About This Blog
News, analysis and opinion on reforms being offered to improve schools, whether the ideas originate in Washington, Austin or Dallas. The online discussion will take education policy debates seriously, while it connects them to students from grade school through college. We welcome and read all letters from readers. Letters are selected for publication based on their clarity and brevity. They also are chosen to represent a diverse set of views on as many issues as possible. February 2010
Recent Posts
UT-Austin: What about using more of its endowment? UNT President Bataille's letter offers some clues Ken Starr: A good choice for Baylor or a bad one? Felipe Calderon's bet on Juarez's schools Baylor's new president: Ken Starr Bill White's smart school finance position A question for tonight's Democratic gubernatorial debate Big urban districts: Tom Luce shares his idea about spreading progress Recent Comments
Categories
dallasnews.com Blogs
|
February 19, 2010
The DMN's Holly Hacker and Bob Garrett reported this week on the budget cuts that state agencies are being asked to make to help correct the state's budget shortfall of anywhere between $10 billion to $15 billion. Universities naturally were on the list, including about $26.6 million in reductions for UT-Austin, $7.2 million for UT-Dallas and $8.3 million for UT-Arlington. We're in a hole, so everyone's going to have to live with less than ideal situations. University of Texas System Chancellor Francisco Cigarroa acknowledged that point in an editorial board interview Wednesday. But he also pointed out something that surprised me. While the UT-System got about a 6.7 percent increase in legislative appropriations during last year's session, UT-Austin got only about a 1.9 percent hike. That's because the state uses formulas based upon enrollment to help fund campuses. And UT-Austin has pretty much maxed out on its enrollment capacity. (UT-Dallas, on the other hand, is in a growth phase so it received a greater percentage increase in legislative appropriations.) Cigarroa said he was exploring ways the Legislature could fund schools other than through enrollment figures. He didn't have any specific suggestions, but that seems like a plausible path to go down. Perhaps the Legislature could reward things like cutting-edge research projects. Whatever the answer, we all have a vested interest in UT-Austin, as well as Texas A&M, climbing higher in the rankings of public universities. Students would benefit from top faculty and better student-teacher ratios. And the state would gain from the innovation that comes out of top public universities. I pressed Cigarroa some about expanding the amount that the UT System spends each year from its endowment, which puts UT in the top five or so of university endowments nationwide. I have no desire to see UT draw it down in a way that harms future generations. Hey, I have kids that I would like to go there someday! But UT should at least look at easing up on its yearly drawdown, which regents recently moved from 4.75 of the fund's value to 5 percent. That changed ended up flowing a few million more into UT-Austin. So, here's my question: How much could UT-Austin get if regents voted to start drawing down some more each year, eventually reaching, say, 5.5 percent or even 6 percent? (My understanding is that Yale spends 6 percent.) And what impact would that have on the multi-billion dollar endowment over time? I don't know the answers, but maybe a little more liberal use of the endowment could help UT get enough extra revenues without having to worry about those funding formulas. ![]() ![]() The entry "UT-Austin: What about using more of its endowment? " is tagged: UT-Austin February 18, 2010
So far, no one — not Gretchen Bataille, not Chancellor Lee Jackson, not the board of regents — has explained just why Bataille is so suddenly and shockingly leaving the presidency of the University of North Texas. But in a letter sent Tuesday to board members of the UNT Foundation, which raises money for UNT, Bataille leaves some intriguing clues. "I am sure that over time the reasons for my resignation will become clearer," she writes. Specific enough to say we will in fact learn the truth, yet vague enough that we don't know when or how the truth will emerge. Jackson says they tried for over a year to improve their relationship. But Bataille writes, "Until the past week I was anticipating a long and