Brian Vastag profiles a dinosaur tracker

EmailPrintFriendlyFacebookTwitterShare

Brian Vastag

When Washington Post science writer Brian Vastag found Ray Stanford, an amateur dinosaur footprint tracker in the D.C. suburbs who had found an unusual baby dinosaur footprint, he thought he had stumbled upon a “nice little day story.” Soon, though, he realized that Stanford’s newest find was only the most recent chapter in a far deeper story. The more time Vastag spent with Stanford, the stranger and more complex his story became. Vastag’s tale of one man’s obsession, and the scientific beliefs he overturned, is a model of profile writing — detailed but restrained, exuberant but never uncritical. [Tireless Tracker Rewrote the Book on Dinosaurs in Maryland appeared in the Washington Post on April 19, 2012.]

Here, Vastag tells the story behind his story:

How did you get the idea for this story?

Last September, Johns Hopkins put out a press release on a new baby dinosaur fossil that was found in College Park, Maryland. I saw that two of the authors were Hopkins dinosaur researchers, and the third was someone named Ray Stanford, whose affiliation was given as the “Mesozoic Track Project.” I looked at that, and I thought, “You know, that sounds like a guy. That doesn’t sound like a university project.” I thought maybe this guy was an amateur, and sometimes those stories are interesting. So I called him up, and immediately I knew that he was going to be a good interview. He was really articulate and very excited. He described this find that he had made, of this little five-inch hatchling. It looked like it had drowned on its back, which is unusual to find, and it was a species that had not been found in Maryland before. I thought this was interesting and it would make a nice little day story. So I arranged to go out to his house with a photographer.

As soon as I walked into the guy’s living room, I realized that there’s a much bigger story here. It’s like this river of rock — there are hundreds and hundreds of pieces, and there’s a dinosaur footprint on every one of them. It’s sensory overload. And Ray is like a kid. He wants to show everything that he’s found, every single piece. He’s probably the most interesting and unique person I’ve ever interviewed.

The photographer and I spent about four hours out there that day. It’s kind of infectious when somebody is so excited about their work like that. I asked him to tell me how this all got started, and he told me a story that goes back to the late 90s, about how he was out with his children and they found something that looked like a track. At first glance he didn’t think it was anything, but then went back to the same spot and he found more, and he realized that there were dinosaur tracks in the area. It kind of broke this orthodoxy. Experts had said that the geology was wrong [for dinosaur fossils], and no dinosaur tracks had been found around here.

So then a larger story began to take shape in my mind. This was a story of this one man’s amazing ability, but it was also a bigger story of how a self-taught person can overturn a scientific orthodoxy.

So I wrote that day story, and then I went back and asked my editor what she thought about me doing this as a story for the Sunday Magazine. She was really encouraging and supportive and said I should go ahead and give it a shot. I went and talked to the magazine editor, Lynn Medford, and asked whether she would be interested in this narrative piece about a guy who has a living room full of dinosaur footprints. And she slammed her hand on the desk and said, “Oh, I love it! Do it.”

I thought, “It was never this easy when I was a freelancer to sell a story to a big magazine.” Read more »

Ask TON: What does a science writing master’s program get you?

EmailPrintFriendlyFacebookTwitterShare

Welcome back for another installment of Ask TON. (Click on “Ask TON” above to see previous installments.) Today’s question:

What does one learn in a science writing master’s program? What are the main elements of a typical curriculum? What are the benefits of doing such a degree? The drawbacks? Is there any hope of graduating without incurring crippling levels of debt?

We asked four science journalism master’s program directors and graduates of those programs to weigh in on this one. Here’s what they had to say: Read more »

Post-Slam Dunk

EmailPrintFriendlyFacebookTwitterShare

The great thing about a Pitch Slam is that everyone benefits from courageous writers who conquer their nerves enough to pitch an idea, at a microphone, in front of a room full of their peers and a panel of editors from top publications. By any measure, the Pitch Slam at ScienceWriters2012 was crammed with outstanding pitches that will undoubtedly find a home. But you don’t have to take our word for it: Editors jotted notes on the pitches, also making note of the writers’ names.

For those who didn’t pitch at the Slam — your fabulous ideas can still find a home. Here’s a summary of what the six editors on the panel are looking for:

Read more »

Ask TON: Planning reporting

EmailPrintFriendlyFacebookTwitterShare

Welcome back for another installment of Ask TON. (Click on “Ask TON” above to see previous installments.)

