Off the Kuff Rotating Header Image

Friday random ten: Birthday time

Today is my birthday, so to celebrate I’m going to be lazy and just repeat last year’s birthday-themed Friday random ten, with one addition:

1. Birthday – The Beatles
2. Rock and Roll Never Forgets – Bob Seger
3. Happy Birthday – Weird Al Yankovic
4. Too Old To Rock And Roll, Too Young To Die – Jethro Tull
5. The Birthday Song – Asylum Street Spankers
6. Old, Fat, and Drunk – Austin Lounge Lizards
7. When I’m 64 – The Beatles
8. It’s My Party (And I’ll Cry If I Want To) – Leslie Gore
9. Glory Days – Bruce Springsteen
10. Still Crazy After All These Years – Paul Simon
11. The Birthday Dirge – various artists
12. Older – They Might Be Giants

The last two are, of course, one for good luck and the pinch to grow an inch. Maybe next year I’ll do something different, assuming I can still remember promising to do so. What’s making you feel old this week?

Entire song list report: Started with “Came For A Dance” by The Mollys. Finished with “Christmas Time Is Here”, the vocal version not the instrumental version, by Vince Guaraldi from the “A Charlie Brown Christmas” soundtrack. That was song #774 and almost but not quite the end of my “Christmas” music, a total of 132 songs this week. I’ll be back with a special Saturday version of the Friday random ten tomorrow. Until then, have a happy Friday.

Posted in: Music.

RIP, Sister Damian Kuhn

This is the sweetest story you’ll read all week.

One spring season when the Astros were in a particularly bad slump, Sister Damian Kuhn made her way to owner Drayton McLane’s office, dressed in her traditional blue habit and veil.

“She was our No. 1 fan, and she always took it personal,” recalled McLane. He told her it was time to start praying.

After a long sigh, she replied, “Drayton, my knees are bloodied. It’s going to take more than that!”

Now McLane and the baseball team’s players are struggling over a different loss — the death of Sister Kuhn on Monday, just months shy of her 90th birthday.

She, as a good Roman Catholic, and McLane, as a good Baptist, connected after he noticed the nun’s unabashed enthusiasm for the team whenever she managed to snare a ticket for a game at the Astrodome that otherwise would have gone unused.

“She was hard to miss in a crowd,” McLane said, since her head was covered with a habit instead of a ball cap.

Thinking it was unbecoming for a nun to shout, she once told the Houston Chronicle that she tried hard to just clap and give high-fives. She never jeered or heckled, and always believed that next crack of the bat might be an Astros’ home run.

It just tickles me that she thought shouting was unbecoming, but high fives were okay. Not that I’m arguing with a nun, mind you – I’m a good Catholic boy, I know better than that. Go read the whole thing, you’ll be glad you did. Rest in peace, Sister Damian.

Posted in: Baseball.

Judicial Q&A: John Stephen Liles

(Note: I am running a series of Q&As for judicial candidates in contested Democratic primaries. There are a lot of judicial races on the ballot in Harris County this election, and so this is intended to help introduce the candidates and their experiences to those who plan to vote in March. I am running these responses in the order that I receive them from the candidates. I will also be conducting some in-person interviews of candidates who will be involved in contested primaries for non-judicial offices. Please see my 2010 Election page for a full list of Q&As and interviews.)

1. Who are you, and what are you running for?

My name is John Stephen Liles. I was born and raised in Houston, am a fifth generation Texan and was educated in Houston’s public schools. I graduated from University of Texas, Austin and obtained a law degree from South Texas College of Law in 1981. Following law school, I started my own law practice dealing primarily in criminal law, later broadening my representation to juvenile delinquencies and Child Protective Services cases involving injured and abused children. I have over 28 years of trial experience and am a candidate for the position of judge of the 314th Juvenile District Court.

2. What kind of cases does this court hear?

The 314th Juvenile District Court deals with juveniles between the ages of 10 and 17 who have been charged with a criminal offense, including both misdemeanors and felonies. The court also hears cases involving abused or neglected children where the state has intervened through Child Protective Services.

3. Why are you running for this particular bench?

I am running for this bench because I believe I can make a positive difference in the lives of the children and families who appear in juvenile court. The juveniles of Harris County need someone who will bring fresh ideas and new programs and services for their rehabilitation. The children need someone who will not just plod along with what is easy or what has been accepted as adequate in the past. The children of Harris County deserve someone who will continually improve the system and think outside the box and strive to allow them to become contributing members of society.

4. What are your qualifications for this job?

My qualifications to become judge of the 314th Juvenile District Court are superior to anyone else running in this election. I have been a trial attorney in Texas for 28 years having had over 150 trials dealing in criminal, juvenile and Child Protective Services issues. Everyday for the last 28 years, I have fought for those up against a system that is not always fair for the children and families that are before it. I have dedicated my life to being the voice that speaks for what is right and fair, but more importantly, I have focused on what can be done to ensure that juveniles receive proper treatment and rehabilitation.

5. Why is this race important?

This race is the most important because how justice is applied in juvenile court not only affects a child for the rest of his/her life, but it also will affect how our society will evolve for the future. If we want to have a prosperous and harmonious life in Harris County, we must not allow our efforts to fail in rehabilitating a child for it is the child who is the future of country.

6. Why should people vote for you in the primary?

People should vote for me in the primary because I am not running as a politician or past appointed judge trying to continue the same old tired inefficient programs. I am running as an outsider who wants to make a positive difference in our society. If elected, I will be a judge who will continually strive to improve the rehabilitative, job training and mental therapy programs available to juveniles in order to ensure that no effort is overlooked in striving for the goal of molding juveniles into becoming productive members of society.

My basic judicial philosophy is that we can strive for the rehabilitation and treatment of a juvenile offender because if we don’t, society will pay for the incarceration of a man.

Posted in: Election 2010.

Judicial Q&A: Olan Boudreaux

(Note: I am running a series of Q&As for judicial candidates in contested Democratic primaries. There are a lot of judicial races on the ballot in Harris County this election, and so this is intended to help introduce the candidates and their experiences to those who plan to vote in March. I am running these responses in the order that I receive them from the candidates. I will also be conducting some in-person interviews of candidates who will be involved in contested primaries for non-judicial offices. Please see my 2010 Election page for a full list of Q&As and interviews.)

1. Who are you, and what are you running for?

I am Olan Boudreaux, and I am a candidate for Judge of the 190th Civil District Court in Harris County. I was born in New Orleans, and came to Houston in 1971 to attend court reporting school. I completed college and law school at night, while working full time as a court reporter to support my family. My wife, Mary Anne, and I have four daughters, five grandchildren (four girls and one boy) and another granddaughter is expected in June.

2. What kind of cases does this court hear?

The Civil District Courts hear civil lawsuits, with the exception of family law cases and probate cases. Examples of the kinds of cases filed in these courts include personal injury cases arising out of car wrecks, medical malpractice, defective products, or premises injuries, as well as many others. In addition, the court hears business disputes, including disputes over contracts, partnerships, real estate matters, employment, construction, oil and gas, and many other forms of civil litigation, ranging from the simple to the very complex.

3. Why are you running for this particular bench?

I am running for a civil district court because my entire career as a lawyer has focused on representing clients in courts such as this one, including those in Harris County and numerous other counties in Texas, as well as several other states. I have seen good judges and bad judges, and I have learned that a good judge is one who treats all of the parties with dignity and respect, who listens to the evidence and the arguments in the case, and who manages the court’s docket so that the parties can get their cases resolved without having to spend their life savings just getting the case tried.

4. What are your qualifications for this job?

I have been practicing law in civil trial courts for over 25 years. I am board certified in both civil trial law and personal injury trial law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization. I was appointed by two different presidents of the State Bar of Texas to serve as chair of the Texas Board of Legal Specialization.

In addition, I have been elected to membership in the American Board of Trial Advocates, recognized in Best Lawyers in America, Texas Monthly’s “Super Lawyers,” and H Magazines “Top Lawyers in Houston” and “Top Lawyers for the People.” All of these honors are based on professional recognition by other lawyers.

I graduated first in my law school class, received the highest score on the Texas bar exam in February 1984, and had a 4.0 GPA throughout my undergraduate career. I have lectured and published materials for CLE programs throughout Texas on issues related to civil trial practice.

Please visit my campaign website, www.olanboudreaux.com, for more details about my qualifications and experience.

5. Why is this race important?

All of the judicial races are important. People come before the civil district courts to protect their rights, and they have a right to expect that the judges in these courts are qualified both in terms of legal experience as well as life experiences, and that they will make sound rulings based on the rule of law and not some political agenda. Often the decisions judges make will have a dramatic impact on the lives of the parties before the bench, and the citizens of Harris County need to elect judges who can appreciate the importance of every case, and who have the work ethic to insure that all parties leave the courthouse knowing that they were treated fairly, regardless of whether they won or lost.

6. Why should people vote for you in the primary?

All my life I have worked to develop and maintain a reputation for integrity and hard work. My experiences over the past 25 years of practicing before courts just like the 190th Civil District Court have prepared me to be the kind of judge the citizens of Harris County have a right to expect of their elected officials. My campaign has received support from a broad range of diverse groups, including the Coalition of Elected Democratic Officials (which is made up of 18 elected officials in Harris County on the federal, state and local level), the Harris County AFL-CIO Council, the Area V Democrats, the Baptist Ministers Association of Houston and Vicinity, the Northeast Harris County Baptist Ministers Alliance, the Association of Women Attorneys, the Mexican-American Bar Association, the Pasadena Bar Association, Key-PAC, Transport Workers Union of America, Local 260, and the Latino Labor Leadership Council of Southeast Texas, among others.

My campaign has also been endorsed by numerous community and political leaders, including former Governor Mark White, Ambassador Arthur Schechter, Representative Sylvester Turner, former Chairman of the Harris County Democratic Party, John Odam, former Dean of South Texas College of Law, James Alfini, former President of NAACP-Houston, Howard Jefferson, former City Attorney for the City of Houston, Benjamin Hall, III, former President of the Houston Bar Association, Roland Garcia, along with many others listed on my campaign website: www.olanboudreaux.com.

In summary, people should vote for me because I will bring to the bench the qualifications, experience, dedication and integrity that equip me to serve the citizens of Harris County in this important office. If elected, I am committed to working hard to insure that the people of Harris County are proud of their decision to choose me to be the Judge of the 190th Civil District Court.

Posted in: Election 2010.

Endorsement watch: Another split for the Lite Guvs

In the Democratic primary for Lieutenant Governor, the Chron goes with Ronnie Earle.

As lieutenant governor, Earle says, he would be able to work across party lines to reach consensus and avoid paralyzing the legislative process.

“I have a long history of working with anybody who is willing to sit down at the table and work things out,” Earle told the Chronicle editorial board. He says he would relish the collegial give and take in the Senate in shaping policy.

