Share this article:
Print

Meter readings: A tale of two homes

Click here for a free download of the latest Adobe Flash Player.

by JONATHAN BETZ / WFAA-TV

Posted on March 11, 2010 at 10:28 PM

Updated yesterday at 10:32 PM

******

FORT WORTH — Following hundreds of consumer complaints and concern from the Texas Public Utility Commission, Oncor is now testing its new "smart" meters in side-by-side comparisons in North Texas.

But homeowners in one neighborhood in far North Fort Worth have already come to their own conclusions.

“I’m very frustrated,” said Diana Fisher. “I just know my meter's different than everybody else's. It's not the old little mechanical with the numbers turning; it’s actually a digital meter.”

Fisher is convinced that her digital meter has been overcharging her for years.

She’s been complaining about high power bills since she moved into a brand-new subdivision three years ago. She often spends, on average, $300-400 a month on electricity.

Fisher became so irritated that she started introducing herself to her neighbors and comparing bills.

She found homes with the mechanical meters consistently showed that families were using less electricity.

Every home in the subdivision is nearly identical; all share similar floor plans and have nearly the same square footage.

Around the corner, Melody Whitlock and her family live in a 3,065 square foot home — exactly the same size as the Fishers'.

Whitlock’s family is larger; she has three kids, while the Fishers only have one at home.

Yet the Whitlocks — with a larger family — consistently have lower power bills. Statements show they’re using half the electricity as the Fishers.

In January, for instance, the Whitlocks' meter said they used 3,123 kilowatt hours of power; the Fishers' meter said the family consumed 4,998 kwh.

“December and January were our two highest bills, and we were gone a week of those months,” Fisher complained. “I really don't know how I could be using this much electricity.”

Not only were the Whitlocks at home, but they had their Christmas lights running for hours every night. The Fishers passed on the decorations to save electricity.

In several ways, the Whitlocks admit they suspect they use more electricity than their neighbors around the corner. They wash clothes every other day, while the Fishers do laundry once a week.

The Fishers spent thousands making their home energy efficient, even unplugging every major appliance.

Diana Fisher, a legal editor, admits she works from home, but insists she leaves the lights off, and only turns on the family television once a week.

Melody Whitlock sheepishly admits her husband sleeps with the TV turned on.

It’s all enraged Diana Fisher.

“They have TV; we don't! We don't have little kids that watch TV! They use a lot more [electricity]; they have to!” she said. “And their bills are $200-$300 cheaper than mine every month!”

Fisher said her years of complaints have been largely ignored. “I’ve called so many times, I think they’re sick of hearing me,” she said.

Oncor is quick to point out the Fishers have a digital meter that’s been in use for nearly 20 years and not one of the new “smart” meters.

The utility recently began installing hundreds of thousands of the new sophisticated digital meters on homes across North Texas.

Homeowners, shocked with suddenly high bills, have questioned their accuracy and lawmakers tried unsuccessfully to get Oncor to stop installing them.

Currently, the Public Utility Commission is investigating, although Oncor insists its new meters work perfectly.

One major difference is that the “smart” devices carry data wirelessly to Oncor. Oncor said the Fishers' digital reader is an older version that cannot transmit readings wirelessly. The company insists both the Fisher’s digital meter and the Whitlocks' mechanical meter work properly.

“There's absolutely no difference (in their meters),” said Oncor spokesperson Chris Schein. “It’s the difference between reading an analog watch and getting it from a digital watch; it’s the same thing.”

Schein said the Fishers’ usage was in line with a family of that size in a home that large, although he concedes that the Whitlocks’ power consumption is low.

However, Schein figures the Fishers’ one teenage daughter is likely using more electricity than the Whitlock’s three young children. He says teenagers, with all of their electronic devices, typically sap more energy than small children who still don’t know how to turn on the lights.

“What we're seeing here is a difference in lifestyle and that's what really drives the difference between the two families' usage,” Schein said.

Diana Fisher strongly disagrees. She’s now left feeling helpless and furious as she struggles to pay electric bills reaching $600 a month.

“I don't know what to do,” she said.

And the difference in power usage has even Melody Whitlock suspicious.

“There's really not making any sense of it,” she said. “There's something definitely wrong.”

E-mail jbetz@wfaa.com

Share this article:
Print

To add a comment, please register or login.

Leave your comment
1000 characters remaining

Submit

We welcome your comments on this story's topic. Off-topic comments, personal attacks, and inappropriate language may be flagged and removed, and comment privileges blocked, per our Terms of Service. Thanks for keeping the comments space respectful.

