The full set of results from the Iowa caucus are in. This is our first glimpse at who the prefered presidential nominees might be.
If you are not familiar with the US election process we have a brief guide below.
The Iowa caucus was remarkable for (at least) two reasons: first for its low turnout and second because the Republican candidate race was so close.
The total votes were announced on Wednesday morning and you can relive the excitement over on our Iowa caucus results live blog.
Barack Obama easily held his position as most favoured Democratic candidate with 98.46% of the votes, while the Republican presidential candidate was hotly contested.
We have organised the Repubican votes so that, hopefully, it is easier for you to use and map yourself. This map shows the candidate with the most votes in each county of Iowa:
You can see just how close the voting was as the winner Mitt Romney received 24.55% of all Republican votes while former Senator Rick Santorum received 24.54%. Those percentage come from 30,015 votes for Romney and 30,007 votes to Santorum.
Ron Paul of Texas ran a close third, receiving 26,219 votes, that is 21.4% of the total.
Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich had 16,251 votes or 13.3% of all Republican votes.
The Texas governor Rick Perry received 12,604 votes or 10.3% in total while Michele Bachmann had 6,073 votes giving her 5% of the total.
The former Utah governor and ambassador to China Jon Huntsman has been focusing on the New Hampshire primaries only received 745 votes making up 0.6% of the total.
Here is all the data from Republic and Democat votes, what can you do with it?
A brief guide to the Iowa caucus
The US voters registered to each party have the chance to vote for their preferred US presidential candidate. The Iowa caucus is really just to show preference, it does not result in selection of a national delegate as the primaries do as explained here. The national delegate is selected later in Iowa. The Republicans and Democrats each hold their own set of caucuses.
Data summary
FIPS Code
|
County
|
Bachmann
|
Gingrich
|
Huntsman
|
Paul
|
Perry
|
Romney
|
Santorum
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Source: IowaCaucus.com and IowaDemocrates.org |
||||||||
1 | Adair | 26 | 44 | 1 | 42 | 47 | 43 | 66 |
3 | Adams | 9 | 24 | 0 | 74 | 14 | 32 | 47 |
5 | Allamakee | 18 | 82 | 0 | 157 | 28 | 155 | 77 |
7 | Appanoose | 25 | 71 | 1 | 77 | 90 | 87 | 174 |
9 | Audubon | 17 | 32 | 0 | 41 | 31 | 48 | 54 |
11 | Benton | 66 | 121 | 5 | 202 | 168 | 184 | 290 |
13 | Black Hawk | 262 | 596 | 29 | 870 | 259 | 835 | 783 |
15 | Boone | 104 | 160 | 4 | 276 | 170 | 230 | 400 |
17 | Bremer | 57 | 98 | 14 | 194 | 105 | 246 | 215 |
19 | Buchanan | 40 | 77 | 1 | 66 | 62 | 78 | 133 |
21 | Buena Vista | 26 | 128 | 3 | 169 | 110 | 124 | 154 |
23 | Butler | 41 | 71 | 4 | 99 | 87 | 92 | 157 |
25 | Calhoun | 31 | 54 | 2 | 75 | 71 | 69 | 131 |
27 | Carroll | 32 | 145 | 2 | 133 | 85 | 146 | 168 |
29 | Cass | 32 | 147 | 2 | 116 | 66 | 141 | 170 |
31 | Cedar | 34 | 84 | 4 | 188 | 67 | 165 | 167 |
33 | Cerro Gordo | 100 | 235 | 5 | 304 | 170 | 408 | 345 |
35 | Cherokee | 20 | 78 | 0 | 95 | 63 | 126 | 155 |