At the same time, Earle makes it clear he would not support controversial voter ID legislation, saying voter fraud is not a problem in Texas and the bill “reeks of oppression” of certain demographic groups.

If elected, he promises to open the Senate process to public input and greater transparency, just as he sought as district attorney to get community members more involved in the criminal justice process.

And the Star Telegram recommends Linda Chavez-Thompson.

Known as a tough but reasonable negotiator, Chavez-Thompson says she wants to be a consensus builder in the state Senate, tackling the issues of education funding and the projected budget shortfall. She favors passing a local-option funding bill for transportation.

Chavez-Thompson said the Republican’s leadership in gerrymandering congressional districts in 2003 bordered on “stupidness — if that’s a word.”

Because she would bring a fresh perspective, a commitment to work with both sides of the aisle and an emphasis on the state’s public schools and higher education, the Star-Telegram Editorial Board recommends Linda Chavez-Thompson for lieutenant governor in the Democratic primary.

Chavez-Thompson also picked up the BOR endorsement.

Linda Chavez-Thompson got her first job in Texas at the age of ten, working for thirty-cents an hour hoeing cotton with her family. She picked cotton, cleaned homes, and learned English when she should have been finishing high school — all so she could support her family. In her youth, she learned the values of protecting Texas families and ensuring every Texas child has the best education possible. It is amazing to hear Linda Chavez-Thompson talk about how her days growing up in Texas instilled in her the strength, intelligence, and passion she has carried with her throughout her life.

The rest of her lifetime of public service is well documented. From a ten-year old picking cotton in West Texas, she became the first woman and first person of color to serve as Executive Vice-President of the National AFL-CIO. And in that time, she — unlike her wealthy billionaire opponent, incumbent David Dewhurst — always put the best interests of Texas families first. One fellow blogger wrote passionately about why she is supporting Linda Chavez-Thompson:

Until we elect somebody like Linda, who understands what the rest of Texas goes through, our state won’t develop policies designed for everybody to succeed. Linda Chavez-Thompson has been working for those less fortunate not just her entire career, but her entire life.

We agree. We endorse Linda Chavez-Thompson for Lieutenant Governor, and hope you get to hear her story directly very soon.

Keeping the “split” theme going, Ronnie Earle had won the BOR readers poll, but their editorial board went the other way.

Posted in: Election 2010.

Sugar Land moves forward on getting a baseball team

They couldn’t get the Dynamo, but the city of Sugar Land is making progress on landing a baseball team.

The city council of Sugar Land agreed this week to work with a company that specializes in getting cities to build minor-league baseball parks and get teams to go in them.

The city approved a Memorandum of Understanding with Opening Day Partners that will provide an exclusive window for the two sides to forge a plan to build a stadium and see what level of minor-league team should be in it.

Sugar Land has already designated an entertainment district near Highway 59 (approved by voters in a special election) to hold the stadium, and the hope is to have it ready for the 2012 season, with public and private financing.

“This is a project that combines more than a decade of citizen surveys, parks master plans, City Comprehensive Plans and Economic Development plans with the efforts of a citizen task force,” Mayor James Thompson told Fort Bend Now. “We are looking forward to the possibility of working with Opening Day Partners to make our vision a reality.”

Cool. They’ve been working on this for at least two years now. Still a ways to go, but it is progress. I’d catch a game there when and if they succeed. Bob, Juanita, and Banjo have more.

Posted in: Baseball.

Bill Watterson speaks

The reclusive “Calvin & Hobbes” creator gives his first public interview in 20 years. I had hoped they’d ask him about those “peeing Calvin” stickers, but according to Wikipedia, he has actually addressed that before, so no big deal. (See Ask Metafilter for more.) Anyway, if you’re at all a fan, you should read it, and the accompanying story about the 15th anniversary (!) of “C&H”’s last strip, as well. Check ‘em out.

Posted in: Books.

CD18 public forum at Rice

From the inbox:

Forum
Houston Enriches Rice Education (HERE)
Speaker: Robert Stein – Moderator
Lena Gohlman Fox Professor of Political Science
Rice University
District 18 Congressional Political Forum
Monday, February 22, 2010
6:00 PM  to 9:00 PM
Rice Memorial Chapel  RMC/Ley Student Center
Rice University
6100 Main St
Houston, Texas, USA
An open forum for 18th Congressional District candidates.

The Houston Enriches Rice Education (H.E.R.E.) Project is an innovative curricular and research initiative that advances Rice’s relationship to the larger Houston community and enhances faculty research and both undergraduate and graduate education. The H.E.R.E Speakers Series advances understanding of Houston’s impact on national issues of religiosity, social justice, political equality, etc, by inviting noteworthy figures to give public lectures on related topics.

A map of the campus, which has a “find a building” feature, is here. Events like this are great opportunities to hear what the candidates are saying, so check it out.

Posted in: Election 2010.

Objections to Special Master’s findings on Sharon Keller filed

Yesterday was the deadline for the examiner in the Sharon Keller case to file objections to the Special Master’s report. The examiner did have some objections, and they have now been filed.

The prosecutors’ objection said the special master who presided over the case, state District Judge David Berchelmann, focused on the “irrelevant” matter of what caused Richard’s execution rather than on what they said were Keller’s willful and incompetent actions.

Berchelmann faulted some of Keller’s behavior but maintained that she violated no laws. He said the Texas Defender Service — which represented Richard — bore “the bulk of fault for what occurred on Sept. 25, 2007.”

Berchelmann said Keller shouldn’t lose her job or be punished “beyond the public humiliation she has surely suffered.”

The Texas Defender Service earlier disputed Berchelmann’s characterization, and the prosecutors said Wednesday, “The issue here is not TDS’s conduct, but Judge Keller’s conduct.”

The prosecutors asked that the Commission on Judicial Conduct, which will consider the special master’s report, “determine such consequences to Judge Keller’s conduct as the Commission finds to be supported by the findings and to be just.” They said her conduct authorizes action under an article of the Texas Constitution that allows for discipline, censure or removal from office. Removal would require further proceedings.

I recommend you read the objections, or at least Grits’ summary of them. To put it bluntly, the examiner tore Berchelmann’s report up most impressively. For those of you who, like me, think that Keller has not been disciplined enough for her behavior, this offers some hope that she still may face real sanctions. It’s up to the Commission now.

Posted in: Crime and Punishment.

Judicial Q&A: Steve Reilley

(Note: I am running a series of Q&As for judicial candidates in contested Democratic primaries. There are a lot of judicial races on the ballot in Harris County this election, and so this is intended to help introduce the candidates and their experiences to those who plan to vote in March. I am running these responses in the order that I receive them from the candidates. I will also be conducting some in-person interviews of candidates who will be involved in contested primaries for non-judicial offices. Please see my 2010 Election page for a full list of Q&As and interviews.)

1. Who are you, and what are you running for?

My name is Steve Reilley and I am running for Judge of Harris County Civil Court at Law No. 1. I worked my way through college and law school at the University of Texas, and I am a founding partner of Thompson & Reilley, a recognized and growing litigation firm. I have worked as a litigator in Houston for fifteen years representing plaintiffs and defendants in state and federal court. Besides practicing law, I have volunteered on various community projects including reading programs in HISD schools and fundraising efforts for the Houston Area Women’s Center. As a volunteer lawyer, I contribute my time to the Houston Volunteer Lawyer Service, to victims of Hurricane Ike, to the Dispute Resolution Center, and to state and local bar committees.

2. What kind of cases does this court hear?

These courts hear civil cases that can have a big impact on the everyday lives of average Harris County residents. Most of the matters considered by the four county civil courts at law are personal injury cases, contract disputes, and collection suits in which the amount of controversy falls between $500 and $100,000. The county civil courts at law also hear appeals from the Justice of the Peace courts and certain administrative matters including worker’s compensation act claims. Importantly, these courts are responsible for eminent domain and condemnation cases with unlimited amounts in controversy.

3. Why are you running for this particular bench?

I am running for this bench because I passionately believe that the Democrats must not waste an opportunity to reform and improve the county civil courts at law. I requested that the party slate me for a county civil court at law bench rather than a district court bench even though I am equally qualified to serve as a district court judge, because I believe that we need strong and experienced candidates running for every position on the ballot.

4. What are your qualifications for this job?

Before founding my law firm, I worked in the Consumer Protection Division of the Texas Attorney General’s Office, and I worked for Texas Supreme Court Justice Lloyd Doggett. I have been lead counsel in nearly 2,000 cases. I have tried cases and handled appeals in federal and state court. Also, I am a trained mediator, and I have participated in 500 mediations as an advocate or as a mediator. I have been representing my own clients as lead counsel in County Civil Court at Law No. 1 for nearly fifteen years. I am the only Democratic candidate in this race with any experience in this court. I also have worked on litigation involving issues of eminent domain, which is an important aspect of the work of the county civil court at law judge.

5. Why is this race important?

For too long these courts have been given little thought and too many of the judges lacked relevant experience before taking the bench. As a result frustrated lawyers have turned to the district courts to resolve disputes that would be more appropriately handled in the county civil courts. We need judges with experience who can directly address the problems in the county civil court system including the high cost of litigating even modest-sized cases, administrative inefficiencies, and the lack of transparency in court’s procedures, rulings, and appointments.

6. Why should people vote for you in the primary?

Voters should support me in the primary because I have the right experience and the right ideas for improving this court. I know this court and have a plan to restore trust in this court by making it efficient, transparent, and fair. We need to nominate experienced Democrats, and I am the candidate with the appropriate experience in this race. I also am the only candidate with any demonstrated involvement with the Democratic Party including voting in primaries, volunteering on campaigns, and serving as a delegate to the State Democratic Convention.

Based on my experience, my plans for improving this court, and my involvement in the party, I have been honored to receive the endorsements of nearly every Democratic and nonpartisan endorsing organization to date, including: The Coalition of Elected Democrats, Harris County Democrats, Harris County Tejano Democrats, Houston Black American Democrats (H-BAD), The AFL-CIO, The GLBT Political Caucus, Democracy for Houston, Area V Democrats, The Association of Women Attorneys, The Mexican American Bar Association of Houston (MABAH), the Latino Labor Leadership Council of Southeast Texas, and the Houston Young Stonewall Democrats.

To learn more about my candidacy or to join my campaign to reform Harris County Civil Court at Law No. 1, please visit www.ReilleyforJudge.com.

Posted in: Election 2010.

Judicial Q&A: Mary Galligan

(Note: I am running a series of Q&As for judicial candidates in contested Democratic primaries. There are a lot of judicial races on the ballot in Harris County this election, and so this is intended to help introduce the candidates and their experiences to those who plan to vote in March. I am running these responses in the order that I receive them from the candidates. I will also be conducting some in-person interviews of candidates who will be involved in contested primaries for non-judicial offices. Please see my 2010 Election page for a full list of Q&As and interviews.)

1. Who are you, and what are you running for?

My name is Mary Galligan and I am a Democrat running for Judge of Harris County Probate Court No. 3.

