A year of revelations flow from unmasking of Mark Kennedy

Over the past year, a series of disclosures have exposed secret police operations to infiltrate and disrupt protest groups

This time last year, the public knew little about Mark Kennedy and the network of police spies in political campaigns. It is in many ways remarkable how much more the public has learnt about these clandestine operations in the past 12 months.

A year ago, on January 10 2011, Kennedy's name first burst out into the public consciousness. Kennedy had been outed initially by activists. The disclosure of his role in a collapsed court case led to a cascade of revelations about the police's secret manoeuvres to infiltrate and disrupt activists over the past 40 years.

The disclosures have shone unprecedented light on a very hidden story of British policing.

We thought that we would step back for one moment and outline what has been revealed in the past 12 months.

As well as Kennedy, seven other undercover police officers have been named or accused. (A ninth, Peter Black, had spoken out in 2010).

Kennedy has gone from being a spy operating deep undercover for years to being a high-profile name - so much so that the BBC listed him as one of their Faces of 2011.

Other spies who have been thrust into the spotlight are Jim Boyling, Lynn Watson, Mark Jacobs, Bob Lambert, and Simon Wellings. Last month, two more were accused of being undercover police officers - Mark Cassidy and John Barker.

The revelations have compelled police chiefs, prosecutors and other official bodies to set up 12 inquiries, all behind closed doors. The establishment is so far resisting launching a full public inquiry.

There have been a series of controversies which have made the covert world of undercover policing a little less covert.

Here are some of the main talking points.

A group of women has launched a lawsuit against police chiefs. They say they were duped into forming long-term loving relationships with undercover policemen and have suffered intense emotional trauma and pain.

Police chiefs have also been accused of authorising undercover officers embedded in protest groups to give false evidence in court in order to protect their fake identities. It was a practice defended by Britain's most senior police officer, Bernard Hogan-Howe.

A major inquiry blamed both prosecutors and police officers for a miscarriage of justice in which environmental activists were wrongly prosecuted. The inquiry by Sir Christopher Rose, a retired high court judge, said prosecutors and police had failed to ensure that crucial surveillance recordings made by Kennedy were given to lawyers representing the activists.

Police chiefs have come under heavy criticism for spending taxpayers' money on infiltrating political groups which were running legitimate and peaceful campaigns.

This article gives more of the big picture.

2011 was a bumper year for revelations. We wonder what 2012 will bring out into the open.


Your IP address will be logged

Comments

4 comments, displaying oldest first

or to join the conversation

  • This symbol indicates that that person is The Guardian's staffStaff
  • This symbol indicates that that person is a contributorContributor
  • sampsonbrass

    9 January 2012 2:23PM

    "A group of women has launched a lawsuit against police chiefs. They say they were duped into forming long-term loving relationships with undercover policemen and have suffered intense emotional trauma and pain."

    More power to their elbows.

    Of all the betrayal and falsehood involved, this personal deception must be the among the worst aspects of the story.

  • elflojo84

    9 January 2012 4:10PM

    I agree it was a horrible, indefensible thing to do, just like forming any relationship on the basis of a lie would be - but should it really be sueable? It boils down to an emotional issue between two people in a relationship, and I don't think that is an area the law should be involved.

  • ROUcynic

    9 January 2012 5:11PM

    legitimate and peaceful campaigns.

    Here we go again with the double speak - does this mean 'non - violent' or 'we think it should be lawful but know it isn't' as - and I'm sorry to have to break it to you, planning to break into a power-station with angle grinders to cut off the locks is neither peaceful nor lawful.

    The policing response matches the threat.

  • verybutton

    9 January 2012 7:22PM

    It boils down to an emotional issue between two people in a relationship, and I don't think that is an area the law should be involved.

    The law isn't getting involved in the relationships in the way you suggest. The court case isn't against the officers in the relationships, it's against government bodies for employing people to have the relationships. I don't think there's any imminent danger that lying to your partner is going to become a criminal offence.

or to join the conversation

Bestsellers from the Guardian shop

  • Neoprene gloves
  • Neoprene gloves

  • Banish cold hands and aching joints with these lightweight, fingerless unisex gloves.

  • From: £9.95

Guardian Bookshop

This week's bestsellers

  1. 1.  Stop What You're Doing and Read This!

    £4.99

  2. 2.  Bigger Message

    by Martin Gayford £18.95

  3. 3.  Send Up the Clowns

    by Simon Hoggart £8.99

  4. 4.  Why It's Kicking Off Everywhere

    by Paul Mason £14.99

  5. 5.  100 Simple Things You Can Do to Prevent Alzheimer's

    by Jean Carper £10.99

Undercover, with Paul Lewis and Rob Evans weekly archives

Jan 2012
M T W T F S S
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31 1 2 3 4 5