37 | Chickasaw | 14 | 53 | 3 | 142 | 74 | 85 | 72 |
39 | Clarke | 42 | 46 | 1 | 98 | 62 | 65 | 51 |
41 | Clay | 40 | 137 | 4 | 150 | 75 | 149 | 165 |
43 | Clayton | 28 | 72 | 1 | 205 | 81 | 116 | 122 |
45 | Clinton | 62 | 149 | 9 | 295 | 73 | 437 | 354 |
47 | Crawford | 22 | 84 | 0 | 72 | 64 | 93 | 101 |
49 | Dallas | 192 | 591 | 15 | 688 | 504 | 1417 | 840 |
51 | Davis | 25 | 35 | 0 | 79 | 39 | 18 | 100 |
53 | Decatur | 35 | 51 | 0 | 81 | 54 | 79 | 44 |
55 | Delaware | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
57 | Des Moines | 79 | 187 | 6 | 260 | 121 | 308 | 388 |
59 | Dickinson | 17 | 132 | 4 | 100 | 132 | 187 | 161 |
61 | Dubuque | 28 | 255 | 15 | 659 | 175 | 779 | 601 |
63 | Emmet | 47 | 27 | 0 | 38 | 43 | 42 | 65 |
65 | Fayette | 58 | 134 | 4 | 133 | 80 | 241 | 174 |
67 | Floyd | 34 | 56 | 1 | 89 | 31 | 119 | 182 |
69 | Franklin | 32 | 80 | 0 | 106 | 53 | 78 | 125 |
71 | Fremont | 36 | 41 | 2 | 33 | 15 | 59 | 58 |
73 | Greene | 17 | 74 | 1 | 73 | 57 | 99 | 102 |
75 | Grundy | 45 | 82 | 0 | 99 | 100 | 129 | 172 |
77 | Guthrie | 40 | 70 | 1 | 112 | 106 | 108 | 140 |
79 | Hamilton | 51 | 138 | 6 | 164 | 73 | 144 | 184 |
81 | Hancock | 36 | 89 | 7 | 126 | 67 | 55 | 157 |
83 | Hardin | 46 | 96 | 4 | 156 | 98 | 168 | 258 |
85 | Harrison | 37 | 98 | 2 | 110 | 69 | 123 | 205 |
87 | Henry | 43 | 97 | 0 | 147 | 55 | 170 | 227 |
89 | Howard | 40 | 26 | 0 | 33 | 16 | 51 | 108 |
91 | Humboldt | 36 | 39 | 0 | 78 | 49 | 64 | 160 |
93 | Ida | 12 | 48 | 1 | 47 | 49 | 46 | 105 |
95 | Iowa | 58 | 81 | 1 | 151 | 46 | 159 | 197 |
97 | Jackson | 18 | 90 | 2 | 163 | 43 | 139 | 92 |
99 | Jasper | 122 | 171 | 8 | 300 | 162 | 285 | 576 |
101 | Jefferson | 32 | 88 | 7 | 408 | 48 | 101 | 156 |
103 | Johnson | 121 | 476 | 52 | 1445 | 247 | 1604 | 746 |
105 | Jones | 48 | 52 | 1 | 167 | 76 | 200 | 183 |
107 | Keokuk | 37 | 60 | 0 | 89 | 47 | 80 | 104 |
109 | Kossuth | 42 | 98 | 3 | 87 | 60 | 106 | 192 |
111 | Lee | 16 | 140 | 5 | 219 | 51 | 169 | 195 |
113 | Linn | 411 | 1066 | 64 | 2072 | 785 | 2520 | 1818 |
115 | Louisa | 16 | 73 | 0 | 87 | 41 | 67 | 87 |
117 | Lucas | 22 | 29 | 1 | 48 | 95 | 80 | 120 |
119 | Lyon | 23 | 42 | 1 | 57 | 52 | 36 | 329 |
121 | Madison | 54 | 144 | 5 | 221 | 154 | 170 | 223 |
123 | Mahaska | 138 | 170 | 2 | 241 | 209 | 159 | 494 |
125 | Marion | 117 | 159 | 5 | 326 | 333 | 228 | 567 |
127 | Marshall | 97 | 299 | 7 | 315 | 235 | 365 | 373 |
129 | Mills | 29 | 79 | 2 | 84 | 44 | 132 | 163 |
131 | Mitchell | 16 | 86 | 3 | 96 | 17 | 44 | 68 |
133 | Monona | 5 | 53 | 1 | 43 | 33 | 96 | 112 |
135 | Monroe | 16 | 46 | 1 | 43 | 47 | 28 | 84 |
137 | Montgomery | 13 | 39 | 0 | 52 | 56 | 95 | 106 |
139 | Muscatine | 49 | 171 | 12 | 255 | 129 | 361 | 243 |
141 | O'Brien | 29 | 57 | 3 | 105 | 73 | 56 | 265 |
143 | Osceola | 20 | 29 | 2 | 78 | 17 | 48 | 81 |
145 | Page | 41 | 104 | 5 | 94 | 50 | 129 | 157 |
147 | Palo Alto | 12 | 52 | 1 | 53 | 38 | 48 | 70 |
149 | Plymouth | 42 | 161 | 2 | 195 | 140 | 369 | 349 |
151 | Pocahontas | 21 | 48 | 0 | 85 | 74 | 55 | 109 |
153 | Polk | 900 | 2797 | 171 | 4948 | 2070 | 6240 | 4735 |
155 | Pottawattamie | 115 | 457 | 12 | 529 | 220 | 719 | 666 |
157 | Poweshiek | 42 | 113 | 8 | 197 | 77 | 116 | 155 |
