Retreating Ice
Arctic Melt Unnerves the Experts
Scientists are unnerved by this summer?s massive polar ice melt, its implications and their ability to predict it.
- The Big Melt: Articles | Video | Interactive Graphic: Sea Ice in Retreat ?
Global warming has become perhaps the most complicated issue facing world leaders. On the one hand, warnings from the scientific community are becoming louder, as an increasing body of science points to rising dangers from the ongoing buildup of human-related greenhouse gases — produced mainly by the burning of fossil fuels and forests. On the other, the technological, economic and political issues that have to be resolved before a concerted worldwide effort to reduce emissions can begin have gotten no simpler, particularly in the face of a global economic slowdown.
Global talks on climate change opened in Cancún, Mexico in late 2010 with the toughest issues unresolved, and the conference produced modest agreements. But while the measures adopted in Cancún under the auspices of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change are likely to have scant near-term impact on the warming of the planet, the international process for dealing with the issue got a significant vote of confidence. The next round of talks will take place in December 2011 in Durban, South Africa.
The Cancún agreement fell well short of the broad changes scientists say are needed to avoid dangerous climate change in coming decades. But it laid the groundwork for stronger measures in the future, if nations are able to overcome the emotional arguments that have crippled climate change negotiations in recent years. The package, known as the Cancún Agreements, gave the more than 190 countries participating in the conference until December 2011 to decide whether to extend the frayed Kyoto Protocol, the 1997 agreement that requires most wealthy nations to trim their emissions while providing assistance to developing countries to pursue a cleaner energy future.
At the heart of the international debate is a momentous tussle between rich and poor countries over who steps up first and who pays most for changed energy menus.
In the United States, in January 2011, the Environmental Protection Agency began imposing regulations related to greenhouse gas emissions. The immediate effect on utilities, refiners and major manufacturers was minor, with the new rules applying only to those planning to build large new facilities or make major modifications to existing plants. Over the next decade, however, the agency plans to regulate virtually all sources of greenhouse gases, imposing efficiency and emissions requirements on nearly every industry and every region.
Barack Obama vowed as a candidate that he would put the United States on a path to addressing climate change by reducing emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas pollutants. He offered Congress wide latitude to pass climate change legislation, but held in reserve the threat of E.P.A. regulation if it failed to act. The deeply polarized Senate’s refusal to enact climate change legislation essentially called his bluff.
But working through the E.P.A. has led to a clash between the administration and Republicans that carries substantial risks for both sides. The administration had to retreat somewhat from its efforts to curtail greenhouse gases. In September 2011, Mr. Obama rejected a proposed rule from the E.P.A. that would have significantly reduced ozone pollution, saying that it would impose too severe a burden on industry and local governments at a time of economic distress. And Republicans in Congress who move too aggressively in their attempts to handcuff the E.P.A. could provoke a popular outcry that they are endangering public health in the service of their well-heeled patrons in industry.
Global Talks
The United States entered the Cancún conference in 2010 in a weak position because of continuing disputes with China and other major developing nations over verification of emissions reductions, and its lack of action on domestic climate and energy legislation. Democratic leaders in the Senate in July 2010 gave up on reaching even a scaled-down climate bill, in the face of opposition from Republicans and some energy-state Democrats. The House had passed a broad cap-and-trade bill in 2009.
The Cancún conference ended in December 2010, with only modest achievements. The conference approved a package of agreements that set up a new fund to help poor countries adapt to climate changes, created new mechanisms for transfer of clean energy technology, provided compensation for the preservation of tropical forests and strengthened the emissions reductions pledges that came out of the U.N. climate change meeting in Copenhagen in 2009.
The conference approved the agreement over the objections of Bolivia, which condemned the pact as too weak. But those protests did not block its acceptance. Delegates from island states and the least-developed countries warmly welcomed the pact because it would start the flow of billions of dollars to assist them in adopting cleaner energy systems and adapting to inevitable changes in the climate, like sea rise and drought.
But the conference left unresolved where the $100 billion in annual climate-related aid that the wealthy nations promised to provide would come from.
The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change operates on the principle of consensus, meaning that any of the more than 190 participating nations can hold up an agreement.
Background
Scientists learned long ago that the earth's climate has powerfully shaped the history of the human species — biologically, culturally and geographically. But only in the last few decades has research revealed that humans can be a powerful influence on the climate, as well.
A growing body of scientific evidence indicates that since 1950, the world's climate has been warming, primarily as a result of emissions from unfettered burning of fossil fuels and the razing of tropical forests. Such activity adds to the atmosphere's invisible blanket of carbon dioxide and other heat-trapping "greenhouse" gases. Recent research has shown that methane, which flows from landfills, livestock and oil and gas facilities, is a close second to carbon dioxide in impact on the atmosphere.
