Sides square off in catfish controversy

May 11, 2011 by John McCoy

Blue catfish can grow to weigh more than 100 pounds

Let’s get ready to rrrrummmmmble!

Trouble’s a-brewin’ in the tidewater area of Virginia, where catfish anglers hope to fend off efforts by federal and state agencies to eradicate — or at least greatly reduce — blue catfish populations in the state’s tidewater rivers.

For those of you unfamiliar with the situation, let me summarize. Since being stocked in the James and other eastern Virginia rivers, blue catfish have thrived beyond anyone’s wildest expectations. Catches of 60-pound-plus blues have become almost commonplace. To get that big, of course, catfish have to eat. Blue cats are being blamed for declines in largemouth bass, striped bass and blue crab populations.

Members of the Chesapeake Bay Program Sustainable Goal Implementation Team, or GIT, want to have blue catfish declared an invasive species. If the effort succeeds, blue cats would become a prime target for eradication.

Catfish anglers are understandably furious. They’ve grown rather fond of their trophy fishery, and plan to resist any proposed eradication effort.

The controversy has created quite a bit of chatter on Mastercatters 2 and other catfish angler message boards. Expect the back-and-forth to grow more intense as the summer progresses. Government agencies hope to have something decided by fall.

Bookmark and Share

How the heck did that kiwi get to Russia?

May 10, 2011 by John McCoy

A long way from New Zealand

I can never look at a photo of a kiwi bird without thinking of the Johnny Hart comic strip, “B.C.”

One of the strip’s recurring themes was for one of the characters to be accosted by a bird whose first words were, “Hi! I am an apteryx, a wingless bird with hairy feathers!”

There’s a good reason why I associate kiwis with B.C.’s apteryx. The five known species of kiwis all fall within the Apteryx genus. The flightless birds are native to New Zealand and are found nowhere else.

Well, almost nowhere.

A kiwi has turned up on the Black Sea coast of Russia, nearly 10,000 miles from the remote Southern Hemisphere islands of New Zealand. No one seems to have a clue why it’s there.

One thing’s for sure. It didn’t fly.

The full story is here, in the Guardian.

Bookmark and Share

Want to bag a gobbler? Put in the time!

May 8, 2011 by John McCoy

Photo by Maslowski/NWTF

Contrary to what some might think, turkey hunting isn’t a matter of luck.  It’s a matter of time.

Fifty hours, to be exact. That’s the average number of hours a West Virginia spring gobbler hunter spends in the woods before he bags a tom.

That 50-hour figure didn’t stem from estimates or guesswork. It came from the Division of Natural Resources’ annual Spring Gobbler Hunters’ Cooperative Survey. Hunters keep track of the number of hours they spend in the woods, how many gobbles they hear, how many turkeys they killed, and so forth. DNR biometricians compile the data and publish the results.

And sure enough, last spring’s survey showed that it took roughly 50 hours, on average, for a hunter to score. At roughly seven hours’ worth of legal hunting time per day, that comes out to a bit more than seven days’ worth of hunting.

Skilled hunters obviously don’t require as much time. Me? By the Cooperator Survey’s measure, I should kill my next gobbler sometime in 2019…

Bookmark and Share

‘Tweaks’ make conservative 2011 doe regs a little more liberal

May 8, 2011 by John McCoy

Still a target on private land

No one was really surprised when West Virginia’s wildlife biologists proposed more conservative hunting regulations for antlerless deer. The surprise came when the people who approve those regulations actually them more liberal.

The changes were minor, but they did catch observers off-guard. Let me explain:

The state’s buck kill declined 31 percent in 2010. Under the Division of Natural Resources’ deer-management plan, antlerless-deer regulations become more conservative when the buck kill drops. True to form, DNR biologists proposed significantly more conservative regulations for 2011. The proposals included lower bag limits for most counties, and restrictions on the number of antlerless-deer permits in some others.

Details are here, in the news story I wrote for this week’s Gazette-Mail Woods & Waters page.

Hardly anyone expected the Natural Resources Commission — the seven-man panel responsible for setting season dates and bag limits — to liberalize the DNR’s recommendations.

They did, though. The changes amounted to minor tweaks, but they will result in the killing of more antlerless deer on private lands in nine counties.

DNR officials had proposed that the number of antlerless-deer permits be restricted in nine counties — Barbour, Braxton, Cabell, southern Greenbrier, Pendleton, Pocahontas, Randolph and Tucker. Commissioners considered the proposal, but ultimately decided that private lands in those counties contained considerably more deer than public lands. So they voted to continue allowing unlimited numbers of over-the-counter permits in those counties.

Paul Johansen, the DNR’s assistant wildlife chief, said he was somewhat surprised by the commissioners’ vote but added that it was entirely within their purview to change the DNR proposals.

