News Release Information

12-131-CHI

Tuesday, January 31, 2012

Contacts

Technical information:
Media contact:
  • (312) 353-1138

County Employment and Wages in South Dakota – Second Quarter 2011


South Dakota’s only large county, Minnehaha, reported employment growth of 1.0 percent from June 2010 to June 2011, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. (Large counties are defined as those with employment of 75,000 or more as measured by 2010 annual average employment.) Regional Commissioner Charlene Peiffer noted that in June 2011, Minnehaha County’s employment level of 115,300 accounted for 28.5 percent of total employment within the state.

Nationally, employment rose 0.9 percent during this 12-month period, as 215 of the 322 largest U.S. counties gained jobs. Nationwide, the 322 largest counties made up 70.5 percent of total U.S. employment, which stood at 130.5 million in June 2011.

The average weekly wage in Minnehaha County was $739 in the second quarter of 2011, 4.8 percent higher than one year ago. (See table 1.) Nationally, the average weekly wage rose 3.0 percent over the year to $891 in the second quarter of 2011.

Employment and wage levels (but not over-the-year changes) are also available for the 65 counties in South Dakota with employment below 75,000. All 65 of these smaller counties had average weekly wages below the national average. (See table 2.)

Large county wage changes

Minnehaha County’s 4.8-percent wage growth from the second quarter of 2010 to the second quarter of 2011 ranked 35th nationally. (See table 1.) Among the 322 largest counties in the U.S., 307 had over-the-year increases in average weekly wages in the second quarter of 2011. Williamson, Texas, ranked first in average weekly wage growth with an increase of 18.0 percent. Champaign, Ill., had the largest wage decline with a loss of 3.6 percent over the year.

Large county average weekly wages

Minnehaha County’s $739 average wage placed in the bottom quartile among the 322 large counties, ranking 263rd. Nationally, weekly wages were higher than average in 107 of the 322 largest U.S. counties. Santa Clara, Calif., held the top position among the highest-paid large counties with an average weekly wage of $1,743. New York, N.Y., was second at $1,645, followed by Arlington, Va. ($1,553), and Washington, D.C. ($1,541). Among the 215 large counties with an average weekly wage below the U.S. average in the second quarter of 2011, Horry, S.C. ($526) reported the lowest wage.

Average weekly wages in South Dakota's smaller counties

All 65 counties in South Dakota with employment below 75,000 had average weekly wages lower than the national average of $891. Among these smaller counties, Union County had the highest average weekly wage at $843 and Jones County had the lowest at $431. (See table 2.)

When all 66 counties in South Dakota were considered, none had wages above the national average of $891. Ten reported average weekly wages under $500, 23 had wages from $500 to $549, 12 reported wages from $550 to $599, 11 had wages from $600 to $649, and 10 had wages of $650 or more. (See chart 1.)

Additional statistics and other information

QCEW data for states have been included in this release in table 3. For additional information about quarterly employment and wages data, please read the Technical Note or visit the QCEW Web site at www.bls.gov/cew/.

Employment and Wages Annual Averages Online features comprehensive information by detailed industry on establishments, employment, and wages for the nation and all states. The 2010 edition of this publication, which was published in November 2011, contains selected data produced by Business Employment Dynamics (BED) on job gains and losses, as well as selected data from the first quarter 2011 version of this news release. Tables and additional content from the Employment and Wages Annual 2010 are now available online at www.bls.gov/cew/cewbultn10htm.

Information in this release will be made available to sensory impaired individuals upon request. Voice phone: 202-691-5200; TDD message referral phone number: 1-800-877-8339.

For personal assistance or further information on the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages Program, as well as other Bureau programs, contact the Midwest Information Office in Chicago at (312) 353-1880 from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. CT.

Technical Note

Average weekly wage data by county are compiled under the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW) program, also known as the ES-202 program. The data are derived from summaries of employment and total pay of workers covered by state and federal unemployment insurance (UI) legislation and provided by State Workforce Agencies (SWAs). The 9.1 million employer reports covered 130.5 million full- and part-time workers. The average weekly wage values are calculated by dividing quarterly total wages by the average of the three monthly employment levels of those covered by UI programs. The result is then divided by 13, the number of weeks in a quarter. It is to be noted, therefore, that over-the-year wage changes for geographic areas may reflect shifts in the composition of employment by industry, occupation, and such other factors as hours of work. Thus, wages may vary among counties, metropolitan areas, or states for reasons other than changes in the average wage level. Data for all states, Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs), counties, and the nation are available on the BLS Web site www.bls.gov/cew/; however, data in QCEW press releases have been revised and may not match the data contained on the BLS Web site.

