Table 4. Changes in State-specific Standardized Infection Ratios (SIRs) 2009 compared 2010: Central Line-associated Bloodstream Infections (CLABSI), All Locations1
State | All Locations Reporting2 |
Continuously Reporting Locations |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2009 | 2010 | Significant Change | p-value | No. of Continuous Reporters 3 | Significant Change | p-value4 | |
Alabama | 1.228 | 1.098 | No | 0.3296 | 4 | No | 0.3317 |
Alaska | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
Arizona | 0.443 | 0.859 | Increase | 0.0106 | 2 | No | 0.8586 |
Arkansas | 0.572 | 0.572 | No | 1.0000 | 6 | No | 0.7431 |
California | 0.856 | 0.644 | Decrease | 0.0000 | 133 | Decrease | 0.0000 |
Colorado | 0.828 | 0.662 | Decrease | 0.0182 | 60 | Decrease | 0.0182 |
Connecticut | 0.873 | 0.685 | No | 0.0754 | 30 | No | 0.0754 |
Delaware | 0.607 | 0.903 | Increase | 0.0358 | 7 | No | 0.0650 |
Dist. of Columbia | 0.476 | 0.685 | No | 0.1343 | 4 | No | 0.7840 |
Florida | 1.142 | 0.754 | Decrease | 0.0000 | 20 | Decrease | 0.0003 |
Georgia | 0.982 | 0.806 | Decrease | 0.0266 | 15 | Decrease | 0.0441 |
Hawaii | 1.684 | 0.929 | No | 0.2504 | 1 | No | 0.5636 |
Idaho | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
Illinois | 0.869 | 0.678 | Decrease | 0.0000 | 145 | Decrease | 0.0000 |
Indiana | 1.224 | 1.039 | No | 0.1896 | 4 | No | 0.1375 |
Iowa | 0.596 | 0.430 | No | 0.4860 | 3 | No | 1.0000 |
Kansas | 0.644 | 0.573 | No | 0.5409 | 7 | No | 0.5318 |
Kentucky | 0.716 | 0.656 | No | 0.5708 | 11 | No | 0.8819 |
Louisiana | 0.721 | 0.797 | No | 0.5459 | 10 | No | 0.6803 |
Maine | 1.263 | 0.907 | No | 0.0639 | 2 | No | 0.0640 |
Maryland | 1.290 | 0.915 | Decrease | 0.0000 | 47 | Decrease | 0.0000 |
Massachusetts | 0.727 | 0.579 | Decrease | 0.0043 | 70 | Decrease | 0.0043 |
Michigan | 0.467 | 0.411 | No | 0.2402 | 31 | No | 0.2546 |
Minnesota | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
Mississippi | 1.040 | 0.781 | Decrease | 0.0125 | 6 | Decrease | 0.0138 |
Missouri | 0.807 | 0.752 | No | 0.6195 | 8 | No | 0.7181 |
Montana | 0.539 | 0.470 | No | 0.8181 | 5 | No | 0.8151 |
Nebraska | 1.146 | 0.869 | Decrease | 0.0259 | 3 | Decrease | 0.0131 |
Nevada | 1.572 | 0.769 | Decrease | 0.0000 | 2 | No | 0.6651 |
New Hampshire | 0.673 | 0.557 | No | 0.5080 | 24 | No | 0.5080 |
New Jersey | 0.779 | 0.791 | No | 0.8379 | 72 | No | 0.8379 |
New Mexico | 0.376 | 0.427 | No | 0.7026 | 7 | No | 0.7913 |
New York | 1.029 | 0.858 | Decrease | 0.0000 | 178 | Decrease | 0.0000 |
North Carolina | 1.124 | 0.710 | Decrease | 0.0000 | 21 | Decrease | 0.0000 |
North Dakota | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
Ohio | 0.773 | 0.585 | Decrease | 0.0031 | 20 | Decrease | 0.0041 |
Oklahoma | 0.554 | 0.541 | No | 0.8599 | 50 | No | 0.9064 |
Oregon | 0.695 | 0.491 | Decrease | 0.0179 | 46 | Decrease | 0.0252 |
Pennsylvania | 0.711 | 0.531 | Decrease | 0.0000 | 222 | Decrease | 0.0000 |
Puerto Rico | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
Rhode Island | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
South Carolina | 1.126 | 0.860 | Decrease | 0.0000 | 70 | Decrease | 0.0000 |
South Dakota | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
Tennessee | 1.168 | 0.889 | Decrease | 0.0000 | 76 | Decrease | 0.0000 |
Texas | 0.936 | 0.639 | Decrease | 0.0001 | 15 | Decrease | 0.0278 |
Utah | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
Vermont | 0.546 | 0.782 | No | 0.3690 | 8 | No | 0.3690 |
Virginia | 0.822 | 0.673 | Decrease | 0.0078 | 77 | Decrease | 0.0069 |
Washington | 0.632 | 0.485 | Decrease | 0.0068 | 64 | Decrease | 0.0068 |
West Virginia | 0.709 | 0.483 | Decrease | 0.0191 | 38 | Decrease | 0.0191 |
Wisconsin | 0.586 | 0.705 | No | 0.1844 | 13 | No | 0.4693 |
Wyoming | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
US | 0.854 | 0.684 | Decrease | 0.0000 | 1644 | Decrease | 0.0000 |
Footnotes for Table 4:
- SIRs are not reported for states with fewer than 5 facilities reporting CLABSI data to NHSN in 2010.
- Data from all ICUs, wards (for this table wards also include stepdown, specialty care areas including hematology/oncology, bone marrow transplant, and LTAC locations or facilities), and NICUs.
- Continuous reporters include all facilities with at least one location that reported any data for CLABSI during both 2009 and 2010.
- Adjusted by limiting analysis to only continuous reporters, i.e., facility locations reporting for 1 month or more during 2009 that also reported during 2010.