I have been a resident of Houston since 1977. I graduated from the University of Houston Law School in 1985. My husband, Jeff Galligan, is a teacher at St. Pius X High School. We have one son, Michael, who is a student at South Texas College of Law and a daughter-in-law, Eileen Romero Galligan, who is a teacher at Yes Prep.

2. What kind of cases does this court hear?

Although Harris County Probate Court No. 3 has jurisdiction (as do the other 3 probate courts) over claims brought by or against an executor, administrator or guardian of an estate, guardianship and will contests, will construction cases and claims related to trusts, there are relatively few actual trials in probate court. Most of the probate courts’ business involves administration matters. The probate courts are responsible for monitoring decedents’ estates and guardianships which can go on for years. They must review and approve inventories and accountings, determine the priority and validity of creditor claims, evaluate evidence to determine who a decedents’ heirs are, and make sure that a prospective ward’s rights have been preserved when a guardianship is instituted.

Most of the public’s contact with the probate courts occurs when a will is probated. This involves a non adversarial proceeding during which the probate judge must be well acquainted with the rules relating to what is a valid will and what is involved in a valid will execution.

Probate Court No. 3 (along with Probate Court No. 4) also has a special charge – administering the mental health docket. During the mental health docket, the judge must determine whether there is sufficient evidence for there to be court ordered mental health services and/or court ordered administration of psychoactive medication.

3. Why are you running for this particular bench?

It is clear from the media coverage of the probate courts (in the Houston Chronicle and in other publications) and the reaction to that media coverage that the public has lost faith in our probate courts. This loss of faith has come about mainly because of the practice of judges soliciting campaign contributions from the attorneys who regularly appear before them. Because of this practice, the public has the perception that justice is for sale.

I would like to take a step toward restoring the public’s confidence in the probate courts by refusing to accept campaign contributions from those attorneys who regularly practice in probate court. I have sent a letter to the members of the Probate, Trusts and Estate Section of the Houston Bar Association informing them that, while I would appreciate their vote and moral support, I will not accept any campaign contributions from them. I have also issued a challenge to the incumbent Judge of Harris County Probate Court No. 3 to join me in not accepting campaign contributions from probate attorneys. He has not responded. Copies of these letters are posted on my website at www.galliganforprobatejudge.com.

4. What are your qualifications for this job?

Unlike my opponent who has never been an attorney of record in a probate case in Harris County, I have practiced in the probate courts for over 22 years. I was Board certified in Estate Planning and Probate Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization in 1992 and I serve on the Texas Board of Legal Specialization Advisory Committee which is charged with the responsibility of reviewing the qualifications of candidates who wish to become board certified. I am an adjunct professor at South Texas College of Law where I teach a class on Counseling the Terminally Ill. I am the founding partner of Galligan & Manning, a law firm that focuses its practice on estate planning, probate and probate litigation and I am the recipient of Martindale-Hubbel’s highest national peer review rating of AV for legal abilities and high ethical standards.

5. Why is this race important?

Of all the courts in Harris County, probate court is the one court that touches almost every person in the county. It is the court that people need to turn to at the most vulnerable times in their lives – the death or incapacity of a loved one. That is why it is important that a probate court judge have the experience and expertise to help those going through the process deal with issues that can appear overwhelming.

6. Why should people vote for you in the primary?

There are three reasons why people should vote for me in the primary. First is my experience. A probate judge needs to be thoroughly acquainted with the Probate Code. The Probate Code contains many procedural provisions that are not included in the Rules of Civil Procedure (in fact the Rules of Civil Procedure apply only in the event there is not a Probate Code provision that governs). My opponent has had little or no experience with probate law.

Second is my commitment to reform. I have pledged not to accept campaign contributions from attorneys who regularly practice in probate court. Neither my primary opponent, nor the incumbent judge, is willing to make that pledge.

Third is my electability. I have been endorsed by every organization that has endorsed in this race and I am the stronger candidate to run against the incumbent judge in the general election.

Posted in: Election 2010.

Texas takes a stand in favor of global warming

There was a time when stuff like this would have surprised me. But then, there was a time when being anti-science wasn’t a point of pride for the Republican Party.

Texas on Tuesday became the first state to challenge the Environmental Protection Agency’s finding that gases blamed for global warming threaten public health.

Gov. Rick Perry and other Texas officials said the federal finding is based on flawed science and would harm the state’s economy.

The EPA issued the finding two months ago in an attempt to regulate carbon dioxide and other heat-trapping gases as pollutants under the Clean Air Act.

Such rules would have a profound impact on Texas, which pumps more carbon dioxide into the air than any other state because of its scores of coal-fired power plants, refineries and other industrial facilities.

“The EPA’s misguided plan paints a big target on the backs of Texas agriculture and energy producers and the hundreds of thousands of Texans they employ,” Perry said in a statement. “This legal action is being taken to protect the Texas economy and the jobs that go with it, as well as defend Texas’ freedom to continue our successful environmental strategies free from federal overreach.”

Texas asked the U.S. Court of Appeals in Washington, D.C., to review the finding, with its petition coming on the heels of similar filings by business and conservative groups.

There are many things about which Rick Perry and the state of Texas is officially indifferent, ranging from food stamps to getting a complete Census count and on and on. But when business and conservative groups say “Sue!”, he’s right there to reply “Which court?” I believe this effort will go nowhere and will waste a lot of money in the process, but it will keep Perry’s base happy, and that’s what really matters. BOR, SciGuy, Rep. Mike Villarreal, and Texas Vox have more.

Posted in: The great state of Texas.

Bellaire officially opposes Dynamo Westpark Stadium

Bellaire City Council unanimously passed a resolution Monday night that opposes the construction of a Dynamo Stadium on Westpark.

“To ignore it and not speak up for our residents would be the wrong thing to do,” said Mayor Cindy Siegel, after introducing the resolution, which stated:

“Whereas, the proposed Midway stadium site is not compatible with the existing Bellaire and Houston residential neighborhoods that surround this site and would negatively impact their quality of life with significant noise, traffic gridlock, cut-through traffic, event parking on the CenterPoint Energy easement immediately adjacent to Bellaire and Houston homes’ backyards, and overflow event parking on Bellaire and Houston residential neighborhood streets.”

The council vote came on the heels of continued negative reaction from residents after news of the Midway proposal surfaced in late January.

“The Dynamo stadium in that area would be a logistical nightmare,” said resident Cynthia Freeman to the council.

Councilman Will Hickman said he conducted a survey of 110 residents on the issue and revealed that 89 percent of the respondents oppose any stadium plan near city limits.

Mayor Siegel was an early opponent of this idea. The proposed location is outside the Bellaire city limits so the resolution has no force, but it is a pretty clear expression of what the locals want. Given that the folks on the East End are strongly in favor of the original downtown stadium idea, perhaps this will give that project another nudge. Dynamo President Oliver Luck certainly hasn’t given up on that.

Dynamo President Oliver Luck said the council’s resolution doesn’t change his thinking because he is already trying to make the downtown site work.

“We won’t say no to any other reasonable proposals until we have a shovel in the ground but certainly the East End has been our focus,” Luck said.

So you’ve got one location for which nearly all of the pieces are in place and there’s community support, and another location that would have to start from scratch and overcome opposition from its closest neighbors. Makes you wonder why we’re even having this conversation, doesn’t it? Instant News Bellaire has more.

Posted in: Other sports.

Endorsement watch: Going mobile

This is very cool. From the inbox:

CAUCUS PAC INTRODUCES MOBILE ENDORSEMENT CARD

Pro-equality voters in Houston are used to turning to the Houston GLBT Political Caucus PAC endorsement card for the candidates most qualified and most ready to address the concerns of the gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender community, whether they get the card in the mail or at their polling location. Now, there’s a new way to get the card.

The Caucus is proud to debut the mobile endorsement card, which any interested voter can receive just be texting “2010” to the number 24587. The voter will immediately receive a text back with a link to the mobile endorsement card, which she or he can access on her or his smart phone.

“You can do almost anything on your phone now – why not be able to see which candidates are the best for the GLBT community?” said Kristopher Banks, Caucus president.

The mobile endorsement card lists all candidates Caucus members voted to endorse for the March 2010 primary.

“In the past, we have mailed the Caucus card to identified GLBT and pro-GLBT voters, and those who did not receive it in the mail could get it from a Caucus volunteer at the West Gray Multi-Service Center early voting location, or at any Montrose precinct on Election Day. We’re still doing that,” Banks said. “However, members of our community live all over Harris County. With the mobile endorsement card, we’ll be able to get our message to more people.”

While voters are encouraged to look at the mobile endorsement card before they vote, it is in violation of Texas Elections Code to use a wireless communication device within 100 feet of a polling location.

I’ve noted before that some endorsing organizations do a better job than others at making their endorsements known to a wider audience. This is a great example of the HGLBTPC making their endorsement more useful and worthwhile. I’d love to see more organizations do stuff like this.

Posted in: Election 2010.

IH-10/White Oak detention facilities public hearing

Via email from the CTC:

TxDOT is working toward adding frontage roads to IH-10 inside the loop and separating the depressed section of IH-10 from White Oak Bayou. TxDOT is required to provide new flood mitigation facilities to offset impacts to adjacent neighborhoods from these roadway changes.

TxDOT is proposing improvements intended to replace the volume of water currently contained by the depressed section of IH-10 west of White Oak Bayou which include:

  • Construction of two detention ponds
  • Reduction of embankments in the White Oak Bayou floodway
  • Removal of damaged railroad bridge which crosses White Oak Bayou, upstream from Yale

On Thursday evening, TxDOT will present the proposed sites for detention ponds, show preliminary engineering schematics, and share the results of environmental studies to date. This is your chance to get involved.

There will be a formal public hearing after the presentation to invite feedback regarding the current plans. Individuals will each have 3 minutes at the microphone to present comments. TxDOT will record all comments and prepare responses for a subsequent report.

What: TxDOT public hearing – IH-10 detention ponds
When: Thursday, Feb 18, 2010, 6:00 pm open house, 7:00 pm public hearing
Where: Reagan High School, 413 E 13th St, Houston, Texas 77008 (map)

In the meantime, please visit CTC’s online forum to read more about proposed IH-10 detention ponds near White Oak Bayou and share your thoughts.

Information about the previous meeting is here and here.

Posted in: Planes, Trains, and Automobiles.

Abbott sues to protect the sanctity of divorce

Now hear this: All you people out there who got yourselves gay married, Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott wants to make sure you stay gay married.

Attorney General Greg Abbott is trying to halt the divorce of two women in Austin on grounds their Massachusetts marriage is not recognized in Texas.

A Travis County state district judge on Feb. 10 granted a divorce in court to Sabina Daly, 41, of San Antonio, and Angelique Naylor, 39, of Austin. Abbott’s aides went to court the following day to block the divorce before the written decree was entered.

