Official Site of the U.S. Air Force   Right Corner Banner
Join the Air Force

News > Commander calls for command-wide investigation of inappropriate relationships
 
Photos 
AETC commander looks into inappropriate relationships
Command Directed Investigation
Download HiRes
 
Related Biographies
 GENERAL EDWARD A. RICE JR.
 MAJOR GENERAL MARGARET H. WOODWARD
Commander calls for command-wide investigation of inappropriate relationships

Posted 6/23/2012 Email story   Print story

    


by Staff. Sgt. Clinton Atkins
Air Education and Training Command Public Affairs


6/23/2012 - JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-RANDOLPH, Texas (AFNS) -- Concerned by allegations of misconduct by Air Force Basic Military Training instructors, the commander of Air Education and Training Command has directed an investigation, led by a general officer from outside the command, that goes beyond BMT and includes all AETC initial and technical training units.

Gen. Edward A. Rice Jr., the AETC commander, appointed Maj. Gen. Margaret H. Woodward to lead the command directed investigation. Woodward is currently assigned as acting director of Operational Planning, Policy and Strategy for the Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff for Operations, Plans and Requirements at Headquarters U.S. Air Force, Washington D.C.

"The vast majority of our military training team abides by the standards of conduct set forth for the men and women charged with the responsibility of training our force," Rice said. "There is an ongoing comprehensive criminal investigation, and we have taken a series of steps to ensure our trainees at basic military training have a safe and professional training environment. It's important to look even deeper and wider to identify any systemic issues that may place our youngest Airmen at risk in any basic or technical training environment. If there are, we need to address them."

The issue of instructor sexual misconduct came to light when Staff Sgt. Luis Walker, a BMT instructor at Joint Base San Antonio-Lackland, was accused of sexually assaulting a trainee in June 2011. Walker was immediately relieved of duty and his leaders began an investigation into the allegations. Walker now faces a general court-martial on 28 charges, including rape, adultery, obstruction of justice, attempted aggravated sexual contact, multiple counts of aggravated sexual assault, violating a training group instruction, and violating a lawful order regarding unprofessional relationships with trainees. Walker is set to appear in court July 16.

Since then, several members of the military training instructor corps have come forward with allegations of inappropriate behavior by other instructors. As soon as leaders became aware of additional possible misconduct, they launched a comprehensive investigation. That investigation has so far led commanders to initiate proceedings against three other instructors, and there are ongoing investigations into potential misconduct by several other instructors. Commanders consider the full range of appropriate disciplinary and administrative measures to include courts-martial while protecting the Constitutional rights of the accused.

"The fact that MTIs stepped forward to identify those suspected of misconduct cannot be overlooked," said Col. Polly Kenny, the 2nd Air Force Staff Judge Advocate. "It demonstrates that these NCOs care about the integrity of the BMT Corps and are not willing to tolerate behavior that will tarnish a hallowed Air Force institution."

One of the accused MTIs, Staff Sgt. Peter Vega-Maldonado, pleaded guilty to one charge of having an improper relationship with a trainee and violation of a no-contact order. He was sentenced to 90 days confinement, forfeiture of $500 pay per month for four months, 30 days hard labor and reduction in rank to airman. Since then, he was granted testimonial immunity in exchange for aiding prosecutors in other cases.

Vega-Maldonado testified for the government during a June 1 Article 32 hearing regarding Staff Sgts. Craig LeBlanc and Kwinton Estacio. Estacio is charged with sexual misconduct with a trainee, violating a no-contact order and obstruction of justice. LeBlanc is charged with sexual misconduct with two trainees, violating a no-contact order, adultery and obstruction of justice.

During his immunized testimony, Vega-Maldonado admitted he had engaged in improper sexual conduct with several other women in addition to the woman identified in his previous guilty plea.

Once the training unit's leaders learned there were further incidents of sexual misconduct, they took immediate action to investigate and offer services to affected Airmen.

The 37th Training Wing surveyed all of the 5,900 trainees in BMT March 17 to identify sexual misconduct. Trainees were briefed by chapel, legal, sexual assault response coordinator and office of special investigations staff members. They also heard from the 737th Training Group commander. Discussions covered everything from reporting procedures to services available for anyone affected by sexual misconduct.