successful tenure as president of UNT." Which begs the question: what very recent event triggered her departure? Still no details. Bataille (who has a PhD in English) simply writes, "As many of you know, things change — or as both Chinua Achebe and William Butler Yeats wrote, sometimes 'things fall apart.'" Read Bataille's letter and Jackson's comments below. And you can read some of our recent stories here and here and here. And here's why our editorial board thinks we deserve an explanation. And for one UNT insider's thoughts on what really happened, check this out. ![]() ![]() The entry "UNT President Bataille's letter offers some clues " is tagged: Gretchen Bataille , Lee Jackson , University of North Texas
Is Ken Starr a good pr bad pick to lead Baylor? We had a discussion about this on the Opinion blog yesterday. Here is my take: We don't know yet. It depends upon how good of an administrator and fundraiser he turns out to be. Given his conservative Christian roots, I think he will fit in with part of the Baylor culture. And there probably will be fewer Baylor students and alums who are offended by his Clinton prosecution than those who are not offended, so I wouldn't dismiss him on just those grounds. It's not like he's becoming president of Berkeley. The bigger issue is whether or not he will be a good educator. He led Pepperdine Law School for a few years, so he has some track record. But I don't think we will know the answer for a while. What's your view? ![]() ![]() The entry "Ken Starr: A good choice for Baylor or a bad one?" is tagged: Ken Starr February 17, 2010
By agreeing last week to put more money in Juarez's schools, Mexican President Felipe Calderon placed a bet on his country's future. He may not have many good wagers to make given the violence along the border, but this was a smart one. The money won't turn Juarez around tomorrow, but it could later if students have an alternative to the lucrative but deadly life of a drug cartel member. Mexico's schools have notoriously been behind others internationally, despite some recent reforms to increase standards. The unions remain strong. But the fact Calderon diverted some money from the immediate need of reining in the drug violence shows that he gets the long-term picture. Mexico can't move beyond Third World status without a better education system. The U.S. could help with the situation, too. Thomas Friedman wrote recently in the New York Times that for every buck we spend on drones in Yemen we should spend an equal amount on building schools there. Well, the same principle applies to Mexico. For every buck we apply to fighting the narcos through military or policing means, we should give Mexico an equivalent amount in educational aid. As in Yemen, we will benefit in the long-run if Mexican students opt for a life in the global economy. By the way, our aid doesn't have to be entirely in dollars. We could get folks involved in turning around our urban schools to share during summer trips or through video-conferences the best ways to reach students. (Numerous Americans already provide scholarship aid to young Mexican students through churches and civic organizations.) An idea like this may sound naive, but look at it this way: Our security along the border depends upon fewer young Mexicans drifting into gang violence. Calderon's placing a strategic bet on schools being part of the answer. Why don't we do the same? ![]() ![]() The entry "Felipe Calderon's bet on Juarez's schools " is tagged: Ciudad Juarez , Felipe Calderon February 14, 2010
That's what KWTX in Waco is reporting. ![]() ![]() The entry "Baylor's new president: Ken Starr" is tagged: Baylor , Ken Starr February 11, 2010
Bill White said something interesting and different in Monday night's gubernatorial debate. Different for most Democrats, that is. "In addressing the question posed by the Dallas schoolteacher, Bill was recognizing the basic tensions that school districts and the legislature face. In trying to create a funding system that is fair and meets everyone's needs, there are competing principles. First, that all students, regardless of their economic situation and where in the state they live, have equal access to a quality education. Second, that local communities are able to make decisions about how much money they put towards education." This approach may sound like a no-brainer, but Democrats usually haven't been so forthcoming about letting parents put what they want into their child's school. They often focus on equalizing funding. What White is saying allows for the fact that some schools could end up with more money beyond what the state puts in through its funding formulas. More than the politics of his position, the state shouldn't shoo away parents who want to improve upon the state's investment, as long as they don't run afoul of school finance laws. This is both good policy and good politics. ![]() ![]() The entry "Bill White's smart school finance position" has no entry tags. February 8, 2010