“A divorce is an ending or a termination of a valid legal marriage,” Abbott said Tuesday. “In this instance there was no valid legal marriage recognized by the state of Texas. Texas can’t have a faulty precedent on the books that validates an illegal law.”

[...]

It was not the first time Abbott’s office has sought to halt a same-sex divorce. He intervened last October in a Dallas case when two men were granted a divorce.

[Daly's lawyer Bob] Luther said in that case Abbott intervened before the divorce was decreed in open court. The judge in that case rejected Abbott’s arguments and the state has appealed to try to overturn the divorce.

You got that? Divorce is the sacred dissolution of a bond between one man and one woman. Greg Abbott is fighting to make sure it stays that way.

Posted in: Society and cultcha.

Judicial Q&A: Juliet Stipeche

(Note: I am running a series of Q&As for judicial candidates in contested Democratic primaries. There are a lot of judicial races on the ballot in Harris County this election, and so this is intended to help introduce the candidates and their experiences to those who plan to vote in March. I am running these responses in the order that I receive them from the candidates. I will also be conducting some in-person interviews of candidates who will be involved in contested primaries for non-judicial offices. Please see my 2010 Election page for a full list of Q&As and interviews.)

1. Who are you, and what are you running for?

My name is Juliet Kathy Stipeche, and I am a Democratic judicial candidate for the 281st Civil District Court in Harris County, Texas. If you would like to learn more about my background, please visit my website: www.stipecheforjudge.com.

2. What kind of cases does this court hear?

The 281st Civil District Court only hears and determines civil cases. It does not handle cases involving family, juvenile, probate or criminal matters. Civil causes of action before this court include a wide variety of claims ranging from simple to complex. Matters include but are not limited to collections, personal injury, wrongful death, professional liability, premises liability, products liability, contract claims, and real estate disputes.

3. Why are you running for this particular bench?

For the past decade, I have been a civil litigator and have practiced almost exclusively before civil district courts, so I am very familiar with the types of cases that this court handles. I have witnessed the need for our civil trial courts to remain committed to the principles of fairness and accessibility for all persons. We also need judges who believe in the jury system. I am running for the 281st Civil District Court because the citizens of Harris County deserve experienced civil court judges who are fair, hard working, and committed to the community and to maintaining the highest ethical standards. I am dedicated to these principles and will also treat all parties with courtesy and respect.

4. What are your qualifications for this job?

I grew up in a working class household in Houston’s East End as the daughter of immigrant parents from Argentina and Mexico. My parents always told me that the key to my future was through hard work and education. I took their words to heart graduating valedictorian of the High School for Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice. I earned an academic scholarship to Rice University, where I graduated with majors in Political Science, Policy Studies and Religious Studies, magna cum laude. Afterward, I obtained my law degree from The University of Texas School of Law in Austin, Texas.

I have practiced exclusively in complex and general civil litigation for the past ten (10) years, and I am a shareholder at my firm, Nagorny & Stipeche, P.C. I have worked on hundreds of cases and participated in trials concerning serious, catastrophic injuries. The longest trial lasted six (6) weeks, while the shortest was approximately one (1) week. I have experience working up cases from inception to trial to appeal. I have also given lectures on a variety of legal topics, and I take my role as a counselor seriously.

I am conversant in Spanish, a very hard worker, and a creative problem solver. I have a passionate conviction for impartiality and justice that motivated me to become a lawyer in the first place. Additionally, I want to serve my community, and I will devote every single ounce of free time to improving the life circumstances of the citizens of Harris County by mentoring, volunteering, and making a difference.

5. Why is this race important?

This race is important because the Courts serve as the guardians of due process, equal protection, and our liberties and freedoms. Most of us do not think about the judges on the benches until we are before them, and if and when this happens, we are usually at our weakest. This is because civil lawsuits are derived from conflict, tragedies and disagreements. We need a Judge in the 281st who will serve as a fair and even-handed referee and who believes in the right to trial by jury. Therefore, this is your opportunity to assist in the selection.

6. Why should people vote for you in the primary?

This is my first time running for political office, but I have always had a passion to serve others and to make a difference. I have excellent academic and legal credentials and the integrity and character to remain independent. I have life and legal experiences that make me knowledgeable about the law as well as people. I have an industriousness and willingness to work hard for the citizens of Harris County and a personality that is courteous and considerate to all persons. I have served as a volunteer for my community with the YMCA, the American Red Cross, the American Heart Association and the Ya Es Hora program, and I have always been committed to the Democratic Party’s principles of strength, inclusion and opportunity. I have received the endorsement of the Coalition of Harris County Democratic Elected Officials, the Harris County Tejano Democrats, Dos Centavos, the Harris County AFL-CIO, the Houston Police Organization of Spanish Speaking Officers (O.S.S.O.), the Mexican American Sheriff’s Organization (M.A.S.O.), and the Latino Labor Leadership Council of Southeast Texas.

Posted in: Election 2010.

Judicial Q&A: J. Anthony Referente

(Note: I am running a series of Q&As for judicial candidates in contested Democratic primaries. There are a lot of judicial races on the ballot in Harris County this election, and so this is intended to help introduce the candidates and their experiences to those who plan to vote in March. I am running these responses in the order that I receive them from the candidates. I will also be conducting some in-person interviews of candidates who will be involved in contested primaries for non-judicial offices. Please see my 2010 Election page for a full list of Q&As and interviews.)

1. Who are you, and what are you running for?

My name is J. Anthony Referente and I am running for the 313th Juvenile District Court. I am a graduate of the University of Houston Law Center, Georgetown University (Washington D.C.), and Strake Jesuit College Preparatory. I have lived in Houston for nearly 30 years and am proud to be a Texan. My wife, Elizabeth A. Nguyen (a native Houstonian), is also an attorney practicing in commercial transactions with an oil and gas pipeline company.

2. What kind of cases does this court hear?

The Juvenile Courts handle two types of cases. The first are cases involving juveniles who have been accused of delinquent conduct ranging in seriousness from thefts to capital murders. In the second type of cases, the Texas Department of Protective and Family Services (otherwise known as Children’s Protective Services or CPS) is involved in the lives of families in which children have been abused or neglected. These cases could result in the termination of parental rights and the adoption of children.

3. Why are you running for this particular bench?

I am running for the 313th Juvenile Court because I believe this Court deserves a change in both principle and policy. I want to restore integrity, fairness and independence in the decisions that are made in this courtroom. Too often, there is the perception that attorneys practicing in the Juvenile Courts obtain appointments to represent clients based on their political contributions to judges. I no longer want this to be a recurring issue. I pledge complete transparency and adherence to the Fair Defense Act Management System and the appointment of attorneys based on individual qualifications, not contributions. No attorneys will receive a disproportionate amount of cases to handle. Everyone is entitled to quality representation especially in cases as serious as those in the juvenile courts where parental rights could be terminated or long sentences could be imposed.

I also want to put an end to any suspicion that there are discriminatory practices occurring in this court. There is no room for intolerance in our judicial system, and it is unacceptable to me as a practicing attorney, a potential judge and a member of our society. This court shall serve the entire community of Harris County equally without special preference to any individuals or groups.

Most importantly, I want to be instrumental in controlling the rising statistics of juvenile delinquency and the increase in abuse and neglect case throughout Harris County. After 13 years or practice always advocating on behalf of what is best for children, I want to continue my public service at a level where my legal knowledge and compassion for the children will best be used.

4. What are your qualifications for this job?

Through my 13 years of practice as a juvenile law attorney, I am the only candidate who has worked both as a prosecutor representing our Great State of Texas as well as a defense attorney in the Juvenile Courts. I have tried over 600 cases, including numerous jury trials both as a prosecutor and as a defense attorney. I also handle adoptions in these courts and firmly believe that adoptive parents should not be discriminated against based on their race, sex, religion or sexual orientation. I have presented continuing legal education courses on the topic of adopting through the CPS system. I currently serve on the Family Intervention Court (also known as Drug Court), where a group of judges, lawyers, social workers, therapists and other community members interested in the lives of children collaborate to determine the best way to address drug abuse issues facing CPS cases. Through this program, and as a former Advisory Board Member to DAPA Family Recovery Programs, I have gained invaluable training and a comprehensive understanding of drug abuse and treatment.

I am also a graduate of the United Way Project Blueprint Program which promotes diversity in volunteerism throughout our community. As a result, I am a board member of Crossroads Partnership for Youth, Inc, a mentorship program for troubled youth, and a past board member of Spaulding for Children, Inc., an adoptions agency specializing in the placements of children with special needs. I have also organized a fitness/running program for the young women at the Burnett Bayland Home, a residential treatment facility. Through this program, I and a group of volunteers train with these young women at Memorial Park to prepare them to race in charity “fun runs” around Houston.

After years of working with children both as an attorney and a community volunteer, I have learned how to develop rapport, earn their trust and maintain mutual respect. Coupled with my training and knowledge of the law, I am very qualified to be the next judge of this court.

5. Why is this race important?

This race is important because this Court plays a key role in shaping the future of Houston and Harris County, which begins with our children. The children who enter the juvenile courts are valued assets which our community must protect and promote. Therefore, the focus of the judge in these courts must always be what is in the best interest of the children, not themselves or the attorneys who practice in the courts.

Especially in the juvenile courts, attorneys who have in the past compromised their principles for their own benefits should be subject to scrutiny to determine their ability to serve as a judge. The juvenile courts are too important to allow monetary considerations to influence or interfere with judicial independence.

This race is important because integrity and transparency should be restored to the 313th Juvenile District Court. We do not need to elect judges who, as attorneys, have participated in a system where contributions are rewarded with court appointments and who would therefore be likely to perpetuate such a system. The focus must always remain on the children.

6. Why should people vote for you in the primary?

People should vote for me because of my outstanding qualifications to serve on this bench. I also bring diversity and energy to the Juvenile Courts. Harris County should have a judiciary that is more representative of its demographics. Moreover, as the youngest candidate with the most diversified experience, I plan on using innovative methods to rehabilitate juvenile delinquents and strengthen family relationships. Most importantly, I feel that the Democrats of Harris County should choose me as their candidate because of my strong commitment to justice, integrity and change in the Juvenile Courts in order to improve the lives of children. My practice has always been devoted to service for the children and families of my community, and I pledge to continue that as the next judge of the 313th District Court.

Posted in: Election 2010.

Endorsement watch: Star-Telegram goes Kinky

I’m not sure if there’s something in the water up in the Metroplex, but the Star Telegram joins its sister paper to the east in endorsing Kinky Friedman for Ag Commish.

Although Friedman has pockets full of one-liners at his disposal, he has been restrained in using them, talking instead about family farms and soil and water conservation. Gilbert, who has a pocket full of endorsements from several political organizations and members of the Texas Legislature, possesses knowledge and passion for the responsibilities of the Texas Agriculture Department. Both candidates want to increase the production of biofuels and bioenergy.

