Below are rankings for the requested broadband characteristics. The broadband data below is as of 12/31/11 and represents data collected by SBDD grantees.
| Rank | Name | Speed Combo DL>3 UL>0.7  |
Add Metric | Add Metric | Add Metric | Add Metric | Add Metric | Add Metric |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Harris, TX | 100% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 2 | Dallas, TX | 100% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 3 | Tarrant, TX | 100% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 4 | Collin, TX | 100% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 5 | Denton, TX | 100% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 6 | Nueces, TX | 100% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 7 | Guadalupe, TX | 100% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 8 | Rockwall, TX | 100% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 9 | San Saba, TX | 100% ± -0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 10 | Midland, TX | 100% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 11 | Bexar, TX | 100% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 12 | Hidalgo, TX | 100% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 13 | Ector, TX | 100% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 14 | Travis, TX | 100% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 15 | Mills, TX | 100% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 16 | El Paso, TX | 99.9% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 17 | Lubbock, TX | 99.9% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 18 | Cameron, TX | 99.9% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 19 | Bee, TX | 99.9% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 20 | Parker, TX | 99.9% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 21 | Johnson, TX | 99.8% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 22 | Fort Bend, TX | 99.8% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 23 | Potter, TX | 99.7% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 24 | San Patricio, TX | 99.7% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 25 | Wilson, TX | 99.7% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 26 | Galveston, TX | 99.7% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 27 | Kaufman, TX | 99.6% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 28 | Karnes, TX | 99.6% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 29 | Ellis, TX | 99.5% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 30 | Grayson, TX | 99.5% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 31 | Randall, TX | 99.5% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 32 | Maverick, TX | 99.5% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 33 | McLennan, TX | 99.5% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 34 | Bailey, TX | 99.5% ± -0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 35 | Hunt, TX | 99.4% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 36 | Calhoun, TX | 99.3% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 37 | Caldwell, TX | 99.1% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 38 | Gonzales, TX | 99.1% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 39 | Howard, TX | 99.1% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 40 | Hood, TX | 99.0% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 41 | Jefferson, TX | 99.0% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 42 | Victoria, TX | 99.0% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 43 | Live Oak, TX | 98.9% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 44 | Wise, TX | 98.9% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 45 | Bell, TX | 98.9% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 46 | Montgomery, TX | 98.9% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 47 | Fannin, TX | 98.9% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 48 | Archer, TX | 98.8% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 49 | Crane, TX | 98.7% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 50 | Williamson, TX | 98.7% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 51 | Gregg, TX | 98.7% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 52 | Swisher, TX | 98.6% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 53 | Webb, TX | 98.6% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 54 | Val Verde, TX | 98.5% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 55 | Cooke, TX | 98.4% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 56 | Andrews, TX | 98.3% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 57 | Refugio, TX | 98.2% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 58 | Coryell, TX | 98.1% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 59 | McCulloch, TX | 98.0% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 60 | Hays, TX | 97.8% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 61 | Brazos, TX | 97.7% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 62 | Smith, TX | 97.6% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 63 | Orange, TX | 97.5% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 64 | Wichita, TX | 97.4% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 65 | Clay, TX | 97.3% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 66 | Willacy, TX | 97.2% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 67 | Armstrong, TX | 97.2% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 68 | Briscoe, TX | 97.2% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 69 | Somervell, TX | 97.1% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 70 | Delta, TX | 97.1% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 71 | Moore, TX | 97.0% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 72 | Aransas, TX | 96.7% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 73 | Crosby, TX | 96.5% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 74 | Kerr, TX | 96.5% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 75 | Jim Wells, TX | 96.4% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 76 | Limestone, TX | 96.4% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 77 | Taylor, TX | 96.3% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 78 | Jim Hogg, TX | 96.2% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 79 | Lynn, TX | 96.0% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 80 | Comal, TX | 96.0% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 81 | Dawson, TX | 96.0% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 82 | Frio, TX | 95.8% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 83 | Brooks, TX | 95.8% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 84 | Terry, TX | 95.7% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 85 | Winkler, TX | 95.4% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 86 | Hockley, TX | 95.3% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 