LABEL DISCLOSURE FOR
BRANDY TREATED WITH WOOD
(27 C.F.R. 5.39(c))
Distilled Spirits Plant Proprietors, Importers and Others
Concerned:
Purpose. The purpose of this circular is to advise
industry members that ATF Ruling 87-3 is being modified by
a new ruling which will be published in the next issue of
the Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms Quarterly Bulletin.
The ruling reads substantially as follows:
In order to afford industry members sufficient time to
make label revisions to comply with section 5.39(c), the
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms is extending the
use-up period for existing certificates of label approval
until December 31, 1988.
Background. In ATF Rul. 87-3 (A.T.F. Q.B. 1987-3,
12), and corresponding Industry Circular 87-6 (dated
September 4, 1987), the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and
Firearms (ATF) addressed the question of whether brandy
treated with wood, in forms other than chips or slabs
(e.g., extracts, powders, infusions, etc.), at any time
during the production process, was subject to the label
disclosure requirement in 27 C.F.R. 5.39(c).
Specifically, section 5.39(c) reads as follows:
Treatment with wood. The words "colored and flavored
with wood ____________ (insert chips, slabs, etc., as
appropriate)" shall be stated as a part of the class
and type designation for whisky and brandy treated, in
whole or in part, with wood through percolation, or
otherwise, during distillation or storage, other than
through contact with the oak container.
The Bureau also addressed the question of whether
brandy produced with an ingredient that had been treated
with wood (e.g., blending sherry) was subject to the
provisions of section 5.39(c), and whether Cognac, in
particular, treated with wood was subject to the
provisions of 5.39(c).
ATF Rul. 87-3 held that brandy (including Cognac),
treated with wood in any form, either directly or
indirectly, at any point in the production process, up to
and including the time of bottling, must comply with the
requirements of 27 C.F.R. 5.39(c). ATF Rul. 87-3 further
held that existing certificates of label approval for
brandies which did not meet the requirements of the ruling
would expire at midnight, December 31, 1987. In addition,
applications for certificates of label approval received
on or after September 1, 1987, had to meet the
requirements discussed in the ruling.
ATF believes that in order to avoid placing an undue
burden on the industry, and to afford industry members
sufficient time to make revisions to comply with section
5.39(c), an extension of the use-up period for existing
certificates of label approval is warranted.
Held, existing certificates of label approval for
brandies which do not meet the requirements of ATF Rul.
87-3 will expire at midnight, December 31, 1988.
ATF Ruling 87-3 (A.T.F. Q.B. 1987-3, 12), and
corresponding Industry Circular 87-6 (dated September 4,
1987), are modified.
Inquiries. Inquiries concerning this circular should
refer to its number and be addressed to: Associate
Director (Compliance Operations), Bureau of Alcohol,
Tobacco and Firearms, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,
Washington, DC 20226.
Director
|