Friedman offers a vision for how the department can best serve all Texans, as well as the lands and animals entrusted to them. He supports more farmer co-ops, restoration of the pine and hardwood forests and repairing pasture lands damaged by tidal surges.

The primary winner will face Republican incumbent Todd Staples in the general election.

The Star-Telegram Editorial Board recommends Kinky Friedman for commissioner of agriculture in the Democratic primary.

Unlike the DMN, whose endorsement of Kinky was really a litany of complaints about Gilbert, it’s not really clear to me why the ST board came to this conclusion. As such, I’m sticking with my theory that it’s something in the water up there. Makes as much sense as anything else.

Posted in: Election 2010.

Stand up and be counted

Please participate in the Census. Nothing good happens when you don’t.

When the new, condensed census form arrives in the mail during the second week in March, each recipient’s decision about whether to toss it in the trash or fill it out and mail it back will carry important implications.

“It is very important to the city of Houston that we have a complete and accurate count for the 2010 Census,” Parker said in a message on the city’s Web site in January. “We lose an estimated $1,700 per person per year for everyone not counted.”

Experts say the figure Parker used is open to question, in part because allocation formulas for various federal programs use census data in different ways. But no one disputes that vast sums are at stake.

Karl Eschbach, the state demographer, said big cities like Houston with large populations of immigrants and poor people are particularly vulnerable to undercounts. A recent analysis by the Pew Charitable Trusts estimated Houston was undercounted by 25,000 people, or 1.3 percent, in the 2000 Census.

And although leaders of various groups promoting participation discourage the notion that they are competing with one another, Eschbach noted the supply of federal dollars is a fixed sum.

“Undercount is a relative issue,” he said. “My undercount is good for you: Every dollar not assigned here goes somewhere else.”

I figure everyone who reads this blog is already familiar with the issue and doesn’t really need the nudge. But I figure it’s important to repeat the message as often and in as many places as possible. And as the Trib notes, it’s not just a Houston issue.

A September 2001 study commissioned by the U.S. Census Monitoring Board and conducted by PricewaterhouseCoopers estimated that more than 373,000 Texans were not counted in 2000, resulting in a net loss of more than $1 billion in federal monies that would have gone to support schools, hospitals, social services, and transportation projects over the last decade. That poor showing has prompted the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund to launch its own Complete Count Committee for this year’s census. The task is something the group and its supporters insist should be undertaken by state leaders. “We are asking the governor to work with the U.S. Census Bureau and to issue a directive to all state agencies to promote the census because we feel that it’s crucial,” MALDEF attorney Luis Figueroa said.

Eight Texas counties, including most of the largest, are included on the Census Bureau’s list of the top 50 hard-to-count counties in the U.S. (Areas considered “hard-to-count” include those where a large majority receives public assistance; where renters are common; households with large numbers of children; areas with high non-English proficiency, and dwellings where multiple families live.) Harris County sits at number 5, with 19.1 percent of its approximately 3.4 million residents living in these areas. It is followed by Dallas County in the number 10 spot, with 16.4 percent of its 2.22 million, and Hidalgo County at number 11, with 57 percent of its 540,000 residents living in these areas. Bexar County is in number 32 on the list, with 10.6 percent of its 1.4 million in hard-to-count areas, and Tarrant County is number 36, with 9.3 percent of its 1.45 million residents affected. Travis County sits at 38 (15.3 percent of its 812,000), El Paso County at 42 (16.7 percent of its 680,000) and Cameron County at 45 (30 percent of its 335,000).

Get counted or get overlooked, those are your choices.

Posted in: Uncategorized.

No texting while deliberating

If you get called in for jury duty in Harris County, you can now get free WiFi in the Jury Assembly Room. But once you get into a courtroom, and especially if you get empaneled, you should expect to have to unplug.

If you think you’re going to use your spanking new iPhone to entertain yourself next time you’re on jury duty, think again.  Judges are going to take an even dimmer view of jury member use of Blackberry, iPhone or other electronic devices as a judicial policy-setting group has told district judges they should restrict jurors from using electronic technologies to research or communicate.

The Judicial Conference Committee on Court Administration and Case Management for the United States District Courts said it developed instructions that would be issued by judges, “to address the increasing incidence of juror use of such devices as cellular telephones or computers to conduct research on the Internet or communicate with others about cases. Such use has resulted in mistrials, exclusion of jurors, and imposition of fines. The suggested instructions specifically inform jurors that they are prohibited from using these technologies in the courtroom, in deliberations, or outside the courthouse to communicate about or research cases on which they currently serve, the group stated.

Specifically, those instruction spell out that jurors should not you should not consult dictionaries or reference materials, search the internet, websites, blogs, or use any other electronic tools to obtain information either before the trial, during deliberations or after until the judge instructs otherwise.

The instructions state jurors must not use cell phones, e-mail, Blackberry, iPhone, text messaging, or on Twitter, or communicate through any blog or website, through any internet chat room, or by way of any other social networking websites, including Facebook, MySpace, LinkedIn, and YouTube.

In the old days, judges instructed jurors not to read the newspaper or watch the news, or discuss the case with anyone. This isn’t really different from that, it’s just a revision for modern forms of news and discussion. Better to spell it all out than to risk a mistrial somewhere because a juror didn’t realize that not discussing the case meant not posting a Facebook status update about it, too.

Posted in: Legal matters.

Endorsement watch: Dem civil court races

The Houston Chronicle gets in the judicial endorsement game with a series of recommendations in the Democratic primaries for civil courts.

For the County Civil Courts at Law, the endorsees are:

County Civil Court at Law 1: Steve Reilley
County Civil Court at Law 2: Cheryl Elliott Thornton
County Civil Court at Law 3: Damon Crenshaw

For the civil District Courts, the endorsees are:

113th Civil District Court: Christina Bryan
157th Civil District Court: Shawn Thierry
189th Civil District Court: Larry Hinojosa
190th Civil District Court: Olan Boudreaux
234th Civil District Court: Tanner Garth
270th Civil District Court: Lee Arellano
281st Civil District Court: Donna Roth
295th Civil District Court: Paul Simon

Needless to say, there will be a lot more of these to come. The 2010 Election page has been updated to reflect these, and will continue to be updated as we go. I’ve also updated the sorted Google spreadsheet.

Posted in: Election 2010.

Primary early voting, Day One

I’m not going to create a daily spreadsheet of the early voting totals by location this election, as life is just too short. I do have a spreadsheet showing the 2006 dailies by location, thanks to Hector DeLeon in the County Clerk’s office, from which I can tell you that there were 24,602 early and 8,648 mail ballots cast in Harris County in the Republican primary as of the end of the EV period (more mail ballots came in after that), out of a total of 82,989 total ballots, or 40%; and 10,933 such ballots on the Democratic side – 8,760 in-person and 2,173 mail – out of 35,447 total, or 31%. On Day One of this year, there were 2,774 in-person GOPers plus 5,946 returned mail ballots, and 2,190 Dems plus 2,886 mailers. Based on that, I will say with confidence that there will be more Democratic ballots cast this year, and that they will be a larger share of the total early amount. We’ll see how it goes, and I’ll take a stab at guessing turnout later on. So tell me, who out there did their duty today, and how busy was it where you were? Leave a comment and let us know.

Posted in: Election 2010.

Endorsement watch: Statesman on the SBOE

The Statesman makes some recommendations in SBOE primaries in hopes of getting a better, or at least a slightly less dysfunctional, Board for the coming year.

In the District 5 Republican primary, Tim Tuggey, 54, gets our endorsement. Tuggey, running against incumbent Ken Mercer, is a lawyer and lobbyist from Austin who graduated with honors from the University of Texas School of Law, served as a captain in the U.S. Army and is a product of Texas public schools.

Tuggey brings a level head and financial management experience to the board. It speaks volumes that he has earned the endorsement of business leader Red McCombs and H-E-B. CEO Charles Butt for a campaign that focuses on improving dropout rates, preparing students for college or work after high school and competent oversight of the school fund.

In the District 5 Democratic primary, Rebecca Bell-Metereau, 60, is the best choice. She is running against Daniel Boone, Josiah James Ingalls and Robert Bohmfalk.

Bell-Metereau brings strong skills to the job as a longtime English professor at Texas State University. With a distinguished academic background, experience raising two daughters in San Marcos public schools, high energy and thorough knowledge of the challenges facing public schools, she won’t put politics over children’s welfare.

For District 10, we endorse Republican Rebecca Osborne, 51, a teacher in the Round Rock school district. It would be a refreshing change to have someone on the board who could give a contemporary classroom perspective. In addition to college preparation, she wants schools to offer career and vocational instruction for students who decide to go directly to jobs after high school.

[...]

We’re also making an endorsement in the District 9 race that includes Brazos County, home of Texas A&M University. We recommend Thomas Ratliff in the Republican primary.

Ratliff, 42, of Mount Pleasant, a graduate of Texas Tech University with a UT master’s degree, has immersed himself in public school issues, including serving as a room parent for his daughter’s second grade class. He understands the urgency of the task of getting students ready to compete in a global society.

His opponent, incumbent Don McLeroy, 63, is stuck in the past, advocating a back-to-basics curriculum that all but guarantees that Texas students will lag behind their peers. Time to end McLeroy’s tenure.

That’s not even counting McLeroy’s – and Mercer’s – troglodytic views on science, history, and just about everything else. The Trib has a good overview of the SBOE 5 GOP primary as well, and you just can’t help but notice how much this stuff is about politics and grievances for the likes of Mercer and McLeroy and their destructive crew. Getting those two to join their retiring comrade Cynthia Dunbar on the sidelines would be such a huge step forward.

Posted in: Election 2010.

Judicial Q&A: Darrell Jordan

(Note: I am running a series of Q&As for judicial candidates in contested Democratic primaries. There are a lot of judicial races on the ballot in Harris County this election, and so this is intended to help introduce the candidates and their experiences to those who plan to vote in March. I am running these responses in the order that I receive them from the candidates. I will also be conducting some in-person interviews of candidates who will be involved in contested primaries for non-judicial offices. Please see my 2010 Election page for a full list of Q&As and interviews.)

1. Who are you, and what are you running for?

My name is Darrell Jordan and I am running for the 180th Criminal District Court. I am married to Dr. Rhonda Jordan and we have two children Ashley and Andrew.

2. What kind of cases does this court hear?

This court handles felony cases. Felony cases are the most serious criminal cases such as murder, aggravated robbery, and sexual assault. The sentences in these cases can range from a period of probation to life imprisonment or in some instances death.

3. Why are you running for this particular bench?

I am running for this bench because I want to restore justice to the Harris County Criminal Justice System. I will work to promote courtroom efficiency by ensuring swift justice for victim and offender, saving Harris county tax payer dollars and creating safer communities as well.

