinical Specialty
Family Practice
Internal Medicine
Neurology
Sleep Medicine
Intended Users
Advanced Practice Nurses
Physician Assistants
Physicians
Guideline Objective(s)
To provide evidence-based recommendations for the treatment of rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder (RBD)
Target Population
Adults (age 19 years and older) with rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder (RBD)
Interventions and Practices Considered
Treatment
- Clonazepam
- Melatonin
- Pramipexole
- Paroxetine
- L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA)
- Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors
- Zopiclone
- Benzodiazepines
- Yi-Gan San
- Desipramine
- Clozapine
- Carbamazepine
- Sodium oxybate
Prevention of Sleep-related Injury
- Modify sleep environment
- Clonazepam
Major Outcomes Considered
- Injury rates
- Sleep quality
- Daytime effects
- Rapid eye movement (REM) sleep without atonia (RSWA)
|
Methods Used to Collect/Select the Evidence
Hand-searches of Published Literature (Primary Sources)
Hand-searches of Published Literature (Secondary Sources)
Searches of Electronic Databases
Description of Methods Used to Collect/Select the Evidence
A search for articles on the medical treatment of rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder (RBD) was conducted using the PubMed database, first in February 2008, and subsequently updated in June 2009, to include the most current literature. The key words for the searches were the following: [(RBD OR Rapid Eye Movement Sleep Disorder OR REM Sleep behavior disorder) AND (treatment OR medication OR drug therapy] as well as [Rapid eye movement behavior disorder AND evaluation AND (neurological diseases OR dementia OR stroke OR sleep disorders OR Lewy body dementia OR drug induced OR multiple systems atrophy OR narcolepsy OR Parkinson's OR synucleinopathies)]. Each search was run separately and findings were merged. When the search was limited to articles published in English and regarding human adults (age 19 years and older), a total of 315 articles was identified. Abstracts from these articles were reviewed to determine if they met inclusion criteria. The literature on medical treatment of RBD was noted to comprise mostly small case series. In order to be inclusive, latitude in disorder definition was allowed and no minimum number of subjects was applied. The articles had to address at least 1 of the "PICO" questions (acronym standing for Patient, Population or Problem, provided a specific Intervention or exposure, after which a defined Comparison is performed on specified Outcomes) that were decided upon ahead of the review process (see Table 1 in the original guideline document). The literature review and pearling (i.e., checking the reference sections of search results for articles otherwise missed) provided 42 articles for review and grading.
Number of Source Documents
Methods Used to Assess the Quality and Strength of the Evidence
Weighting According to a Rating Scheme (Scheme Given)
Rating Scheme for the Strength of the Evidence
American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) Classification of Evidence (Adapted from Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine)
Evidence Levels |
Study Design |
1 |
High quality randomized clinical trials with narrow confidence intervals |
2 |
Low quality randomized clinical trials or high quality cohort studies |
3 |
Case-control studies |
4 |
Case series or poor case-control studies or poor cohort studies or case reports |
Methods Used to Analyze the Evidence
Systematic Review with Evidence Tables
Description of the Methods Used to Analyze the Evidence
Evidence was graded according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine Levels of Evidence (see, "Rating Scheme for the Strength of the Evidence" field). All evidence grading was performed by independent review of the article by 2 members of the task force. Areas of disagreement were addressed by the task force until resolved.
Methods Used to Formulate the Recommendations
Expert Consensus
Description of Methods Used to Formulate the Recommendations
The Standards of Practice Committee (SPC) of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) commissioned among its members 7 individuals to conduct this review and develop best practice principles. Work began in December 2007 to review and grade evidence in the peer-reviewed scientific literature regarding the treatment of rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder (RBD) in adults.
Recommendations were formulated based on the strength of clinical data and consensus attained via a modified Research and Development/University of California, Los Angeles (RAND/UCLA) Appropriateness Method. The task force developed a ranking of recommendations for increased transparency. The nomenclature for the recommendations and levels of recommendation are listed in the "Rating Scheme for the Strength of the Recommendations" field. Recommendations were downgraded if there were significant risks involved in the treatment or upgraded if expert consensus determined it was warranted.