Today’s question:

I feel like I waste a lot of time when I’m reporting for feature articles — feeling hazy about what I’m aiming to learn, asking the wrong questions, having to go back and ask a lot of follow-up questions — not just a couple, but a lot of questions that in retrospect seem like they should have been the first and most obvious question. It’s not that I don’t plan my reporting…I actually spend a lot of time writing lists of interview questions. But somehow, often my planning doesn’t seem to quite hit the mark and I later realize that I hadn’t really defined the story before I started reporting. What strategies do you use to plan out your reporting for features? Are there certain questions you ask yourself that seem to be reliably helpful?

We asked several science journalists to share their thoughts on this question:

Read more »

Cramming for the Slam

EmailPrintFriendlyFacebookTwitterShare

Few tasks bring more stress and anxiety to freelancers than pitching a story, except coming face-to-face with an editor at a meeting and pitching a story on the spot — in front of an audience. With ScienceWriters2012 and the Pitch Slam in just a few days, we decided to help freelancers prepare by offering up some advice — some specific to this unique pitching environment, and some more general pitch advice from the TON archives.

First, here’s how a Pitch Slam works: Editors on the panel spend a couple minutes describing their publications and their needs. Then, writers come to the microphone and present their ideas in no more than ONE minute. After each pitch, one or more editors respond, discussing whether the story might work for their publications and if so, how the idea would need to be slanted. Even introverts reluctant to make the trip to the microphone can learn from this event because the discussion is like eavesdropping on a magazine’s story meeting.

Editors love a good pitch, and they love meeting new writers who can deliver a tantalizing story idea. Here are some tips to help you hone your idea into a compelling 60 seconds: Read more »

Like being there: How science writers use sensory detail

EmailPrintFriendlyFacebookTwitterShare

“­At this time of year, with new growth laying a haze of green over the wet fields, the farm country around this small town smells faintly but distinctly of manure. It’s a rich, warm aroma, appropriate to the place that bills itself on road signs as “Canada’s foremost cattle county.” But follow the dip in Hwy. 4 over the Saugeen River and down into Walkerton, and the smell changes noticeably. It is acrid and ammoniac. It hits you in the back of the nose, and it is weirdly familiar. It smells like a swimming pool. It’s bleach. All the people living in Walkerton, and most of the objects out in public — doorknobs, store counters, cafe tables — have been washed or swabbed with a potent mixture of chlorine bleach and water, the most effective way to kill the bacterium that has contaminated their water system and invaded their lives.”

When Maryn McKenna began writing a series of newspaper stories on a Canadian E. coli epidemic for the Atlanta Journal Constitution more than a decade ago, she was surprised by the number of readers who connected with this small Ontario town through her articles and who wrote her to say, “You made me feel like I was there.” Read more »

Ask TON: How to fact-check

EmailPrintFriendlyFacebookTwitterShare

Welcome back for another installment of Ask TON. (Click on “Ask TON” above to see previous installments.)

Today’s question:

What is the appropriate way to go about fact-checking your own stories? Is there a specific method that a person should use? If so, what is it, exactly? Also, when in the process is the right time to do this — before turning in a draft, or after a story has been through the bulk of substantive editing?

We asked several science journalists to share their thoughts on this question: Read more »

(Free) tickets to Quammen/Dobbs event in Raleigh

EmailPrintFriendlyFacebookTwitterShare

UPDATE: The (free) tickets for this event are gone — though we’ll have a few at the door. But thanks to the  generosity of the Burroughs Wellcome Fund, we’ll be video-recording the event and posting the full video here. Sincerest thanks to BWF’s Russ Campbell for helping us arrange this!

***

As we mentioned last week, we’ll be hosting a live event in Raleigh at 5:15 on Saturday, October 27, during a break in the ScienceWriters programming. David Dobbs will interview David Quammen about his new book, Spillover. See here and here for more details.

This event is FREE, but we’re distributing advance tickets via Eventbrite, starting now. Reserve your seat here. (A small number of tickets will be available at the door.) Thanks, and see you in Raleigh!

Natural Habitat: Erik Vance

EmailPrintFriendlyFacebookTwitterShare

In our “Natural Habitat” series, we invite science writers to share their working spaces — offices, spare bedrooms, coffee shops, hammocks — and the accoutrements that help them do their best work. (If you’d like to nominate your office to be featured at Natural Habitat, let us know.)

Today we drop in on Erik Vance, an award-winning freelance writer who has written for Discover, Nature, The New York Times, The Christian Science Monitor, Conservation, and many other publications. Over the next month or so, aided by funding from The Pulitzer Center, Vance and photographer Dominic Bracco II will follow anthropologists and ocean scientists along the Sea of Cortez, traveling on shrimp boats, and visiting indigenous villages. They’ve started blogging about their adventure on the Center’s new In the Field blog.