4. What are your qualifications for this job?

As a criminal defense attorney I practice exclusively in the area of criminal law. In the past year my caseload exceeded 100 cases. In addition to that I have proudly served for the past 8 years in the United States Army Reserves, currently serving in the rank of Captain in the JAG Corps. In this role, I serve as a recorder (prosecutor) on separation boards. In addition, I serve as legal advisor providing answers to questions of law to the board (jury). I have also served in the Texas House of Representatives as a policy analyst for Rep. Hubert Vo and as legal counsel for Sen. Rodney Ellis.

5. Why is this race important?

This race is important because there is nothing greater than freedom. I believe in due process and my duty to ensure that it is carried out. As a judge I view my position as the last stop to ensure that justice is done in each and every case for victim and offender.

6. Why should people vote for you in the primary?

People should vote for me because I will ensure that justice will prevail in the courtroom. I know what needs to be done to ensure justice and strongly believe in my ability to get the job done correctly. I will support the Public Defender’s Office 100%. I will also implement a morning and afternoon docket in my courtroom. This will allow defendants to get their day in court as quickly as possible and it will also save the citizens of Harris County money by reducing the jail population.

Posted in: Election 2010.

Judicial Q&A: Jim Wrotenbery

(Note: I am running a series of Q&As for judicial candidates in contested Democratic primaries. There are a lot of judicial races on the ballot in Harris County this election, and so this is intended to help introduce the candidates and their experiences to those who plan to vote in March. I am running these responses in the order that I receive them from the candidates. I will also be conducting some in-person interviews of candidates who will be involved in contested primaries for non-judicial offices. Please see my 2010 Election page for a full list of Q&As and interviews.)

1. Who are you, and what are you running for?

Jim Wrotenbery. I am running for the 190th Civil District Court. I am a native Texan. I began my love affair with Houston when I came here to attend Rice in the late 70’s. After completing law school at UT-Austin, I returned to Houston to make it my home in the mid 80’s. I have had a long and distinguished legal career in civil litigation. In addition, I have a lifelong history of community service consistent with my personal values and those of the Democratic Party. I am a musician and have a passion for the mountains and nature. I share this personal information because I believe that we all should strive to fully explore and use our individual gifts and talents. My web site is www.jimforjudge.com

2. What kind of cases does this court hear?

The Civil District Courts in Harris County have very broad jurisdiction over a wide variety of cases from simple to complex. Much of the case load is personal injury, contractual disputes and employment to name a few important areas. They do not preside over probate, juvenile and criminal cases.

3. Why are you running for this particular bench?

After a long and successful career as a civil litigator on both the trial and appellate level, I want to give back to the citizens of Harris County and my colleagues in the legal community who I have worked with for over 25 years. At this stage in my life, I am best suited to be a fair, impartial and balanced referee. The people of Harris County deserve experienced, hard working, open-minded judges who fully understand the lack of equal protection and discrimination that too often continues to occur in our courts.

Many years ago I became increasingly troubled by the Republican Party domination of the Harris County judiciary. This court is no exception. The most recent occupant of the 190th was appointed by Republican Governor Perry in December 2007. 38% of those responding to a 2009 bar poll found the performance in this court only acceptable or poor. I can do better.

4. What are your qualifications for this job?

It is my belief that to be an outstanding judge, one needs not only an excellent legal resume but also a history of service and life experience indicative of a person who cares about people and can be truly fair and impartial. I have an excellent resume. I am an honors graduate of Rice and UT-Austin Law School. I have an AV rating from the legal community. This is the highest rating for both quality of work and professional ethics. I have a very unique combination of civil trial and appellate work. I have tried over 150 cases to jury verdict in State and Federal Courts all over the State of Texas. I have argued at every appellate level. I have represented individuals and companies from all walks of life and areas of our society on both sides of the docket. A portion of my work has always been on a pro bono basis.

Since 1990, I have had partner and management responsibilities including supervision and mentoring of associate attorneys in law firms. The judge must have the technical ability as well as management experience to supervise a large court staff and to run a docket successfully and efficiently.

As important, I have a community service history reflective of my personal beliefs and the values the Democratic Party stands for. We strive to eliminate the blight of poverty. One way I support this principle is my volunteer work at the Beacon, a facility in downtown Houston which supports the homeless community. I have also been active with Habitat for Humanity for many years. Over the past few years, I trained for and became a court appointed guardian ad litem for children in protective custody. I do this work as a volunteer with Child Advocates, Inc. I also mentor in after school programs. Since the HIV/AIDS crises in the 1980’s I have supported various organizations that help those with HIV/AIDS.

5. Why is this race important?

In my opinion, all judicial races are important. A judge has a great deal of discretion and authority and makes decisions that have serious and long-term ramifications in the lives of people who come before the court.

The citizens who serve as jurors sacrifice their time and resources as part of their civic duty. They are crucial to our goal of fair trials with juries reflective of our diverse community. In return for this public service, they deserve highly qualified, hard working, efficient and compassionate judges who will fully respect them and their time and who also reflect our diverse community.

The attorneys who zealously represent their clients deserve, knowledgeable, consistent, efficient judges who can find practical and cost efficient solutions to disputes. They deserve judges who are available and who fully understand and will never forget what it is like to stand on the other side of the bench.

There is a great deal at stake in these courts. All parties deserve a fair and impartial judge who knows and understands the law and who will apply it with compassion.

6. Why should people vote for you in the primary?

I am highly qualified with a unique combination of civil trial and appellate experience. My lifelong community service is consistent with my personal values and those of the Democratic Party. Since I became eligible to vote, I have worked for and supported the Democratic Party and Democratic candidates. I worked as a legislative aide for my Democratic State Representative from my hometown when I was in law school. More recently, in 2008 I stepped forward and ran as a Democratic candidate for judge and was honored by the support I received. Although I personally came up short in 2008, I continued to work for my friends now serving on the bench and the coordinated campaign. I also worked in New Mexico for two weeks on the campaign of President Obama and to help turn that state blue. I personally will not give up the fight and we in the Democratic Party must keep fighting for candidates who uphold the ideals and values we share. If elected in the primary, I promise you a candidate who will represent the Democratic Party with great energy and integrity. You will have a representative who is well qualified and deeply understands equal protection under the law for everyone.

Posted in: Election 2010.

Endorsement watch: Where I stand

Early voting begins in the primaries today. With that in mind, the following are Democratic candidates I will be voting for, or would be voting for if I lived in their district. I am only addressing contested races – you may safely assume that I will vote for the uncontested candidates on my ballot.

Governor: Bill White. He’s the candidate I wanted in this race for at least a year now. I couldn’t be happier that he finally got in.

Lite Gov: Linda Chavez-Thompson. But I have no quarrel with a vote for Ronnie Earle. I just wish these campaigns would be a lot more visible.

Ag Commissioner: Hank Gilbert. To be blunt, I can’t say Hank has run a very good campaign so far. But he’s still the best qualified and most knowledgeable person running for the office, and that includes the incumbent.

Land Commissioner: Hector Uribe.

CD18: Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee. I have nothing against her opponents, Jarvis Johnson and Sean Roberts. But as I’ve said many times, Rep. Jackson Lee votes the way I’d want her to vote, and I’m happy with that.

CD22: Doug Blatt. Seems reasonable enough, and I do not want this person on the ballot.

Harris County Judge: Gordon Quan. A strong candidate and a good person.

Harris County Clerk: Sue Schechter. Ditto what I said about Gordon Quan.

HD146: Borris Miles. Miles did more in his one term in office than Al Edwards has done in a decade. I believe he’s gotten a handle on the personal demons that caused him problems during and after that first term, and as such I believe he will be an even stronger representative in Austin at a time when we’ll need all the strong representation we can get.

HD105: Loretta Haldenwang. The best candidate for the Democrats’ best pickup opportunity in the Lege.

SBOE District 5: Rebecca Bell-Metereau. A good candidate who is working the hardest in the race.

Judicial races: I am not going to publicly announce endorsements in these races, outside of the one I have already made. My mission for this primary, at least as I saw it, was to try to bring as much information about the candidates that I could for your inspection, and I hope I’ve done that with the judicial Q&As. There’s a lot of strong, well-qualified candidates running for these benches, and while I have a pretty good idea of who I’ll be voting for in most of these races, I have too much respect for too many of the ones I will not be voting for to say so in this space. Having said that, it has not escaped my notice that a few candidates have collected all or nearly all of the endorsements from the dozen or so groups that took the time and made the effort to screen them, and I think everyone would be wise to take that into consideration. Any single endorsement doesn’t mean that much in these races, but a whole bunch of them is worth noticing.

Speaking of which, please note that the 2010 Election page has been updated to include names and endorsements for all of the candidates for which I have received but not yet published Q&As. As of today, I expect all of them to be completed by Friday, and will be running two a day until they’re all done. In response to several requests, I have also created this Google spreadsheet, which is sorted by race rather than by the date the Q&A responses were received, and which includes candidates for which I have not received Q&A responses, so you can compare endorsements in individual races more easily. Please do remember you can sort the table on my page by clicking the arrow in the right hand side of the column header.

Finally, on a somewhat tangential note, I recommend everyone read Stace’s take from last week on Lisa Falkenberg’s column about endorsements for a thoughtful perspective on the process.

Posted in: Election 2010.

BAE loses Army truck deal

I didn’t comment on the story of the Army rejecting BAE Systems’ appeal to keep the contract to build combat trucks at its Sealy plant, but BOR said most of what I would have; you should also see this comment by CD10 candidate Ted Ankrum. (My previous blogging about it is here.) I don’t think what happened is a surprise, nor is the reaction from the various Republican elected officials who are now concerned that the federal government is spending less money on something and chastising it for not continuing to send its evil, dirty money to Texas in order to save jobs. Who knew federal money could do such a thing? (Here’s another local example of a hardworking fiscal conservative who wants the federal gubmint to quit spending so damn much money outside of his own district. Is that really so much to ask? Too bad his district is no longer represented by a ranking member of the majority party, by the way.) Anyway, I hope that BAE Systems is successful at diversifying its production line and winning other opportunities, and that in the end the impact of this decision is much less significant than what is being predicted now. And like all those Republican elected officials, I look forward to a day when the federal government spends more money here in Texas. May they all work harder towards that end.

Posted in: The great state of Texas.

Texas blog roundup for the week of February 15

The Texas Progressive Alliance wishes you all a happy Lunar New Year. Click on for the first Year of the Tiger blog roundup.

Continue reading →

Posted in: Blog stuff.

Judicial Q&A: Shawn Thierry

(Note: I am running a series of Q&As for judicial candidates in contested Democratic primaries. There are a lot of judicial races on the ballot in Harris County this election, and so this is intended to help introduce the candidates and their experiences to those who plan to vote in March. I am running these responses in the order that I receive them from the candidates. I will also be conducting some in-person interviews of candidates who will be involved in contested primaries for non-judicial offices. Please see my 2010 Election page for a full list of Q&As and interviews.)