Rating Scheme for the Strength of the Recommendations
Levels of Recommendation
Term |
Level |
Evidence Levels |
Explanation |
Recommended/Not Recommended |
A |
1 or 2 |
Assessment supported by a substantial amount of high quality (Level 1 or 2) evidence and/or based on a consensus of clinical judgment |
Suggested/Not Suggested |
B |
1 or 2
few studies
3 or 4
many studies and expert consensus |
Assessment supported by sparse high grade (Level 1 or 2) data or a substantial amount of low-grade (Level 3 or 4) data and/or clinical consensus by the task force |
May Be Considered/Probably Should Not Be Considered |
C |
3 or 4 |
Assessment supported by low grade data without the volume to recommend more highly and likely subject to revision with further studies |
Cost Analysis
A formal cost analysis was not performed and published cost analyses were not reviewed.
Method of Guideline Validation
External Peer Review
Internal Peer Review
Description of Method of Guideline Validation
The paper was reviewed by content experts in the area of rapid eye movement (REM) sleep behavior disorder.
The Board of Directors of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) approved the recommendations. They were submitted and accepted for publication in November, 2009.
|
Major Recommendations
The levels of evidence (1-4) and the levels of recommendations (A-C) are defined at the end of the "Major Recommendations" field.
Treatment for Rapid Eye Movement Sleep Behavior Disorder (RBD) Involves Medication and Injury Prevention
The following medications are treatment options for RBD:
- Clonazepam is suggested for the treatment of RBD but should be used with caution in patients with dementia, gait disorders, or concomitant obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Its use should be monitored carefully over time as RBD appears to be a precursor to neurodegenerative disorders with dementia in some patients. (Level B)
- Melatonin is suggested for the treatment of RBD with the advantage that there are few side effects. (Level B)
- Pramipexole may be considered to treat RBD but efficacy studies have shown contradictory results. There is little evidence to support the use of paroxetine or L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA) to treat RBD, and some studies have suggested that these drugs may actually induce or exacerbate RBD. There are limited data regarding the efficacy of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, but they may be considered to treat RBD in patients with a concomitant synucleinopathy. (Level C)
- The following medications may be considered for treatment of RBD, but evidence is very limited with only a few subjects having been studied for each medication: zopiclone, benzodiazepines other than clonazepam, Yi-Gan San, desipramine, clozapine, carbamazepine, and sodium oxybate. (Level C)
The following are injury prevention techniques for patients with RBD:
- Modifying the sleep environment is suggested for the treatment of patients with RBD who have sleep-related injury. (Level A)
- Clonazepam is suggested to decrease the occurrence of sleep-related injury caused by RBD for whom pharmacologic therapy is deemed necessary. It should be used in caution in patients with dementia, gait disorders, or concomitant OSA, and its use should be monitored carefully over time. (Level B)
Definitions:
Levels of Recommendation
Term |
Level |
Evidence Levels |
Explanation |
Recommended/Not Recommended |
A |
1 or 2 |
Assessment supported by a substantial amount of high quality (Level 1 or 2) evidence and/or based on a consensus of clinical judgment |
Suggested/Not Suggested |
B |
1 or 2
few studies
3 or 4
many studies and expert consensus |
Assessment supported by sparse high grade (Level 1 or 2) data or a substantial amount of low-grade (Level 3 or 4) data and/or clinical consensus by the task force |
May Be Considered/Probably Should Not Be Considered |
C |
3 or 4 |
Assessment supported by low grade data without the volume to recommend more highly and likely subject to revision with further studies |
American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) Classification of Evidence (Adapted from Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine)
Evidence Levels |
Study Design |
1 |
High quality randomized clinical trials with narrow confidence intervals |
2 |
Low quality randomized clinical trials or high quality cohort studies |
3 |
Case-control studies |
4 |
Case series or poor case-control studies or poor cohort studies or case reports |
|
Evidence Supporting the Recommendations
Type of Evidence Supporting the Recommendations
The type of supporting evidence is identified and graded for each recommendation (see the "Major Recommendations" field).
|
Benefits/Harms of Implementing the Guideline Recommendations
Potential Benefits
Appropriate treatment of rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder to improve sleep, reduce adverse daytime effects and prevent injury
Potential Harms
Clonazepam
- Clonazepam should be used with caution in patients with dementia, gait disorders, or concomitant obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Its use should be monitored carefully over time as rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder (RBD) appears to be a precursor to neurodegenerative disorders with dementia in some patients.
- In retrospective trials, the most common side effects included sedation, impotence, early morning motor incoordination, confusion, and memory dysfunction. These data suggest that clonazepam should be used with caution and oversight in patients with neurodegenerative disorders, obstructive sleep apnea, and underlying liver disease.