That conclusion has emerged through a broad body of analysis in fields as disparate as glaciology, the study of glacial formations, and palynology, the study of the distribution of pollen grains in lake mud. It is based on a host of assessments by the world's leading organizations of climate and earth scientists.
In the last several years, the scientific case that the rising human influence on climate could become disruptive has become particularly robust.
Some fluctuations in the Earth's temperature are inevitable regardless of human activity — because of decades-long ocean cycles, for example. But centuries of rising temperatures and seas lie ahead if the release of emissions from the burning of fossil fuels and deforestation continues unabated, according to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. The panel shared the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize with former Vice President Al Gore for alerting the world to the risks of warming.
Despite the scientific consensus on these basic conclusions, enormously important details remain murky. That reality has been seized upon by some groups and scientists disputing the overall consensus and opposing changes in energy policies.
For example, estimates of the amount of warming that would result from a doubling of greenhouse gas concentrations (compared to the level just before the Industrial Revolution got under way in the early 19th century) range from 3.6 degrees to 8 degrees Fahrenheit. The intergovernmental climate panel said it could not rule out even higher temperatures. While the low end could probably be tolerated, the high end would almost certainly result in calamitous, long-lasting disruptions of ecosystems and economies, a host of studies have concluded. A wide range of economists and earth scientists say that level of risk justifies an aggressive response.
Other questions have persisted despite a century-long accumulation of studies pointing to human-driven warming. The rate and extent at which sea levels will rise in this century as ice sheets erode remains highly uncertain, even as the long-term forecast of centuries of retreating shorelines remains intact. Scientists are struggling more than ever to disentangle how the heat building in the seas and atmosphere will affect the strength and number of tropical cyclones. The latest science suggests there will be more hurricanes and typhoons that reach the most dangerous categories of intensity, but fewer storms over all.
Government figures for the global climate show that 2010 was the wettest year in the historical record, and it tied 2005 as the hottest year since record-keeping began in 1880.
Steps Toward a Response
The debate over climate questions pales next to the fight over what to do, or not do, in a world where fossil fuels still underpin both rich and emerging economies. With the completion of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change at the Earth Summit in 1992, the world's nations pledged to avoid dangerously disrupting the climate through the buildup of greenhouse gases, but they never defined how much warming was too much.
Nonetheless, recognizing that the original climate treaty was proving ineffective, all of the world's industrialized countries except for the United States accepted binding restrictions on their greenhouse gas emissions under the Kyoto Protocol, which was negotiated in Japan in 1997. That accord took effect in 2005 and its gas restrictions expire in 2012. The United States signed the treaty, but it was never submitted for ratification in the face of overwhelming opposition in the Senate because the pact required no steps by China or other fast-growing developing countries.
It took until 2009 for the leaders of the world's largest economic powers to agree on a dangerous climate threshold: an increase of 2 degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit) from the average global temperature recorded just before the Industrial Revolution kicked into gear. (This translates into an increase of 1.3 degrees Fahrenheit above the Earth's current average temperature, about 59 degrees.)
The Group of 8 industrial powers also agreed that year to a goal of reducing global emissions 50 percent by 2050, with the richest countries leading the way by cutting their emissions 80 percent. But they did not set a baseline from which to measure that reduction, and so far firm interim targets — which many climate scientists say would be more meaningful — have not been defined.
At the same time, fast-growing emerging economic powerhouses, led by China and India, still oppose taking on mandatory obligations to curb their emissions. They say they will do what they can to rein in growth in emissions — as long as their economies do not suffer. The world's poorest countries, in the meantime, are seeking payments to help make them less vulnerable to the impacts of climate change, given that the buildup in climate-warming gases so far has come mainly from richer nations. Such aid has been promised since the 1992 treaty and a fund was set up under the Kyoto Protocol. But while tens of billions of dollars are said to be needed, only millions have flowed so far.
In many ways, the debate over global climate policy is a result of a global "climate divide.'' Emissions of carbon dioxide per person range from less than 2 tons per year in India, where 400 million people lack access to electricity, to more than 20 in the United States. The richest countries are also best able to use wealth and technology to insulate themselves from climate hazards, while the poorest, which have done the least to cause the problem, are the most exposed.
In the meantime, a recent dip in emissions caused by the global economic slowdown is almost certain to be followed by a rise, scientists warn, and with population and appetites for energy projected to rise through mid-century, they say the entwined challenges of climate and energy will only intensify.
Scientists are unnerved by this summer?s massive polar ice melt, its implications and their ability to predict it.
Scientists have long thought that the Southwest was prone to long, severe megadroughts far worse than any in modern times. But a new analysis may provide the strongest evidence yet of a severe one in the second century.
November 07, 2011If urban policy makers focus only on those who can afford carbon-reducing technologies, the movement for sustainability may end up exacerbating climate change.
November 6, 2011As climate change unfolds in coming decades, the American bullfrog could move aggressively into areas of tropical South America that are considered vital to biodiversity, a study warns.
