Harper feisty, talented and not a bad guy

April 30, 2011 by Nick Scala

ONE WORD best describes Bryce Harper after his five-night stand in Charleston this week with the Hagerstown Suns:

Aggressive.

Whether it was trying to take an extra base on a hit, jumping on first-pitch fastballs for home runs or barking at the opposing pitcher after taking a curveball for a called third strike, Harper displayed the type of aggressiveness you don’t normally see out of an 18-year-old baseball prospect.

Of course, Harper is not your normal prospect. The five-year, $9.9 million contract the Washington Nationals gave him a year ago as the No. 1 pick in the draft is proof of that.

I wonder, though, how aggressive the Nationals will be in promoting Harper up the organizational ladder to his predestined spot on the major-league roster, and how Harper’s aggressive nature — some are equating it with arrogance — figures into that decision.

Read the rest of this entry »

Bookmark and Share

Bryce Harper week in Charleston

April 25, 2011 by Nick Scala

It’s Bryce Harper Week in Charleston and, depending on your point of view, the timing is either awful or splendid.

It’s awful for those very few — are there any, really? — who live and die with the fortunes of the West Virginia Power, Charleston’s representative in the Class A South Atlantic League. The arrival Monday of the Hagerstown Suns for a five-night stand at Appalachian Power Park brings the precocious Harper, who, as the No. 1 pick in the 2010 amateur draft, was granted a five-year, $9.9 million contract by the Washington Nationals.

It’s awful to those few die-hards because the 18-year-old wunderkind, after a slow start to his professional career, has begun to feast on Sally League pitching in a manner befitting the ballyhoo and absurd expectations of a player whose potential seems to lie somewhere between Roy Hobbs and Babe Ruth.

In the Suns’ just-completed three-game series with Hickory in Hagerstown, Harper went 6-for-10 — two singles, two doubles and two home runs — with seven RBIs and seven runs scored. He also walked three times (and struck out once) and, for good measure, stole a base.

In other words, he’s on a bit of a roll, which could spell trouble for the Power faithful. On the bright side, all ye faithful, Hagerstown lost two of those three games to Hickory.

For the vast majority who don’t care whether the Power wins or loses, and come to the APP strictly for the atmosphere, the social interaction and, especially, the baseball, Harper’s recent hot streak is a blessing.

For the next five nights, we’re getting a rare glimpse of a player who, unless I miss my guess, or unless some tragedy befalls him, will be someday mentioned in the same breath as the Hall of Fame’s top shelf of prior generations — Cobb and Wagner, Ruth and Gehrig, Williams and DiMaggio, Mays and Mantle, Griffey and Bonds*.

At the risk of adding to the absurd expectations, yeah, I think he’ll be that good. I’ve never seen anyone with this kind of potential, and neither have you. There’s really no one to compare to Harper’s pre-professional baseball life. The closest you could come to an accurate comparison is the unworldly youthful development of basketball’s LeBron James, and we’ve seen how that’s turned out.

Every draft has it’s No. 1 pick, but none have been accompanied by the credentials of the 6-foot-3, 225-pound left-handed-swinging Las Vegas native. Yes, we knew No. 1 picks Ken Griffey Jr. and Alex Rodriguez could not help but be superstars, but even they have to be impressed with what Harper’s done so far.

The first thing to remember about Harper is his birthdate — Oct. 16, 1992. That would make him 18 years old. When he takes the field Monday night, he’ll be the youngest player on either roster, by a good year and a half. The vast majority of the players on the Suns and Power are in their early 20s, and most are in their second or third year of professional baseball, toiling away as they climb the minor-league ladder with their eyes on a chance at The Show.

Harper, had he lived a normal life, would be graduating high school next month.

It was his precociousness, of course, that brought him to this place at such a young age. The highlights:

Read the rest of this entry »

Bookmark and Share

Time travel: Oct. 8, 1956

April 7, 2011 by Nick Scala

Back in November of 2009, when this blog was in its infancy, I made reference in a post as to where, or, more specifically, when I would go if I got my hands on a time machine.

