[Accessibility Information]
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20090508154006im_/http://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/images/mlrhead5.gif)
![Monthly Labor Review Online](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20090508154006im_/http://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/images/mlron.gif)
Related BLS programs | Related articles
![ABSTRACT](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20090508154006im_/http://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/images/mlrabs.gif)
January 1999, Vol. 122, No. 1
Cooperative provisions in collective bargaining agreements
George R. Gray, Donald W. Myers, and Phyllis S. Myers
Professors at the School of Business, Virginia Commonwealth
University, Richmond, Virginia
In the midst of mixed results, a clear trend can be seen in which firms are
progressing toward a new collective bargaining paradigm; fourteen percent of workers in
the sample examined in this study are covered by some sort of partnering agreement. The
analysis that is presented investigates the areas in which workers have been given
decision-making authority and measures the extent to which true partnering and mutual
respect exists between labor and management.
Read excerpt
Download full
article in PDF (134K)
- Related BLS programs
Collective Bargaining Agreements
Related Monthly Labor Review articles
How
do labor and management view collective bargaining?Oct. 1998.
- Collective
bargaining agreements: safety and health provisions.May 1998.
Within Monthly Labor Review Online:
Welcome | Current
Issue | Index | Subscribe
| Archives
Exit Monthly Labor Review Online:
BLS Home | Publications & Research
Papers