Official Site of the U.S. Air Force   Right Corner Banner
Join the Air Force

News > Commentary - Time to change our EPR culture
 
Related Links
 CMSAF: Now is the time for bold leadership
Time to change our EPR culture

Posted 4/25/2012 Email story   Print story

    


Commentary by Master Sgt. Lee Hoover
American Forces Network Incirlik


4/25/2012 - INCIRLIK AIR BASE, Turkey (AFNS) -- The second I pinned on staff sergeant I knew I could do it. I could be the NCO the Air Force wanted me to be. I could write fair enlisted performance reports and prove the naysayers in airman leadership school wrong. Sure, what we learned might "not be the way it's done in the real Air Force," but that didn't mean it couldn't be.

I was going to prove them wrong. I was going to set the example.

But I didn't.

Before I could spell EPR I had fallen in line. I rated every Airman the same - fives across the board. Some deserved it. Others probably, admittedly, did not.

So, what happened? Culture happened.

Culture influences the way a country, a community, even a military organization operates. Members of a culture share certain beliefs that drive their actions. These beliefs are often unconscious, but so firmly held that to think otherwise - and to respond otherwise - is, as Vizzini from "The Princess Bride" puts it, inconceivable.

In America we believe timeliness is important. We respond by tracking every minute, making firm appointments and rushing to be on time. When we do run late our bodies physically respond with stress. In countries that feel differently about time this is, yes, inconceivable.

In certain communities, parents believe children need tough discipline. They respond by collecting spanking sticks, publicly yelling at their children and assigning multiple chores. In communities that raise their children in a gentler environment this is, you got it, inconceivable.

In the Air Force, when it comes to the EPR, we also have beliefs that influence our behavior. We believe a five EPR is necessary for promotion. We believe inflated ratings don't matter because they happen everywhere. We even believe a three or four EPR is reserved for "bad" Airmen. These aren't what the numbers say, nor what the EPR says; but they are what we believe, and we respond accordingly. In fact, these assumptions are so ingrained in our minds that it's hard to reject them. They are so strong that even those who don't want to believe, those who want to rate fairly, struggle to break free from the cultural pressure.

If we understand the inflated ratings as a symptom of our shared beliefs, one thing becomes clear: the enlisted evaluation system doesn't need to change. We need to change. Our culture needs to change.

Unfortunately, culture change isn't easy. Just ask Kevin Bacon.

In the movie "Footloose," Bacon moves to a town that believes dancing and pop culture lead teenagers to sex, drugs and, ultimately, death. Town residents respond by outlawing dancing, hiding pop records and burning inappropriate books.

Bacon faces intense pressure to conform to these standards, but he refuses. He's ridiculed, shamed and treated as a troublemaker, but he doesn't give up.

He puts on his dancing shoes and begins to fight back.

At first he stands alone, dancing by himself in an empty warehouse (I never understood that scene), but as time passes, more of his neighbors begin to dance beside him. As the number of dancers grows, his movement grows. Eventually the town begins to see their stance against dancing for what it is - a misplaced belief.

Last week I read Chief Master Sgt. of the Air Force James Roy's perspective on bold leadership and thought now is the time for us to make like Bacon and change the way our Air Force operates. It will take more than dancing shoes, of course. It will take bold leadership from the very top to the very bottom, it will take open and honest dialogue to expose our beliefs for what they really are - beliefs, not facts - and it will definitely take time.

It always takes time, but that time can't start until we begin.

The question is who is going to respond to Roy's challenge? Who is going to set the example, to stand out from the crowd, to take it upon themselves to change these beliefs that are holding us back?

Or maybe the question isn't who. I'd be dumb to think Airmen everywhere are not ready for this change.

Maybe the question is when. When do we start holding ourselves, and others, accountable for doing proper feedbacks and setting goals for our Airmen? When do we start demanding honest and fair ratings according to the EPR scale? When do we start supporting those who have already tried?

Today would be good.



tabComments
5/2/2012 9:04:08 PM ET
What about simplifying the EPR to match the performance assessment categories in Block III of the EPR Rate 1 through 4 from Does Not Meet to Clearly Exceeds and justify each category. For example the 'Meets' category or 2 would be for the airman that does their job and is to work on time and follows all the rules. A 3 or 'Above Average' is the airman that does more than the average airman in their career field like additional eduaction, community involvement, award nominations and the 'Clearly Exceeds' or 4 is the airman who has actually won awards like Airman of the Quarter Year etc. and performed duties or hold positions above their current rank.
David, Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam
 
5/2/2012 7:37:47 PM ET
The fact that this issue is still haunting us is quite depressing. Make it simple and allow EPRs to follow the same model as OPRs. A rating of either Meets or Does Not Meet is all it takes. Why do we insist on beating this dead horse when the solution is so obvious
Joe, Texas
 