1. Who are you, and what are you running for?

My name is Shawn Nicole Thierry. I am a native Houstonian and have lived in the Westbury and Northfield areas of town for most of my life. I am a graduate of Westbury High School in Houston, and I attended Howard University in Washington, D.C. I obtained my law degree from the Thurgood Marshall School Of Law in Houston, Texas in 1996. I have been a licensed, practicing attorney for over thirteen years. Over the course of my broad legal career, I have represented individual clients, both poor and wealthy, and businesses, both small and large. I have been very active in democratic politics for a number of years and have served the community as well. I respect the law and have always been a champion for justice. Barbara Jordan was my role-model as a child, and I was affectionately called by her name whenever I stood up for others who were not being treated fairly. I am seeking the position of Judge of the 157th Civil District Court and am running to lead. Leadership in the judicial system starts with judges since they have broad powers and broad discretion. My goal is to lead with courage and conviction by first listening to all voices and sides and then ruling impartially.

2. What kind of cases does this court hear?

The types of cases which come before this court are wide-ranging, and include, but are not limited to, matters such as: contractual disputes, pharmaceutical and general products liability, toxic tort, premises liability, medical malpractice, employment and labor issues, real estate and property matters, insurance coverage cases, first amendment cases involving defamation and libel actions, wrongful death, and a high volume of other personal injury cases. District Courts are trial courts of general jurisdiction in law and equity. The district courts generally have exclusive jurisdiction in civil cases where the amount in controversy is $100,000 or greater and also have concurrent jurisdiction with the statutory county courts in cases where the amount in controversy is greater than $500.00 but is less than $100,000. This court may also handle multi-district litigation (MDL) for cases such as those involving mass tort claims and/or securities litigation. The MDL court is assigned by a judiciary panel, which is comprised of appellant court justices. As evidenced by this abbreviated list, the civil district court hears matters that could potentially affect most any individual and/or business.

3. Why are you running for this particular bench?

This particular judicial bench has not been subject to a contested election for many years. Specifically, in 2003, the incumbent judge obtained the bench through the appointment of Governor Rick Perry to complete the term of yet another departing republican judge who was also appointed to this bench by Governor Perry in 2001. The judiciary should reflect a balance of differing views and experiences and not be subject to “group think” or concurrent appointments by the republican party. This year, the citizens will finally have an opportunity to participate in the democratic process for this court. I am the only candidate in this race who has been running for 157th civil bench since the election cycle began in 2009 and have never shopped benches or switched races during the primary. I remain focused and committed to the 157th, because I truly believe that this is a bench that needs a change in leadership and a fresh perspective.

4. What are your qualifications for this job?

I have diverse legal experience. For over thirteen years, I have protected and championed the legal rights of individual citizens, as well as represented and defended small businesses and large corporations. I have successfully handled cases varying from commercial disputes, personal injury, product defects, deceptive trade practices and other civil litigation matters. My legal career has also afforded me the valuable experience of clerking for the Houston Court of Appeals First District. I also worked as a civil litigator for two renowned Texas commercial litigation firms. I gained invaluable experience at these respected firms. I later opened my own successful law practice where I represented individual clients and consumers in precisely the types of cases that will come before the 157th Civil District Court. I have an extensive background in civil procedure, rules of evidence, drafting and arguing trial motions, oral hearings, settlement of complex claims and cases, and other trial related matters. As a result, I have the broad experience necessary to view the lens objectively.

Second, I also have diverse life experience. Growing up, I was typically one of a few African-American children in my class, and/or or social activities such as girl scouts, camp, etc. While some would think this was difficult, it afforded me the opportunity to form deep friendships with a variety of people from different backgrounds. Although there were some instances where I was on the receiving end of injustice, those experiences merely made me want to work harder to stand up for what was fair and right. I was also the first African-American woman to be hired at the law firm which recruited me from law school. Throughout my life, both personally and professionally, I have always been the type of person that has helped my peers to keep an open mind on issues and express differences of opinions through patience and respectful dialogue. These unique life experiences have helped to develop the type of character and even temperament that will serve me well, if elected to the bench. My judicial philosophy also mirrors my life philosophy, which is, all people should be treated equally and without bias to religion, gender, race, financial status, sexual orientation, and/or age. I believe that my both my legal and life experiences are of importance to my qualifications. I am uniquely qualified to not only understand the complexities and intricacies of the law, but also to balance and apply it so that justice is truly achieved.

5. Why is this race important?

The voters in this Democratic primary are obviously counting on their candidate to win in the November general election. Therefore, the Democratic primary candidate for the 157th Civil District Court must be able to run a strong campaign against the republican incumbent on the bench. Strong community support and strong financial support will be necessary to remain competitive against the well-established incumbent. I have raised significant financial contributions from a large base of Democratic voters; whereas my opponent’s finance report indicates campaign contributions of less than $500.00. This is important because a self-funded candidate is typically not able to energize a diverse base of the party, nor remain financially viable throughout the length of the general election. Also, my candidacy has been endorsed by the AFL-CIO, Area V Pasadena Democrats, Tejano Democrats, Houston Black American Democrats, South Union Civic Association, and the Coalition of Harris County Democratic Elected Officials. Strong endorsements, combined with an ability to secure contributions from Democratic donors, will help ensure that I will be a viable candidate who can go the distance against the incumbent in November.

6. Why should people vote for you in the primary?

I have the most diversified legal experience in this primary. I have practiced law for both sides of the bar representing both plaintiffs and defendants. My opponent has dedicated his career to defending large companies and, unfortunately, has not had much experience representing everyday citizens. I will be able to better balance the competing interests in each case fairly and impartially. Equal access will be available to all those seeking legal redress and relief if I am elected as judge of the 157th Civil District Court. I have the qualifications needed for this important and honorable job. I will apply the rule of law with intelligence, insight and integrity. I am committed to the 157th Civil District Court race and to the voters of Harris County. For all of the reasons previously stated herein, I am sincerely seeking support from the voters to elect me as the democratic primary candidate and, ultimately, as Judge of the 157th Civil District Court. Please feel free to visit my website: ShawnThierry4Judge.com to learn more about me and the judicial campaign.

Posted in: Election 2010.

Early voting starts tomorrow

The following is from the County Clerk’s office:

IN-PERSON EARLY VOTING BEGINS FOR MARCH 2 PRIMARY ELECTIONS: STRONG TURNOUT WILL NOT SURPRISE

Houston, TX, - Early voting by personal appearance for the upcoming Democratic and Republican Primary Elections in Harris County is set to begin, Tuesday, Feb. 16th and continue until Feb. 26th.

“In the aftermath of the 2008 primary elections, a strong turnout during this year’s primaries will not be surprising. But, without the presidential contest at the top of the ballot, it will be difficult to replicate our record turnout of two years ago of almost 600,000 voters,” said Harris County Clerk Beverly Kaufman, the chief elections officer of the County. “Voting during the in-person early voting period and by mail may be telling.”

As of Thursday, Feb 11th, the Harris County Clerk’s office had responded to 25,747 ballot-by-mail requests. The current 2010 ballot-by-mail requests are short of the 2008 March primaries overall total of 29,970. But, the current total is higher than the 2006 primary elections total of 21,097, the last non-presidential year primary elections in the County. The ballot-by-mail application deadline for the 2010 primary election cycle is Feb. 23rd.

A report of the total number of persons processed for voting at each early voting site during the early voting period and the mail ballot requests processed will be posted on a daily basis on the Clerk’s election page, www.harrisvotes.com, after the polls close starting Feb. 16th.

The hours of service at the county’s early voting locations are as follows: Tuesday to Friday, Feb, 16th to 19th, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.; Saturday, Feb. 20th, 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.; Sunday, Feb. 21st, 1:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.; Feb. 22th to 26th, 7:00 am to 7:00 p.m.

In total for the March 2, 2010 Democratic Party and Republican Party Primary Elections there are thirty-seven early voting locations in Harris County:

Harris County Early Voting Locations

(* Indicates Change in Location)

1. Main Office: Harris County Administration Bldg., 1001 Preston, 1st Floor, 77002

2. Moody Park: Moody Park Community Center, 3725 Fulton, 77009

3. * Kashmere: Kashmere Multi-Service Center, 4802 Lockwood Dr., 77026

4. Downtown-East: Ripley House, 4410 Navigation Blvd., 77011

5. Southeast Houston: H.C.C.S. Southeast College, Learning Hub, 6815 Rustic, 77087

6. Palm Center: Justice of the Peace/Constable Entry, 5300 Griggs Road, 77021

7. Astrodome Area: Fiesta Mart, Inc., 8130 Kirby Drive, 77054

8. Neartown: Metropolitan Multi-Service Center, 1475 W. Gray, 77019

9. Northeast Houston: Northeast Multi-Service Center, 9720 Spaulding, 77016

10. Galena Park: Galena Park Branch Library, 1500 Keene Street, Galena Park, 77547

11. Hobby Area: I.B.E.W. Hall #66, 4345 Allen Genoa Road, Pasadena, 77504

12. Sunnyside: Sunnyside Multi-Service Center, 4605 Wilmington, 77051

13.* S. Houston Area: Townwood Park, 3403 Simsbrook, 77045

14. SW. Houston: Bayland Park Community Center, 6400 Bissonnet (near Hillcroft), 77074

15. Near West Side: Tracy Gee Community Center, 3599 Westcenter Drive, 77042

(One block East of Sam Houston Tollway)

16. Spring Branch: Trini Mendenhall Sosa Comm. Center, 1414 Wirt Road, 77055

17. Acres Homes: Acres Homes Multi-Service Center, 6719 W. Montgomery Road, 77091

18. North: Hardy Senior Center, 11901 West Hardy Road, 77076

19. Humble: Octavia Fields Branch Library, 1503 South Houston Ave., Humble, 77338

20. Kingwood: Humble ISD Instructional Support Ctr., 4810 Magnolia Cove, Kingwood, 77345

21. Wallisville Road: North Channel Branch Library, 15741 Wallisville Road, 77049

22. Baytown: Baytown Community Center, 2407 Market Street, Baytown, 77520

23. * Pasadena: Harris County Courthouse Annex #25, 7330 Spencer Highway, Pasadena, 77505

24. Clear Lake: Freeman Branch Library, 16616 Diana Lane, 77062

25. Alief: Henington-Alief Regional Library, 7979 South Kirkwood, 77072

26. West Houston: Lac Hong Square, 6628 Wilcrest Dr., 77072

27. * Far W. Houston: Nottingham Park, 14205 Kimberley Lane, 77079

28. Far West/Katy: Franz Road Storefront, 19818 Franz Road, Katy, 77449

29. Bear Creek: Bear Creek Park Community Center, 3055 Bear Creek Dr. at Patterson Rd., 77084

30. Jersey Village: City of Jersey Village-City Hall, 16327 Lakeview Drive, Jersey Village, 77040

31. Tomball: Tomball Public Works Building, 501 B James St., Tomball, 77375

32. * Cypress Creek: Champion Forest Baptist Church, Multi-Purpose Building

15555 Stuebner-Airline Dr., 77069

33. Far North: Ponderosa Fire Station No. 1, 17061 Rolling Creek Drive, 77090

34. Cypress: Cypress Top Park, 26026 Hempstead Highway, Cypress, 77429

35. George Bush Park: Glen Cheek Education Building, 16002 Westheimer Parkway, 77082

36. * Lone Star College: University Park, Visitors Center, 20515 State Hwy 249, 77070

37. Crosby: Crosby ISD Administration Building, 706 Runneburg Road, Crosby, 77532

For more information regarding the early voting locations, voters may visit www.harrisvotes.com or call 713.755.6965.