The when was Oct. 8, 1956, and the where was Yankee Stadium, to witness Don Larsen’s World Series perfect game, which to me, at least, is the single greatest performance in baseball history.

I wanted to breathe in the atmosphere of that crisp autumn Monday afternoon in the Bronx, to get a feel for the pregame anticipation — remember, it was Game 5, Yankees against Brooklyn, and the Series was tied at two games apiece — and then to watch it unfold, out by out until all 27 Dodgers were put out in succession, and then, ultimately, marvel in the postgame discussion of what we had just witnessed.

Beyond the baseball, it’s a time-and-place destination that’s special to me. It’s the world into which I was born — New York, and 1956. On Oct. 8, 1956, I was 13 days old.

(By the way, when I got that time machine, I would promise that I’d resist the urge to pull a Biff Tannen and put down bets on what I knew would be the outcome, and I wouldn’t be play the spoiler and let anyone know what I knew was impending.)

Well, as it turns out, I no longer need that time machine, because, through the miracles of modern technology, I’ve been transported back to that day.

I’m talking, of course, about DVD technology. That memorable game is now available on DVD, thanks to the discovery of a kinescope — essentially filming what was on TV off the TV — of the national television broadcast, almost in its entirety. (It’s missing the entire first inning plus the first batter of the top of the second, one Jackie Robinson).

The MLB Network got a hold of the kinescope, remastered it and first aired its production during the network’s launch on Jan. 1, 2009. Since I don’t get MLB Network, I had to wait for it to come out on DVD.

I’m actually coming a little late to the party. MLB Productions included the Larsen perfecto when, in the summer of 2009,  it released “New York Yankees Perfect Games and No-Hitters,” a six-disc boxed set that also includes full TV broadcasts of the other no-hit gems in Yankees history — Dave Righetti (July 4, 1983 vs. Boston), Jim Abbott (Sept. 4, 1993 vs. Cleveland), Dwight Gooden (May 14, 1996 vs. Seattle) and the perfect games thrown by David Wells (May 17, 1998 vs. Minnesota) and David Cone (July 18, 1999 vs. Montreal).

Since I wasn’t paying attention — shame all over me — I wasn’t aware of its availability until a few months ago, and I immediately purchased it.

Then I traveled back in time . . .

Read the rest of this entry »

Bookmark and Share

2011 predictions and a wager

March 30, 2011 by Nick Scala

Your AL MVP, Adrian Gonzalez

In response to the overwhelming odds favoring Boston going into the 2011 baseball season, I devised a wager with a friend and colleague who happens to be a rabid Red Sox fan.

If the Yankees have a better finish than Boston — judged by getting to or winning the World Series, reaching the AL championship series (or beating the Sox in it), or finishing higher than the Red Sox in the AL East standings –  then he has to watch, in its entirety, my DVD of Game 7 of the 2003 ALCS. Yeah, the Aaron Boone game, where Grady Little supposedly left Pedro Martinez in the game a little too long.

And if the Red Sox, as predicted by most, have a better year than the Yanks? I have to watch any one of the last four games of the 2004 ALCS, his choice. They were all brutal for Yankees fans.

At this the dawn of the 2011 season, I kind of like being a fan of the underdog for a change. Less pressure.

Instead, the pressure shifts to Boston, which is heavily favored to not only outdistance the Yankees but also to win the World Series.

How heavily favored are the Sox? Well, ESPN.com asked 45 baseball employees of the ESPN empire to offer their predictions for the season, and all 45 of them — every last one, including Aaron Bleepin’ Boone — said Boston will win the AL East.

Of those, 42 said the Sox are going to the World Series. (The contrarians? Tristan Cockroft thinks the Yankees will make the Fall Classic, Eric Carabell says it will be the Rays and Jim Caple has the White Sox winning the darn thing. Hey, don’t laugh. Caple was the only one of 36 ESPN predictors to correctly pick the Giants as World Series champions at the start of the 2010 season.)