87 | Hill, TX | 95.3% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 88 | Uvalde, TX | 95.2% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 89 | Angelina, TX | 94.9% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 90 | Hale, TX | 94.8% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 91 | Matagorda, TX | 94.7% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 92 | Medina, TX | 94.4% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 93 | Atascosa, TX | 94.4% ± 0.1 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 94 | DeWitt, TX | 94.3% ± 0.1 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 95 | Hutchinson, TX | 94.3% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 96 | Bastrop, TX | 94.2% ± 0.1 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 97 | Zavala, TX | 94.0% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 98 | Bowie, TX | 93.8% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 99 | Ward, TX | 93.8% ± 0.1 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 100 | Jackson, TX | 93.8% ± 0.1 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 101 | Gray, TX | 93.8% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 102 | Dickens, TX | 93.5% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 103 | Deaf Smith, TX | 93.3% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 104 | Lamar, TX | 93.0% ± 0.1 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 105 | Edwards, TX | 93.0% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 106 | Kleberg, TX | 92.9% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 107 | Chambers, TX | 92.8% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 108 | Falls, TX | 92.6% ± 0.1 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 109 | Starr, TX | 92.5% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 110 | Garza, TX | 92.4% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 111 | Zapata, TX | 92.3% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 112 | Dimmit, TX | 92.2% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 113 | Brazoria, TX | 91.7% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 114 | Duval, TX | 91.0% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 115 | Lamb, TX | 90.8% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 116 | Tom Green, TX | 90.1% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 117 | Kent, TX | 89.9% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 118 | Ochiltree, TX | 89.5% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 119 | Palo Pinto, TX | 89.4% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 120 | Nacogdoches, TX | 89.4% ± 0.1 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 121 | Upton, TX | 89.4% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 122 | Hall, TX | 89.0% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 123 | Reagan, TX | 88.1% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 124 | Henderson, TX | 88.0% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 125 | Nolan, TX | 87.9% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 126 | Cottle, TX | 87.9% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 127 | Lavaca, TX | 87.4% ± 0.1 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 128 | Jack, TX | 87.2% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 129 | Parmer, TX | 86.9% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 130 | Llano, TX | 86.8% ± 0.1 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 131 | Montague, TX | 86.6% ± 0.1 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 132 | Young, TX | 86.1% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 133 | Motley, TX | 85.9% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 134 | Martin, TX | 85.7% ± 0.1 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 135 | Lampasas, TX | 85.6% ± 0.1 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 136 | Mitchell, TX | 85.4% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 137 | Milam, TX | 84.9% ± 0.2 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 138 | Carson, TX | 84.7% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 139 | Mason, TX | 84.2% ± 0.1 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 140 | Lee, TX | 83.9% ± 0.2 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 141 | Cochran, TX | 83.9% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 142 | Hansford, TX | 83.8% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 143 | Real, TX | 83.4% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 144 | Floyd, TX | 83.4% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 145 | Wilbarger, TX | 83.1% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 146 | Navarro, TX | 82.6% ± 0.1 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 147 | Brown, TX | 82.3% ± 0.1 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 148 | Hardeman, TX | 81.4% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 149 | Throckmorton, TX | 81.2% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 150 | Scurry, TX | 80.9% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 151 | Lipscomb, TX | 80.8% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 152 | Kendall, TX | 80.7% ± 0.1 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 153 | Sherman, TX | 80.3% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 154 | Gaines, TX | 80.3% ± 0.1 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 155 | Hardin, TX | 80.0% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 156 | Callahan, TX | 79.7% ± 0.1 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 157 | Burnet, TX | 79.6% ± 0.1 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 158 | Yoakum, TX | 79.4% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 159 | La Salle, TX | 79.4% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 160 | Dallam, TX | 79.3% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 161 | Sutton, TX | 79.3% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 162 | Hopkins, TX | 79.1% ± 0.1 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 163 | Waller, TX | 78.7% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 164 | Erath, TX | 78.5% ± 0.1 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 165 | Franklin, TX | 78.5% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 166 | Goliad, TX | 78.4% ± 0.2 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 167 | Hudspeth, TX | 78.1% ± 0.1 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 168 | Rains, TX | 78.1% ± 0.1 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 169 | Trinity, TX | 77.8% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 170 | Crockett, TX | 77.4% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 171 | Brewster, TX | 77.0% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 172 | Sterling, TX | 76.5% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 173 | Bosque, TX | 76.0% ± 0.1 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 174 | Kinney, TX | 75.3% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 175 | Culberson, TX | 75.3% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 176 | Wood, TX | 74.9% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 177 | Pecos, TX | 74.8% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 178 | Hemphill, TX | 73.8% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 179 | Wheeler, TX | 73.7% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 180 | Anderson, TX | 73.6% ± 0.1 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 181 | Runnels, TX | 73.2% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 182 | Castro, TX | 72.7% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 183 | King, TX | 72.6% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 184 | Hamilton, TX | 72.4% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 185 | McMullen, TX | 72.2% ± 0.1 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 186 | Harrison, TX | 72.0% ± 0.1 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 187 | Shackelford, TX | 71.9% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 188 | Morris, TX | 71.7% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 189 | Collingsworth, TX | 70.9% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 190 | Freestone, TX | 70.8% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 191 | Polk, TX | 70.7% ± 0.1 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 192 | Menard, TX | 69.4% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 193 | Comanche, TX | 69.3% ± 0.1 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 194 | Childress, TX | 68.9% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 195 | Wharton, TX | 68.6% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 196 | Van Zandt, TX | 68.5% ± 0.1 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 197 | Walker, TX | 68.3% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 198 | Robertson, TX | 67.9% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 199 | Titus, TX | 67.9% ± 0.1 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 200 | Eastland, TX | 67.8% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 201 | Fayette, TX | 67.4% ± 0.1 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 202 | Reeves, TX | 67.0% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 203 | Stephens, TX | 66.7% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 204 | Liberty, TX | 66.2% ± 0.1 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 205 | Gillespie, TX | 65.7% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 206 | Houston, TX | 65.7% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 207 | Madison, TX | 64.9% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 208 | Hartley, TX | 64.6% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 209 | Washington, TX | 64.2% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 210 | Haskell, TX | 63.9% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 211 | Knox, TX | 63.5% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 212 | Roberts, TX | 63.1% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 213 | Austin, TX | 62.6% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 214 | Leon, TX | 62.2% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 215 | Burleson, TX | 61.0% ± 0.2 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 216 | Cherokee, TX | 61.0% ± 0.1 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 217 | Fisher, TX | 60.5% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 218 | Rusk, TX | 60.4% ± 0.1 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 219 | Grimes, TX | 60.2% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 220 | Red River, TX | 59.0% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 221 | Donley, TX | 58.4% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 222 | Schleicher, TX | 57.6% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 223 | Blanco, TX | 57.3% ± 0.1 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 224 | Baylor, TX | 55.7% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 225 | Oldham, TX | 55.4% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 226 | Jones, TX | 55.3% ± 0.2 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 227 | Camp, TX | 55.0% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 228 | Kimble, TX | 54.4% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 229 | Coleman, TX | 54.2% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 230 | Cass, TX | 53.7% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 231 | Sabine, TX | 53.1% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 232 | Upshur, TX | 53.1% ± 0.2 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 233 | Irion, TX | 52.8% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 234 | Colorado, TX | 52.1% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 235 | Jeff Davis, TX | 49.8% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 236 | Borden, TX | 49.3% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 237 | Stonewall, TX | 48.8% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 238 | Tyler, TX | 46.5% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 239 | Bandera, TX | 44.7% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 240 | San Augustine, TX | 43.2% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 241 | Panola, TX | 42.9% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 242 | Concho, TX | 41.2% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 243 | Jasper, TX | 41.1% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 244 | Newton, TX | 39.9% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 245 | Shelby, TX | 39.4% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 246 | San Jacinto, TX | 34.8% ± 0.1 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 247 | Marion, TX | 30.5% ± 0.1 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 248 | Presidio, TX | 26.3% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 249 | Glasscock, TX | 16.9% ± 0.1 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 250 | Loving, TX | 10.7% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 251 | Coke, TX | 3.5% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 252 | Kenedy, TX | 1.5% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 253 | Foard, TX | 0.0% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
| 254 | Terrell, TX | 0.0% ± 0.0 | % | % | % | % | % | % |
View and download popular reports.
You are now leaving the National Broadband Map web site, and will be automatically forwarded to the following site:
%url%
This link is provided for informational purposes only. We do not endorse any other product or service, and are not responsible for the content of other websites, including their accuracy, completeness, or timeliness.
Short URL »