Melatonin
Dose-related side effects included morning headache, morning sleepiness, and delusions/hallucinations.
Pramipexole
Dopaminergic agonists may exacerbate symptoms of dementia of Lewy body (DLB), and since many patients with idiopathic RBD (IRBD) ultimately develop DLB, caution should be exercised with its use.
Paroxetine
Case reports of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI)-induced RBD suggest that it might exacerbate RBD. Reported side effects included nausea, dizziness, diarrhea, and thirst.
Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitors
Cholinesterase inhibitors may be associated with sleep disruption, vivid dreams and sleep-related disruptive behaviors.
Zopiclone
Side effects of cases reviewed included rash and nausea.
|
Qualifying Statements
- The Best Practice Guides endorse treatments based on review of the literature and with agreement by a consensus of the task force. These guidelines should not, however, be considered inclusive of all proper methods of care or exclusive of other methods of care reasonably directed to obtaining the same results. The ultimate judgment regarding propriety of any specific care must be made by the physician in light of the individual circumstances presented by the patient, available diagnostic tools, accessible treatment options, and resources.
- Certain precautions should be taken when interpreting the treatment data in the original guideline document. Many of the studies have subjects with dementia of Lewy body (DLB). Because DLB is characterized by symptom fluctuation, it may be difficult to ascertain whether or not symptom improvement is a function of medication effect or natural history.
|
Implementation of the Guideline
Description of Implementation Strategy
An implementation strategy was not provided.
|
Institute of Medicine (IOM) National Healthcare Quality Report Categories
IOM Care Need
Getting Better
|
Identifying Information and Availability
Bibliographic Source(s)
Aurora RN, Zak RS, Maganti RK, Auerbach SH, Casey KR, Chowdhuri S, Karippot A, Ramar K, Kristo DA, Morgenthaler TI, Standards of Practice Committee, American Academy of Sleep Medicine. Best practice guide for the treatment of REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD). J Clin Sleep Med 2010 Feb 15;6(1):85-95. [99 references] PubMed |
Adaptation
Not applicable: The guideline was not adapted from another source.
Guideline Developer(s)
American Academy of Sleep Medicine - Professional Association
Source(s) of Funding
American Academy of Sleep Medicine
Guideline Committee
Standards of Practice Committee
Composition of Group That Authored the Guideline
Committee Members: R. Nisha Aurora, MD; Rochelle Zak, MD; Rama K. Maganti, MD; Sanford Auerbach, MD; Kenneth R. Casey, MD; Susmita Chowdhuri, MD; Anoop Karippot, MD; Kannan Ramar, MD; David A. Kristo, MD; Timothy I. Morgenthaler, MD
Financial Disclosures/Conflicts of Interest
All members of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) Standards of Practice Committee and Board of Directors completed detailed conflict-of-interest statements and were found to have no conflicts of interest with regard to this subject.
Guideline Status
This is the current release of the guideline.
Availability of Companion Documents
NGC Status
This NGC summary was completed by ECRI Institute on January 11, 2011. The information was verified by the guideline developer on February 7, 2011. This summary was updated by ECRI Institute on May 20, 2011 following the U.S. Food and Drug Administration advisory on antipsychotic drugs.
Copyright Statement
This NGC summary is based on the original guideline, which is subject to the guideline developer's copyright restrictions. Please contact the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) for information regarding reproduction of AASM guidelines.
|
NGC Disclaimer
The National Guideline Clearinghouseâ„¢ (NGC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the guidelines represented on this site. Read full disclaimer...The National Guideline Clearinghouseâ„¢ (NGC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the guidelines represented on this site.
All guidelines summarized by NGC and hosted on our site are produced under the auspices of medical specialty societies, relevant professional associations, public or private organizations, other government agencies, health care organizations or plans, and similar entities.
Guidelines represented on the NGC Web site are submitted by guideline developers, and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NGC Inclusion Criteria which may be found at http://www.guideline.gov/about/inclusion-criteria.aspx.
NGC, AHRQ, and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or clinical efficacy or effectiveness of the clinical practice guidelines and related materials represented on this site. Moreover, the views and opinions of developers or authors of guidelines represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NGC, AHRQ, or its contractor ECRI Institute, and inclusion or hosting of guidelines in NGC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes.
Readers with questions regarding guideline content are directed to contact the guideline developer. Hide...
|