5/2/2012 12:38:25 PM ET
As long as the force requires lower-paid personnel to be exceptional performers to stay on the good side of higher-paid managers who need only to meet standards to remain on the payroll and earn a much bigger retirement check, there will be severe imbalances in the rating system.
J.T., Crestview FL
 
5/2/2012 11:46:03 AM ET
Hoover, you are right my friend, but it takes courage.
SMSgt retired, Robins
 
5/2/2012 11:09:13 AM ET
I believe PT should be the biggest deciding factor between a good or bad EPR rating. If you failed a PT test anytime in your rating period, then you should Recieve at a max a 3 on your EPR. Then we can start getting rid of all the fat bodys.
Arnold, Peterson AFB
 
5/2/2012 9:57:31 AM ET
@Really, other people's supervisors don't dictate your integrity. If the member deserves a 3 or 4 and you've provided mentoring and feedback accordingly, then you give it. Your excuse is why we have people still doing it because you're all too worried about doing what everyone else is. Give the right EPR and you'll grow better Airmen.
Shocker, VA
 
5/1/2012 2:02:01 PM ET
LOL story of the week
Garrett, Portland OR
 
5/1/2012 1:45:26 PM ET
While I would agree with MSgt Hoover in principle the challenge needs to be issued to our senior leaders to get the ball going. The question was asked when I was in NCOA about how many of us wouldn't mind a 4 EPR if that's what we really deserved. Everyone raised their hand. Well everyone except me. I would happily take a 4 and happily write a 4 IF EVERYONE IN THE AF WAS GRADING ON THE SAME CURVE DURING THE SAME REPORTING CYCLE or from a set date forward. The fact remains that some may abide by the book but there will still be others that won't and in the end who's going to get more promotion points at WAPS time That's right those who have a supervisor who won't follow the book.Senior leaders are just that LEADERS When I hear of our last few CMSAF's talk about this issue they inevitably defer the responsibility to start the cycle to the grassroots troops. What they should do is set a date on the calendar and demand that the future EPR's comply to the book. Only
Really, Nebraska
 
5/1/2012 10:34:14 AM ET
I knew someone was going to mention PT scores. I think we have done enough in stressing how important PT is. I know several individuals who have scored above a 90 on their PT test and could not find their way out of a paper bag. PT tests are not a method to give people a promotion boost. By the way I have no problem with the current system we do not need to emphasize PT any more the system works as it is. Also before you ask I just passed my PT test last week and scored very well.
Pete, Ramstein
 
5/1/2012 9:19:43 AM ET
Read AFI 36 2903. Set Standards that are Clear Measurable and Attainable. Provide continuous feedback. Do Initial Midterm maybe even Rater Directed or Ratee Requested Feedbacks. Write MFR LOC LOA LOR as needed. Then write the EPR. The Supervisor doesnt give a rating the subordinate earns one. Can the rating be justified It may take a few closed door sessions to iron out the details and a good NCO can work through challenges.In my experience Supervisors are not prepared to write the EPR because they have not supervised properly and or they wait until the last minute. There are also some supervisors that know it is hard to hold an subordinate to a standard that they themselves do not follow. The NCO corps needs to step up encourage those NCOs that are doing it right correct those that are not and lead. Personally we need to redefine the boundary between Airmen Jr. NCOs and Sr NCOs. Personal relationships can compromise leadership but thats just a thou
Retired NCO, Ohio
 
4/30/2012 1:33:43 PM ET
Blah blah blah. Sorry to say it but that's how tired I am of hearing about this whole EPR issue. Just like the AF to pick a topic and run it in the ground The system will never change because the human factor will never be removed from the process. I'm so sick of watching people sit on profile for 2 years can't take a full PT test, can't deploy, volunteer for everything under the sun, do not know a thing about their job, etc, but still receive firewall 5's, Oh and when you do try to mark someone down you have to show countless pieces of paper to justify. Give me a break. When you do have a legit 5 then you spend all day changing great to awesome to satisfy whatever writing style your current leadership likes. Again, give me a break.
FedUp SNCO, Soon retired
 
4/30/2012 12:31:45 PM ET
For clarification in order to have his dance Kevin Bacon actually had to have the dance outside of the city limits. The Air Force is sorta like the town. Oh sure you can change things but not here.
David, Washington DC
 
4/30/2012 12:25:42 PM ET
The point about separating EPR scores from WAPS is well-taken and may prove to be popular. However where then is the incentive for performance
MSgt F V - retired, Ireland
 
