Official Site of the U.S. Air Force   Right Corner Banner
Join the Air Force

News > Panetta pledges 'No hollow force' on his watch
 
Photos 
Panetta sworn in as SECDEF
Leon E. Panetta takes the oath of office as the 23rd secretary of defense during a Pentagon ceremony, July 1, 2011. Department of Defense General Counsel Jeh Johnson administered the oath in the secretary’s office. (Defense Department photo/Tech. Sgt. Jacob N. Bailey)
Download HiRes
 
Related Links
 Leon E. Panetta
Panetta pledges 'No hollow force' on his watch

Posted 7/1/2011 Email story   Print story

    


by Jim Garamone
American Forces Press Service


7/1/2011 - WASHINGTON (AFNS)` -- New Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta pledged there will be no hollow force on his watch.

The secretary made the commitment in a message to the Defense Department released after he took the oath of office July 1. DOD General Counsel Jeh Johnson administered the oath in the secretary's office. Taking the oath transferred responsibility for the department from Robert M. Gates.

Panetta also pledged to be a tireless advocate for service members and their families.

"You and your families will always be foremost on my mind and at the top of my agenda," he said.

The secretary will not hesitate to do what needs to be done to defend America. He also will fight for the needs "of the men and women who serve in harm's way, and the families who support them," he said. "Even as the United States addresses fiscal challenges at home, there will be no hollow force on my watch. That will require us all to be disciplined in how we manage taxpayer resources."

During the day, Panetta will meet with Deputy Defense Secretary William J. Lynn III, and participate in a "tank" meeting with the members of the Joint Chiefs, said Doug Wilson, assistant secretary of defense for public affairs. Panetta and his wife, Sylvia, also will have lunch in his Pentagon office with Navy Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and his wife, Deborah.

The secretary, who served as the director of the CIA, has been intimately involved with operations around the world since the beginning of the Obama administration. The nation is at war, he said, and must prevail against its enemies.

"We will persist in our efforts to disrupt, dismantle and ultimately defeat al-Qaida," he said. "The successful operation that killed Osama Bin Laden -- a mission that showcased American military strength and precision -- is a major step toward that goal."

In Afghanistan, the secretary said service members must continue to work with Afghan security forces and coalition partners to transition security responsibility to the Afghans by 2014. The goal must be an Afghanistan that never again becomes a safe haven for terrorists, he said.

The transition of American troops in Iraq is well under way with more than 100,000 U.S. service members out of the nation, and 48,000 due to leave by the end of the year.

"As we continue our transition out of Iraq, we must cement a strategic relationship with the Iraqi government, one based not solely on our military footprint there but on a real and lasting partnership," Panetta said. "It is in America's interests to help Iraq realize its potential to become a stable democracy in a vitally important region in the world and to reinforce that responsibility, for the future security of Iraq must belong to the Iraqis themselves."

The secretary has a long public service career that began as an Army intelligence officer in 1964. He also served in the House of Representatives from California, director of the Office of Management and Budget and White House chief of staff during President Clinton's administration. Throughout his career, he said, he has focused on being disciplined with the taxpayers' money, but not short-changing security.

"We must preserve the excellence and superiority of our military while looking for ways to identify savings," he said. "While tough budget choices will need to be made, I do not believe in the false choice between fiscal discipline and a strong national defense. We will all work together to achieve both."

The secretary noted he is taking office just before Independence Day. He said his parents, who immigrated to California from Italy, believed it was important to give something back to their adopted country.

"I will never forget my father's words: 'to be free, we must also be secure,'" Panetta said. "As Americans come together to commemorate what we and those before us have accomplished, and as I take on my new role, my thoughts are with you and your families.

"You are making personal sacrifices to preserve our liberty, serving on front lines around the world," he continued. "You are fighting to keep America safe. Rest assured that I will fight with you and for you."

As he was sworn in, Panetta noted there's "no higher responsibility for a secretary of defense than to protect those who are protecting America."

