External dataset

Unsaved View

Save As... Revert

Digest of United States Practice in International Law 2003

Based on
Toggle full screen
Data.gov Program Management Office Data.gov Program Management Office

created Feb 18, 2011

updated May 03, 2011

Description

The Office of the Legal Adviser publishes the annual Digest of United States Practice in International Law to provide the public with a historical record of the views and practice of the Government of the United States in public and private international law. In his introduction to the 2003 volume, then Legal Adviser William H. Taft IV stated in part: "The year 2003 witnessed a number of significant developments in the field of international law. The military campaign to oust Saddam Hussein and his regime in Iraq and the continuing effort to locate Osama bin Laden and his supporters gave rise to many important legal issues, including those related to the lawful use of force, the response to international terrorism, and compliance with international humanitarian law. Beyond Iraq and Afghanistan, of course, many other situations affecting international security and stability generated complicated and sensitive issues for the world community and its lawyers. . . ." "The year was also marked by a series of significant cases and decisions in domestic courts and international tribunals related to international law and practice. The International Court of Justice in The Hague handed down its decision on preliminary measures in the Avena case brought by Mexico under the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations, as well as its judgment in the Oil Platforms case (Iran v. United States). By agreement the Lockerbie case (Libya v. United States) before the ICJ was discontinued. Ongoing litigation in our domestic courts concerned fundamental issues arising under two important U.S. statutes, the Alien Tort Statute of 1789 and the 1976 Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act. Other cases began to address issues related to the status and rights of detainees in Guantanamo and the United States. Significant decisions were rendered in several cases by NAFTA tribunals. And the United States made several major submissions in government-to-government and interpretative cases pending before the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal. We were also active in bringing and defending claims under the dispute resolution mechanisms of the WTO. . . ."

Activity
Rating
0.0
Raters
0
Visits
3
Comments
0
Contributors
0
Meta
Category
Population
Permissions
Public
Tags
China, capital punishment, psychotropic, Pan Am 103, military, export controls, commercial law, sanctions, state sponsor, Cyprus, jurisdiction, biological diversity, terrorist, defense articles, NATO, Ukraine, labor law, General Assembly, Sudan, weapons convention, investment, International Maritime Organization, Cuba, labor issues, non-proliferation, Guantanamo, maritime, World Trade Organization, smuggling, intellectual property, WTO, Avena, trafficking, Council of Europe, Soviet Union, self-defense, children, Burma, interdiction, NAFTA, Angola, torture, organized crime, Montreal Protocol, North Atlantic Treaty Organization, Mexico, AIDS, ICJ, money laundering, Lebanon, President, IAEA, Legal Adviser, Supreme Court, nuclear, Zimbabwe, environment, Israel, Nicaragua, arms control, drugs, Georgia, expropriation, Burundi, corruption, preservation, intervention, Colombia, marine, drug trade, International Criminal Court, counterterrorism, protocol, peacekeeping, constitution, France, extradition, biological weapons, Department of State, privileges and immunities, Poland, Middle East, border, William J. Clinton, chemical weapons, Marshall Islands, narcotic, crime, piracy, missile, foreign missions, statute, cultural object, international organization, Belarus, war crimes, Russia, Northern Mariana Islands, bilateral investment treaty, FSIA, International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, act of state, Moldova, exports, law of the sea, Cambodia, court, national security, Afghanistan, armed conflict, Deputy Secretary, cultural property, Congo, North American Free Trade Organization, Arctic, marine environment, comity, agreements, Holocaust, electronic commerce, Somalia, foreign affairs, prisoner transfer, International Law Commission, West Bank, conservation, Hague, Pakistan, Gaza, Bosnia, arbitration, Libya, jus cogens, alien, HIV, deportation, Al Qaeda, detention, Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, Costa Rica, overflight, diplomatic, family, Czech Republic, immunities, law enforcement, Syria, Haiti, diplomatic note, genocide, International law, Secretary of State, testimony, space, Iraq, trafficking in persons, Liberia, pollution, discrimination, Alien Tort Statute, immunity, claims, gender, drug trafficking, Iran, apartheid, labor standards, trade, Vienna, travel restrictions, air transport, carriage of goods, refugee, state courts, former Yugoslavia, OECD, compliance, Organization of American States, Cold War, Al-Qa'ida, International Court of Justice, defense, ILC, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, citizenship, United Kingdom, use of force, criminal, Peru, Thailand, UNIDROIT, mutual legal assistance, Alien Tort Claims Act, Algiers Accords, North Korea, Al-Qaida, human rights, Vienna Convention, consular, immigration, Lockerbie, India, Uruguay, Article 33, data, Japan, customary international law, licensing, Romania, forum non conveniens, International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, Germany, service of process, proliferation, Nauru, conflict resolution, detainee, Panama, United Nations, Micronesia, asylum, Taliban, state responsibility, Geneva, oil, Hungary, naturalization, marine scientific research, Canada, Yugoslavia, softwood lumber, migrant, intercountry adoption, passport, Philippines, religious freedom, nonproliferation, Rwanda, judicial assistance, family law, fish, convention, Security Council, navigation, weapons of mass destruction, political rights, international child abduction, tribunals, reciprocity, visa, treaty practice, Red Cross, terrorism
Licensing and Attribution
Data Provided By
Department of State
Source Link
(none)
Dataset Summary
Agency
Department of State
Date Released
1/1/2005
Date Updated
1/1/2005
Time Period
2003.0
Frequency
daily, weekly, or monthly as appropriate
Dataset Information
Data.gov Data Category Type
Raw Data Catalog
Specialized Data Category Designation
Research
Unique ID
4322
Dataset Coverage
Unit of Analysis
International Law
Geographic Coverage
Global
Data Description
Collection Mode
phone/paper, phone/computer, person/paper, person/computer, web
Data Collection Instrument
http://www.state.gov/s/l/c14625.htm
Data Dictionary
http://www.state.gov/s/l/c14625.htm
Data Quality
Applicable Information Quality Guideline Designation
Department of State
Data Quality Certification
Yes
Privacy and Confidentiality
Yes
This view cannot be displayed
Data.gov Program Management Office Data.gov Program Management Office