QCEW data are not designed as a time series. QCEW data are simply the sums of individual establishment records reflecting the number of establishments that exist in a county or industry at a point in time. Establishments can move in or out of a county or industry for a number of reasons—some reflecting economic events, others reflecting administrative changes.

The preliminary QCEW data presented in this release may differ from data released by the individual states as well as from the data presented on the BLS Web site. These potential differences result from the states’ continuing receipt, review and editing of UI data over time. On the other hand, differences between data in this release and the data found on the BLS Web site are the result of adjustments made to improve over-the-year comparisons. Specifically, these adjustments account for administrative (noneconomic) changes such as a correction to a previously reported location or industry classification. Adjusting for these administrative changes allows users to more accurately assess changes of an economic nature (such as a firm moving from one county to another or changing its primary economic activity) over a 12-month period. Currently, adjusted data are available only from BLS press releases.


Table 1. Covered (1) employment and wages in the United States and the largest county in South Dakota, second quarter 2011(2)
Area Employment Average weekly wage (3)
June 2011 (thousands) Percent change, June 2010-11 (4) National ranking by percent change (5) Average weekly wage National ranking by level (5) Percent change, second quarter 2010-11 (4) National ranking by percent change (5)

United States (6)

130,469.9 0.9 -- $891 -- 3.0 --

South Dakota

404.8 0.8 -- 656 51 3.8 9

Minnehaha, S.D.

115.3 1.0 123 739 263 4.8 35

Footnotes:
(1) Includes workers covered by Unemployment Insurance (UI) and Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) programs.
(2) Data are preliminary.
(3) Average weekly wages were calculated using unrounded data.
(4) Percent changes were computed from quarterly employment and pay data adjusted for noneconomic county reclassifications.
(5) Ranking does not include the county of San Juan, Puerto Rico.
(6) Totals for the United States do not include data for Puerto Rico or the Virgin Islands.

Table 2. Covered (1) employment and wages in the United States and all counties in South Dakota, second quarter 2011 (2)
Area Employment June 2011 Average weekly wage (3)

United States (4)

130,469,924 $891

South Dakota

404,784 656

Aurora

946 516

Beadle

8,663 603

Bennett

855 517

Bon Homme

1,835 519

Brookings

16,683 666

Brown

20,525 660

Brule

2,114 484

Buffalo

510 662

Butte

2,729 521

Campbell

493 495

Charles Mix

3,742 507

Clark

989 503

Clay

5,910 601

Codington

15,858 611

Corson

852 612

Custer

3,145 520

Davison

12,067 603

Day

2,040 506

Deuel

1,696 591

Dewey

2,271 578

Douglas

1,206 516

Edmunds

1,202 580

Fall River

2,702 608

Faulk

601 554

Grant

3,763 595

Gregory

1,526 447

Haakon

735 570

Hamlin

1,757 538

Hand

1,272 494

Hanson

554 517

Harding

433 600

Hughes

10,739 677

Hutchinson

2,692 526

Hyde

575 624

Jackson

869 501

Jerauld

1,582 519

Jones

571 431

Kingsbury

1,801 522

Lake

4,596 599

Lawrence

11,869 550

Lincoln

15,817 699

Lyman

1,513 485

Marshall

1,703 562

McCook

1,354 522

McPherson

649 449

Meade

6,938 668

Mellette

379 442

Miner

737 551

Minnehaha

115,252 739

Moody

2,456 608

Pennington

55,134 643

Perkins

1,110 498

Potter

903 515

Roberts

3,460 548

Sanborn

694 519

Shannon

3,486 728

Spink

2,564 560

Stanley

1,376 518

Sully

583 519

Todd

3,161 594

Tripp

2,153 524

Turner

2,182 525

Union

8,707 843

Walworth

2,318 498

Yankton

12,339 641

Ziebach

288 654

Footnotes
(1) Includes workers covered by Unemployment Insurance (UI) and Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) programs.
(2) Data are preliminary.
(3) Average weekly wages were calculated using unrounded data.
(4) Totals for the United States do not include data for Puerto Rico or the Virgin Islands.