Here's what I want to hear more about tonight in the Democratic gubernatorial debate: Bill White, the former Houston mayor who is the frontrunner, says that he wants to "take aggressive action against diploma mills that offer a high school diploma with little education." What does that mean? If it means that he is taking an Obama-like line and will shut down failing schools, which is not a popular position with some educators, then that' s a great idea. He's showing a willingness to take on teachers, a traditional Democratic bloc. More than that, he's not giving schools repeated chances to fail students if the campuses don't meet the standards of the state. But if he means something other than shutting down schools or redesigning them, two actions that have caused a stir when it comes to campuses like Dallas Spruce High School and Austin's Johnston High, then this is not good. It's easy to talk tough, but it's much harder to intervene on behalf of kids. There are all sorts of folks, from principals to teachers to parents to students, who prefer the status quo. Which does White mean? I hope we find out tonight. ![]() ![]() The entry "A question for tonight's Democratic gubernatorial debate" is tagged: Bill White
Editor's Note: Tom Luce, the Dallas attorney who heads the National Math and Science Initiative, is the second guest blogger to weigh in on our discussion about what it takes to spread progress across a big urban school district. A former assistant secretary of education under George W. Bush, Luce had these thoughts: The comment I encounter most often when talking about education across the country is that people say, "Oh my goodness. The problem is so overwhelming. Where do we start?" There is a lot of wailing and gnashing of teeth. But there is hope. We do have American programs that work. I believe we are proving at the National Math and Science Initiative that one of the most effective approaches to take is to identify those worthy programs that are "tried and true" and then share them with as many students as possible in order to do the most good. We are doing this by replicating math and science programs nationally that have a documented record of success. While there have been a host of pilot programs focused on the math and science achievement gap, NMSI is one of the few organizations that has rigorously researched and then replicated programs that have produced immediate and sustainable results. We then organize public-private partnerships and coalitions to fund the expansion of the programs, including corporate and foundation donations as well as federal and state funding. At this moment, NMSI is implementing two "lighthouse programs" that are showing the way ahead. Last year, our AP Training and Incentive Program to help students succeed in college-level classes produced a 52 percent increase in the Advanced Placement courses passed. That is nine times greater than the national average. Just as importantly, this program can help reduce the minority achievement gap - our participating schools showed a 71 percent increase in AP courses passed by African American and Hispanic students. We also are training a new generation of skilled math and science teachers through the UTeach program. This popular program is now being expanded to 20 universities around the country. Enrollment has nearly doubled. But we have dozens more universities on our waiting list. Both of these programs were commended in the 2005 National Academies' report "Rising Above the Gathering Storm" for having 10 years of data showing they produce positive results. Both of these programs are proving that you can take a good idea and make it even better by sharing it. "Scaling up" is the kind of commonsense approach that can make a real difference in our country's math and science gap. It's not just hopeful, it's do-able if more people pitch in.
