News Release Information

12-833-SAN

Friday, April 27, 2012

Contacts

OCCUPATIONAL EMPLOYMENT AND WAGES IN TUCSON
May 2011

Workers in the Tucson Metropolitan Statistical Area had an average (mean) hourly wage of $20.55 in May 2011, about 5 percent below the nationwide average of $21.74, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Regional Commissioner Richard J. Holden noted that, after testing for statistical significance, no wages in the local area were significantly higher than their respective national averages in 22 major occupational groups. Eleven groups had significantly lower wages than their respective national averages, including legal; management; and life, physical, and social science.

When compared to the nationwide distribution, local employment was more highly concentrated in 11 of the 22 occupational groups, including office and administrative support, food preparation and serving related, and architecture and engineering. Conversely, five groups had employment shares significantly below their national representation, including production, transportation and material moving, and sales and related. (See table A and box note at end of release.)

Table A. Occupational employment and wages by major occupational group, United States and the Tucson Metropolitan Statistical Area, and measures of statistical significance, May 2011
Major occupational group Percent of total employment Mean hourly wage
United States Tucson United States Tucson Percent difference (1)

Total, all occupations

100.0% 100.0% $21.74 $20.55* -5

Management

4.8 5.2* 51.64 43.16* -16

Business and financial operations

4.8 4.2* 33.05 28.41* -14

Computer and mathematical

2.7 3.1* 37.85 36.55 -3

Architecture and engineering

1.8 2.7* 37.08 38.32 3

Life, physical, and social science

0.8 1.3* 32.44 25.88* -20

Community and social services

1.5 2.0* 21.07 17.51* -17

Legal

0.8 0.8 47.30 36.17* -24

Education, training, and library

6.6 6.6 24.46 23.04 -6

Arts, design, entertainment, sports, and media

1.3 1.3 25.89 20.05* -23

Healthcare practitioner and technical

5.9 6.5* 34.97 36.29 4

Healthcare support

3.1 3.8* 13.16 13.00 -1

Protective service

2.5 3.2* 20.54 21.57 5

Food preparation and serving related

8.7 9.7* 10.30 10.09 -2

Building and grounds cleaning and maintenance

3.3 3.6* 12.29 11.48* -7

Personal care and service

2.8 2.7 11.84 11.88 0

Sales and related

10.6 9.6* 18.04 14.98* -17

Office and administrative support

16.7 17.8* 16.40 15.25* -7

Farming, fishing, and forestry

0.3 0.1* 11.68 12.20 4

Construction and extraction

3.9 4.1 21.46 18.84* -12

Installation, maintenance, and repair

3.9 4.0 20.86 20.62 -1

Production

6.5 3.4* 16.45 15.98 -3

Transportation and material moving

6.7 4.4* 15.96 14.58* -9

Footnotes:
(1) A positive percent difference measures how much the mean wage in Tucson is above the national mean wage, while a negative difference reflects a lower wage.
* The percent share of employment or mean hourly wage for this area is significantly different from the national average of all areas at the 90-percent confidence level.

One occupational group—office and administrative support—was chosen to illustrate the diversity of data available for any of the 22 major occupational categories. Tucson had 61,540 jobs in office and administrative support, accounting for 17.8 percent of local area employment, significantly higher than the 16.7-percent share nationally. The average hourly wage for this occupational group locally was $15.25, measurably below the national wage of $16.40.

With employment of 9,530, customer service representatives was the largest occupation within the office and administrative support group, followed by general office clerks (7,450) and secretaries and administrative assistants, except legal, medical, and executive (6,480). Among the higher paying jobs were postal service clerks and postal service mail carriers, with mean hourly wages of $25.51 and $25.44, respectively. At the lower end of the wage scale were interviewers, except eligibility and loan ($10.52) and hotel, motel, and resort desk clerks ($10.58). (Detailed occupational data for office and administrative support are presented in table 1; for a complete listing of detailed occupations available go to www.bls.gov/oes/2011/may/oes_46060.htm.)

Location quotients allow us to explore the occupational make-up of a metropolitan area by comparing the composition of jobs in an area relative to the national average. (See table 1.) For example, a location quotient of 2.0 indicates that an occupation accounts for twice the share of employment in the area than it does nationally. In the Tucson Metropolitan Statistical Area, above average concentrations of employment were found in some of the occupations within the office and administrative support group. For instance, customer service representatives were employed at 1.6 times the national rate in Tucson, and switchboard operators, including answering service, at 1.5 times the U.S. average. On the other hand, general office clerks had a location quotient of 1.0 in Tucson, indicating that this particular occupation’s local and national employment shares were similar.

These statistics are from the Occupational Employment Statistics (OES) survey, a federal-state cooperative program between BLS and State Workforce Agencies, in this case, the Arizona Department of Commerce. The OES survey provides estimates of employment and hourly and annual wages for wage and salary workers in 22 major occupational groups and nearly 800 non-military detailed occupations for the nation, states, metropolitan statistical areas, metropolitan divisions, and nonmetropolitan areas.

OES wage and employment data for the 22 major occupational groups in the Tucson metropolitan statistical area were compared to their respective national averages based on statistical significance testing. Only those occupations with wages or employment shares above or below the national wage or share after testing for significance at the 90-percent confidence level meet the criteria.

NOTE: A value that is statistically different from another does not necessarily mean that the difference has economic or practical significance. Statistical significance is concerned with the ability to make confident statements about a universe based on a sample. It is entirely possible that a large difference between two values is not significantly different statistically, while a small difference is, since both the size and heterogeneity of the sample affect the relative error of the data being tested.