Back to this year’s picks, 33 ESPNers predict that the Red Sox will be the ones spraying champagne on one another at or near the end of October. (FYI: Seven pick the Phillies, two the Braves and one each go with the Giants, Rockies and the aforementioned Pale Hose.)

Also, 24 of the 45 see a Boston-Philly World Series, with 19 of those picking the Red Sox.

Wanna bet? Then go to Las Vegas, where you can plunk down $100 on the Red Sox and get it plus $400 back if they win the World Series. Curiously (or perhaps shrewdly), Vegas makes the pitching-rich Phillies the overall World Series favorite at +225. Click here for the full menu of those odds, which list nine teams — Blue Jays, Indians, Royals, Mariners, Nationals, Astros, Pirates, Padres and Diamondbacks — at the maximum 100-to-1, where $100 down would win you $10,000 and 10 thousand makes you a millionaire.

You’re reading an equally reliable predictor of future baseball events, so let’s get to it, shall we?

Read the rest of this entry »

Bookmark and Share

The Trials of Barry Bonds

March 30, 2011 by Nick Scala

The first thing to remember about the Barry Bonds trial is that it’s not about steroids or home run records or shrunken testicles or expanding craniums.

It’s about lying. Lying to a grand jury. Perjury.

For me, though, the trial is mostly about getting closer to the truth about baseball’s so-called Steroid Era, and putting the bloated numbers it produced in historical perspective. I’m not sure it’s worth the estimated $6 million it’s costing American taxpayers, but the trial will go a long way toward bringing us closer to closure on baseball’s unanswered steroid questions.

Whether or not he’s found guilty — my uneducated guess is that he will be — Bonds will forever be linked to the Steroid Era. There isn’t (and shouldn’t be) an asterisk affixed to his name in the many places it can be found in the record books, but the evidence — circumstantial and otherwise — that Bonds used performance-enhancing drugs to help set those records is overwhelming. It’s certainly enough to convict him in the court of public opinion.

Read the rest of this entry »

Bookmark and Share

SOM Negro Leagues tournament: Satchels 5, Turkeys 3

February 11, 2011 by Nick Scala

Satchel Paige recorded 15 ground ball outs in his seven-hitter.

(Note: This is the second in a series of game recaps of the Catbird Seat’s Strat-o-Matic Negro Leagues tournament in honor of Black History Month and the 50th anniversary celebration of the Strat-o-Matic Game Co.)

Paige, Dixon lead Satchels past Turkeys

CHARLESTON, W.Va. — Satchel Paige pitched a complete-game seven-hitter and Rap Dixon rapped out three hits in the first four innings, leading the Satchels to a 5-3 win over the Turkeys in Game 1 of their Strat-o-Matic Negro Leagues tournament semifinal series Thursday at One Morris Stadium.

Paige, captain of the Satchels, struck out only four but got 15 ground ball outs. He also walked two but was helped out by two double plays, including one in the ninth inning with the tying run at the plate for the Turkeys.

Paige was especially effective against the top of the Turkeys’ batting order, holding the top four hitters in the lineup to a combined 1-for-15. Turkeys captain Turkey Stearnes was 0-for-3 with a walk.

Read the rest of this entry »

Bookmark and Share

SOM Negro Leagues tournament: Gibbies 11, Charlestons 8

February 11, 2011 by Nick Scala

Ray Dandridge: 3-for-5, 2 RBIs

(Note: This is the first in a series of game recaps of the Catbird Seat’s Strat-o-Matic Negro Leagues tournament in honor of Black History Month and the 50th anniversary celebration of the Strat-o-Matic Game Co.)

Seven-run 7th carries Gibbies

CHARLESTON, W.Va. — A seven-run seventh inning catapulted the Gibbies to an 11-8 win over the Oscars in Game 1 of the Catbird Seat Negro Leagues tournament semifinal series Thursday at One Morris Stadium.

