|
|
|
|
Van Hollen Statement on the Extension of Expiring Provisions in the Patriot Act
Washington,
May 26, 2011 -
Mr. Speaker, in February of this year, I voted to support a three-month extension of the Patriot Act provisions in today’s underlying legislation in order to give Congress time to build a consensus around necessary, common sense reform. Today, it is with great reluctance that I must stand in opposition to an additional extension of these provisions, as Congress has failed to make reforms to safeguard civil liberties.
This is a missed opportunity. Senators Leahy and Paul offered a bipartisan amendment that included a sunset date for National Security Letters, enhanced oversight of Patriot Act authorities, and more focused standards of relevance for business record requests – changes that would provide meaningful improvements to the balance between national security and civil liberties. However, this proposal was not given a vote on the floor of the Senate.
I believe there are important provisions in this bill that should be extended. However, there is also a clear need for improved oversight and privacy protections. We must not be stampeded into continuing to pass bad policy, especially when credible solutions are well within reach. I voted to give Congress time to responsibly reform these provisions. But I cannot in good conscience support a four-year extension that makes no effort to ensure that the authorities under this law are being exercised responsibly.
Mr. Speaker, I have always been prepared to support a balanced Patriot Act that defends Americans without eroding our freedom. Unfortunately, S. 990 is not that legislation.
|
Print version of this document
|
Congressman Chris Van Hollen