![]() ![]() The entry "Big urban districts: Tom Luce shares his idea about spreading progress" is tagged: Tom Luce , Urban districts February 4, 2010
You could see this move coming a long time ago. A few years back, as states started getting nervous about No Child Left Behind holding them responsible for their students meeting the educational standards of their own states, their officials started fiddling with their collars and asking for more breathing room, even weakening their standards. Now comes the Obama administration, and its education secretary Arne Duncan is floating the idea of giving up on No Child's goal of seeing how many students in each school are making significant progress each year. He's also suggesting Congress give up on the goal of children being proficient in their subjects by 2014, calling that part of No Child "utopian." If the administration has its way with these two changes, let's just be honest: We as a nation will be giving up on kids, especially the many poor and minority children who are stuck in failing schools. We as a nation will be saying, we don't think you can learn at grade level. And we don't think we should ask you to achieve at an academic rate that will prepare you for a complicated world. That's the hard, cold reality, so if we decide to go down that road, let's just be realistic about what we are doing. Now, with that said, there are certainly ways and places to improve upon No Child Left Behind, which was passed nine years ago with overwhelming bipartisan majorities in both houses. No law is sacred, and there are ways to improve upon this bill. Here are a few: 1. Allow states to show progress with their students, even if not all are proficient. In short, let them distinguish between the improving ones and the terrible ones. That's called "differentiated consequences," and it's a concept that Bush Education Secretary Margaret Spellings used to let states show they are making some progress, just not enough progress. The idea allows schools to keep working with struggling students without being put on a black list. 2. Make sure the standards of each state prepare kids to graduate from high school with the skills for either a good trade job or college. Duncan talks about college/career readiness being a new goal, so pursue it, much like Texas did in adopting a new school accountability system in 2009. But let's be specific about what these terms mean and what we expect kids to do to earn that recognition. Fuzziness will not help them compete in a world where others are rushing to become the next global economic powers. 3. Give states more money to improve low-performing campuses. This is a no-brainer, as long as the concept is more money-and-strong standards. If it is more money and less accountability, then this reform will make no sense at all. 4. Extend the date that states must have their students learning at grade level. I liked the 2014 goal because that let states take their entering kindergarteners in 2002, when the law kicked in, and get them at grade level by the time they walked across the stage and collected their high school diploma in 2014. If Duncan and Congress think that's too hard, kick it back a few years. Just don't give up on it. Duncan talked about some of these changes in a recent New York Times article. But he really didn't give many details. Evidently, he thinks that's something he and Congress will work on over the next few months. What we need to hear next are precise details. This isn't about No Child per se, but the concepts in the landmark bill. If there's a way to build upon the idea of measuring students annually and seeing whether they are being left behind, then let's do it. But if that's not what's going on here, let's be honest with the students in Dallas, Los Angeles, Chicago and everyplace else. ![]() ![]() The entry "No Child Left Behind: Mend, don't end" is tagged: Arne Duncan , No Child Left Behind February 2, 2010
Whether the answer is yes or no, I'd like to know the reasons behind your decision. It's for a story I'm working on today. Feel free to post a comment or e-mail me directly. Thanks! ![]() ![]() The entry "Have you donated to your alma mater in this lousy economy?" is tagged: Universities February 1, 2010
(Editor's Note: Charles Miller, the Houston businessman who once headed the University of Texas board of regents, put out an email last week to a list of contacts around the nation about the effort by the Obama administration and numerous governors to create a common core of national standards for schools. The Education Front received his comments, which we are posting today. The email provoked an exchange among some of the nation's leading education experts.) Recent events have put a spotlight on a national debate and movement about setting curriculum standards for our K-12 public schools, that is, determining what it is we want our children to learn and who should decide that. Historically that has been a state function but recently there has been more than a lot of chatter about "national curriculum standards". An Obama administration challenge grant program---Race to The Top--- has elevated the issue and the Texas position has been especially noticeable and unique. ![]() ![]() The entry "National Curriculum Standards: What's Really Going On?" is tagged: national standards January 28, 2010
![]() ![]() The entry "Join us for live blogging during the GOP Gubernatorial Debate" has no entry tags.
