Official Site of the U.S. Air Force   Right Corner Banner
Join the Air Force

News > New instruction puts spotlight on standards, culture
 
Photos 
New instruction puts spotlight on standards, culture
Air Force Instruction 1-1, Air Force Standards, was signed and certified recently. In a single document, the instruction conveniently summarizes the expected standards of conduct for uniformed Airmen. (U.S. Air Force graphic/Sylvia Saab)
Download HiRes
 
Related Stories
 Donley praises Airmen, emphasizes standards at AFSA conference  - 8/16/2012
 
Related Links
 Air Force e-Publishing
New instruction puts spotlight on standards, culture

Posted 8/13/2012 Email story   Print story

    


by Tech. Sgt. Shawn J. Jones
Air Force Public Affairs Agency


8/13/2012 - JOINT BASE ANDREWS, Md. (AFNS) -- When referencing fundamental standards, Airmen now have a single source: Air Force Instruction 1-1, Air Force Standards.

As one of the capstone acts of his 39-year career, Gen. Norton Schwartz, Air Force chief of staff, put his signature on the brand new instruction, which communicates in one document the required standards of conduct, performance and discipline expected of every uniformed Airman.

The instruction -- the first and only to be signed and certified by the chief of staff -- was preceded by Air Force Policy Directive 1, Air Force Culture, in which the secretary of the Air Force directed the chief of staff to develop and execute policy related to standards.

The new instruction is particularly noteworthy not because it offers many new standards, but because it consolidates many of the standards that had been spread among many separate instructions, officials said. In a single document, the instruction conveniently summarizes the expected standards of conduct for uniformed Airmen.

The intention for the instruction is to serve as a compass, providing a convenient overview of standards while directing Airmen to other instructions where more detailed information may be found, officials said.

Having a one-stop shop for standards-related guidelines, while not unprecedented, has long been absent in the Air Force. In fact, the vast majority of the new instruction's initial content and structure were borrowed from the now outdated Air Force Regulation 30-1, Air Force Standards, which was not replaced in the early 1990s when Air Force instructions replaced Air Force regulations.

In December 2011, Schwartz directed the Air Staff to develop the new instruction. Much of the heavy lifting related to coordinating and drafting the instruction was performed by Scott Martin, a legal advisor on Schwartz's senior air staff counsel.

"We needed to capture and consolidate the existing Air Force standards," said Martin, a 23-year veteran who retired as a colonel in 2010.

From cover to cover, the instruction counts 27 pages, broken into three chapters.

The first chapter, the Air Force environment, focuses on topics such as core values, customs and courtesies, force structure and diversity. According to the chapter overview, the Air Force environment "encompasses the actions, values and standards we live by each and every day."

The second chapter focuses on standards of conduct, including sections on professional relationships, ethics, drug and alcohol abuse, and government neutrality regarding religion.
The instruction's final chapter addresses standards related to dress and appearance, physical fitness and government housing.

Martin said that while he borrowed a lot from the old regulation, it was incomplete for today's Air Force since so much had changed in the past two decades.

"We updated it and brought it up to the 21st century to address contemporary challenges that Airmen face," he said.

Some of those 21st century updates include standards related to relationships on social media, the wingman concept, resiliency, sexual assault prevention and response, tattoos and body piercing, and the Joint Ethics Regulation.

Martin said he expected the instruction to become a valuable resource for educating today's Airmen.

"If you have a young Airman who's not quite getting it, this will be a great tool for a mentoring session," he said. "Every Airman should periodically review these standards of conduct to assure he is living up to what the Air Force expects of him every day."