Privacy Policy

HTML is not allowed.

whitedovetail said on March 12, 2010 at 1:47 AM

One thing that I have NOT heard from any of the complaints is if both parties have their power provided by the same people. When I recently changed my electricity provider I went from about $600 per month to about $200 per month. Same meter, same usage. Just a provider with a much lower kw/hr provider that we found from a friend of a friend. Lucky us!

mayflowers said on March 12, 2010 at 6:32 AM

Whitedovetail, that would be a good point except they're looking at the USAGE - which shows more KW used per month!! I DON'T WANT a smart meter - but we don't have a choice do we??? There are just TOO MANY complaints about these things and what is being done?? California has had the same complaints, but , oh well, just give us your money!!

gcjacox said on March 12, 2010 at 7:33 AM

They talk about the money, but it's about the Usage. If you turn off all your lights you will save some money, but if your electric heater is running all the time, then it doesn't matter about a the lights you have turned off.

gpbob said on March 12, 2010 at 7:44 AM

Whitdovetail, who is your provider??? I'd like to get a better rate please!!! Has anyone heard how Oncor is defending the parking lot lights story? I'd REALLY like to hear their excuse on that one!!! Another excuse I'd like to hear from them is the guy with the $5 dollar electric bills for the last 3 months. Do they insist his meter is working correctly? Who died and left Oncor in charge is what I want to know!!!

vidkid said on March 12, 2010 at 7:50 AM

Oncor/TXU is nothing but a communist energy giant. They can & are raping the good folks in Texas and there is NOTHING you or I can do about it. Sicking that Americans have to live like 3 world citizens! Thanks for the change, Obama!

cordarei said on March 12, 2010 at 8:55 AM

vidkid, what does obama have to do with our electric company problems here in north texas?

sir_techie said on March 12, 2010 at 9:00 AM

Side by side testing huh! Just like WFAA reported last night. TXU & Oncor will wave the fee to test your smart meter to see if it's working right. That is the funniest statement I've heard over this situation. I have an OLD meter; when I say OLD, I mean OLD!!!! I had TXU test the meter to my apartment last year and the Meter had not been check for functionality in over 20 years. I asked them to let me know when they would be out so I could be there for the testing. They said they would inform me. Did I hear anything? NOPE!!! But I did finally hear something when I contacted them back a week later and found out that they came out and said my meter was just fine! So you see it doesn't matter if the meters are messed up or not; they will not admit there is a problem with it. Why would they want to give up the extra income they are getting? Get Real!!!

iluvourboys2 said on March 12, 2010 at 9:05 AM

It should be renamed "THE DUMB METER"....

vidkid said on March 12, 2010 at 9:16 AM

As leader of our country, he has to lead the way to solve our energy crisis. Where is the push for solar energy panels to reduce dependence on these greedy electric companies? Give the banks & the auto industries billions, but nothing to help homeowners get panels on our roofs. I voted for him to change the way this country was being run. We are being manipulated by oil and the utility giants. This is what's driving our economy in the ground. As President, isn't he responsible for solving this problem concerning the well being of our country? I'm just saying SOMEONE has to do something about this runaway energy crisis.....

txsailor said on March 12, 2010 at 9:37 AM

Obama pays my electric bill for me every month.

tink12 said on March 12, 2010 at 9:39 AM

Electric water heaters are a huge culprit.

bware said on March 12, 2010 at 9:50 AM

vidkid, what did Bush do in 8 years to solve our problems? Nothing! He created problems financially and in foreign relations to the point of no return. I don't care for politicians in general but laying this problem at the Presidents feet is stupid. I prefer he work on the national and international problems at hand.

asenglin09899501 said on March 12, 2010 at 10:12 AM

An Energy Audit will provide home owners answers. An energy audit will provide an evaluation of energy usage and possible needs to improve your environment.

patys25 said on March 12, 2010 at 10:13 AM

The "old" mechanical meters were only charging you idiots a percentage of what you were actually USING. In other words, you were probably ONLY billed about 60% of what you ACTUALLY used, because they have NEVER been tested- so of course you're happy with your old bill. These digital meters don't need to be tested as often because they read ACCURATELY every 15 freaking seconds!!!! If you have someone at home all day long, guess what? The a/c or heater is probably always on, a television and so forth. Power is constantly running. Here's what you people, especially the ones with the newer homes, should do: Check your water heaters if they're electric, check insulation, check for windows/doors leakage, etc. Its not the power, its the maintenance of this stuff that requires a looking at. Rule of thumb, your electric bill is USUALLY 10% of the square footage of your house. In other words if you have a 3000sqft home you're bill will probably be ABOUT $300. DUH!