Florence Williams takes the measure of modern breasts

EmailPrintFriendlyFacebookTwitterShare

Florence Williams

“For such an enormously popular feature of the human race,” writes Florence Williams in Breasts: A Natural and Unnatural History, “it’s remarkable how little we know about their basic biology.” Breasts make us mammals, says Williams, but they also seem to make us confused: Our theories about their enduring appeal are muddled, and our understanding of both their strengths and vulnerabilities are incomplete. Williams, a science journalist and contributing editor of Outside, delved into the history, culture, and science of the human mammary gland, and in Breasts, she tells the fascinating — and often very funny — story of our breasts and ourselves.

Here, Williams tells TON guest contributor Michelle Nijhuis the story behind her story:

What drew you to the subject of breasts — other than the obvious, of course?

(Laughs) Yes, I am the owner of a couple. But I never really thought much about my breasts one way or the other until I became a mother. Then I really became awed by how they work, and how brilliantly they work. I suddenly felt like such a mammal — it was a profound and transformative experience for me. But I also began to see the scientific reports about industrial pollutants showing up in breast milk, and I wanted to tell that story. I was breastfeeding at the time, and I did a story for The New York Times Magazine in which I tested my own breast milk.

I FedExed a sample of my breast milk to a lab in Germany, and it came back with some slightly higher than above-average U.S. levels for flame retardants. But American levels in general, I learned, are 10 to 100 times higher than anywhere else in the world. The experience brought home to me, in this very dramatic way, how our bodies respond to environmental change. Our bodies are permeable in ways that we just don’t think about, or haven’t been taught to think about in the age of modern medicine.

I’m curious when and how you made the decision to put breasts — instead of the forces affecting them, such as endocrine disruptors and cancer — at the center of your book. When did you decide to make the book an environmental history of a body part?

As I was learning about how the environment changes the lactating process, I also started learning more about early puberty. And there’s a fair amount of breast cancer in my family — that’s always been big elephant in the room in terms of my family’s health. I realized that at every life stage of the breast, there’s a vulnerable period during which the environment acts upon it. Read more »

Special TON event: A conversation with David Quammen

EmailPrintFriendlyFacebookTwitterShare

UPDATE: The (free) tickets for this event are gone — though we’ll have a few at the door. But thanks to the  generosity of the Burroughs Wellcome Fund, we’ll be video-recording the event and posting the full video here. Sincerest thanks to BWF’s Russ Campbell for helping us arrange this!

***

See if you can watch the promotional video for David Quammen’s new  book, Spillover: Animal Infections and the Next Human Pandemic (due in October, from Norton), without your pulse quickening.

Then, if you’re planning to attend the ScienceWriters meeting in Raleigh on October 26-30, mark your calendars for The Meeting of the Davids — a public conversation between Quammen and journalist (and TON advisory board member) David Dobbs, who recently described Spillover thusly:

“The book is riveting, terrifying, and inspiring, and it matches and possibly excels Quammen’s Song of the Dodo, which I consider one of the best science books of the 20th century.”

This event, sponsored by The Open Notebook, will be free and open to the public, and will occur during a break in the ScienceWriters programming.  David (Dobbs! Sheesh) writes more about the upcoming event here.

Few science writers command the respect and admiration that David Quammen does — as David Dobbs recently expressed it to us, “The guy has no peers.” We hold David Dobbs in equally high esteem, so we could not be more thrilled to provide a venue for him to interview Quammen about his latest book.

We’re also delighted to announce that Norton has donated 10 copies of Spillover, which we will give away according to some clever-but-fair scheme at the live event. We’re grateful to Norton for providing these gratis copies!

David Dobbs

David Quammen

Who: David Quammen and David Dobbs

What: A craft-centered conversation revealing the story behind Quammen’s forthcoming book, Spillover

When: Saturday, October 27, 5:15 – 6:15 p.m. (following the last NASW workshop and before the Gala)

Where: Raleigh Convention Center (room 303)

Why: Because the Davids are game! And because it’s TON’s second birthday that week, and we feel like celebrating.

Ask TON: Is this draft too long?

EmailPrintFriendlyFacebookTwitterShare

Welcome back for another installment of Ask TON. (Click on “Ask TON” above to see previous installments.)

Today’s question:

How strictly do editors expect writers to stick to the “10% rule”? How far over the assigned word count is acceptable? Do editors appreciate seeing some of that extraneous material and consider it part of their job to sift through it, or is it a major headache for them when writers significantly exceed the assigned word limit?

We asked several magazine editors for their take on this question. Here’s what they had to say:

Read more »

Powered by WordPress