Official Site of the U.S. Air Force   Right Corner Banner
Join the Air Force

News > Commentary - Standards of courage
Standards of courage

Posted 7/6/2011 Email story   Print story

    


Commentary by Lt. Col. Aaron Burgstein
1st Combat Camera Squadron


7/6/2011 - JOINT BASE CHARLESTON, S.C. (AFNS) -- The other day at lunch I saw something that really stuck with me. A colonel excused himself from his dining companions for a moment and went over to an Airman at another table. Discretely, he corrected her on improper wear of the uniform.

Is this something to be concerned about? Is this what leaders should take their time to do?

The answer is yes. He corrected something the moment he saw it was wrong. It doesn't matter that it was something as seemingly trivial as the improper wear of the uniform. It's our duty as Airmen, and especially as leaders, to correct things that are wrong, from simple uniform items to multi-million-dollar budgets, and everything in between. It's a combination of excellence and integrity. To put it more concretely, as I sit writing this in an airport gate area, awaiting my maintenance delayed flight, I sure hope someone is watching and correcting the mechanics fixing my jet.

In addition to integrity, it also took courage to correct that Airman. Sure, some might argue that as a senior officer, one should feel secure in correcting a lower-ranking person. In this case, rank doesn't matter. It takes moral courage to walk up to someone you don't know and tell them they're doing something wrong. Odds are, you're not making an instant friend and you're going to cause some hurt feelings.

It's a responsibility all supervisors share. I knew of a supervisor who would not give feedback, or at least honest feedback, because once when he did so, the person he was trying to help started crying. I've known of others who just didn't take the time to correct seemingly minor infractions such as hair or uniforms. The problem is those seemingly minor issues become larger issues. These leaders set their Airmen up for failure. In a couple of cases I've seen, the lack of an early course correction resulted in being passed over for promotion a few years down the road.

It's not fun correcting people. Adversarial encounters rarely are a good time. However, it's our duty, as Airmen and as leaders, to uphold the standards. That requires not only knowing the standards, but having the moral courage to tell someone they're wrong. You do it professionally, with as little fuss as needed, but nonetheless, you do it.

But it's not just supervisors.

A personal example and one that definitely shows courage is the Airman who recently corrected me on a uniform issue. We were at a squadron event and he asked if he could speak to me. When we were out of earshot of everyone else, he very quietly told me that I was doing something the Air Force Instructions did not allow. I quickly corrected the issue and thanked him for helping me out.

That took courage. Moreover, he handled it fantastically. He pulled me aside, kept it very professional and helped me out instead of playing "gotcha!" I appreciated that correction which helped me look better, and even more so, I appreciated his courage in approaching me.

This is where excellence comes in. We hold ourselves responsible, as Airmen of all ranks, to uphold standards and display excellence in what we do.

It's also about more than just correcting mistakes or issues you see. It's about setting your Airmen up for success. One of the hardest things I've had to do in my career was to defer a promotion until the Airman could meet standards -- not my standards, but Air Force standards. However, as a leader, it was about more than just telling someone they were wrong. It doesn't just stop with the correction. After that, a good leader ensures the Airman has the support needed to get back on track. That's what we do as leaders. We help our Airmen.

Have that moral courage to do what's right, no matter how unpleasant it may be. You'll be happy you did, and just importantly, those people you correct will most likely thank you in the long run.



tabComments
7/7/2011 11:51:55 AM ET
Well said, Lt.Col Burgstein. It reminds me of things done and things said over 20 years ago in places like Dover AFB, Quantico MCAS, Ft. Belvoir VA. It is amazing how time has passed and as you have clearly indicated that Standards are just that: Standards. It doesn't matter if you are a LCPL or a Maj. General, the US Armed Forces set standards that all military personnel should uphold and as you informed us enforced. The main thing is that we hold one another accountable to the Standard and how we perform the accountability. I remember as an OCS Candidate at Quantico, I saw a Sgt. Instructor with a rank insignia that had lost a clutch back and had spun upside down. Talk about having second thoughts. I had 5th and 6th ones. But after seeing a moment when no one was within a direct hearing distance, I asked the Instructor if I could ask him a question. So I began the whole OCS line of talking in 3rd person, but eventually was able to inform him that his chevrons were upside down.
James Denny, TN
 
Add a comment

 Inside AF.mil

ima cornerSearch

tabSubscribe AF.MIL
tabMore HeadlinesRSS feed 
KC-46 enters critical design review phase

Slideshow: Fifth-generation formation  1

Air Force Week in Photos

Chaplains provide support and comfort for families

IDS agencies team up to teach life skills to new Airmen

ANG director discusses way forward

Carter: Sequestration would have effect of 'hidden tax'

CMSAF: 'Be the best, know your Airmen, tell your story'  1

Carter urges stepped up progress on cyber defense

Partnerships develop Air Force youth  1

Air Force leaders offer perspectives at four-star forum

Dempsey: Insider attacks won't affect NATO's Afghan strategy  1

'Teammates wanted' to deliver future

Personnel chief: Road ahead for Airmen tough, but bright  3

tabCommentaryRSS feed 
Sept. 17: A day for Constitutional conversation  2

Losing Your Future to Sexual Assault   24


Site Map      Contact Us     Questions     Security and Privacy notice     E-publishing