buckey said on March 12, 2010 at 10:19 AM

Try StarTex power. Had TXU and was paying $300-$400 per month, my last bill was $146.00 with startex and the one before was $205 and that is with the coldest months. Hope this helps.

quietman said on March 12, 2010 at 10:30 AM

Funny how ONCOR was in a hurry to "recycle" all of the old meters. Isn't that soooo environmentally conscious of them??? Let's all start calling the new ones "CHEATER METER." I will be waiting for an explanation from patys25 how the light pole used 800% more electricity in one month.

patys25 said on March 12, 2010 at 10:40 AM

Blame the Texas Representatives down in Austin for these smart meters you dont want. They're the ones that voted a clear yes for them back in 2005. Oncor was actually the one saying no to them, because of the billions it would cost the consumers. Oncor's not afraid to test these meters because they KNOW they are flawless. Do you actually think they'd spend millions on a project that had a flaw? Come on! The only people complaining are those in residential areas. Have you heard one commercial consumer complain yet? No because now they're getting billed correctly. And if I'm correct this person in FAR NORTH FORT WORTH might be mistaking in having a new digital meter. They've only done a few areas in DFW and PLANO or North Fort Worth is NOT one of them. Check their grid. Some people just like to complain, think they're right no matter what and wont listen to reason. Here's a thought: hire an electrician for about $1,000 to prove your meter is right and you're WRONG.

quietman said on March 12, 2010 at 11:04 AM

Patys25....light pole....up 800%....other guy $5 a month all winter for his apartment....hmmm.....

adric22 said on March 12, 2010 at 11:24 AM

All they talk about is TV and lights. Those two things probably account for 2% of that person's electric bill. The real culprits are the A/C and heating system, along with refrigerators and hot water heaters.. I bet the one neighbor has an efficient heat-pump and the other one has an all-electric furnace. Also, how many refrigerators do they have? Where do they set their hot water heater? How much hot water do they use? Also, malfunctions in the heating system can lead to HUGE amounts of energy use, such as when all your heat is escaping into the attic, or if the A/C and heat run at the same time. I have every confidence that these new meters work right. If anything, their old meter was the one not working correctly and under-rating the amount of power they were using, and they just lucked out for a while.

stargazer0725 said on March 12, 2010 at 12:53 PM

Geesh, vidkid, you might not be fully aware, but it costs approximately $20,000 - $25,000 to outfit an average home with today's solar panel technology. There is no way on earth the federal government should fork out that much money for outdated and expensive technology. As it is, you get a personal tax credit when you purchase green technology for your home - so you are getting money for going green - just not the full cost. Put the blame on the Texas legislature and Oncor, and spend federal funds where it's most beneficial - encouraging advances in green energy technology.

dgnzlz3990889062 said on March 12, 2010 at 1:50 PM

The whole world is not wrong and Oncor is the only one that is wright on this issue. The Fisher's digital meter does appear to measure usage differently than that of their neighbor's... It could be that these new "smart" digital meters record energy usage more accurately than the old analog meters. If this is the case, then Oncor is overcharging their customers and they need to lower their rates. Lawmakers need to be aggressive with Oncor, possibly recommending that Oncor reduce their rates for customers that already have a new "smart" meter. Side-by-side comparisons will only work if the testing is performed in the field, an independent third party is hired to perform the testing, and the independent third party is responsible for monitoring and recording the results. A digital meter and an analog meter would need to simultaneously measure energy usage for the same home or business.

dgnzlz3990889062 said on March 12, 2010 at 1:51 PM

Many families cannot afford to pay hundreds of dollars more per month on their electric bills, and, at the same time, continue to make timely mortgage payments. If this issue is not addressed promptly, I expect house foreclosures to be on the increase as we approach the summer months, and this could have a bad effect on this countries already fragile economy.

vidkid said on March 12, 2010 at 2:14 PM

dgnzlz3990889062.... Amen. That's all I'll trying to say. Abound Solar is selling the latest lowest cost / highest efficient panels to ELECTRIC companies only. I'm not "preaching" Solar, but just saying that something has to be done to lower the monthly burden that some of us are dealing with in this down economy. When people have to choose between paying a $700-$1000 electric bill or a mortgage payment, you have to have utilities... especially if you have kids. More money in our pockets means more money to spend in this poor economy, which hopefully leads to a recovery. Record profits for big energy while the people are squeaking by is just plain wrong!

lrbox said on March 12, 2010 at 2:21 PM

I know they keep printing all these bad stories about the smart meters and something does seem to be wrong. But my Mom has had one for over a year and she hasn't noticed any problems. So, not all are bad but it does seem like enough that the problem needs to be fixed.