The uprising made a winner of Gibbies starter Smokey Joe Williams and staked his team to a 1-0 advantage in the best of seven series.

Buck Leonard and Ray Dandridge led the Gibbies 15-hit attack with three hits apiece. Dandridge’s two-run single was the key hit of the seven-run seventh, which made a loser of Oscars starter Hilton Smith.

The big inning gave the Gibsons a seemingly insurmountable 11-2 lead, but the Oscars didn’t go down quietly. Oscars captain  Oscar Charleston smacked a two-run home run in the eighth and a two-run triple in the bottom of the ninth, helping his team pull to within 11-8 before Leon Day came on in relief with two outs in the ninth to retire Chino Smith on a fly to center for the final out.

The Oscars had 13 hits of their own in the offense-heavy opener, including four in five trips (including two doubles) by catcher Biz Mackey and three by Charleston, who also had a first-inning single and stolen base. Charleston was denied a fourth hit when Gibsons second baseman Bonnie Serrell robbed the Oscars center fielder of a sure base hit with a diving stop of a hard grounder up the middle in the bottom of the fourth.

Leading 11-2 going into the bottom of the seventh, Gibsons captain and catcher Josh Gibson pulled Williams and turned the big advantage over to his bullpen, which nearly gave the lead away. Verdell Mathis was charged with five runs in 22/3 innings and Roosevelt Davis was touched for two hits and another run before Day recorded the final out and the save.

Williams (1-0) got the win, allowing five hits and two runs while striking out two and walking none in his six innings of work. Hilton Smith (0-1) took the loss, allowing 10 runs on 11 hits in six-plus innings.

The Oscars trailed by just 4-2 entering the top of the seventh before the eight consecutive Gibsons reached base off Hilton Smith and lefty Slim Jones.

Pop Lloyd got things started with a base hit, and a single by Gibson and a walk to Leonard loaded the bases. Singles by Mule Suttles and Wild Bill Wright added single runs, and Dandridge’s base hit scored two more and chased Hilton Smith from the game.

Fats Jenkins greeted Jones with an RBI double, and Serrell’s base hit gave the Gibsons their seventh run of the inning and an 11-2 lead. Bill Drake then relieved Day and quieted the rally without further damage.

The Oscars will try to even the series at a game apiece in Game 2 today. Charleston will call on Dick Redding and Gibson will counter with Rube Foster in Friday’s matchup of starting pitchers.

Bookmark and Share

Oscars vs. Gibbies, Satchels vs. Turkeys

February 10, 2011 by Nick Scala

I wanted to write about two things this month — Black History Month (as it pertains to baseball, of course), and the 50th anniversary celebration of the Strat-o-Matic Game Co.

Thanks to Strat-o-Matic’s Negro Leagues Baseball card set, I’ve devised a way to combine my interest in those two topics and turn it into a fun excursion into a part of baseball history that was heretofore mostly unknown to me.

For the next . . . well, for however long it takes, I’ll be familiarizing myself with Negro Leagues history by playing a Strat-0-Matic baseball tournament using the 103 players in the Negro Leagues  card set the company put out in 2009. Along the way, I hope I’ll get to learn, through the magic of Strato’s cards, dice and charts, a little something about players like Buck Leonard, Biz Mackey, Smokey Joe Williams, Slim Jones and all the other Negro League players who, prior to baseball’s integration in 1947,  were denied the opportunity to play alongside and against baseball legends such as Walter Johnson, Ty Cobb, Babe Ruth, Lefty Grove et. al.

At the same time, it’ll be my way of tipping the Catbird Seat cap to the 50th anniversary celebration of the game that was instrumental in fostering my love of baseball and my appreciation for the numbers and history it produces.

Read the rest of this entry »

Bookmark and Share

Larkin or bust in 2012?