You can see a map of the locations here (PDF). Note the changes to some of them. I voted at the Power Center in 2008 because lines were so long at all of the places I was used to going, but that’s not being used this election for the South Houston location. If you’ve never voted in a primary before, remember that you can show up and vote in either one, but only in one. Just say which one you intend to vote in and you’ll be set. Voting in a primary means that you cannot sign someone’s petition to appear on the ballot as an independent, and it means you may only vote in that party’s runoff. If you do not vote in the primary, you may still vote in either party’s runoff, though again you must pick only one. Happy voting!

Posted in: Election 2010.

Interview with Sean Roberts

Sean Roberts

Sean Roberts

For what will most likely be my final interview of the 2010 primary cycle, I bring you a conversation with Sean Roberts, who was the first candidate to mount a challenge to Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee in CD18. Roberts is a UH graduate and attorney who now manages his own small firm. This is his first time running for office. The interview is here:

Download the MP3 file

A full list of the interviews I have done is on the 2010 Election page. As it happens, David Ortez ran an interview with Roberts in Hair Balls last week, the first in a promised series of three for this race, and there was a debate on Saturday featuring all three candidates. So you can’t say you haven’t had the chance to hear what the candidates have had to say.

Posted in: Election 2010.

Judicial Q&A: Donna Roth

(Note: I am running a series of Q&As for judicial candidates in contested Democratic primaries. There are a lot of judicial races on the ballot in Harris County this election, and so this is intended to help introduce the candidates and their experiences to those who plan to vote in March. I am running these responses in the order that I receive them from the candidates. I will also be conducting some in-person interviews of candidates who will be involved in contested primaries for non-judicial offices. Please see my 2010 Election page for a full list of Q&As and interviews.)

1. Who are you, and what are you running for?

I am Donna Roth. I am running for Judge of the 281st Civil District Court, Harris County, Texas.

2. What kind of cases does this court hear?

The 281st is a civil court of general jurisdiction. It is a district court which handles civil cases with amounts in controversy from $500 to any dollar amount. The court also has equity power to impose injunctions, restraining orders and declaratory judgments (a judgment that declares the rights of the parties). The court hears a wide variety of matters including but not limited to breach of contract, commercial disputes, personal injury cases, employment disputes, malpractice cases, death cases, insurance disputes, corporate disputes, partnership/corporate dissolutions, property disputes, debt collection cases, bank foreclosures, attorney disbarment and discipline cases and Harris County property tax collection cases. The civil courts have also begun to hear family trials. The family courts have been so overwhelmed that many of the civil judges, when agreed by the parties, have begun trying jury trials for the family court judges including divorces, child custody and modifications.

3. Why are you running for this particular bench?

The current incumbent was just this January, 2009, appointed by Governor Perry. She received this appointment because her Republican predecessor made his decision to resign just days after the deadline for the 281st to be placed on the ballot. Therefore, rather than to have the people of Harris County decide who they wanted as their next judge, a sitting Republican judge resigned after the deadline and allowed a Republican Governor to appoint yet another Republican judge. I want to return honesty, integrity and transparency to the 281st Civil District Court.

4. What are your qualifications for this job?

I am a 1987 cum laude graduate from South Texas College of Law. Since then I have practiced civil trial law. I have extensive first chair jury trial experience, have litigated almost every type of case that could come before the court, have extensive trials before the bench and have mentored any number of younger lawyers by sitting second chair and assisting and advising. In my practice, I have represented the hard working people of Harris County.

I currently serve on the board of directors for the Houston Trial Lawyers Association and I am a member of the Texas Trial Lawyers Association. In 2009 I was the sole recipient of the HTLA Leadership and Service Award. I am also a member of the Association of Women Attorneys and the Harris County Democratic Lawyers Association. I have not just recently joined these organizations but have been an active member for years. I am also a member of the Houston Bar Association and the Mexican American Bar Association.

5. Why is this race important?

Many, if not most people, will someday be required to come before a judge. Whether it be a civil judge, a family judge, a probate judge, a juvenile judge or a criminal judge most people will find themselves before a court.

If you have been fired and have to sue your employer for wrongful discharge or employment discrimination, or if you have been seriously injured or lost a family member because of another’s negligence, or if you have lost a limb or organ because of a medical facilities’ negligence, you would file such a lawsuit in a civil district court. If you have a property boundary dispute, a dispute with your homeowners’ association, or a disagreement with Harris County Appraisal District over the value of your property, you would file such a lawsuit in a civil district court.

Presiding over the determination of fair and adequate compensation for the loss of a loved one because of another’s negligence, whether one’s livelihood has been taken away without just cause, the value of one’s home, or whether an insurance company should be required to reimburse you for the loss of a limb or organ are important matters that make this race and the determination of who the next judge in this court will be an important matter.

6. Why should people vote for you in the primary?

Experience:

    The 281st Civil District Court is a civil trial bench.  Because the role of the judge is to fairly and impartially try cases, trial experience is the most important qualification for voters to choose a candidate. I am the only candidate in my race with first chair jury trial experience.  I have tried to verdict almost every type of case that could potentially come before the court.  I also sit second chair to assist younger lawyers who are learning or who need help and guidance.  I can start working the day I am elected.

    The Harris County District Clerk’s Web site provides a listing of cases involved in litigation where attorneys have been named as counsel of record.  As of January 31, 2010, the district clerk web site indicates that I have filed and litigated 223 cases during my years of practice.  My opponent has been listed in just five (5) cases.  This is a civil trial court bench.  The people of Harris County deserve someone who can begin working on the day they are elected.

    I came to Houston in 1985.  I graduated from South Texas College of Law in 1987 and have practiced law here in Houston since that time.  I have raised my daughter, mostly as a single mom, here in Houston.  I have learned patience from being a mom which will allow me to exercise the judicial temperament necessary to be a judge.

Committed Democrat:

    I am a sustaining member of the Harris County Democratic Party, a member of a number of Democratic groups, including the Spring Branch Democrats, Meyerland Democrats and Tejano Democrats.  My daughter, Andrea and I, are both members of Oak Forest Democrats and the GLBT caucus.  Andrea is also a member of the Young Democrats.  In 1994, I won a contested democratic primary for judge of the 234th Civil District Court.  I unfortunately, along with many other good democrats, lost in the general election in a Republican sweep.  Since then I have helped in many democratic campaigns including Judge Jaclanel McFarland, Judge Robert Schaffer, Judge Steven Kirkland,  Judge Kathy Stone, State Rep. Ellen Cohen, State Rep. Jessica Farrar, Mayor Bill White and Michael Skelly for Congress.  I have contributed money, pushed cards on Election Day and block walked.  In 2008 on Election Day I served at the party headquarters as legal counsel for any problems and issues that arose during the day.

Community Focused:

    I maintain on my docket at least one pro bono case where I represent a woman in need of either a divorce, child support, child custody or a protective order.  I volunteered after Hurricane Ike and provided legal services through the Houston Bar Association at the hurricane victim’s assistance centers.  I often volunteered at my daughter’s high school having coordinated a mock trial event with the senior class.  I volunteered for the Children’s Assessment Center and assisted participants at a skeet shoot.  My favorite activity, however, is serving as a “judge” at South Texas School of Law for the mock trial program.  This I do approximately twice a year and have done since I graduated law school in 1987.  I feel that I have been fortunate in life to have obtained the education that I have received and to practice a profession I could only have dreamed about as a child.  I want to share that with as many people as I can who cannot otherwise afford an attorney or someone to help them.

Justice for All:

    It is important that we elect Judges who are fair and impartial, who do not have a preconceived notion about who should win before they hear any testimony or evidence. I have a passion for justice that has grown through my years of practice. I believe in the rule of law, I believe that each litigant that comes before the court, whether poor or rich, educated or not, whether represented by counsel or not, deserves a fair and impartial judge.  Backed by my belief that justice and fair play are the fundamental values of the United States and Texas Constitutions, I am running for Judge of the 281st Civil District Court.  My name is Donna Roth and I would consider it an honor and a privilege to serve as your next judge of the 281st Civil District Court in Harris County, Texas and I am, therefore, asking for your vote on March 2, 2010 in the Democratic Primary Election.

Posted in: Election 2010.

Sales tax collections keep going down

That sound you hear is the budget writers gnashing their teeth.

In more grim news for Texas’ budget, state Comptroller Susan Combs said Friday that monthly sales tax collections are down again, the eighth straight month of double-digit declines.

Collections for January — the period that reflects December holiday shopping — were down by 14.2 percent compared with a year ago.

[...]

“Eight consecutive months of double-digit declines — there is no parallel for what we’re seeing with the sales tax,” said budget expert Dale Craymer, president of the Texas Taxpayers and Research Association.

You wonder what effect all this will have on the Governor’s race. Is Governor Perry going to keep running ads that proclaim what great fiscal shape Texas is in? How are any attacks he’s going to make on Houston’s fiscal shape going to play when contrasted with this?

Speaking of Houston’s fiscal shape, I forget where I saw this, but Houston’s sales tax collections were equally crappy in January, and we got back a smaller amount from the state than last year. Expect the next communication from Controller Ronald Green to be a glum one.

Combs has predicted the state will collect $21.2 billion in revenue from the sales tax in the fiscal year that began Sept. 1, slightly more than the $21 billion collected in fiscal 2009.

So far, however, collections are about $1.2 billion below the amount that had been collected by this time in the last fiscal year.

For the sales tax to bring in as much this year as originally projected, Craymer said, it “would have to grow by 11 percent for the rest of the fiscal year, and clearly that’s not going to happen.”

Sales tax collections represent more than 56 percent of the state’s tax revenue and more than 24 percent of overall revenue.

Lawmakers already expect to face a funding gap of at least $12 billion to $13 billion when they meet in regular session in 2011 to write the next two-year state budget. That figure does not account for new spending to meet the demands of a growing population.

It’s gonna be ugly. And all this is without taking into account the long-term structural deficit that was created by the irresponsible, unaffordable property tax cut of 2006, for which the business margins tax is a completely inadequate replacement. Somebody needs to be talking about this, because it is not sustainable.

One small glimmer of hope:

Craymer said Texas could be eligible for some additional stimulus money if federal legislation passes.

The irony of that just kills ya, doesn’t it?

Posted in: Budget ballyhoo.