(Editor's note: AFI 1-1, Air Force Standards, and AFPD 1, Air Force Culture, can be found on www.e-publishing.af.mil.)



tabComments
9/12/2012 11:04:09 AM ET
First, let me say that I support this particular AFI. It's basically the Cliff Notes for the major instructions. It's perfect for a young Airman or butterbar who isn't yet intimately familiar with the myriad AFIs or for we who've been in a while who want just a quick refresher. It shouldn't have been necessary in the first place, true, but I think we needed something like this to condense the important information into one hard and fast source.Second, I echo the call for a reduction in the number of AFIs. If that can't or won't be done, then we need to have real SMEs - your experienced Staffs, Techs and mid to senior Captains - to go TDY and help rewrite our pubs. A lot of these things are bloated and need to be condensed into hard and fast documents. If you've ever read the SPINS for OEF and/or OIFOND, you know what I mean.
SSgt S.O., Land of Entrapment
 
9/6/2012 10:27:15 AM ET
What does this mean for the ART staff it says off duty wear of uniforms is prohibited...it seems that if someone is being paid as a civilian they are off duty...do art show up buisness casual attire now
DS, Niagara
 
8/30/2012 5:22:30 PM ET
Now if they could just get some Airman's Manuals printed to enhance our combat skills no matter how professional we are...
SA, US
 
8/29/2012 5:13:44 PM ET
@TSgt B Germany...AFI 36-2903 has a change 1 that was added 1 June 2012 and it changes from 4mm to 6mm.
Dyess Diamond, Dyess AFB
 
8/27/2012 9:57:06 AM ET
AFI 1-1 was a great idea to provide a snapshot of several publications. My only concern is the inconsistencies between AFI 1-1 and the AFI's they originated from for example- AFI 36-2903 Dress and Personal Appearance of Air Force Personnel Section 6.3.1.1. states that earrings will not exceed 4mm in diameter while in a note in AFI 1-1 Air Force Standards section 3.3.2.3 it states women may wear earrings that do not exceed 6mm in diameter. This leaves me to wonder if that is a change or a misprint. Other than that I think it's a great tool and people shouldn't have any excuse to not know and enforce the rules
TSgt B, Germany
 
8/23/2012 4:05:34 PM ET
At CSAF level all he can do is issue policy that is his job and he did it well for us for 4 years I might add. The Gen stabilized the force after a period of unrest and firings We take the policy and convert to actions.What we need to be is MILITARY and stop trying to build consensus and agreement. The Army and navy laughs at us and the way we try to committee everything at the tactical level. Learn your job learn how to be be a leader and demand same from subordinates...be MILITARY. No none of us gets it right the first time or are perfect at it. Cheers
Retired SMSgt, Robins AFB
 
8/23/2012 8:13:30 AM ET
While the idea of this new AFI is sound like someone already mentioned the PDG did the exact same thing. So this really is a redundant waste of taxpayer dollars. Why couldn't they have focused on something more worthwhile like say putting the attention to detail back in BMT and the discipline right with it It seems every new crop of Airmen that rolls in is worse than the last in regards to attention to detail and discipline. After hearing some of the things they cut out of BMT I can see why. I mean seriously comment boxes for trainees to whine about their TI Rolling all of your clothes instead of folding them I bet the little turds have fitted sheets now too. Its time to reverse course from the kinder gentler mentality and start acting like we are a branch of the MILITARY. That also includes eliminating the AFIs and going back to AFRs with no stupid grey areas. There is too much crap nowadays that can be left to interpretation.
FIGMO, CONUS
 
8/17/2012 5:48:30 PM ET
To those of you who say we don't need this then you are wrong plain and simple. Standards are the number one thing I see failing us as a Military Organization. No matter what rank you are you should go and read this thing cover to cover. It's only 27 pages and it's a great one stop resource.
SSgt Tyler, Shaw AFB
 
8/17/2012 8:33:11 AM ET
I think consolation of any AFI is a good thing. Standards and code of conduct is a great thing in any organization. I served for many years in blue and now work Civil Service. You talk about a work force that needs some standards and ethic codes....CS is a must. I really believe that all DODUSAF civilians should fall under this guidance as well or have their own developed. When I was hired Civil Service I once again had to raise my hand a make the oath. Ask most retired military or ANGRES civilians and I bet they all agree. The Civilian workforce needs to be held to our same high standards.
MG, Hill AFB
 