159 | Ringgold | 5 | 35 | 1 | 23 | 28 | 26 | 62 |
161 | Sac | 25 | 69 | 1 | 87 | 32 | 105 | 134 |
163 | Scott | 166 | 834 | 55 | 1168 | 296 | 2005 | 1444 |
165 | Shelby | 85 | 39 | 0 | 108 | 46 | 63 | 153 |
167 | Sioux | 82 | 160 | 9 | 279 | 297 | 299 | 943 |
169 | Story | 139 | 542 | 51 | 1088 | 439 | 1098 | 833 |
171 | Tama | 55 | 91 | 1 | 126 | 102 | 134 | 148 |
173 | Taylor | 7 | 25 | 0 | 64 | 82 | 44 | 45 |
175 | Union | 54 | 42 | 4 | 78 | 105 | 75 | 98 |
177 | Van Buren | 33 | 46 | 1 | 112 | 24 | 48 | 93 |
179 | Wapello | 74 | 152 | 3 | 196 | 119 | 103 | 199 |
181 | Warren | 150 | 335 | 23 | 596 | 308 | 479 | 630 |
183 | Washington | 51 | 128 | 0 | 277 | 113 | 168 | 205 |
185 | Wayne | 23 | 22 | 2 | 45 | 61 | 37 | 72 |
187 | Webster | 62 | 162 | 5 | 203 | 140 | 287 | 311 |
189 | Winnebago | 42 | 68 | 6 | 55 | 22 | 69 | 170 |
191 | Winneshiek | 19 | 169 | 8 | 174 | 34 | 149 | 136 |
193 | Woodbury | 80 | 406 | 19 | 529 | 308 | 952 | 1125 |
195 | Worth | 18 | 30 | 3 | 31 | 26 | 34 | 46 |
197 | Wright | 32 | 59 | 0 | 69 | 62 | 83 | 92 |
Statewide Total | 6073 | 16251 | 745 | 26219 | 12604 | 30015 | 30007 |
Download the data
• DATA: download the full spreadsheet
More data
Data journalism and data visualisations from the Guardian
World government data
• Search the world's government data with our gateway
Development and aid data
• Search the world's global development data with our gateway
Can you do something with this data?
• Flickr Please post your visualisations and mash-ups on our Flickr group
• Contact us at data@guardian.co.uk
• Get the A-Z of data
• More at the Datastore directory
• Follow us on Twitter
• Like us on Facebook
Comments
5 January 2012 4:33PM
Articles like this need to present the total number of voting eligible persons in the State, the total registered Republicans in the State, and then report the turn out of small subset of these Reblicans who actually vote. Such data will clearly show how totally unrepresentative the actual vote is to the population of Iowa, and its Republicans.
Iowa has three essential functions for the election process: [1] it kicks off the election season for the media, [2] it guarantees that a Conservatives will set the agenda for the debates to come - thus allowing the Democrat to run to the right of their actual constituency, and [3] it formally announces the "money season" has opened for politicians of both parties - politicians put themselves on the market to be bought and sold by the ruling elites.
The last thing that America needs is a pretty boy venture capitalist running out of vanity for the highest office in the land.
5 January 2012 5:52PM
@nauseausa thank you for your comment and good suggestion. I did include a link to data showing the turn out in the third paragraph of this piece, but you are right, it would be good to fully follow through what this means by showing turn out relative to those elligable to vote.
7 January 2012 7:18PM
This report assumes that the counts at the individual caucuses were accurate, and as the affidavit just filed by an Iowa vote counter demonstrates, this is not necessarily true. A full manual recount of all ballots is needed now.