Your browser doesn't support JavaScripts

TTBGov Results of the FY 2009 Alcohol Beverage Sampling Program for Malt Beverages

Consumer Corner

Sake Banner Image

Results of the FY 2009 Alcohol Beverage Sampling Program for Malt Beverages

Label Compliance

  • We estimate that 90 percent (±4 percent) of all malt beverage labels in the marketplace are in compliance with Federal alcohol beverage laws and regulations.

Findings:

  • Reasons for non-compliance in our sample included:
    • No approved COLA.
    • Additional labels appeared on the container (other than those included on the approved COLA).
    • Additional information appeared on the bottle or cap that did not appear on the approved COLA.  

Content Compliance

  • We estimate that 92 percent (±4 percent) of malt beverage products in the marketplace are in compliance with Federal alcohol beverage laws and regulations for malt beverages.

Findings:

  • Reasons for non-compliance in our sample included:
    • Containers were under-filled.
    • Containers were over-filled.
    • Actual alcohol content was less than that stated on the label.
    • Actual alcohol content was more than that stated on the label.
    • Actual calories did not match what was stated on the label.

Overall Findings

  • We found no significant difference in labeling and content compliance rates for domestic and imported products.
  • The overall marketplace compliance rate for malt beverage labels together with the compliance rate for content is 85 percent ± 5 percent.

 

Results of the FY 2009 Alcohol Beverage Advertising Program

  • We estimate the compliance rate for all malt beverage advertisements with Federal alcohol beverage advertising laws and regulations is 73 percent ± 4 percent.

Findings:

  • Advertising on the internet and radio appear to have the most compliance issues while TV ads appear to be the most compliant.
  • The top four reasons for non-compliance in our malt beverage advertising sample were:
    • Mandatory information related to the responsible advertiser was missing (37 percent of all non-compliant ads)
    • Prohibited claims regarding the alcohol content (strength claims) appeared (30 percent of all non-compliant ads)
    • Mandatory class designation information was missing (22 percent of all non-compliant ads)
    • Calorie or carbohydrate claims appeared without the required Statement of Average Analysis (12 percent of all non-compliant ads)
  • Of all the non-compliant ads 18 percent were non-compliant for more than one reason.
  • The most common reasons for non-compliance by media type:

Media Type

Reason

Percentage of Non-compliant Ads

Internet

Prohibited strength claims

45%

Outdoor

Missing  Info - Responsible Advertiser

86%

Print

Missing  Info - Responsible Advertiser

80%

Missing -  Class Designation

80%

Radio

Missing  Info - Responsible Advertiser

100%

TV

Missing -  Class Designation

60%