8/15/2012 9:22:01 PM ET
The vocal minority will always snivel to get their way instead of actually breaking a sweat or getting their hands dirty to make a difference. Great AFI...takes a lot of the ambiguity out of current policy. Pay no attention to the babies in the front. There's no valid reason for this to be a contentious issue.
S. Helmer, PNW
 
8/15/2012 8:55:50 PM ET
Another waste of time. Just like CBT's and now wearing blues 4 days a week. Retirement is close.
Dane, Colorado
 
8/15/2012 7:24:57 PM ET
What's done is DONE! Read, acknowledge, comply. You raised your hand, enlisted or comissioned, and are most likely better off than you were the day before you left for basic. My favorite crayon is blue, what's yours?
HEYREB, DC
 
8/15/2012 5:23:01 PM ET
Msgt H, you will make an excellent E9.
yup, ft carson
 
8/15/2012 4:01:15 PM ET
Count me among those who think this is a good idea. The PDG is just a guide and other info is scattered among multiple AFIs. However, here are key points about standards and conduct that we learned when we came into the AF and now it's codified in a single place. Plus, since the information about standards and conduct is in an AFI, which means it is directive, it can be used by supervisors/commanders if adverse action is needed. Considering the AF seems to have quite the issue recently with failure to follow standards, questionable conduct and ethics, lack of discipline, etc., it's a good starting point to fixing what ails us.
Joe, Northern VA
 
8/15/2012 3:14:15 PM ET
Most of the negative comments here lack any real substance and constitute griping for the sake of griping. It's fair to question whether this was necessary but the CSAF found it to be. And it is now published so the duty is to get behind it. It is also fair to anticipate that changes in the referenced AFIs COULD create some administrative headaches for the OPR. But what I like is that I was able to read this entire AFI in one sitting and found it to be a pretty good summary of what is expected of every Airman. I will keep this handy and encourage my subordinates to be familiar with it as well.
MSgt H, JBPHH HI
 
8/15/2012 3:14:14 PM ET
OK we have too many AFIs. This new one while it may have wasted time money and energy it's here now so use it. It can help new troops find the right place to look if an NCO isn't around. In my SP days the squadron published a job knowledge book that was to guide our study of AFIs when learning our jobs.
DMPI, NOVA
 
8/15/2012 7:16:17 AM ET
@Sjones- I read these articles every day and just recently I have noticed the author commenting directly namely you. This seems a little odd to me unless there is a very controversial point to be restated by the author. Seems you take it a little too personally. Continue reporting in good fashion and let the comments flow as they will. Most people know how to sort the wheat from the chaff.
RC, GA
 
8/15/2012 5:04:58 AM ET
It never ceases to amaze me how so many Airmen like to complain about anything new in the Air Force. This new AFI will prove to be an outstanding tool for our young Supervisors. It outlines the basics that we expect our young Airmen to understand and abide by. We can never expect all personnel to read understand and apply all AFI's but this one AFI is a good start. If everyone would just govern their actions by this instruction the Air Force would be better for it.
Concerned 1st Sgt, Afghanistan
 
8/14/2012 1:53:41 PM ET
Don't sweat it Tech. Sgt. Jones. Welcome to the Interwebz where everyone tries to make their own candle brighter by blowing other's out. If they weren't taking swipes at this AFI they would make derogatory remarks about someone's decoration or how they're tired of seeing all-female fill-in-the-blank stories. Haters simply like hating.
TSgt. Nystrom, USSTRATCOM
 