created Feb 18, 2011

updated May 03, 2011

Description

The Office of the Legal Adviser publishes the annual Digest of United States Practice in International Law to provide the public with a historical record of the views and practice of the Government of the United States in public and private international law. In his introduction to the 2003 volume, then Legal Adviser William H. Taft IV stated in part: "The year 2003 witnessed a number of significant developments in the field of international law. The military campaign to oust Saddam Hussein and his regime in Iraq and the continuing effort to locate Osama bin Laden and his supporters gave rise to many important legal issues, including those related to the lawful use of force, the response to international terrorism, and compliance with international humanitarian law. Beyond Iraq and Afghanistan, of course, many other situations affecting international security and stability generated complicated and sensitive issues for the world community and its lawyers. . . ." "The year was also marked by a series of significant cases and decisions in domestic courts and international tribunals related to international law and practice. The International Court of Justice in The Hague handed down its decision on preliminary measures in the Avena case brought by Mexico under the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations, as well as its judgment in the Oil Platforms case (Iran v. United States). By agreement the Lockerbie case (Libya v. United States) before the ICJ was discontinued. Ongoing litigation in our domestic courts concerned fundamental issues arising under two important U.S. statutes, the Alien Tort Statute of 1789 and the 1976 Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act. Other cases began to address issues related to the status and rights of detainees in Guantanamo and the United States. Significant decisions were rendered in several cases by NAFTA tribunals. And the United States made several major submissions in government-to-government and interpretative cases pending before the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal. We were also active in bringing and defending claims under the dispute resolution mechanisms of the WTO. . . ."

Activity
Rating
0.0
Raters
0
Visits
3
Comments
0
Contributors
0
Meta
Category
Population
Permissions
Public
Tags
China, capital punishment, psychotropic, Pan Am 103, military, export controls, commercial law, sanctions, state sponsor, Cyprus, jurisdiction, biological diversity, terrorist, defense articles, NATO, Ukraine, labor law, General Assembly, Sudan, weapons convention, investment, International Maritime Organization, Cuba, labor issues, non-proliferation, Guantanamo, maritime, World Trade Organization, smuggling, intellectual property, WTO, Avena, trafficking, Council of Europe, Soviet Union, self-defense, children, Burma, interdiction, NAFTA, Angola, torture, organized crime, Montreal Protocol, North Atlantic Treaty Organization, Mexico, AIDS, ICJ, money laundering, Lebanon, President, IAEA, Legal Adviser, Supreme Court, nuclear, Zimbabwe, environment, Israel, Nicaragua, arms control, drugs, Georgia, expropriation, Burundi, corruption, preservation, intervention, Colombia, marine, drug trade, International Criminal Court, counterterrorism, protocol, peacekeeping, constitution, France, extradition, biological weapons, Department of State, privileges and immunities, Poland, Middle East, border, William J. Clinton, chemical weapons, Marshall Islands, narcotic, crime, piracy, missile, foreign missions, statute, cultural object, international organization, Belarus, war crimes, Russia, Northern Mariana Islands, bilateral investment treaty, FSIA, International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, act of state, Moldova, exports, law of the sea, Cambodia, court, national security, Afghanistan, armed conflict, Deputy Secretary, cultural property, Congo, North American Free Trade Organization, Arctic, marine environment, comity, agreements, Holocaust, electronic commerce, Somalia, foreign affairs, prisoner transfer, International Law Commission, West Bank, conservation, Hague, Pakistan, Gaza, Bosnia, arbitration, Libya, jus cogens, alien, HIV, deportation, Al Qaeda, detention, Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, Costa Rica, overflight, diplomatic, family, Czech Republic, immunities, law enforcement, Syria, Haiti, diplomatic note, genocide, International law, Secretary of State, testimony, space, Iraq, trafficking in persons, Liberia, pollution, discrimination, Alien Tort Statute, immunity, claims, gender, drug trafficking, Iran, apartheid, labor standards, trade, Vienna, travel restrictions, air transport, carriage of goods, refugee, state courts, former Yugoslavia, OECD, compliance, Organization of American States, Cold War, Al-Qa'ida, International Court of Justice, defense, ILC, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, citizenship, United Kingdom, use of force, criminal, Peru, Thailand, UNIDROIT, mutual legal assistance, Alien Tort Claims Act, Algiers Accords, North Korea, Al-Qaida, human rights, Vienna Convention, consular, immigration, Lockerbie, India, Uruguay, Article 33, data, Japan, customary international law, licensing, Romania, forum non conveniens, International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, Germany, service of process, proliferation, Nauru, conflict resolution, detainee, Panama, United Nations, Micronesia, asylum, Taliban, state responsibility, Geneva, oil, Hungary, naturalization, marine scientific research, Canada, Yugoslavia, softwood lumber, migrant, intercountry adoption, passport, Philippines, religious freedom, nonproliferation, Rwanda, judicial assistance, family law, fish, convention, Security Council, navigation, weapons of mass destruction, political rights, international child abduction, tribunals, reciprocity, visa, treaty practice, Red Cross, terrorism
Licensing and Attribution
Data Provided By
Department of State
Source Link
(none)
Dataset Summary
Agency
Department of State
Date Released
1/1/2005
Date Updated
1/1/2005
Time Period
2003.0
Frequency
daily, weekly, or monthly as appropriate
Dataset Information
Data.gov Data Category Type
Raw Data Catalog
Specialized Data Category Designation
Research
Unique ID
4322
Dataset Coverage
Unit of Analysis
International Law
Geographic Coverage
Global
Data Description
Collection Mode
phone/paper, phone/computer, person/paper, person/computer, web
Data Collection Instrument
http://www.state.gov/s/l/c14625.htm
Data Dictionary
http://www.state.gov/s/l/c14625.htm
Data Quality
Applicable Information Quality Guideline Designation
Department of State
Data Quality Certification
Yes
Privacy and Confidentiality
Yes

