• Home
• Calendar
• Project Profiles
• Fact Sheets
• MAP-21
• Glossary
• Resources
• Site Directory

Transportation Revenue Innovations:
An Introduction

State and local governments are turning to new revenue sources to supplement fuel taxes and other traditional sources for surface transportation projects. Options that have been used by communities range from road pricing, to developer contributions, to hotel and tourism taxes, to advertising revenues.

In addition to providing funds, some of these innovative revenue sources can reduce costs and congestion, enable development of more livable communities, and reduce vehicle emissions. In this way, innovative revenue options have the potential to bring more than their dollar value to a project, in some cases improving the quality of the transportation service provided to the public.

The Federal Highway Administration's (FHWA's) Office of Innovative Program Delivery (IPD) provides background research and objective information to assist State and local agencies in exploring nontraditional revenue sources. IPD provides information about revenue-raising strategies that States and local governments have used to address transportation shortfalls. In addition, IPD has in place a robust program focused on road pricing that includes a significant research agenda. IPD provides assistance to State and local agencies in addressing technical, institutional, and operational hurdles associated with road pricing. Finally, IPD coordinates the provision of tolling authority for Federal-aid highway facilities through various legislatively authorized programs and ensures that revenues that are generated by or used for Federal-aid projects follow any applicable Federal requirements.

Road Pricing Innovations

Congestion pricing is one example of an innovative revenue generation strategy. Whereas tolling involves the collection of a flat fee from motorists for their use of a highway facility, the term "pricing," as applied to road usage, entails fees or tolls that vary by level of vehicle demand on the facility. By varying the toll, free flow can be maintained while generating revenue that can support either construction of the additional tolled capacity or transit and highway services.

Case Study: High-Occupancy Toll (HOT) Lanes on I-15 in San Diego, CA

Since 1998, single-occupant vehicles pay a per-trip fee each time they use the I-15 HOT lanes. Tolls vary "dynamically" with the level of traffic demand on the lanes. Fees vary in 25-cent increments as often as every six minutes to help maintain free-flow traffic conditions on the high-occupancy-vehicle lanes. The project has recently been extended with construction of new lanes to the North. The project originally generated $2 million in revenue annually, about one-half of which was used to support transit service in the corridor.

Case Study: State Route 91 Express Lanes in Orange County, CA

The four variably priced express lanes in the median of the State Route 91 Freeway opened in December 1995. The toll schedule is adjusted every three months based on traffic observed over the prior three-month period. Speeds are 60-65 mph on the express lanes, whereas congestion on the free lanes has reduced average peak hour speeds to no more than 15-20 mph. Toll revenues have been adequate to pay for construction and operating costs; surplus revenues will be used to extend the express lanes into Riverside County.

Value Capture Innovations

"Value capture" refers to financing techniques in which the increase in private land value created by new transportation facilities is "captured" to repay the cost of the public investment. In contrast to user charges, value capture asks land owners who benefit from access to the new infrastructure to provide the revenue source to help repay the investment. Examples of value capture innovations include the following.

Tax Increment Financing (TIF)

TIF utilizes the prospect of increased property taxes to secure bonds issued to fund the transportation improvement. When property values rise because of a new public transportation investment, the resultant tax revenue increase becomes the "tax increment," all or a portion of which can be dedicated to repay the debt incurred to build the facility. Such TIF districts created to issue bonds are found in cities throughout the United States.

Transportation Special Districts

When property owners form a transportation special district or local improvement district (LID), they agree to share in the cost of public infrastructure improvements that promise to increase the value of their holdings. Rather than paying via future property tax increases, however, the LID members agree to pay directly for the cost of the improvement. The project scope and assessment methodology can vary.

Case Study: Reno Transportation Rail Access Corridor (ReTRAC) Project

The City of Reno, NV, successfully used a variety of revenue sources, including assessments from a transportation special district, to fund a portion of the cost of the $280-million ReTRAC Project. The project removed 11 rail/highway grade crossings in the heart of downtown Reno. The crossings had caused significant congestion and created safety hazards, which included numerous collisions.

The project involved the construction of a 2-mile-long, 54-foot-wide, and 33-footdeep trench. According to the city of Reno, "Traffic flow is greatly improved, emergency vehicle access is enhanced, property values of buildings adjacent to the trench have significantly increased, and there are even various environmental benefits. Thanks to ReTRAC, there are now 120 acres of new real estate (valued at more than $11.5 million dollars) available for development or open space in downtown Reno."