8/14/2012 1:07:53 PM ET
How many of you actually read the entire AFI The comments on this board demonstrate the immaturity of many of our Airmen. Complaining and attempting sarcasm serves no purpose and doesn't achieve anything. We needed this instruction and I applaud the USAF for publishing it. For those who don't think we need this AFI its because you don't have a strategic view. If you don't like this AFI or other things related to standards or decisions Leaders make...please get out of the Air Force ASAP
Concerned Airman, OCONUS
 
8/14/2012 12:44:21 PM ET
Shawn your writing is excellent. This AFI is junk. It is counterproductive. Summarizing AFIs in another AFI encourages people to not reference the governing AFI from the get go. The AFIs consolidated in 1-1 aren't rocket science. Unnecessary.
JS, JBER
 
8/14/2012 12:15:07 PM ET
@S Jones- I'm sure everyone will love this AFI. However its very existence confirms the fact that we have too many AFIs. We have so many AFIs that the AF recognized the need to create this one stop shop. Next step is to eliminate many of the other AFIs. KISS is a live and well. That is Keep It Simple Stupid.
Maj, staff
 
8/14/2012 12:09:30 PM ET
S.Jones you are going to make an excellent E9
yup, Ft Carson
 
8/14/2012 11:35:00 AM ET
@S.Jones I received a copy of AFI 1-1 read through it and didn't understand the purpose of it before I read your article. So I don't believe your writing is the problem. The problem is publishing an AFI that covers areas already covered by other publications. This is merely a cheat sheet and really shouldn't be an AFI itself.
MM, FL
 
8/14/2012 11:15:05 AM ET
@TSgt Jones - Dont worry about the naysayers. These individuals would likely find fault in anything written and much that is unwritten as is evidenced by the use of pseudonyms. I read your article and the AFI and realized that this would be easy as I was already in compliance. Keep up the good work.
Maj Douglas Pietersma, F. E. Warren AFB
 
8/14/2012 11:13:15 AM ET
I'm thinking that in the age of immediate gratification a simplified one-stop-shop regulation is not out of order. Maybe the simplification will help some of our up and comers with a clarity they complain they cannot get from current leadership or standard regs. I certainly do not believe that the writer of this story should take any of this to mean he was unclear. That is untrue.
free pennies, MD
 
8/14/2012 11:00:10 AM ET
@ Jones unfortunately it is an AFI now. If I remember right thats why we changed the PFE to PDG to be one source document for all Airmen to us as tool nothing more. I cant believe AFPDO allowed this to go through. It says the same thing as the other AFIs and the same thing as PDG. This product is going to be a nightmare for the OPR. Especially when all those governing publications that this AFI reference changes. Then the OPR has to change this AFI within 180 days. Another great product What ever happen to the little Blue Book
CONUS, Midwest
 
8/14/2012 10:38:19 AM ET
Judging by the last line of the story all Airmen are male.
TSgt, JBSA
 
8/14/2012 9:12:43 AM ET
Hey I wrote the story so you can call me a company man or whatever but the idea of a convenient single source for all standard-related AFIs makes sense to me. It doesn't replace any AFIs and it doesn't tell you how to use AFIs. It's just a useful tool nothing more. Judging by some of the comments I feel like some of the readers are not getting the point...which is ultimately my fault as the writer.
S.Jones, Pentagon
 
8/14/2012 6:56:17 AM ET
Oh thank gawd I was lost without this. Good job A1 whatever would we do without your sage guidance.
Some Guy, Germany
 
8/14/2012 6:20:58 AM ET
Yo dawg I heard you like AFIs so we put AFIs in your AFIs so you can regulate while you regulate.
D, MDL
 
8/13/2012 8:08:43 PM ET
@ AFPDO I thought you couldn't combine different series into one AFI Now you have 36-series 44 series 35 series 51-series and etc...all into one AFI. Looks like SAFA6 will have to rewrite AFI 33-360 to allow multi series in one AFI. Looks like that verbiage above each AFI Compliance with this Publication is Mandatory doesn't hold water. So how about this AFI
CONUS, CONUS
 