“It’s the way the system works. We make our proposals, and the commissioners can approve them, reject them or change them. In this case, they changed them,” he said.

Bookmark and Share

The ‘wolf ping-pong’ game goes on

May 6, 2011 by John McCoy

Back and forth we go…

Ping.

The Interior Department once again removes gray wolves from Endangered Species List protection in several western states. Details here, in the L.A. Times

Pong.

No sooner are the wolves “de-listed” than preservationist groups file suit to have them “re-listed.” Details here, in the Great Falls Tribune.

Is it just me, or is this game getting really, really tiresome?

Bookmark and Share

Grand theft antler?

May 4, 2011 by John McCoy

The lust for trophy antlers is getting downright ridiculous.

Case in point: Two Maryland men have been arrested for the alleged theft of two elk trophies from a vendor at the National Rifle Association convention in Pittsburgh.

One set of antlers, a titanic rack that measured 522 inches on the Boone & Crockett Club scoring scale, was valued at $500,000. The other one, at a “mere” 486 inches, was worth $15,000.

The men, 44-year-old Stephen Christopher Lee of Cumberland, Md.; and 49-year-old Gary Curtis Felts of Jopps, Md., were charged with theft and criminal conspiracy. The two allegedly stole the trophies while the vendor, an Idaho outfitter, was busy loading his truck.

A full story is here, in the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review.

Hat tip: Don Surber

Bookmark and Share

New fiber promises thinner, stronger fishing lines

May 3, 2011 by John McCoy

Good news, fresh off the PR Newswire. I’ll bet it won’t take fishing-line manufacturers long to make hay from this development:

http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/honeywell-introduces-new-ultra-thin-fiber-for-high-performance-fishing-line-121153404.html

If the new, thinner Spectra fiber indeed allows manufacturers to produce thinner, stronger, smoother-casting lines, all us anglers stand to benefit. The main knock on previous Spectra lines has been their roughness.

Bookmark and Share

A rant about argumentative anglers

May 2, 2011 by John McCoy

This week’s column is a bit of a rant. So sue me…

Rodney King said it best: “Can’t we all just get along?”
“We,” in this case, refers to people who fish. We enjoy a common pastime, but we spend far too much time criticizing each other.
Spend five minutes examining the posts on just about any Internet fishing forum, and chances are you’ll come across at least one flame war.
A common example: Fellow catches a nice trout on a spinner, photographs his catch and posts a photo online. Within minutes – sometimes within seconds – someone puts up a post that reads, “What?!! You used a treble hook? Don’t you know that treble hooks can cause fish mortality? Have you no decency, man? No care for the resource?!!”
And that’s an example of a tame response. The flames really get intense if someone (horrors!) uses live bait or (cardiac arrest!) keeps a bass or a trout for the dinner table.
For crying out loud, people, it’s only a pastime.
Fishing is supposed to be recreation – a way for us to leave the workaday world behind. When I grab a rod and head for the water, my goals are simple: To spend some time away from cameras and computers and telephones, to get some fresh air and maybe to catch a fish or two.
I fish with the tackle best suited to the task. For trout, that usually means a fly rod – but I’d happily grab a spinning rod and sling PowerBait if I thought that would work better. When I fish for bass, it’s almost always with spinning or bait casting gear. My preferred bait for channel catfish is chicken liver.
Crappies go bonkers for live minnows. By the way, so do trout and bass. Yes, you read right; the man who owns 14 fly rods deliberately uses minnows to catch trout or bass when the spirit moves him to do so.
If this horrifies anyone, let me offer some timeless advice from Sgt. Hulka, the drill sergeant in “Stripes”:
Lighten up, Francis.
Life’s too darned short to get bent out of shape because someone caught a fish using a method that offends your delicate sensibilities.
There was a time when stuffy British fly fishermen lived by a strict code of conduct, and looked steeply down their noses at anyone who didn’t comply with it. Trout were to be caught only on dry flies, and specifically only when those dry flies were cast upstream to visibly rising fish.
The high priest of this cult was a stuffy chap named Frederic Halford. One day, he found out that a young upstart named George Edward MacKenzie Skues had fished England’s River Itchen with a sunken nymph.
Halford confronted Skues at the local angler’s club. “Young man!” Halford exclaimed. “One simply cannot fish the Itchen with the methods you describe!”
“But I’ve done it,” Skues replied.
I’m with Skues. If a fishing method is legal, and if the person who uses the method obeys any regulations that govern the body of water being fished, far be it from us to criticize.
We anglers face ongoing challenges from those who would pollute the waters we fish, or those who seek to close off prime destinations by putting up no-trespassing signs. Only through unity can we ensure our fishing future. Yet here we sit, Balkanizing ourselves over such trivial matters as barbed versus barbless hooks.
Can’t we all just get along?
Bookmark and Share

A spring for W.Va. anglers to forget

April 29, 2011 by John McCoy

After two years of drought, West Virginia needed a lot of rain.

