The despicable Michael Moore revealed his utopian dream cards yesterday when he challenged Obama to earn the Nobel Peace Prize. Unfortunately Moore unmasked the reality behind his idealism-utopianists see their potential world through rose colored glasses. There is no Oz and the wizard is a fairytale. But, one cannot reasonably explain that to little boys like Michael Moore:
Dear President Obama, How outstanding that you've been recognized today as a man of peace. Your swift, early pronouncements -- you will close Guantanamo, you will bring the troops home from Iraq, you want a nuclear weapon-free world, you admitted to the Iranians that we overthrew their democratically-elected president in 1953, you made that great speech to the Islamic world in Cairo, you've eliminated that useless term "The War on Terror," you've put an end to torture -- these have all made us and the rest of the world feel a bit more safe considering the disaster of the past eight years. In eight months you have done an about face and taken this country in a much more sane direction. But... The irony that you have been awarded this prize on the 2nd day of the ninth year of what is quickly becoming your War in Afghanistan is not lost on anyone. You are truly at a crossroads now. You can listen to the generals and expand the war (only to result in a far-too-predictable defeat) or you can declare Bush's Wars over, and bring all the troops home. Now. That's what a true man of peace would do. There is nothing wrong with you doing what the last guy failed to do -- capture the man or men responsible for the mass murder of 3,000 people on 9/11. BUT YOU CANNOT DO THAT WITH TANKS AND TROOPS. You are pursuing a criminal, not an army. You do not use a stick of dynamite to get rid of a mouse. The Taliban is another matter. That is a problem for the people of Afghanistan to resolve -- just as we did in 1776, the French did in 1789, the Cubans did in 1959, the Nicaraguans did in 1979 and the people of East Berlin did in 1989. One thing is certain through all revolutions by people who wish to be free -- they ultimately have to bring about that freedom themselves. Others can be supportive, but freedom can not be delivered from the front seat of someone else's Humvee. You have to end our involvement in Afghanistan now. If you don't, you'll have no choice but to return the prize to Oslo. Yours, Michael Moore MMFlint@aol.com MichaelMoore.com P.S. Your opposition has spent the morning attacking you for bringing such good will to this country. Why do they hate America so much? I get the feeling that if you found the cure for cancer this afternoon they'd be denouncing you for destroying free enterprise because cancer centers would have to close. There are those who say you've done nothing yet to deserve this award. As far as I'm concerned, the very fact that you've offered to walk into the minefield of hate and try to undo the irreparable damage the last president did is not only appreciated by me and millions of others, it is also an act of true bravery. That's why you got the prize. The whole world is depending on the U.S. -- and you -- to literally save this planet. Let's not let them down.
Those who want to delve a little deeper into Michael Moore's skewed look at the world might read the classic Nostromo by the immortal Joseph Conrad.Nostromo unveils the tragic reality inherent to the millions who sold their souls for a fairytale. Amazon editors offer this synopsis of the book:
One of the greatest novels of the twentieth century, Joseph Conrad’s Nostromo is an immensely exciting tale of love, revolution, and politics set in the mythical South American country of Costaguana during the 1890s. Ten years after his father is murdered by a brutal dictator, Englishman Charles Gould arrives in Costaguana to reopen the family silver mine. But instead of ushering in a shining era of prosperity and progress, the return of the silver engenders a new cycle of violence as Costaguana erupts in civil war, initiated by rival warlords determined to seize the mine and its riches. In desperation, Gould turns to the only man who can save the mine’s treasure—Nostromo, the incorruptible head of the local dockworkers, who protects the silver from rebel forces by taking it out to sea. But disaster strikes, burdening Nostromo with a terrible secret that forever alters the fate of everyone involved with the mine. A stunning monument to futility, Nostromo reveals how honor, idealism, and loyalty are inadequate defenses against the inexorable assault of corruption and evil.
BRAINIACS OR MANIACS ?
Leftists often muse at their own sense of self importance and deeply desire for the world to place utmost faith in their adolescent utopian dreams. Furthermore, leftists spend their time touting their Ivy League credentialed intellectuals as the nation's sole saving grace. And intellectualism often stands as nothing more than misguided socialist idealism. FDR's administration institutionalized the phenomenon with the incarnation of a new godhead entitled New Deal. Roosevelt's program came complete with socialist/communist walking on water virtues. World War II sent New Deal brainiacs into a whirlpool. Following 60 plus years of thrashing about in the sea of humanity, socialist brainy types have been reinvigorated by FDR Jr.-President Obama. Conservative man of letters Thomas Sowell eloquently draws a contrast between brainiac idealism and mature wisdom received through aged experience. He proceeds by briefly examining Hitler's superior intellectual prowess:
Sowell's wise counsel reminds me of the Old Testament's King Solomon. As son of the great King David, Solomon sought to continue building an extravagant utopia for himself. The young idealistic men of his day encouraged his extravagance. Older, wiser men advised him otherwise. Solomon listen to the youthful idealists instead of the experienced gray hairs which eventually lead his nation into a slow, but steady decline. Perhaps George Will offers us some saving grace when he suggests that the purpose of conservatism is to keep idealism in check.
Posted by jeffreymark at 10:34 AM in Commentary, Politics | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)