Official Site of the U.S. Air Force   Right Corner Banner
Join the Air Force

News > Panetta: DOD will help nation meet fiscal challenges
Panetta: DOD will help nation meet fiscal challenges

Posted 8/3/2011 Email story   Print story

    


by Karen Parrish
American Forces Press Service


8/3/2011 - WASHINGTON (AFNS) -- Though defense spending must and will be part of the solution to the national financial struggle, Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta told the Defense Department workforce in a message Aug. 3, budget reductions must take sound strategy and policy into account.

President Barack Obama signed a bill Aug. 2 raising the nation's debt ceiling and outlining spending reductions.

"One of the key challenges we face as a department (is) how to ensure that our military has everything it needs to protect our national security at a time of considerable fiscal challenge in our country," Panetta wrote.

The secretary said reductions in defense spending that will result from the legislation -- $350 billion over 10 years -- are in line with what DOD leaders were anticipating. Defense leaders can implement those reductions while maintaining the military's excellence, the secretary wrote, adding that spending choices must be based on sound strategy and policy.

"As a department, we are asking ourselves: What are the essential missions our military must do to protect America and our way of life? What are the risks of the strategic choices we make? And what are the financial costs?" he wrote.

Across-the-board cuts have in the past resulted in a force undersized and underfunded relative to its responsibilities, Panetta wrote.

"I will do everything I can to ensure that further reductions in defense spending are not pursued in a hasty, ill-conceived way that would undermine the military's ability to protect America and its vital interests around the globe," he added.

The debt ceiling agreement contains a mechanism that will take effect if Congress fails to further reduce the deficit, Panetta noted.

"If that happens, it could trigger a round of dangerous across-the-board defense cuts that would do real damage to our security, our troops and their families, and our ability to protect the nation," he wrote. The potential deep cut in defense spending is not meant as policy, he explained, but rather is designed to spur responsible, balanced spending reduction and avoid misguided cuts.

"I am aware that as Washington discusses strategy and policy, you and your families are discussing the implications of the decisions that might result, on issues from the future of military pay, to benefits, retirement and health care," Panetta wrote.

"I promised in my first message as secretary that I will fight for you. That means I will fight for you and your families as we face these budget challenges," he added.

DOD owes the defense workforce and its families the support they have earned on the battlefield and the home front, he wrote. At the same time, he noted, aging equipment dating to the defense buildup of the 1980s must be replaced.

"Going forward, we must ensure that the military gets the effective and affordable weapons it needs by redoubling our efforts to enforce procurement discipline," he wrote.

DOD must also continue to tackle wasteful and duplicative spending, and overhead staffing, he wrote.

"We must be accountable to the American people for what we spend, where we spend it, and with what result," he added.

Panetta emphasized that the military has succeeded in every mission it has been assigned, from the Iraq and Afghanistan wars to humanitarian assistance and disaster relief at home and abroad.

"You -- the men and women of the military -- have never said 'I can't do it.' Nor have the civilians who support you. That is the military ethos -- to salute and press on," he wrote.

The ethos of the nation's leaders and policy makers must be to ensure that the missions assigned to the military meet critical national security priorities, he wrote.

"It is our responsibility to determine those priorities and to ensure that you will always have the training and equipment to succeed in those missions," the secretary wrote.



tabComments
8/5/2011 8:17:33 AM ET
The acadamies are not going to go away, that's a pipe dream, although I would tend to agree with your point. There are so many ways to eliminate expenses without doing it on the backs of the common warrior. First, eliminate or drastically cut the 86th Airlift Wing at Andrews AFB, Md. Obama wants to bash corporate jets but has 2 of the largest in the world, not to mention congress flying all over on them. Cut back on all the crap he hauls when he goes overseas. You know how many C-17's and C-5's it takes to move his helicopters, electronic gear, people and limos? Depending on the trip, between 2 and 6 planes at $10K an hour operating costs. Elimintate base housing. We need out of that business. Do away with BAS and BAH and add them into military pay. Sell off the housing to a private company and let the people rent them if they wish, and they will. Itw would spur the local economy and add jobs. And don't give me the "We don't get BAH so we already pay" argument. It doesn't h
Dave C, OH
 
8/4/2011 2:44:29 PM ET
Superfluous tainted intransigent factors cost taxpayers about $417K for each Air Force Academy graduate vs. $65K total cost for ROTC commissioned officer or $22K for Officer Training School graduate. Expand proven and less costly ROTC and OTS commissioning programs to cover privileged twenty percent of accessions lavishly educated by USAFA. Eliminate this exclusive DRU empire and four other United States Military Academies to get DoD out of undergraduate campus education business. Trim trappings of costly triplication and extravagant traditions.
Modern Warrior, FY Cut Real World
 
8/4/2011 10:09:12 AM ET
Secretary Panetta, the Fed holds nearly 1.7 trillion in U.S. debt. The Govt pays the interest on the debt to the Fed which, in turn, returns to the Treasury 90 percent. Nonetheless, that 1.7 trillion in U.S. Bonds that the Fed owns is still counted in the debt ceiling number. Solution: Get the Fed and Treasury to rip up the debt (it's fake, anyway) and you eliminate 1.7 trillion in debt ceiling.
Tom Mowers, Virginia
 
8/3/2011 5:49:49 PM ET
Why do I have the funny feeling SECDEF will try to balance the defense budget by making changes to retiree TRICARE? Better to drop the F-35. Don't balance your budget on my backheart.
Otis R. Needleman, USA
 
Add a comment

 Inside AF.mil

ima cornerSearch

tabSubscribe AF.MIL
tabMore HeadlinesRSS feed 
Life Extension Programs modernize ICBMs

SecAF visits basic military training

Through Airmen's Eyes: Airman battles breast cancer

Remains of two Airmen lost in 1969 identified, honored

Top female AF general tells personal examples of women's progress in military

Wizards salute Andrews Airmen, service members

Online access simplifies dependent updates

Aviano unveils first locally painted F-16

'Green Flag' keeps Airmen, Soldiers mission ready

Contingency Response Airmen battle elements at JRTC  1

AF awards $25K to essay winners

Through Airmen's Eyes: Ultimate wingman helps save friend's life  12

Declassified document shows 'real' flying saucer

Hurlburt Airman found dead after boating mishap identified

tabCommentaryRSS feed 
Teal ropes to spotlight sexual assault response  37

Air Force Academy energy research will yield global benefits


Site Map      Contact Us     Questions     Security and Privacy notice     E-publishing