8/13/2012 8:07:03 PM ET
Racetracker Absolutely right Did you see those band commander outfits they wore at the CSAF CoC
Homey, PAFB
 
8/13/2012 7:21:41 PM ET
So uh does this mean Finance is going to stop closing for 'a function' in the middle of the duty day
Old Bear, 70 degrees north
 
8/13/2012 6:10:55 PM ET
Sort of reminds me of my flightline days. We once got a Tech Order to show us how to read Tech Orders...
TDS, San Antonio TX
 
8/13/2012 5:01:49 PM ET
Taylor exactly what I thought. Someone needed OPREPR bullets. Enough already
Zsurely, Luke
 
8/13/2012 4:49:17 PM ET
@Taylor they should have named it the BMTI Failure Analysis Wrap-up
Retired Chief, Overhere
 
8/13/2012 4:27:53 PM ET
Oh Good a regulation that simplifies other regulations down to... following the regs. Instead of hacking through the red tape and simplifying AFIs let us add another one to the pile. Here I thought the PDG was supposed to transition from WAPS material to guidepost for all Airmen to follow. I guess this is version 2
D, Congress
 
8/13/2012 4:02:21 PM ET
Please stop trying to reinvent me.
The Wheel, JBSA
 
8/13/2012 3:49:23 PM ET
Ah another waste of timeeffortmoney CSAF legacy project. T Mike left the Airman's Creed and Schwartz left this. I sincerely hope Welsh can turn the AF around.
CJ, SC
 
8/13/2012 3:49:13 PM ET
Now from the repetitive department is redundancy...Really. Don't we have uniforms to worry about You know important things
Racetracker, In the sky
 
8/13/2012 3:38:22 PM ET
Wow it's pretty awesome that CSAF finally decided to do something about the broken EPR system and not just make it easier for lazy NCOs to quote regs that they should be getting into every now and then.Oh wait....
Jaded NCO, conus
 
8/13/2012 3:32:41 PM ET
Reminds me of when I created a checklist of the checklists. When you needed a checklist you went to the checklist book first so you would know what checklist you should go get. In other words a complete and total waste of time.
Retired, Ohio
 
8/13/2012 3:12:35 PM ET
already notice information poorly writtenconfusingPage 23 3.3.2.3. While in civilian attire off-duty on a military installation with the exception of wear in areas in and around military family and privatized housing or earrings for women all members are prohibited from attaching affixing or displaying objects articles jewelry or ornamentation to or through the ear nose tongue eye brows lips or any exposed body part.As it is written men are allow to wear earrings in the base housing area. Does any one else read it this way
Cold and frosty SMSgt, Minot ND
 
8/13/2012 3:00:26 PM ET
Ah yes, just what I needed. An AFI to tell me what AFIs say.
Taylor, JBLE
 
Add a comment

 Inside AF.mil

ima cornerSearch

tabSubscribe AF.MIL
tabMore HeadlinesRSS feed 
Welsh: 'The only way to move forward is together'  1

ISR chief stresses importance of turning data into information

New DOD Safe Helpline Mobile App now available

Annual space, missile pioneers inducted

Donley talks sequestration, explains AF budget plans

Shinseki: VA honors 'exceptional Americans'  1

SecAF: Caring for Airmen top priority  1

AFPC works to improve unemployment compensation process  1

SecAF highlights 'state of force' at AFA conference  1

Air Force leaders welcome attendees to annual conference

AFRI hosts cyber conference, next step in new school

Forest Service deactivates C-130 firefighting operations

Photos: Air Force leaders attend AFA remembrance ceremony

Public trust requires apolitical military, Dempsey says  2

tabCommentaryRSS feed 
Sept. 17: A day for Constitutional conversation

Losing Your Future to Sexual Assault   23


Site Map      Contact Us     Questions     Security and Privacy notice     E-publishing