Required Field
    There are no results

    Drag the columns into the order you would like, and then press done to apply the new order.

    • 500x425

    • 760x646

    • 950x808

    425x425 is the minimum size

    Download As
    Show
      Post Cancel

      Your email address will be shared with the owner of this dataset so they can reply.

      Send Cancel

      This dataset is Public and shared with the following

      • Loading Shares...

      You are not currently sharing this dataset with anyone

      This dataset is currently Public

      The Socrata Open Data API (SODA) allows software developers to access data hosted in Socrata data sites programmatically. Developers can create applications that use the SODA APIs to visualize and “mash-up” Socrata datasets in new and exciting ways. Create an iPhone application that visualizes government spending in your area, a web application that allows citizens to look up potential government benefits they'd overlooked, or a service that automatically emails you when new earmarks are added to bills that you wish to track.

      To start accessing this dataset programmatically, use the API endpoint provided below. For more information and examples on how to use the Socrata Open Data API, reference our Developer Documentation.

      API Access Endpoint:

      http://explore.data.gov/api/views/g52h-23fm/rows.json

      Using a digitally signed dataset, it is possible to prove using cryptographically secure methods that a particular copy of a Socrata dataset has not been tampered with. This is useful if, for instance, you are looking to publish findings based on this data, and you want to be able to prove its integrity.

      To obtain a signed version of this dataset, simply click on the link below to generate a key and begin the download. The key and downloaded data are specific to the current version of this dataset; if the owner updates the dataset in the future, you will have to restart the process to get the new data. Publish the downloaded data along with the key that you receive, and using the instructions found within the downloaded package, third parties will be able to confirm that your data is legitimate.

      To generate a signed version of this dataset, simply click on the link below to generate a key. Note that if you update this dataset in the future, you will have to return and regenerate the key in order for consumers to again have access to it. Also note that this process involves operations on the entirety of the data, so it may take some time if your dataset is very large, or contains large attachments.

      Only dataset owners may generate signed keys.

      Never created a filter before? Watch a short tutorial video here.

      or

      Click here to add your first filter condition
      You are in simplified mode. Go advanced now?
      Users will start in simplified mode. This means that they will be unable to add new conditions, change the columns or operators of filters, or access the advanced menus on filters. Change the default back to advanced.
      Users will start in advanced mode. This means that they will have full access to the options available on the filter. For a more curated experience, you can try the simplified mode. Change the default to simplified.
      No conditions defined yet.
      Add a New Filter Condition
      Remove filter

      Show up to suggested values

      Close

      Create a new Template

      Close

      Email this Dataset

      Your email has been successfully sent.

      Share this dataset with the following email addresses

      Enter an optional message

      Close

      Save view

      Do you want to save your view?

      You have unsaved data that will be lost if you leave this page. Please choose whether or not you wish to save this view before you leave; or choose Cancel to return to the page.

      This change requires a reload. You may Save your changes to view them, or Cancel to stay on this page.

      This change requires a reload. You may Update this view or Save a new view to see your changes, or Cancel to stay on this page.

      Enter a name for your new view:

      Close

      Sign in using your Socrata ID

      Close

      We're glad you want to join Socrata!

      I agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
      Required Field
      Close

      Alert