4/27/2012 3:47:09 PM ET
If all an Airman has to do to get a 5 is be average there is no incentive to be the best. The inflated EPR system ruins motivation just as much as the bogus award system that rewards Airmen not for their excellence but rather for their supervisor's ability to write good bullets.The cure INTEGRITY
Prior non-nonner nonner, Idaho
 
4/27/2012 12:31:03 PM ET
I think we could learn a lot from our joint bretheren. It would behoove every leader to sit down and read a few Marine EPRs; they have by far the best enlisted evaluation system. In addition to their use of only one category of not meeting standards, they use a well understood tiered system for meeting standards and above. And the best among them still don't get max out FITREPS. Don't bore me with comments about how it's not the same. I've rated apples to apples Marines and AF in a joint assignment and their system challenges and rewards the member without bloating the system with false perfection. It's called benchmarking and lessons learned people... do it.
JB, VA
 
4/27/2012 12:16:31 PM ET
Wait a minute... I thought we were all firewall fives now because the threes and fours have been force-shaped out by now. Aren't we doing more with less using only the best of the best?
Stuart, Planet Earth
 
4/27/2012 10:38:26 AM ET
Time to change...how about a simple GoNo Go rating That would surely shake things up.
Retired Sarge, Here n There
 
4/27/2012 9:24:34 AM ET
@ SSgt Grandishar and D conus... I could see this being an associated press style or a journalism thing as you put it if MSgt Hoover was actually reporting on something. This is a Commentary...He did make some valid points about the current EPR sys though. The only way to fix it in my opinion is to untie it from promotion testing.
J, Scott AFB
 
4/27/2012 6:45:02 AM ET
The AF should make the EPR system like the ridiculous Medal system. Amn-Sra get Achievement Medals SSgt- TSgt only get Commendation medals and of course MSgt-CMSgt get the Meritorious medals. Obviously a TSgt that is retiring after 20 years of service has not served well enough to warrant the Meritorious Service Medal but the MSgt who is PCSing after 2 whole years on station should receive the standard Meritorious Service Medal. In other words lets go to a rank based EPR system. AB-SrA are all 3s SSgt-TSgt are all 4 and MSgt-CMSgt are of course all 5.
Happily Retired CMSgt, Ohio
 
4/27/2012 1:34:12 AM ET
As long as the EPR is tied to WAPS testing by points it will never work as it should
Gladly retired, Planet earth
 
4/26/2012 10:33:24 PM ET
Until Congress becomes an institution of fairness and efficiency the EPRAPRWhatever it's called system will not change. As long as SNCOs and officers allow this to continue to go on as MSgt Hoover eluded to that he did as well then the same old same old will continue. You want leadership Be the change.. don't wait for your Senior NCO to step up and do something.
Awesome, Colorado
 
4/26/2012 5:12:25 PM ET
Everyone is a 5 and I want my trophy.
Me, here
 
4/26/2012 3:43:39 PM ET
MSgt Hoover--well said.Fellow Airmen--Keep the faith.
Lt Col Frank Tersigni, Heidelberg GE
 
4/26/2012 2:17:15 PM ET
I bet those 3 EPRs could've been overcome by studying a little harder for the tests. Everyone is quick the blame the EPR, but when someone does the math for them, they realize if they would have scored in the 70's or 80's instead of in the 50's they would have been promoted.
MSgt C, Lackland AFB
 
4/26/2012 1:56:02 PM ET
The problem is not the EPR system, it's the promotion system. they should replace the EPR with the our PT information. Example, last 5 EPRs gets you 135 points, last three 90's get you the same...Work some kind of scale like that. then at least the person who fails to get promoted can only blame themselves. And the EPR systm will probably work it self out.
Mike, Dover AFB
 
4/26/2012 12:58:04 PM ET
I joined the AF 23 years ago shortly after the AF instituted the 5 scale EPR. Prior to that was a 9 scale APR. The reason for the change - inflated ratings. And we knew even back then that eventually ratings would end up inflated and we would end up in the same boat we were in with the APR system. Our supervisors tried at least for a couple of years to give honest ratings. In my squadron there was a quota based on the bell curve. Most everybody got a 3 because that is Average and most people fall into the Average category. A lesser number received a 4 and only a handful received a 5. That philosophy didn't last. The bell curve is good in theory but hard to justify when you have a squadron of sharp hard-working troops. By the time I had been in the AF three years, our supervisors had reverted to the old mentality. Everybody received 5s because we didn't want to hurt their career. And then I went to ALS and we had a lengthy heated discussion that we're still having som
Mahuhu, Kirtland AFB
 
