Improving Quality and the Assurance of Quality in the Design and Construction of Nuclear Power Plants: A Report to Congress (NUREG-1055)
On this page:
Download complete document
This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.
- NUREG-1055 (PDF 29.9 MB)
- Table of Contents (PDF - 714 KB)
- Section 1 (PDF - 3.53 MB)
- Section 2 (PDF - 3.55 MB)
- Section 3 (PDF - 1.72 MB)
- Section 4 (PDF - 1.06 MB)
- Section 5 (PDF - 526 KB)
- Section 6 (PDF - 549 KB)
- Sections 7–10 (PDF - 4.11 MB)
- Appendix A (PDF - 2.81 MB)
- Appendix B (PDF - 5.14 MB)
- Appendix C (PDF - 3.10 MB)
- Appendices D–E (PDF - 5.96 MB)
Publication Information
Manuscript Completed: April 1984
Date Published: May 1984
Prepared by:
W. Altman, T. Ankrum, W. Brach
Quality Assurance Branch
Division of Quality Assurance, Safeguards, and Inspection Programs
Office of Inspection and Enforcement
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Washington, D.C. 20555-0001
Abstract
At the request of Congress, NRC conducted a study of existing and alternative programs for improving quality and the assurance of quality in the design and construction of commercial nuclear power plants. A primary focus of the study was to determine the underlying causes of major quality-related problems in the construction of some nuclear power plants and the untimely detection and correction of these problems. The study concluded that the root cause for major quality-related problems was the failure or inability of some utility managements to effectively implement a management system that ensured adequate control over all aspects of the project. These management shortcoming arose in part from inexperience on the part of some project teams in the construction of nuclear power plants. NRC's past licensing and inspection practices did not adequately screen construction permit applicants for overall capability to manage or provide effective management oversight over the construction project.
The study recommends a number of improvements in industry and NRC programs. For industry, the study recommends self-imposed rising standards of excellence, treatment of quality assurance as a management tool, not a substitute for management, improved trend analysis and identification of root causes of quality problems, and a program of comprehensive third party audits of present and future construction projects. To improve NRC programs, the study recommends a heavier emphasis on team inspections and resident inspectors, an enhanced review of new applicant's capabilities to construct commercial nuclear power plants, more attention to management issues, improved diagnostic and trending capabilities, improved quality and quality assurance for operating reactors, and development of guidance to facilitate the prioritization of quality assurance measures commensurate with the importance of plant structures, systems, and components to the achievement of safety.