Travel

The Hidden Route to Machu Picchu

Piotr Redlinski for The New York Times

Machu Picchu was first seen by an American 100 years ago. Close to a million visitors are expected to visit this year. More Photos »

  • Print
  • Single Page
  • Reprints

AS we neared the end of a very long climb up a very steep ridge, my guide, John Leivers, shouted at me over his shoulder. “It’s said that the Spaniards never found Machu Picchu, but I disagree,” he said. I caught up to him — for what seemed like the 20th time that day — and he pointed his bamboo trekking pole at the strangely familiar-looking set of ruins ahead. “It’s this place they never found.”

Multimedia
Piotr Redlinski for The New York Times

Remote spots can still be reached only on foot, so a visit requires an expedition team much like Hiriam Bingham assembled: a guide, (like John Leivers), provisions, cook, mules and mule tenders. More Photos »

He was pointing to Choquequirao, an Incan citadel high in the Peruvian Andes that so closely resembles Machu Picchu that it’s often touted as the sister site of South America’s most famous ruins. Both are believed to have been built in the 15th century and consist of imposing stone buildings arranged around a central plaza, situated among steep mountain ridges that overlook twisting whitewater rivers, with views of skyscraping peaks — known as apus, or mountain deities, to both the Incas and their Quechua-speaking Andean descendants — in several directions. Both are almost indescribably beautiful.

But there’s no question about which sibling is more popular. An estimated 3,000 people make their way through Machu Picchu’s corridors on a typical day. Between breakfast and lunch at Choquequirao, I counted 14 people, including myself, John and a few scattered archaeologists.

The first known American to see Choquequirao was the young Yale history lecturer Hiram Bingham III, in 1909. He was researching a biography of the South American liberator Simón Bolívar when a local prefect he met near Cuzco persuaded him to visit the site. Many believed that the ruins of Choquequirao had once been Vilcabamba, the legendary lost city of the Incas. Bingham didn’t agree, and was mesmerized by the idea of lost cities waiting to be found. Two years later, he returned to Peru in search of Vilcabamba. On July 24, 1911, just days into his expedition, Bingham climbed a 2,000-foot-tall slope and encountered an abandoned stone city of which no record existed. It was Machu Picchu.

This year, which marks the 100th anniversary of Bingham’s achievement, up to a million visitors are expected to visit those ancient ruins — a sharp rise from last year’s roughly 700,000, one of the highest attendance figures ever. Most of those pilgrims will hear the tale of Bingham’s 1911 trip. But few of them will know that the explorer also located several other major sets of Incan ruins, all of which approach his most famous finds in historic significance. After Machu Picchu — where he lingered for only a few hours, convinced that more important discoveries lay ahead — Bingham continued his hunt for vanished Incan sites. His 1911 expedition turned out to be one of the most successful in history. Within a few hundred square miles, he found Vitcos, once an Incan capital, and Espiritu Pampa, the jungle city where the last Incan king is thought to have made his final stand against the Spanish invaders. A year later he returned, and came upon Llactapata, a mysterious satellite town just two miles west of Machu Picchu whose importance is still being decoded.

Today Machu Picchu is a beehive of ongoing archaeological work while elsewhere in the area restoration efforts have progressed slowly, allowing visitors a chance to see ancient history in a form that closely resembles what Bingham encountered.

I wondered if it was still possible to detour from the modern, tourist path and arrive in the same way Bingham had — by taking the scenic route. Aided by John, a 58-year-old Australian expatriate who works with the Cuzco-based adventure outfitter Amazonas Explorer, I assembled a trip to do just that. Rather than start with the most famous ruins, our route began in Cuzco and looped counterclockwise around them, stopping first at the other extraordinary sites. You might call it a backdoor to Machu Picchu.

A typical Machu Picchu package tour to Peru lasts a week. But anyone able to stretch that to two and a half weeks — and who has relatively sturdy legs — can hike in blissful solitude through roughly 100 miles of some of the world’s most varied and beautiful terrain while pausing to gawk at Bingham’s greatest hits. (April through October are the driest months to undertake such a trip; we traveled in October.) Best of all, by circumventing the most common approaches to Machu Picchu — the train from Cuzco and the Inca Trail — the Backdoor Route avoids the site’s notorious crowds almost entirely.

Though the little-seen wonders surrounding Machu Picchu exist in an area not much bigger than Los Angeles, Peru’s crazy-quilt topography and weather patterns have provided them with a grand and amazingly varied setting. “In Inca Land one may pass from glaciers to tree ferns within a few hours,” Bingham wrote. My packing list included long underwear and malaria medicine.

MARK ADAMS is the author of “Turn Right at Machu Picchu: Rediscovering the Lost City One Step at a Time,” to be published this week by Dutton.

This article has been revised to reflect the following correction:

Correction: July 10, 2011

A map on June 26 with the cover article about a hiking route to Machu Picchu that takes in lesser-known sites located incorrectly one site and mislabeled two trails. Llactapata, as stated in the article, is two miles west of Machu Picchu, not 10 miles southeast; that is the location of another Inca site, also called Llactapata. And only the trail leading to Machu Picchu from the east is commonly called the Inca Trail. A corrected map can be found at nytimes.com/travel.

  • Print
  • Single Page
  • Reprints
Get Free E-mail Alerts on These Topics
Book Flights Book A Hotel Rent A Car Book A Cruise Book A Package Book An Activity
expedia

Inside NYTimes.com

Arts »
McCartney at the Plate
McCartney at the Plate
Science »
Baboon Study Shows Benefits For Nice Guys
Baboon Study Shows Benefits For Nice Guys
Opinion »

Bloggingheads: Murdoch Under Scrutiny

Henry Farrell of George Washington University and Felix Salmon of Reuters discuss Britain’s hacking scandal.

Arts »
Opera Star Tries Doin’ What Comes Natur’lly
Opera Star Tries Doin’ What Comes Natur’lly
Opinion »

Women’s Choices: School vs. Childbearing

Does education lead women to have fewer children or does having children get in the way of education?

Travel »
36 Hours in Bar Harbor, Me.
36 Hours in Bar Harbor, Me.