This is ridiculous, though. For weeks now, anglers throughout the state have had to battle high and muddy water as storm after storm swept dumped rain into rivers and streams.

A casual glance at the DNR’s weekly fishing report (available in its entirety here) shows most minor streams running high and all the major rivers running muddy, and a fair number of lakes either milky or muddy.

It’s been a spring to forget so far, but a couple of weeks of fair weather would allow anglers to make up for lost time during what are arguably the best four angling weeks of the year — from mid-May to mid-June.

Bookmark and Share

Killing baby animals with kindness

April 28, 2011 by John McCoy

Hands off! I'm just hiding!

Spring is indeed a time of regeneration, a time when creatures large and small insure the survival of their species by bearing young.

We who are fortunate to live in West Virgina, cheek by jowl with nature, often come upon young animals that appear to have been abandoned. We often feel inclined to try to help. While there’s nothing wrong with feeling that way, plenty can go wrong if we act on our inclinations.

In short, we can end up killing the critters we seek to save. Case in point: Here in West Virginia, white-tailed deer often leave their newborn fawns unattended. The fawns, hunkered down amid grass or weeds, become almost invisible to would-be predators.

All too often, though, we do-gooding humans come along and say, “Gee, a fawn! Poor little thing must have been abandoned by its mom.” We pick the fawn up, take it home with us, decide it’s hungry and feed it a can of evaporated milk. Sounds humane, right?

Wrong. Chances are we’ve just killed the poor little creature. Evaporated milk, cow’s milk and other dairy products wreak havoc on a fawn’s digestive system. Bill Vanscoy, the former superintendent of the West Virginia Wildlife Center, used to complain about it all the time. “They feed these fawns evaporated milk, the fawns come down with the screaming scours [diarrhea], and then when the fawns get in really bad shape they send them to us to ’save,’” Vanscoy grumped.

What’s the better approach? Unless you are 100 percent certain a young animal has been orphaned — and that means you’ve found mama’s carcass — leave it alone!

Every year, the West Virginia Division of Natural Resources issues a news release urging folks to leave young wildlife alone. Here’s this year’s edition:

SOUTH CHARLESTON, W.Va. – The West Virginia Division of Natural Resources advises people to leave all young wildlife alone. “The spring season is the time of year when the woods and fields of West Virginia are full of new life,” said Gene Thorn, wildlife biologist at the West Virginia State Wildlife Center in Upshur County. “People have a great opportunity to view and enjoy young wildlife during this season, but it is especially important for the public to understand the need to avoid touching or disturbing these wild animals.”
Attempts to rescue or rehabilitate young wildlife are often counter-productive.  Picking up or getting too close to wildlife greatly increases the chance of harm to the animal and/or the persons involved in this unwise practice. By touching young animals or close approach, humans leave scent that may attract predators. Wildlife viewing is an enjoyable and perfectly acceptable activity; however, the DNR recommends that this pastime be conducted from a safe distance and with the aid of binoculars.

 

“In addition to being detrimental to the welfare of young animals, handling wildlife can expose humans to various wildlife-associated diseases, parasites and other health-related risks,” said Thorn.  “Rabies, roundworms and other parasites such as lice and ticks can be transmitted to humans through the improper handling of wildlife.”

 

The Wildlife Center and DNR district offices receive numerous calls each year concerning young wildlife, especially fawn deer that have been picked up by well-meaning residents.  It is important to note that in almost every case, these young animals have not been abandoned. In fact, the offspring are often hidden as the adult searches for food, and this separation can last for a few hours or all day. Humans are poor substitute parents for wild animals, as young wildlife require special diets and learn survival skills from their parents.  Removing the young wildlife from its natural environment almost certainly leads to death of the animal.

 

Many people often mistake a bedded fawn, with no mother in sight, as abandoned.  Hiding the fawn and leaving it while the doe searches for food is an important survival tactic. The spotted pattern and coloration of fawns and their lack of scent afford protection to these young animals and make them difficult for predators to detect. If a predator happens to approach close to a fawn, the young deer will normally hold very still until the threat passes. If discovered by a predator, the fawn will wait until the very last moment before fleeing to safety. Fawns should always be left undisturbed and never be picked up by people.

 

As a final caution, remember that state laws and regulations prohibit the possession of wildlife without a permit. Under any circumstances, when you pick up a young animal in the wild you have taken it into your possession. The fines for illegal possession of a fawn deer, black bear cub, baby raccoon, squirrel or any other species taken or possessed during the closed season, range from $20 up to a maximum of $1,000 and/or up to 100 days in jail.
“We want everyone to enjoy wildlife in West Virginia,” said Thorn.  “For your own health and safety and to protect the state’s wildlife, remember these wild animals should be left alone and allowed to stay wild.”
Bookmark and Share