Table 3. Covered (1) employment and wages by state, second quarter 2011 (2)
State Employment Average weekly wage (3)
June 2011 (thousands) Percent change, June 2010-11 Average weekly wage National ranking by level Percent change, second quarter 2010-11 National ranking by percent change

United States (4)

130,469.9 0.9 $891 -- 3.0 --

Alabama

1,824.8 -0.4 767 34 2.3 41

Alaska

335.9 1.6 941 9 2.6 27

Arizona

2,336.3 1.1 842 20 2.7 26

Arkansas

1,140.4 -1.3 703 47 2.6 27

California

14,664.6 0.3 1,019 6 4.0 7

Colorado

2,234.7 1.4 900 13 3.4 16

Connecticut

1,630.2 0.8 1,116 3 3.8 9

Delaware

408.4 0.5 926 12 5.9 2

District of Columbia

711.3 1.4 1,541 1 2.4 36

Florida

7,092.3 0.8 802 25 2.6 27

Georgia

3,803.1 1.0 832 21 2.5 32

Hawaii

590.5 0.7 799 26 2.4 36

Idaho

616.6 0.0 667 49 2.3 41

Illinois

5,633.0 1.0 939 10 3.2 17

Indiana

2,769.2 1.3 749 41 2.2 46

Iowa

1,476.9 0.7 726 43 2.5 32

Kansas

1,313.2 -0.1 754 40 2.9 23

Kentucky

1,751.8 0.9 760 38 2.3 41

Louisiana

1,844.3 -0.1 794 28 3.1 18

Maine

593.8 0.3 712 46 1.9 48

Maryland

2,513.5 0.5 987 7 3.1 18

Massachusetts

3,230.4 0.9 1,120 2 5.6 3

Michigan

3,896.9 1.8 845 19 2.4 36

Minnesota

2,645.4 1.4 898 15 3.5 12

Mississippi

1,079.4 -0.6 664 50 1.8 49

Missouri

2,617.7 0.3 774 31 1.6 50

Montana

434.1 0.5 681 48 3.5 12

Nebraska

911.6 0.1 714 45 2.4 36

Nevada

1,123.0 0.5 816 24 2.5 32

New Hampshire

615.2 0.4 888 16 2.4 36

New Jersey

3,836.2 -0.3 1,056 5 2.6 27

New Mexico

788.7 -0.5 763 37 2.8 24

New York

8,575.3 1.0 1,092 4 1.0 51

North Carolina

3,865.9 1.5 783 30 2.5 32

North Dakota

382.4 5.1 769 33 8.2 1

Ohio

5,009.1 0.9 795 27 2.6 27

Oklahoma

1,510.3 0.7 749 41 4.5 5

Oregon

1,637.5 0.7 819 22 4.2 6

Pennsylvania

5,606.5 1.0 875 17 3.1 18

Rhode Island

458.1 0.3 862 18 3.5 12

South Carolina

1,801.6 1.1 726 43 2.3 41

South Dakota

404.8 0.8 656 51 3.8 9

Tennessee

2,616.9 1.3 794 28 2.3 41

Texas

10,462.4 2.1 900 13 4.0 7

Utah

1,183.9 2.0 756 39 3.1 18

Vermont

297.0 1.0 773 32 2.8 24

Virginia

3,619.7 0.9 949 8 2.2 46

Washington

2,875.8 0.6 928 11 3.5 12

West Virginia

702.9 0.3 765 36 5.4 4

Wisconsin

2,712.0 0.9 767 34 3.0 22

Wyoming

284.7 1.2 819 22 3.7 11

Puerto Rico

915.1 -1.4 496 (5) 0.6 (5)

Virgin Islands

44.1 0.6 747 (5) 5.5 (5)

Footnotes:
(1) Includes workers covered by Unemployment Insurance (UI) and Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) programs.
(2) Data are preliminary.
(3) Average weekly wages were calculated using unrounded data.
(4) Totals for the United States do not include data for Puerto Rico or the Virgin Islands.
(5) Data not included in the national ranking.

 

Chart 1. Average weekly wages by county in South Dakota, second quarter 2011

 

Last Modified Date: January 31, 2012