4/26/2012 10:30:07 AM ET
Don't agree that it would be Chief Roy's challenge, J. Seems to be the trendy thing to make that claim currently, but it's just not true. Take another look at AF DD1. Re-read the section on Centralized Control and Decentralized Execution: Centralized control maximizes the flexibility and effectiveness of air and space power; however, it must not become a recipe for micromanagement stifling the initiative subordinates need to deal with combats inevitable uncertainties.Decentralized execution of air and space power is the delegation of execution authority to responsible and capable lower-level commanders to achieve effective span of control and to foster disciplined initiative situational responsiveness and tactical flexibility. It allows subordinates to exploit opportunities in rapidly changing fluid situations.Supervisors are responsible for rating fairly. Let's all stop looking for someone to do our job for us and do this ourselves.
Doc Trine, Interwebs
 
4/26/2012 10:19:15 AM ET
If you are performing at a 3, earned a 3, why should you be given a 5?
Commander, Alabama
 
4/26/2012 7:14:41 AM ET
Bold leadership should start at the top. That is why the next AF Chief of Staff should NOT be a pilot. I have said it before, pull EPRs from WAPS scores and you will get more accurate performance evaluations.
BF, IN
 
4/26/2012 6:31:30 AM ET
To J from Scott AFB - MSgt Hoover is correct in using only the last name of the CMSAF after spelling out his title and using his full name on first reference. This falls in line with Associated Press style which is what we follow in the Air Force. Also I hope you received more from this commentary than merely the notion that someone may have been addressed improperly. MSgt Hoover made some bold valid points.
SSgt Gradishar Public Affairs, Incirlik Air Base Turkey
 
4/26/2012 12:01:49 AM ET
Actually with all due respect, J, in this format the last name and last name only is perfectly acceptable. It's a journalism thing...
D, CONUS
 
4/25/2012 9:11:58 PM ET
I was raised in the APR years and provided feedback before it was mandated. I believed in laying the person's performance out and discussing it and offered suggestions to get the rating they desired if the performance warranted. In SAC, they mandated a certain number 3's 4's and 5's per unit. We told the powers that be to basically stick it. Then they came out with rosters on who was not a member of the club...same response. It boils down to this now as then the supervisor sets the stadard through feedback. Only once did I non-concur. Later I had a self described experienced junior captain tell me he was too busy to properly rate a mediocre MSgt. I politely reminded him I had more time on leave than he had in the AF so plz do not lecture me about time. Supervisors get some steel in your backs and if appropriate tell the troop the baby is ugly and how to make it pretty. Otherwise, punch the 5 ticket and gripe about the system later.
John, Pensacola
 
4/25/2012 6:34:12 PM ET
It is true. If we can change our Air Force culture to accept that a three EPR is to be expected then the EPR system will balance out. However this change will not take place by simply passing the buck to the junior line supervisors. Senior leaders in all organizations should require justification for eacy four or five EPR that comes across their desk. It should be difficult to give an airman anything other than a three.
Capt, US
 
4/25/2012 5:05:38 PM ET
Good luck. When I was a flight commander in Germany I fought the battle of getting achievement medals for first term airmen. I had airmen with only 5 EPRs get turned down for them because their EPRs weren't firewall...on one occasion there was a single mark down on the front of the EPR on the airman's first EPR in the AF. His 2nd EPR was firewall but his decoration was denied. Too many SNCOs and junior Os let this happen and not enough are willing to change the culture as you put it. Don't think it'll ever change.
Jeremy Entwistle, Peterson AFB
 
4/25/2012 4:54:19 PM ET
That would be Chief Roy's challenge MSgt Hoover.
J, Scott AFB
 
4/25/2012 4:35:50 PM ET
I was active duty when the AF changed from a 1-9 scale to a 1-5 scale. My first EPR under the new system was written by a 'new' supervisor. She had never supervised before nor had she written an APR or an EPR. So she followed the rules and gave me strong '3s.' Those 3's followed me around for years cost me promotionsawards and eventually led to me getting out of the service.
Stu, Alabama
 
Add a comment

 Inside AF.mil

ima cornerSearch

tabSubscribe AF.MIL
tabMore HeadlinesRSS feed 
More than 900 rally to support wingman's cause

KC-46 enters critical design review phase

Slideshow: Fifth-generation formation  1

Air Force Week in Photos

Chaplains provide support and comfort for families

IDS agencies team up to teach life skills to new Airmen

ANG director discusses way forward

Carter: Sequestration would have effect of 'hidden tax'

CMSAF: 'Be the best, know your Airmen, tell your story'  1

Carter urges stepped up progress on cyber defense

Partnerships develop Air Force youth  1

Air Force leaders offer perspectives at four-star forum

Dempsey: Insider attacks won't affect NATO's Afghan strategy  1

'Teammates wanted' to deliver future

tabCommentaryRSS feed 
Sept. 17: A day for Constitutional conversation  2

Losing Your Future to Sexual Assault   24


Site Map      Contact Us     Questions     Security and Privacy notice     E-publishing