Electric Power Monthly
Data for July 2012 | Release Date: September 24, 2012 | Next Release: October 2012
| full report
Previous Issues of Electric Power Monthly
Table 1.8.A. Net Generation from Petroleum Liquids by State, by Sector July 2012 and 2011 |
(Thousand Megawatthours) |
Electric Power Sector | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Census Division and State |
All Sectors | Electric Utilities | Independent Power Producers |
Commercial Sector | Industrial Sector | ||||||
July 2012 | July 2011 | Percent Change |
July 2012 | July 2011 | July 2012 | July 2011 | July 2012 | July 2011 | July 2012 | July 2011 | |
New England | 70 | 107 | -35% | 10 | 10 | 48 | 81 | 9 | 10 | NM | 6 |
Connecticut | 27 | 36 | -25% | NM | NM | 27 | 36 | -- | -- | NM | NM |
Maine | 17 | 24 | -27% | NM | NM | 14 | 17 | NM | NM | NM | 6 |
Massachusetts | 17 | 39 | -58% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 28 | 7 | 7 | NM | NM |
New Hampshire | 8 | 6 | 22% | 6 | 4 | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM |
Rhode Island | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM | -- | -- |
Vermont | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Middle Atlantic | 238 | 313 | -24% | 137 | 156 | 93 | 150 | NM | NM | 7 | 7 |
New Jersey | 7 | 20 | -68% | NM | NM | 6 | 19 | NM | NM | NM | NM |
New York | 180 | 221 | -19% | 136 | 155 | 37 | 60 | NM | NM | 6 | 6 |
Pennsylvania | 51 | 71 | -29% | NM | NM | 51 | 71 | NM | NM | NM | NM |
East North Central | 74 | 75 | -0.5% | 63 | 64 | 10 | 10 | NM | NM | 1 | 1 |
Illinois | 6 | 8 | -21% | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | NM | NM | NM | NM |
Indiana | 13 | 17 | -21% | 13 | 16 | NM | NM | NM | NM | * | NM |
Michigan | 14 | 21 | -35% | 14 | 21 | -- | NM | NM | NM | * | * |
Ohio | 30 | 24 | 26% | 24 | 19 | 6 | 5 | -- | -- | * | * |
Wisconsin | 11 | 5 | 109% | 11 | 5 | * | -- | NM | NM | NM | NM |
West North Central | 28 | 20 | 37% | 27 | 20 | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM |
Iowa | 7 | 6 | 10% | 7 | 6 | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM |
Kansas | NM | 3 | NM | NM | 3 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Minnesota | 8 | 3 | 193% | 8 | 3 | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM |
Missouri | 8 | 4 | 96% | 8 | 4 | -- | -- | NM | NM | -- | -- |
Nebraska | 1 | 2 | -30% | 1 | 2 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
North Dakota | 2 | 3 | -40% | 2 | 3 | -- | -- | NM | NM | NM | NM |
South Dakota | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM | -- | -- |
South Atlantic | 336 | 376 | -11% | 279 | 224 | 48 | 140 | NM | NM | 8 | 12 |
Delaware | 5 | 6 | -17% | NM | NM | 5 | 6 | -- | -- | -- | -- |
District of Columbia | -- | 73 | -100% | -- | -- | -- | 73 | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Florida | 132 | 97 | 37% | 127 | 93 | 4 | NM | -- | -- | NM | 3 |
Georgia | 7 | 9 | -18% | 5 | 5 | NM | NM | NM | NM | 3 | 4 |
Maryland | 20 | 49 | -60% | NM | NM | 19 | 49 | NM | NM | NM | * |
North Carolina | 13 | 13 | -3.2% | 11 | 12 | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM |
South Carolina | 10 | 8 | 25% | 9 | 7 | -- | -- | NM | NM | 1 | 1 |
Virginia | 137 | 111 | 24% | 116 | 96 | 19 | 12 | * | * | NM | 3 |
West Virginia | 11 | 10 | 9.1% | 11 | 10 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
East South Central | 29 | 47 | -38% | 25 | 44 | NM | NM | -- | -- | NM | NM |
Alabama | 10 | 10 | 1.8% | 6 | 7 | NM | NM | -- | -- | NM | NM |
Kentucky | 10 | 7 | 39% | 10 | 7 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Mississippi | 1 | NM | NM | 1 | NM | -- | -- | -- | -- | * | * |
Tennessee | 8 | 30 | -72% | 8 | 29 | -- | -- | -- | -- | NM | NM |
West South Central | 10 | 14 | -30% | 3 | 7 | 6 | 6 | NM | NM | NM | 2 |
Arkansas | 1 | 6 | -89% | * | 3 | * | 3 | -- | -- | NM | NM |
Louisiana | 2 | 2 | -19% | 1 | 2 | 1 | * | -- | -- | * | 1 |
Oklahoma | NM | 1 | NM | * | 1 | -- | -- | NM | NM | NM | NM |
Texas | 7 | 4 | 53% | 2 | 1 | 5 | 3 | NM | NM | NM | NM |
Mountain | 17 | 22 | -20% | 14 | 19 | 3 | 3 | NM | NM | NM | NM |
Arizona | 3 | 4 | -19% | 3 | 3 | -- | -- | NM | NM | NM | NM |
Colorado | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM | -- | -- | -- | * | NM | NM |
Idaho | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Montana | 2 | 2 | -5.1% | NM | NM | 2 | 2 | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Nevada | 3 | 2 | 14% | 2 | 2 | 1 | * | -- | -- | -- | -- |
New Mexico | 3 | 3 | -12% | 2 | 3 | NM | -- | -- | NM | NM | NM |
Utah | 3 | 4 | -6.8% | 3 | 4 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Wyoming | 3 | 6 | -46% | 3 | 6 | -- | -- | -- | -- | NM | NM |
Pacific Contiguous | 6 | 9 | -41% | 5 | 6 | NM | 3 | NM | NM | NM | NM |
California | 3 | 5 | -34% | 3 | 4 | * | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM |
Oregon | 2 | 1 | 55% | 2 | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Washington | NM | 4 | NM | NM | NM | NM | 3 | NM | NM | NM | NM |
Pacific Noncontiguous | 695 | 715 | -2.8% | 559 | 558 | 128 | 146 | NM | NM | 8 | 10 |
Alaska | 95 | 62 | 54% | 92 | 58 | -- | -- | NM | NM | NM | NM |
Hawaii | 599 | 653 | -8.2% | 467 | 500 | 128 | 146 | * | * | 5 | 6 |
U.S. Total | 1,502 | 1,699 | -12% | 1,123 | 1,106 | 335 | 538 | 11 | 13 | 32 | 42 |
* = Value is less than half of the smallest unit of measure (e.g., for values with no decimals, the smallest unit is 1 then values under 0.5 are shown as *.) |
NM = Not meaningful due to large relative standard error or excessive percentage change. |
Notes: See Glossary for definitions. Values are preliminary. See Technical Notes for a discussion of the sample design for the Form EIA-923. |
Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-923, Power Plant Operations Report. |