Last week, Education Week gave Texas a D for its school funding policies, This week, the National Council on Teacher Quality has given us a C- for the quality of our teachers. It seems to me these issues -- school finance and teacher quality -- would make for an excellent line of questioning in Friday night's gubernatorial debate between Kay Hutchison and Rick Perry. As background, here are the grades the National Council on Teacher Quality, which is supported by a number of foundations, including the Gates Foundation and the Houston Foundation, gave to particular elements of our teacher corps: Delivering well-prepared teachers: C The report also made these findings: *Texas makes evidence of student learning the preponderant criterion in teacher evaluations, but it does not require annual evaluations for all teachers. *Texas's tenure policies do not consider what should count the most about teacher performance: classroom effectiveness. The state does not require that districts collect or consider evidence of teacher effectiveness as part of tenure decisions. *Texas makes it too difficult for districts to attempt to dismiss poor performers by failing to articulate a policy for dismissing teachers for poor performance separate from dismissal policies for criminal and morality violations. Texas also allows multiple appeals of dismissals. *Texas's requirements for the preparation of elementary teachers do not ensure that these teachers are well prepared to teach mathematics. While the state's policies do address the science of reading instruction, Texas fails to ensure that its elementary teachers are well prepared to teach reading through an appropriate test. *Texas does more than most states to exercise oversight of its teacher preparation programs. *Although Texas claims to offer an alternative route to certification, its route is not selective and does not provide preparation that meets the immediate needs of new teachers. *Texas sets low expectations for what special education teachers should know, despite state and federal expectations that special education students should meet the same high standards as other students. I'm particularly struck by how hard it is for the state to get rid of bad teachers. This has been a problem for at least 15 years and it is really frustrating. Sure, teachers deserve due process. But if they aren't effective, they don't deserve a job that comes at the expense of a child's education. I sure hope we hear about these issues in the governor's race. ![]() ![]() The entry "Teacher quality: Here's an issue for Friday's governor's debate" is tagged: teacher quality January 27, 2010
Arne Duncan just did a conference call with reporters and the headlines are: *Obama's cutting the domestic budget elsewhere, but not in education, at least not in aggregate. Overall, education spending would go up six percent if the president's 2011 budget is adopted. *The budget will focus on a "massive investment" in making college more accessible. *Obama considers education the civil rights issue of our day and the way out of poverty. *Duncan wants to see the Elementary and Secondary Education Act reuathorized this year. He cited bipartisan support for the renewal, although he acknowledged it needs to get done by August or mid-term elections will take over. (ESEA is the law that governs No Child Left Behind.) I agree education is the civil rights issue of our day. And while money isn't always the answer to our problems, and I'm a deficit hawk who wants to see entitlements overhauled, I'm glad to see him pushing forward with investments here, especially in trying to get more students into college. We can't let up on this front. ![]() ![]() The entry "Arne Duncan reports on Obama's education plans for this year" is tagged: 2011 budget , Arne Duncan , Barack Obama
![]() ![]() The entry "Join us for live blogging during the State of the Union speech" has no entry tags. January 26, 2010
State Education Commissioner Robert Scott said Tuesday that the next generation of student tests in Texas will be called STAAR - or the State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness. Scott announced the change from TAKS to STAAR at an annual conference of school administrators in Austin, saying students will first take the new exams in the 2011-12 school year. The STAAR will include the 12 new end-of-course exams for high school students that will be launched with freshmen entering school in the fall of 2011. Students will take three end-of-course tests in each of four core subject areas - English, math, science and social studies. To get a diploma, students will have to get a passing average in each subject area as well as pass their classes. Testing in grades 3-8 also will be modified as the STAAR is introduced into schools and results from grade to grade will be evaluated against performance standards for the English III and Algebra II exams administered to high school students. Scott said the new tests will be more rigorous than the TAKS exams, which have been around since 2003 and which were used in deciding whether to promote students in grades 3, 5 and 8. In addition, Scott said the new performance rating system for schools - based on STAAR results - will debut in 2013. ![]() ![]() The entry "TAKS to be replaced by STAAR in 2011-12 school year" has no entry tags.