"I tell (the trainees), 'You are my neighborhood watch -- each and every one of you,'" said Col. Glenn Palmer, the 737th Training Group commander. "If there is any MTI misconduct going on, report it. If it's happening to you, report it. If you observe it happening, be a good wingman and report it."

Additionally, training leaders met with instructors to discuss the severity of the incidents being investigated. Commanders and first sergeants stressed the importance of proper conduct. Each instructor was ordered to re-read Air Force Instruction 36-2909, Professional and Unprofessional Relationships, along with the AETC-specific version of the same instruction, and to sign an agreement of understanding.

Rice said Woodward's investigation is not designed to halt any ongoing or planned training unit reviews, corrective actions or criminal investigations being conducted by subordinate AETC units. Woodward's investigation will evaluate all aspects of sexual and other abuse-of-power misconduct between faculty or staff and trainees or students in BMT and technical training throughout the command.

The AETC commander said correcting this misconduct is a top priority.

"Misconduct, particularly when committed by faculty or staff with trainees or students, undermines an entire team, damages good order and discipline and threatens the trust the American people have in us as professionals and as an institution," Rice said. "It will not be tolerated. Our mission requires an educational environment where students and trainees are prepared for duty with dignity and respect."

A report from Woodward is due to Rice within 60 calendar days of her appointment unless granted an extension.



tabComments
6/27/2012 9:26:49 AM ET
This is the most disgusting thing I have ever heard. Everyone of these rapist should get put down to AB all pay forfeited and hard labor for the rest of their life They have messed up the lives of their victims forever belive me I know
Teresa, FL
 
6/26/2012 3:46:04 PM ET
I fully agree with Jerry. Inappropriate relationships does not come even close to describing what happened. This situation is much more akin to a Prison Guard having sexual relations with an inmate than a MSgt and a SSgt dating. There is absolute control over trainees and in that situation I'm not even sure if consent could be given by a basic trainee. This is a disgrace. Leaders at all levels have a supreme responsibility to know what is going on in this type of environment. SNCOs should be a constant presence in the flights and opportunities for these kinds of rape should not even occur.I'm also concerned that all of a sudden after SSgt Walker was accused, everyone remembers incidents that should have been reported immediately.Judging by this article, I don't think the Air Force fully appreciates the gravity of this situation. If it is as wide-spread as the early investigation implies, the Air Force should brace itself. This will be exponentially bigger than any USA
paul, California
 
6/26/2012 8:56:09 AM ET
The order is for a command-wide investigation of inappropriate relationships, but the charges against the instructors are much more serious than that. They include rape, obstruction of justice and sexual assualt. These are not just inappropriate relationships. They are serious crimes. It also goes to the selection process of training instructors. That should be what is reviewed. How are these people getting through the screening process and how can we change the screening process to identify possible problems. You have some people wanting to be instructors because it puts them into a position of absolute authority over others who are in a vulnerable position. The screening process is where the problem starts.
Jerry, Oklahoma
 
Add a comment

 Inside AF.mil

ima cornerSearch

tabSubscribe AF.MIL
tabMore HeadlinesRSS feed 
Air Force officials outline cyber capabilities in today's fight

AF is transforming how it provides services

Secretary of Defense visits Yokota

Air Force recognizes 2012 Outstanding Airmen of the Year  |  VIDEO

CSAF talks Air Force innovation, evolution at AFA Conference  2  |  VIDEO

AF Reserve commander praises total force

AFLINK mobile app keeps people connected to everything Air Force  1

First week of RARO 12 wraps up

Air Force athletes discuss world class program during roundtable

Multinational communication exercise evolves through years  1

Welsh: 'The only way to move forward is together'  1

ISR chief stresses importance of turning data into information

New DOD Safe Helpline Mobile App now available

Annual space, missile pioneers inducted

tabCommentaryRSS feed 
Sept. 17: A day for Constitutional conversation  1

Losing Your Future to Sexual Assault   24


Site Map      Contact Us     Questions     Security and Privacy notice     E-publishing