Electric Power Monthly

Data for June 2012  |  Release Date: August 24, 2012  |  Next Release: September 2012  
|  full report

Previous Issues of Electric Power Monthly
SAS Output
Table 1.8.A. Net Generation from Petroleum Liquids by State, by Sector June 2012 and 2011
(Thousand Megawatthours)

  Electric Power Sector  
Census Division
and State		 All Sectors Electric Utilities Independent
Power Producers		 Commercial Sector Industrial Sector
  June 2012 June 2011 Percent
Change		 June 2012 June 2011 June 2012 June 2011 June 2012 June 2011 June 2012 June 2011
New England 87 47 87% 3 4 74 30 8 6 3 6
Connecticut 32 21 49% NM NM 32 21 -- -- NM NM
Maine 13 9 46% NM NM 10 2 NM NM 3 6
Massachusetts 39 12 233% 1 1 32 7 6 4 NM NM
New Hampshire NM 3 NM * 1 NM NM NM NM NM NM
Rhode Island NM NM NM NM 1 NM NM NM NM -- --
Vermont NM NM NM NM NM -- -- -- -- -- --
Middle Atlantic 104 164 -36% 52 68 45 88 NM NM 6 8
New Jersey 2 9 -74% NM NM 2 8 NM NM NM NM
New York 80 121 -34% 52 67 22 46 NM NM 5 7
Pennsylvania 22 34 -35% NM NM 21 34 NM NM NM NM
East North Central 42 84 -50% 34 72 7 11 NM NM 1 1
Illinois 5 8 -37% 2 2 4 6 NM NM NM NM
Indiana 11 16 -30% 11 16 NM NM NM NM * *
Michigan 12 19 -34% 12 18 -- NM NM * * *
Ohio 10 37 -72% 6 32 4 5 -- -- 1 *
Wisconsin 3 4 -24% 3 4 * * NM NM NM NM
West North Central 32 28 13% 31 28 NM NM NM NM NM NM
Iowa 14 12 18% 14 12 NM NM NM NM NM NM
Kansas 3 2 35% 3 2 -- -- -- -- -- --
Minnesota 4 2 108% 3 1 NM NM NM NM NM NM
Missouri 7 5 44% 7 5 -- -- NM NM -- --
Nebraska 1 4 -77% 1 4 -- -- -- -- -- --
North Dakota 3 3 -6.6% 3 3 -- -- NM NM NM NM
South Dakota NM NM NM NM NM NM NM NM NM -- --
South Atlantic 261 297 -12% 227 210 26 73 NM NM 7 13
Delaware 4 5 -28% NM NM 4 5 -- -- -- --
District of Columbia -- 24 -100% -- -- -- 24 -- -- -- --
Florida 139 116 20% 137 114 NM NM -- -- NM 2
Georgia 9 7 33% 7 4 NM NM NM NM NM 2
Maryland 16 36 -56% NM NM 15 35 NM NM * 1
North Carolina 13 23 -41% 12 21 NM NM NM NM NM NM
South Carolina 11 7 47% 11 7 -- -- NM NM * 1
Virginia 55 64 -14% 46 50 7 8 * * NM 6
West Virginia 14 14 1.6% 14 14 -- -- -- -- -- --
East South Central 42 33 28% 38 30 NM NM -- -- NM NM
Alabama 14 11 23% 10 8 NM NM -- -- NM NM
Kentucky 13 11 16% 13 11 -- -- -- -- -- --
Mississippi 2 1 127% 1 1 -- -- -- -- 1 *
Tennessee 14 10 40% 14 10 -- -- -- -- NM NM
West South Central 21 12 72% 5 6 16 4 NM NM NM 2
Arkansas 1 3 -54% 1 1 * 1 -- -- NM NM
Louisiana 3 3 24% 1 1 2 1 -- -- * 1
Oklahoma NM NM NM 1 1 -- -- NM NM NM NM
Texas 15 6 150% 2 4 14 1 NM NM NM 1
Mountain 23 24 -0.8% 20 20 3 3 NM NM NM NM
Arizona 3 5 -45% 3 5 -- -- NM NM NM NM
Colorado 1 3 -46% 1 3 -- -- -- -- NM NM
Idaho NM NM NM NM NM -- -- -- -- -- --
Montana 2 3 -16% NM NM 2 3 -- -- -- --
Nevada 1 2 -20% 1 1 1 1 -- -- -- --
New Mexico 3 4 -27% 3 4 NM -- -- NM NM NM
Utah 3 5 -29% 3 5 -- -- -- -- -- --
Wyoming 9 2 312% 9 2 -- -- -- -- NM NM
Pacific Contiguous 7 6 5.8% 4 4 2 NM NM NM NM 1
California 5 3 77% 3 3 2 NM NM NM NM NM
Oregon -- 2 -100% -- 2 -- -- -- -- -- --
Washington NM NM NM NM NM NM NM NM NM NM 1
Pacific Noncontiguous 669 705 -5.1% 513 549 137 137 NM NM 18 18
Alaska 66 66 -0.6% 62 62 -- -- NM NM 3 4
Hawaii 603 639 -5.6% 450 488 137 137 * * 15 14
U.S. Total 1,288 1,399 -7.9% 926 992 311 347 10 8 41 53

* = Value is less than half of the smallest unit of measure (e.g., for values with no decimals, the smallest unit is 1 then values under 0.5 are shown as *.)
NM = Not meaningful due to large relative standard error or excessive percentage change.
Notes: • See Glossary for definitions. • Values are preliminary. - See Technical Notes for a discussion of the sample design for the Form EIA-923. • Negative generation denotes that electric power consumed for plant use exceeds gross generation. • Totals may not equal sum of components because of independent rounding. • Percentage difference is calculated before rounding.
Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-923, Power Plant Operations Report.