November 06, 2011One skeptical scientist found that the Earth, indeed, is warming after studying it himself. Maybe now we can move on to finding smart strategies to address it.
November 3, 2011While some species appear to be shrinking because of climate change, new research shows that West Coast birds are getting larger.
November 03, 2011A look at the glaring gaps between and within countries on access to electricity and contraceptives.
November 02, 2011A report warns that drastic measures are needed to offset future environmental problems that could stall development and perpetuate poverty.
November 02, 2011Levi Strauss underwrites nonprofit program to teach farmers in India, Pakistan, Brazil and West and Central Africa latest irrigation and rainwater-capture techniques, in hopes of reducing amount of water used to produce their denim products; fear water shortages caused by climate change may jeopardize viability of their business; will also introduce substitute for their popular stone-washed jeans that does not use water in smoothing process. Photos
November 2, 2011Levi Strauss sees the efficient use of water by farmers and consumers as crucial to the future of its blue jeans business.
November 2, 2011Bright and downbeat views of next steps on energy and climate.
November 02, 2011The United Nations Development Program says the progress of the poorest countries will be halted or even reversed if bold steps are not taken.
November 02, 2011Family planning is crucial to solving poverty, climate change and other issues. And don’t worry: contraceptives don’t cause sex.
November 2, 2011A campaign by the Center for Biological Diversity is intended to start a debate about how overpopulation crowds out species and hastens climate change.
November 1, 2011Flailing through mounds of debris and sludge, rescue workers hunted for survivors in Tuscany and Liguria on Wednesday after mudslides and flooding left at least six people dead and hundreds homeless.
October 27, 2011At a conference of 1,600 researchers, a participant offers a shorthand of his own: F.H.S.W.T.B.C.K.T.O.A.T.A., or "For heaven's sake, who the bleep can keep track of all these?"
October 26, 2011Max Mara celebrates 60 years in fashion with a cheer for female empowerment.
October 25, 2011The International League of Conservation Photographers has 102 members around the world addressing issues from poaching to global warming to deforestation.
October 25, 2011The state unveiled the country’s first statewide cap-and-trade system to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and combat climate change.
October 24, 2011A study designed to erase doubts about climate science left critics unsatisfied with the findings.
October 21, 2011The new system includes cap-and-trade market incentives to encourage polluters to clean up their plants, an approach much of the rest of the country has resisted.
October 21, 2011Environmental change is just as likely to trap people as it is to make them migrate - or it can cause them to flee to even more vulnerable areas, a British government study warns.
October 20, 2011Researchers who sought to address criticisms of mainstream thinking on global warming concluded that the consensus was right: 1 degree Centrigrade since 1950.
October 20, 2011An inconvenient physicist takes away a persistent talking point of climate skeptics.
October 20, 2011An environmental activist describes his shifts on nuclear power and genetically modified crops.
October 19, 2011From erosion to withering crops to destroyed dwellings, climate change is affecting the people of Tuvalu in myriad ways.
October 18, 2011As global warming melts the polar ice sheet, shipping, fishing and mining interests are looking to take advantage of the newly accessible Arctic Ocean.
October 18, 2011A federal judge has thrown out a main section of an Interior Department rule on global warming’s threat to polar bears.
October 18, 2011More views on what impedes big transformations, and why humans have a habit of waiting too long to make them.
October 18, 2011A NASA scientist is lauded for communicating about climate.
October 18, 2011A closer look at Australia's move to put a price on CO2.
October 17, 2011Scientific data linking climate change to the diminution of animals' size raises the possibility that ecosystems could be thrown out of balance.
October 16, 2011Even as other countries take action, the issue is fading from the American agenda.
October 16, 2011A look at false equivalence and false inequivalence in the fight over climate change.
October 13, 2011A fresh analysis of a path toward feeding some 9 billion people with the fewest environmental regrets.
October 12, 2011Brazil's claims of a big drop in Amazon deforestation rates are probed by a biologist and an American expatriate living in the rain forest.
October 12, 2011SEARCH 3291 ARTICLES ABOUT GLOBAL WARMING:
Since we all the want the E.P.A. to go...Let it snow! Let it snow!
Many of the world’s forests are robust carbon sponges, but others are threatened by a warming climate.
Trees, which provide a crucial protection against climate change, are also under stress from some of climate change’s effects.
An unusual coalition is working to help the Nisqually River watershed and its inhabitants thrive despite a changing climate.
Wheat breeders in Mexico, worried about climate change, are trying to find drought-tolerant varieties.
Malawi, India, the Netherlands and Australia will experience global warming in very different ways.
Science reporter Andy Revkin examines the long-term social consequences of rising temperatures and seas around the globe.
Dr. James Hansen, NASA's top climate scientist, says the Bush administration tried to stop him from talking about emissions linked to global warming.