Panetta said that in the days and weeks ahead he will meet with all levels of military personnel and DOD civilians.



tabComments
7/8/2011 3:07:23 PM ET
Hi Dave. I think the troops are pretty happy with what they have and that's why they get upset if anyone tries to take anything away. As for taxes, they wouldn't have to raise taxes if they just get rid of all the credits and loopholes. I gladly pay my taxes but every year when I file my tax return, the government usually gives me back double of what I paid in simply because I'm married and chose to have a few kids. Not going to pay off a deficit if you keep doing that. Thank you for your service and I hope they don't touch any of your retiree benefits.
MM, FL
 
7/8/2011 8:24:40 AM ET
You're right MM. We should all pay more in taxes Now I will agree that pay and bennies should be the last things that are looked at, as there is A LOT of waste in the DOD. My point is that the troops should be happy with what they have, since many have a much higher standard of living than thier civilian counterparts. Oh, and I am sure many would be more than willing to join but of course cannot for whatever reasons.
Dave C, OH
 
7/6/2011 4:08:35 PM ET
Being that less than 1 percent of the U.S. population serves in the Armed Forces, I think they have every right to complain about any possible cuts to pay and benefits. Right now they expect 2.8 million active duty and reserve military members to protect the other 310 million people in this country. If they want to keep getting good quality troops to do all that protecting then they shouldn't be touching any pay and benefits. Touch those and quality people will go elsewhere, thus leaving a hollow force. Also, if you know so many Americans who want the pay and bennies and they're quality people, please send them to the nearest military recruiter.
MM, FL
 
7/6/2011 10:39:36 AM ET
To those who complain about a possible benefits cut I have some advice: If you don't like it, get out and see if you can do better on the outside. As a retiree I can tell you benefits are being cut all over the place. Even if they went back to paying 50 percent education for instance, that's still lots more than most companies pay on the outside. How about for a change you consider yourself lucky you have some of the best bennies in the job market today and you are still drawing a paycheck. MANY AMERICANS would be more than happy to get your pay and bennies. Seems we don't have a hollow force but an ungrateful spoiled one.
Dave, OH
 
7/5/2011 3:02:41 PM ET
Clue Bird - you already have a hollow force
Greg, California
 
7/5/2011 1:25:23 AM ET
Too late... you just INHERITED a hollow force.
Stuart, Planet Earth
 
7/4/2011 10:13:20 AM ET
At retired Col Jim: Maybe the retired officer corps should pay more for TriCare, but as a retired enlisted member. It is difficult to find providers who accept TriCare, let alone participate in the network. Mr. Secretary, leave our retired benefits alone. We earned them. Good luck in your tenure.
TC, Pittsgrove NJ
 
7/3/2011 6:00:22 PM ET
A review of the joint-base concept should be conducted. It is not working. It has wasted more money than it has saved and now commanders at ALL levels do not get along. Want to save money? Get rid of joint basing...
Ima Taxpayer, California
 
7/2/2011 2:52:00 PM ET
I am a retiree who would pay more for Tricare because I know it is priced way below market rate. It would still be a huge bargain even with the modest increases former Secretary Gates floated. But beyond personnel costs there are many ways to cut Defense spending including drastically reducing the number of bases we support, the number of 3 and 4 star commands that overlap, and the number of DoD contracts that often resemble corporate welfare. Defense can and should be reduced along with other federal expenditures. We cannot mindlessly say that any Defense cut is automatically bad. It is not.
Jim H retired colonel, Omaha
 
7/1/2011 11:58:10 PM ET
Well Mr. Panetta, if you choose to go forth cutting the budget on the backs of the military through Tuition Assistance cuts, changes to retirement and increasing Tricare fees, you will find yourself with a hollow force. Todays military is professional and smart. We know a raw deal when we see one and the fact that our government is looking to cut the budget on the hard working backs of men and women in uniform is unconscionable.
BMB, Edwards
 
7/1/2011 8:55:10 PM ET
Well I like him already
DC, MD
 
Add a comment

 Inside AF.mil

ima cornerSearch

tabSubscribe AF.MIL
tabMore HeadlinesRSS feed 
Airmen build, repair houses at North Pole

AF officials to migrate civilian personnel records to OPM

Basing of first U.S. Space Fence facility announced

Airmen certified for F-35 engine runs

High retention leads to promotion board delay   14

Through Airmen's Eyes: Airman, coalition team ensure health, hygiene of contractors

Emergency management: Prepared for the fight

GARNET breaks mold on guard, reserve careers

OWLS inspires women to ignite power within

Lancers, Falcons share South Dakota skies

U.S. participates in South African Exposition  2

'Multidimensional' approach to energy initiative

US, Nepal build relationships, improve lives   2

Commander addresses military training investigation report

tabCommentaryRSS feed 
Cultural battlegrounds: Why culture matters in Global War on Terror  2

Toeing the line on standards  11


Site Map      Contact Us     Questions     Security and Privacy notice     E-publishing