I don't know whether President Obama's spending freeze will affect his new plans for Race to the Top awards. If so, then what I'm saying here is moot. But if the next round of Race to the Top spending is still in play, something like $1.35 billion for the 2011 fiscal year, then here are some thoughts: I like that Obama and Education Secretary Arne Duncan are proposing a new wrinkle in RTP funding by allowing school districts to apply directly to Washington for funds. Local districts wouldn't have to go through their states for funding in the next round of awards. Sure, this new approach is in effect a political dig at Rick Perry for refusing Race to the Top funds for Texas this year. But the real emphasis should be on whether this change could help local districts. And I think it could. I mean, the money could help them as they try to "repurpose" failing schools, gauge teachers for their effectiveness and reward school districts that are raising the achievement bar. I don't see what's so wrong with that. The goal should be to improve student progress and those bucks could help here in Dallas or in any other local district. ![]() ![]() The entry "Race to the Top funding: giving local districts direct access" is tagged: Race to the Top January 21, 2010
Last week a national report gave Texas a D+ for its school funding system. Today, Texas lawmakers said they'll study ways to improve school finance. Granted, it's just a coincidence. But it's another reminder that like most states, Texas' method of funding public education is far from perfect. (For another local, recent reminder, check out Diane Rado's story about Dallas ISD having to share property tax money with other districts.) Debates over school finance usually focus on two core issues: Adequacy (How much money is spent overall, and is it enough to achieve our state's educational goals?) and Equity (no matter the size of the financial pie, is it split fairly among school districts?). Judging by the following comments, not to mention the current economy, I bet Texas lawmakers will concentrate more on the latter. From Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst: "Few issues are more critical to the future of Texas than the quality of our public schools and the education they provide to our young people. I expect the members of this committee to engage the public and come up with the best ideas to ensure that Texas is using taxpayers funds responsibly to provide our students with a world-class education." From House Speaker Joe Straus: "Every child in Texas public schools deserves a quality education. While we fund important priorities, we must also ensure that we use each taxpayer dollar wisely." School finance eggheads can read the whole release by clicking below. ![]() ![]() The entry "You say school finance, I say school fun-ance" is tagged: David Dewhurst , Joe Straus , School finance , Texas legislature January 15, 2010
State Board of Education members Friday narrowly approved a change in proposed U.S. history standards that calls on students to be taught about leading conservative groups from the 1980s and 1990s - with no similar requirement for liberal groups. Pushed by board member Don McLeroy, R-College Station, the provision says students should learn about "key organizations and individuals of the conservative resurgence of the 1980s and 1990s" including Eagle Forum founder Phyllis Schlafly. The amendment was approved on a 7-6 vote, with the social conservative bloc on the board providing all but one of the affirmative voters. McLeroy explained that the history standards already were "rife with leftist political periods and events - the populists, the progressives, the New Deal and the Great Society. Including material about the conservative resurgence...provides some political balance to the document." Among the conservative groups that will be covered in history are the National Rifle Association, Moral Majority, Heritage Foundation and Contract with America. Board members, who began consideration of social studies standards on Wednesday, continued their deliberations on Thursday, adopting scores of amendments - with McLeroy offering the bulk of the changes. Among the proposals that divided board members was one to add the late Sen. Edward Kennedy to a list of important historical figures that students should learn about. Republicans voted down the board's five Democrats on that amendment and also rejected a second proposal to include the Kennedy family in the standards. ![]() ![]() The entry "Conservatives in, Ted Kennedy out of U.S. history standards" has no entry tags. January 14, 2010
The person I'm most interested in watching tonight in the GOP gubernatorial debate is Debra Medina. If she's articulate and informed, she could be the Ross Perot of this race. The tea-party Republican could make this race very uncomfortable for both Rick Perry and Kay Hutchison, both of whom have been trying to win Medina's supporters. I also will be listening for what Hutchison says about broadening the GOP tent. That was one of her early themes, but it seems like she has been trying to out-border, out anti-tax, out-conservative Perry since then. If she really believes in a big tent, she's got to give moderates a reason to come into it. So far, she hasn't. See you at 7. ![]() ![]() The entry "The Medina Factor" is tagged: Texas GOP primary |
Lee Jackson has a Napoleon complex. He
This all goes back to Rick Perry and hi
Ahh, politics...seems clearly Jackson j
Maybe those budget reductions would imp
that's what you get for hiring a woman
Probably some big bad tough man had a p
Some of you should add 2 + 2 on this an
AKA: A giant scandal is about to unrave
While "Whitewater" is behind us "Blackw
It sounds like White's "position" is a