January 6, 2011 by Nick Scala

See you in Cooperstown in July 2012

As the first runner-up in the recently unveiled Baseball Hall of Fame voting — the player who did not get elected but received the most votes among the also-rans — Barry Larkin becomes an automatic favorite for the 2012 election.

The former Cincinnati Reds shortstop has two things in his favor — the aforementioned finish in the 2011 voting, and the fact that the 2012 ballot is devoid of any slam-dunk first-year candidates. Bernie Williams has the best credentials among next year’s first-time candidates, but his resume, while impressive, doesn’t scream “Hall of Famer.” For Larkin, the timing is good.

Oh, and one other fact that bodes well for Larkin: The Hall of Fame electorate, comprised of 10-plus-year members of the Baseball Writers Association of America, is loathe to not elect anyone, so if Larkin doesn’t get the Hall call this time next near, it’ll be bad for business during the induction ceremonies in Cooperstown, N.Y., in late July of 2012. In the past 40 years, the BBWAA voting has failed to elect at least one new Hall of Famer just once, in 1996.

What’s working against Larkin? Well, for starters, you can look at the fact that he was named on just 62.1 percent of the ballots this year, 12.9 percent shy of the 75 percent needed for election. That’s a lot of ground to make up in one year.

Such a spike in the voting is not unprecedented, however. For instance, newly elected Hall of Famer Roberto Alomar was named on 90.0 percent of this year’s ballots, a 16.3 percent jump from the 73.7 percent he received as a first-year candidate in 2010.

A better comparison for Larkin might be the Hall of Fame path taken by another middle infielder in recent years, Ryne Sandberg.

In his first year as a candidate in 2003, the former Cubs second baseman finished sixth in the Hall of Fame voting after being named on 49.2 percent of the ballots. Sandberg finished behind the two electees that year, Eddie Murray (in his first-year on the ballot) and sixth-time candidate Gary Carter, as well as first runner-up Bruce Sutter (who was elected the next year) and eventual electees Jim Rice and Andre Dawson.

As a first-year candidate in  2010, Larkin finished fifth in the voting and was named on 51.6 percent of the ballots.

In his second year as a candidate in 2004, Sandberg finished as first runner-up behind first-year electees Paul Molitor and Dennis Eckersley, and Ryno’s percentage increased to 61.1 percent — quite similar to the 62.1 percent Larkin received this year in his second time on the ballot.

In his third year as a candidate in 2005, Sandberg got the Hall of Fame nod after being named on 76.2 percent of the ballots. His 15.1 percent increase came despite the fact that he had to contend with a slam-dunk first-year candidate, Wade Boggs, who was elected with a 91.9 percent approval rating. As mentioned, Larkin will have no such obstacle to hurdle in 2012.

With that in mind, I suggest to Reds fans that they make their 2012 reservations to Cooperstown now, because Cincinnati homeboy Barry Larkin will be the lone BBWAA Hall of Fame selection when the voting is revealed 52 weeks hence.

Bookmark and Share

Hall of Fame mystery

January 5, 2011 by Nick Scala

There’s not much mystery about who will and who won’t get the nod today when the 2011 Hall of Fame class is announced .

Two players, Roberto Alomar and Bert Blyleven, will get coveted phone call, telling them they’ve been elected. I predicted as much last year the day after the voting was revealed, and I’m sticking to that. Both came up just a handful of votes short of the 75 percent needed for election by the Baseball Writers Association of America in last year’s vote, and every candidate that came so close in one year has been elected the next. I say that with the same degree of confidence with which I correctly predicted, a year ago, that Andre Dawson would be the only named called to Cooperstown on the 2010 ballot.

The only mystery to me is how much support Mark McGwire and Rafael Palmeiro will receive.

Those two candidates with heretofore unimpeachable slam-dunk Hall of Fame credentials will be thoroughly rejected by the baseball writers who make up the Hall of Fame electorate. But by how much?

Read the rest of this entry »

Bookmark and Share