Technical Note

The Occupational Employment Statistics (OES) survey is a semiannual mail survey measuring occupational employment and wage rates for wage and salary workers in nonfarm establishments in the United States. Guam, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands also are surveyed, but their data are not included in this release. OES estimates are constructed from a sample of about 1.2 million establishments. Forms are mailed to approximately 200,000 establishments in May and November of each year for a 3-year period. The nationwide response rate for the May 2011 survey was 77.3 percent based on establishments and 73.3 percent based on employment. May 2011 estimates are based on responses from six semiannual panels collected over a 3-year period: May 2011, November 2010, May 2010, November 2009, May 2009, and November 2008. The sample in the Tucson Metropolitan Statistical Area included 2,763 establishments with a response rate of 74 percent. For more information about OES concepts and methodology, go to www.bls.gov/news.release/ocwage.tn.htm.

The May 2011 OES estimates mark the first set of estimates based in part on data collected using the 2010 Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) system. Nearly all the occupations in this release are 2010 SOC occupations; however, some are not. The May 2012 OES data will reflect the full set of detailed occupations in the 2010 SOC. For a list of all occupations, including 2010 SOC occupations, and how data collected on two structures were combined, see the OES Frequently Asked Questions online at www.bls.gov/oes/oes_ques.htm#Ques41.

Area definitions

The substate area data published in this release reflect the standards and definitions established by the U.S. Office of Management and Budget.

The Tucson, Ariz. Metropolitan Statistical Area  includes Pima County.

Additional information

OES data are available on our regional web page at www.bls.gov/ro9/home.htm. If you have additional questions, contact the San Francisco Economic Analysis and Information Unit at (415) 625-2270. Information in this release will be made available to sensory impaired individuals upon request. Voice phone: 202-691-5200; TDD message referral phone number: 1-800-877-8339.

Table 1. Employment and wage data from the Occupational Employment Statistics survey, by occupation, Tucson Metropolitan Statistical Area, May 2011
Occupation (1) Employment Mean wages
Level (2) Location quotient (3) Hourly Annual(4)

Office and Administrative Support Occupations

61,5401.1$15.25$31,720

First-Line Supervisors of Office and Administrative Support Workers

4,4401.222.1746,120

Switchboard Operators, Including Answering Service

5501.512.8226,670

Bill and Account Collectors

1,0101.015.5032,250

Billing and Posting Clerks

1,2200.915.6332,510

Bookkeeping, Accounting, and Auditing Clerks

3,4400.816.2533,810

Payroll and Timekeeping Clerks

4000.917.4136,220

Procurement Clerks

2301.217.6636,740

Tellers

1,2900.911.9824,910

Brokerage Clerks

500.319.7341,050

Credit Authorizers, Checkers, and Clerks

500.416.1333,560

Customer Service Representatives

9,5301.613.8528,810

Eligibility Interviewers, Government Programs

1800.618.7138,920

File Clerks

3700.812.3825,740

Hotel, Motel, and Resort Desk Clerks

6901.110.5822,010

Interviewers, Except Eligibility and Loan

5701.110.5221,880

Library Assistants, Clerical

300.112.4525,890

New Accounts Clerks

1200.817.0135,380

Order Clerks

3800.712.7626,550

Human Resources Assistants, Except Payroll and Timekeeping

3600.917.4336,250

Receptionists and Information Clerks

2,5401.012.3525,690

Information and Record Clerks, All Other

8101.616.1233,520

Cargo and Freight Agents

400.215.7432,730

Couriers and Messengers

1400.611.7424,420

Police, Fire, and Ambulance Dispatchers

3201.218.5938,660

Dispatchers, Except Police, Fire, and Ambulance

4600.918.0337,510

Meter Readers, Utilities

1000.919.2139,960

Postal Service Clerks

1500.925.5153,050

Postal Service Mail Carriers

7800.925.4452,920

Postal Service Mail Sorters, Processors, and Processing Machine Operators

2700.724.2250,370

Production, Planning, and Expediting Clerks

5900.820.6843,010

Shipping, Receiving, and Traffic Clerks

1,3700.713.9929,100

Stock Clerks and Order Fillers

5,0401.110.8722,610

Weighers, Measurers, Checkers, and Samplers, Recordkeeping

800.413.3527,770

Executive Secretaries and Executive Administrative Assistants

2,1600.820.8643,380

Legal Secretaries

5200.916.8034,940

Medical Secretaries

1,8301.414.2929,720

Secretaries and Administrative Assistants, Except Legal, Medical, and Executive

6,4801.215.6432,540

Computer Operators

2501.218.6738,830

Data Entry Keyers

6301.112.9826,990

Word Processors and Typists

1300.513.9429,000

Insurance Claims and Policy Processing Clerks

4000.715.5732,380

Mail Clerks and Mail Machine Operators, Except Postal Service

2100.712.3625,710

Office Clerks, General

7,4501.013.3427,750

Office Machine Operators, Except Computer

3702.113.2627,580

Office and Administrative Support Workers, All Other

(5)(5)15.9833,240

Footnotes:
(1) For a complete listing of all detailed occupations in Tucson, AZ, see www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes_46060.htm.
(2) Estimates for detailed occupations do not sum to the totals because the totals include occupations not shown separately. Estimates do not include self-employed workers.
(3) The location quotient is the ratio of the area concentration of occupational employment to the national average concentration. A location quotient greater than one indicates the occupation has a higher share of employment than average, and a location quotient less than one indicates the occupation is less prevalent in the area than average.
(4) Annual wages have been calculated by multiplying the hourly mean wage by a ‘year-round, full-time’ hours figure of 2,080 hours; for those occupations where there is not an hourly mean wage published, the annual wage has been directly calculated from the reported survey data.
(5) Estimate not released.

 

Last Modified Date: July 13, 2012