Official Site of the U.S. Air Force   Right Corner Banner
Join the Air Force

News > Defense budget cuts must be balanced, Mullen says
 
Photos 
Defense budget cuts must be balanced
Navy Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, addresses the media during a press conference in Kabul, Afghanistan, July 31, 2011. The chairman was in Afghanistan to get the ground truth from commanders and service members. He visited service members at Kandahar, Sangin, Lashkar-Gah and Tarin Khowt. (Defense Department photo/Petty Officer 1st Class Chad J. McNeeley)
Download HiRes
 
Related Links
 Adm. Michael G. Mullen
Defense budget cuts must be balanced, Mullen says

Posted 8/1/2011 Email story   Print story

    


by Jim Garamone
American Forces Press Service


8/1/2011 - CAMP LEATHERNECK, Afghanistan (AFNS) -- As the pressure increases on the federal budget, the Defense Department must make cuts in a balanced way, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff said here today.

"There are three dials: the people dial, the operations dial and the acquisition or equipment dial," Navy Adm. Mike Mullen said to about 300 Marines and sailors at this sprawling base in Helmand province. "We're going to have to make adjustments in all three."

Any changes must be done slowly and with forethought, the chairman said. He wants to avoid the hollow force of the 1970s and the kind of severe cuts made in the 1990s.

"When we did this in the 1990s, we learned in hindsight that we came down end-strength far too quickly," he said.

The services need the time to allow service members to plan the next steps in their lives, and to allow "the systems internal to the services to adjust," the chairman said. The Navy has had to drop active-duty end strength over the past decade by 50,000.
"The most we could do was about 10,000 a year in terms of seeing people leave the Navy," he said. "Each service will be different."

There will be adjustments in all three service departments and they must be done in an integrated way, he said.

Cuts in defense, then, cannot come from personnel only or pay and benefits only or acquisition only, Mullen said.

Some aspects of the budget have to be studied because the expense is not sustainable.

"Our health costs in the Department of Defense have grown from $19 billion in 2001, to $51 billion this year," the chairman said. "In four years this will grow to $64 billion. If we don't get control of that, we're going to be a very healthy, but small force. Because those are bills that you just have to pay."

Military health care is a great system, Mullen said. It's a gold standard for health care in America, "but it's not inexpensive ... and the checkbook is not unlimited," he said.

The Army and Marine Corps will drop peronnel in the years after fiscal 2015, the chairman said. The military has 48,000 personnel in Iraq now and is scheduled to have all service members out of the country by the end of the year. President Barack Obama has ordered a drawdown in Afghanistan with a 10,000-personnel reduction by the end of this year and a further reduction of 23,000 by the end of summer 2012.

It makes sense, the chairman said, for the military to draw down if the operations tempo drops. Even then the Army and Marine Corps will have more people than when they started, he said.

At Kandahar Air Base earlier in the day, a soldier asked Mullen about changes to military retirement. The chairman said there's no immediate plan to affect retirement. Any changes to military retirement should be studied carefully and be the product of a senior-level, independent commission. He also said any changes to retirement should be grandfathered so the military doesn't break faith with those in the service.

The chairman is in Afghanistan to get the ground truth from commanders and service members. He visited service members at Sangin, Lashkar-Gah and Tarin Khowt.



tabComments
8/3/2011 4:26:39 PM ET
Amen to that I would be a millionaire if they paid OT.
Eric, Ramstein
 
8/2/2011 4:40:21 PM ET
I sincerely hope that any changes to the military retirement system are grandfathered. The Air Force Times just ran a story about the senior-level indepedent commision that had little military representation and their recommendations to immediately cease the current system and implement a partial pension-401K system which ultimately leads to less retirement funds down the road.After 12 years of settling on lower pay jobs that accrue little or no retirement benefits when I can find them. I'm gravely concerned about the future financial security of all military families and urge all AD families to watch the legislation and raise our voices to protect these benefits.To treat the services like a corporation shows an incredible lack of insight and understanding into the sacrifices an AD family makes. Hmmmm... when was the last time any service member got overtime for working over 40 hrs IF service members received OT they could most likely save enough on their own for retire
Concerned AD Spouse, Colorado
 
Add a comment

 Inside AF.mil

ima cornerSearch

tabSubscribe AF.MIL
tabMore HeadlinesRSS feed 
Missing for 46 years, air commando laid to rest

Air mobility response team readies for 'Sandy'

As Sandy closes in, Mobility Airmen stand ready

Air Force Week in Photos

U.K. F-35 fleet increases capability at Eglin AFB

Avon Park Air Force Range receives Interior Secretary award

Former Little Rock AFB commander and spouse receive 2012 O'Malley award

Reservist sets latest mark in battle for Schriever track record

CSAF shares perspective during AETC Senior Leader Conference

Thule boilers save big in first year

Life Extension Programs modernize ICBMs

SecAF visits basic military training

Through Airmen's Eyes: Airman battles breast cancer

Remains of two Airmen lost in 1969 identified, honored

tabCommentaryRSS feed 
Teal ropes to spotlight sexual assault response  37

Air Force Academy energy research will yield global benefits


Site Map      Contact Us     Questions     Security and Privacy notice     E-publishing